˘ ˇˆ˙ - IBM · qqaa22 db #1 pr1 db #2 tteest app app qqaa 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 5: 0 0 0 5: 5 6 0...
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of ˘ ˇˆ˙ - IBM · qqaa22 db #1 pr1 db #2 tteest app app qqaa 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 5: 0 0 0 5: 5 6 0...

������ ������� ������������������
����������� ������������ ���José Alcino Coelho BrásArquiteto de [email protected] de 2008

Pag 2
������
� Introdução� IBM Systems – Tecnologias de virtualização
– Mainframe– POWER– Modulares (x86)– Redes de Armazenamento de Dados

Pag 3
�������������������� ����� ��� �����������

Pag 4
������� �
Flexibility is the popular term for the ability to easily bend an object or the ability to adapt to different circumstances.
The Flexibility of a system is related to its adaptation to a new environment
Synonyms
noun 1. elasticity, pliability, springiness, pliancy, tensility, give (informal) noun 2. adaptability, openness, versatility, adjustability noun 3. complaisance, accommodation, give and take, amenability
Adj. Flexible.1. a. Capable of being bent or flexed; pliable.
b. Capable of being bent repeatedly without injury or damage.2. Susceptible to influence or persuasion; tractable.3. Responsive to change; adaptable: a flexible schedule.

Pag 5
IT/BUSINESS STRATEGIESFlexibility and agility key to CIO success in 2008 (Carol Hildebrand, Contributor 12.13.2007 )
For many CIOs, the primary trend today revolves around a continuing and increasing business demand for IT agility, to match the quick pace of business. In an age where business decisions are made in minutes and hours rather than days and weeks, CIOsfind themselves looking for ways to make sure that information is available quickly and comprehensively.
"Businesses are calling for more Businesses are calling for more flexible responses, and an IT infrastructureflexible responses, and an IT infrastructure that will allow IT to respond more that will allow IT to respond more quickly to changing business requirements and needs,"quickly to changing business requirements and needs," said Andrew Bartels, a research analyst at Forrester Research Inc. in Cambridge, Mass. "Businesses need to be able to be more nimble and react more quickly, and CIOs will be looking for technologies that allow IT to do that."
��!����"�#$% &��!� ���"!����� ����'�!��!���% (��)��*����� ���������!�!�� ��(�+!������������� �������
��+!��� ��������������������)��*���

Pag 6
��������������������(�,-.��������(��������������/--0��������������������(�,-.��������(��������������/--0��������������������(�,-.��������(��������������/--0��������������������(�,-.��������(��������������/--0������������� ������������� �����������
Green IT. The focus of Green IT that came to the forefront in 2007 will accelerate and expand in 2008.
Unified Communications. Today, 20 percent of the installed base with PBX has migrated to IP telephony,
Business Process Modeling. Top-level process services must be defined jointly by a set of roles
Metadata Management. Through 2010, organizations implementing both customer data integration and product integration and product information management
Virtualization 2.0. Virtualization technologies can improve IT resource utilization and increase the flexibilityneeded to adapt to changing requirements and workloads. However, by themselves, virtualization technologies are simply enablers that help broader improvements in infrastructure cost reduction, flexibility and resiliency. With the addition of automation technologies – with service-level, policy-based active management – resource efficiency can improve dramatically, flexibility can become automatic based on requirements, and services can be managed holistically, ensuring high levels of resiliency. Virtualization plus service-level, policy-based automation constitutes an RTI.
Mashup & Composite Apps. By 2010, Web mashups will be the dominant model (80 percent) for the creation of composite enterprise applications.
Web Platform & WOA. Software as a service (SaaS) is becoming a viable option in more markets and companies must evaluate where service based delivery may provide value in 2008-2010.
Computing Fabric. A computing fabric is the evolution of server design beyond the interim stage, blade servers, that exists today.
Real World Web. The term “real world Web” is informal, referring to places where information from the Webis applied to the particular location, activity or context in the real world.
Social Software. Through 2010, the enterprise Web 2.0 product environment will experience considerable flux with continued product innovation and new entrants, including start-ups, large vendors and traditional collaboration vendors

Pag 7
1���!���2������ � �3������ ������(�
Storage Servers Network WorkstationsApplications/Data
Virtualization creates an unprecedented freedom of choice

Pag 8
Virtual Resources – substitutes for real or physical resourcesSame interfaces and functions but less constrained by attributes or numbersOften of part of the underlying resource, but may span multiple resources
"�������������!���2�� �4 ! ����������!�����!�� �5����6 �� �� ���!����������������5
Virtualization – a substitution process�Creates virtual resources from real resources�Primarily accomplished with software and/or firmware
Real Resources�Things with architected interfaces/functions�Often physical. May be centralized or distributed.�Examples: memory, disk drives, networks, servers
Users of Resources

Pag 9
���������������������!���2�����!�����'�����������'����
Sharing
VirtualResources
Resources
Examples: LPARs, VMs, virtual disks, VLANsBenefits: Resource utilization, workload
manageability, flexibility, isolation
Aggregation
VirtualResources
Resources
Examples: Virtual disks, IP routing to clonesBenefits: Management simplification,
investment protection, scalability
Insulation
Add, Replace,or Change
VirtualResources
Resources
Examples: Spare CPU subst., CUoD, SAN-VCBenefits: Continuous availability, flexibility,
software investment protection
Emulation
VirtualResources
Resources
Examples: Arch. emulators, iSCSI, virtual tapeBenefits: Compatibility, software investment
protection, interoperability, flexibility
ResourceType Y
ResourceType X

Pag 10
�������1���!���2��.���������
Outlook:• Bare metal hypervisors with high efficiency and availability will dominate for servers• Hosted hypervisors will be mainly for clients where host OS integration is important
S/370 SI->PP & PP->SI, Sun Domains, HP nPartitions
Logical partitioning
Physical partitioning
Original POWER4 LPAR HP vPartitionsSun Logical Domains
Adjustablepartitions
PartitionController
...
SMP Server
OS
Apps
OS
Apps
Hardware Partitioning
Server is subdivided into fractionseach of which can run an OS
Hypervisor software/firmwareruns directly on server
System z PR/SM and z/VMPOWER Hypervisor (APV)VMware ESX ServerXen HypervisorMicrosoft Viridian (2008?)
Hypervisor
SMP Server
...OS
Apps
OS
Apps
Bare Metal Hypervisor
Hypervisor provides fine-grainedtimesharing of all resources
Hypervisor software runs ona host operating system
VMware GSXMicrosoft Virtual ServerHP Integrity VMUser Mode LinuxLinux KVM
Host OS
SMP Server
Hypervisor
...OS
Apps
OS
Apps
Hosted Hypervisor
Hypervisor uses OS services todo timesharing of all resources

Pag 11
��������� ������*����� �� ��� $� ���7 ������������� � ����� ���� ����
IBM z/Architecture®Power
Architecture™Cell Broadband
Engine™(1) X-Architecture®
Mainframe Systems
Power SystemsBladeCenter
Storage Systems
Research & Development
IBM Systems
Management technology and infrastructures
POWER.org
Linux
Blades.org
Modular Systems
®
(1) Cell Broadband Engine is a trademark of Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
Soluções de Virtualização IBM
IBM Systems Director
IBM Cool Blue™ Portfolio
Capacidade on Demand
Service-Oriented Architecture
Tecnologias de auto gerenciamento
Information Lifecycle Management

Pag 12
������� �% 1���!���2�� �
Linux
ERP JavaAppl.
WebSphere®CoreNative Linux
CICS
IMS
Business
Objects
JVMz/OS
DB2
z/OS
DB2
JVM
Business Objects
z/VM
Java™
ApplJava Appl
C++Java
DB2
Linux forSystem z Linux
for System z
Linuxfor
System z
CICS®
DB2®
IMS™
HiperSockets™ – virtual networking and switching
Processor Resource/Systems Manager™ (PR/SM™)
CP 1 CP 2 CP n
Memory
Testz/OS
Linux
Native Linux
DB2
z/VM
C++Java
DB2
Linux forSystem z Linux
for System z
Linuxfor
System z
IFL 1 IFL n
System z10
z/VM (z/VM (HypervisorHypervisor Bare Metal)Bare Metal)• Desde 1967• Suporta Centenas de Máquinas Virtuais
Processadores Especializados em Processadores Especializados em WorkloadsWorkloads•• CP CP Central Processor•• ICF ICF Internal Coupling Facility•• zAAPzAAP Application Assist Processor•• zIIPzIIP Integrated Information Processor•• SAP SAP System Assist Facility•• IFL IFL Integrated Facility for Linux
ProcessorProcessor
4.4 GHz 4.4 GHz
zAAP zIIPICF SAP
PR/SM PR/SM HypervisorHypervisor• Até 60 LPARs• Alto nível de utilização (90-100%)• z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE, z/TPF, z/Linux
HipersocketsHipersockets• Emula LANs dentro do complexo CEC• Conecta LPARs via protocolo TCP/IP• Elimina cabeamento externo entre LPARs

Pag 13
Memory
System I/O Bandwidth
Processors
ITR for 1-way
288 GB/sec*
1.5 TB**
64-way
~920
172.8 GB/sec*
~600512 GB
54-way
96 GB/sec
450256 GB
32-way
24 GB/sec
30064 GB
16-way
z10 EC
z9 EC
zSeries 990
zSeries 900
Balanced SystemCPU, nWay, Memory,
I/O Bandwidth*
*Servers exploit a subset of its designed I/O capability** Up to 1 TB per LPARITR: Internal Throughput Rate
���.8��� 2$�������� ���� ��.���� �

Pag 14
9,- :"����������������� �������������������
Capacity
Customer Engines
4.4 GHz processor chipHardware Decimal Floating Point
Significant capacity for traditional growth and consolidation
z9 EC
zIIP
zAAPz990
IFLCrypto
z900
z10 EC
* LSPR mixed workload average running z/OS 1.8 - z10 EC 701 versus z9 EC 701** This is a comparison of the z10 EC 64-way and the z9 EC S54 and is based on LSPR mixed workload average running z/OS 1.8
* All performance information was determined in a controlled environment.
ComparaComparaççãoão
� z10 EC n-way x z9® EC n-way� Até 50% mais performance
� Uniprocessor z10 com z9 *� Até 62%62% mais performance
� z10 EC 64-way x z9 EC 54-way**� Até 70% capacidade total

Pag 15
Simplifique sua arquitetura, gerência e controle.
Estudo: 760 Servidores Linux hospedados z/VM versus Virtualização x86
Virtualização z/VM
Requer um IBM System z10 EC com 26 cores (IFLs) com z/VM instalado– com espaço para mais38 cores
Cresce aqui(dentro da caixa)
Virtualização X86
Requer 304 cores x86
Cresce aqui(adicione mais caixas!)
1���!���2�1���!���2�1���!���2�1���!���2����� � � � � �� 2;1�$#�� 2;1�$#�� 2;1�$#�� 2;1�$#������������������������ �� �������� �������� �������� ���������� � � � �

Pag 16
760 x86 CPs 26 z10 EC IFLs
SpacePowerPeople CostSoftwareMaint
SoftwareMaintHardware
z/VM Linux no System z10
EC
1.0 X
Plataforma
x86
5.1 X
80% Savings
*Comparison is versus x86 Blade servers without virtualization, reflecting a current-day consolidation. Reductions will vary by the number and age of the x86 servers being consolidated.
Estudo: 760 Servidores Linux hospedados z/VM versus Virtualização x86
1���!���2�1���!���2�1���!���2�1���!���2����� � � � � �� 2;1�$#�� 2;1�$#�� 2;1�$#�� 2;1�$#������������������������ �� �������� �������� �������� ���������� � � � �
Virtualização z/VM
Requer um IBM System z10 EC com 26 cores (IFLs) com z/VM instalado– com espaço para mais38 cores
Cresce aqui(dentro da caixa)

Pag 17
IBM z/Architecture®Power
Architecture™Cell Broadband
Engine™(1) X-Architecture®
Service-Oriented Architecture
Tecnologias de auto gerenciamento
Information Lifecycle Management
Research & Development
IBM Systems
Soluções de Virtualização IBM
IBM Systems Director
IBM Cool Blue™ Portfolio
Capacidade on DemandManagement technology and infrastructures
POWER.org
Linux
Blades.org
®
(1) Cell Broadband Engine is a trademark of Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
Mainframe Systems
Power SystemsBladeCenter
Storage SystemsModular Systems
��������� ������*����� �� ��� $� ���7 ������������� � ����� ���� ����

Pag 18
POWER Virtualization Architecture2 layers of firmware:
• Hypervisor code that virtualizes processors, memory, and local networks• Virtual I/O Server partitions that virtualize I/O adapters and devices
Networks and network storage
Unassigned on demandresources
Hypervisor
ServiceProcessor
ProcessorsMemory
Linuxpartitions
HardwareManagement
Console*(HMC)
AIX V5.2
Expansion slots
AIX V5.3 partitions
Virtual Storage
VirtualI/O
Server
Local devices and storage
Workload management and provisioning
Virtual NetworksVirtual Processors
AIX V6 partitions
VEnetVSCSIIVM**
LinuxKernelsAIX Kernels
Virtual Network / Storage

Pag 19
��<��1� �����%���������� ���� �1�#.�����
Virtual I/O paths
� New Offerings for POWER6�Standard�Enterprise (Partition Mobility)
� Micro-Partitioning™� Share processors across multiple partitions
� Minimum Partition: 1/10 processor
� AIX V5.3 / V6.1� Linux
� Virtual I/O Server� Shared Ethernet� Shared SCSI & Fiber Channel� Int Virtualization Manager
���������� ���
Linux AIX V5.2
Dynamically Resizable
3 Cores
2Cores
AIX V5.3
6Cores
6 Cores
Linu
x
AIX
V5.
3
AIX
V5.
3
AIX
V5.
3A
IX V
6.1
AIX
V6.
1
Linu
x
Micro-Partitioning
EthernetSharing
Virtual I/O Server Partition
StorageSharing
Int VirtManager
HMC

Pag 20
������������������� ������ ��������� �������= ������<��>�����
APPAPP APPAPPPR1 DB #2PR1 DB #2 TestTestQA2 DB #QA2 DB #11 QAQA
020406080
100
05:0
0
05:5
6
06:5
2
07:4
8
08:4
4
09:4
0
10:3
6
11:3
2
12:2
8
13:2
4
14:2
0
15:1
6
16:1
2
17:0
8
18:0
4
19:0
0
19:5
6
20:5
2
21:4
8
22:4
4
23:4
0
00:3
6
01:3
2
02:2
8
03:2
4
04:2
0
User% System%
020406080
100
00:0
8
01:0
4
02:0
0
02:5
6
03:5
2
04:4
9
05:4
5
06:4
1
07:3
7
08:3
3
09:3
0
10:2
6
11:2
2
12:1
8
13:1
4
14:1
0
15:0
7
16:0
3
16:5
9
17:5
5
18:5
1
19:4
8
20:4
4
21:4
0
22:3
6
23:3
2
User% System%Estático Dinâmico
0
5
10
15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Elapsed time
0
5
10
15
0
5
10
15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Elapsed time
0
5
10
15
Uncapped
Capped

Pag 21
���������� ����������� � (� ������� ����#? :&@��<��1�
Move Move umauma partipartiççãoão de um de um servidorservidor Power6 Power6 parapara outrooutro semsem paradaparada de de serviserviççoo. .
Infra-estrutura de Rede e Fibra virtualizadaInfra-estrutura de Rede e Fibra virtualizada
LP2
LP3
LP4
LP1
LP5
5.3 TL6Pré-requisitos: Power6 HW +
�Re-balanceamento dacapacidade disponível entreservidores quando necessário
�Aumento da disponibilidade emparadas programadas paramanutenção do sistema

Pag 22
WorkloadPartition
QA
WorkloadPartition
Data Mining
WorkloadPartition
App Server
WorkloadPartition
WebWorkloadPartition
Dev
Move Move umauma Workload Partition de um Workload Partition de um servidorservidor parapara outrooutroPerformance e Performance e flexibilidadeflexibilidade emem balanceamentobalanceamento de workloadsde workloads
Workload Partitione-mail
Works on any hardware supported by AIX 6, including POWER5 and POWER4
WorkloadPartitionsManager
Policy
WorkloadPartitionBilling
AIX AIX
��AB�������������������8

Pag 23
�����������������<��1� BA0@$&�������������B��!� ���0@ � �������������<��
Front End
Lx86 Feature
Back End
Optimizer
Linux x86 Applications
pSeries Server Platform
POWER Processor
ISV Binaries
User Binaries
Linux OS (Red Hat or Novell SuSE)
Native Linux on POWERBinary
Native Linux on POWERBinary
? �������<��1� B�0@CCC
Dynamically translates and maps x86 Linux instructions to POWER
Run any 32-bit Linux/x86 user space application binary�Requires no re-compilation�Direct H/W access or apps using kernel mod’s not
supported
Native & translated applications interoperate
Transparent to users�“It just runs” like on Linux/x86
Performance: 60-80% of native�“Good Enough” for many apps�Translates blocks of code into intermediate
representation�Performs optimizations�Stores optimized, frequently used blocks of code in
cache�Handles Linux OS call mapping�Encodes binary for target POWER processor
platform

Pag 24
�� '��� ��<��.8��� �
Power 575
���������� ���������
��������������������
�� �����
�� ������������
�� �����
�� ������������
Blue Gene™
Cell Solutions / Cell Blades QS21

Pag 25
������ ��������<��@ � � ������.��
�����<��DED�������� �!���"!�#$%�&'(�)�*+,-����!����"��������� �!���"!�#$%�&'(�)�*+,-����!����"��������� �!���"!�#$%�&'(�)�*+,-����!����"��������� �!���"!�#$%�&'(�)�*+,-����!����"�
*����*����*����*����....������������/���0�1��������/����2)������������/���0�1��������/����2)������������/���0�1��������/����2)������������/���0�1��������/����2)
�������������� �����������
����� ����������������
550
234
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Power 595 HP Superdome
Users / core
35,40030,000
21,000
10,175
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Power 595* HP Superdome FujitsuPRIMEPOWER
2500
Sun Fire E25k
SAP SD 2-tier Standard Application Benchmark
.�!���<<<5��;�� ;����� ��>;&��!�������F;0;-0
32 processor64-core
128-thread
*The SAP certification number was not available at press time and can be found at www.sap.com/benchmark . For full IBM Power 595 and competitor detail see the following chart.
64 processor128-core
256-thread#2006089 128-way
#2005013
72-way#2004039
553553
35,40035,400

Pag 26
IBM z/Architecture®Power
Architecture™Cell Broadband
Engine™(1) X-Architecture®Research & Development
IBM Systems
Management technology and infrastructures
POWER.org
Linux
Blades.org
®
(1) Cell Broadband Engine is a trademark of Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
Soluções de Virtualização IBM
IBM Systems Director
IBM Cool Blue™ Portfolio
Capacidade on Demand
Service-Oriented Architecture
Tecnologias de auto gerenciamento
Information Lifecycle Management
Mainframe Systems
Power SystemsBladeCenter
Storage SystemsModular Systems
��������� ������*����� �� ��� $� ���7 ������������� � ����� ���� ����

Pag 27
�Camada de virtualização entre o HW e o sistema operacional
�Ambientes totalmente isolados
�VMotion (migração a “quente”)
�Gerenciamento via VI3
�DRS e soluções de HA
x86 SCSI Etn
(���������� ��1���!���2�� �
� Arquitetura baseada emHypervisor
� Part do Windows 2008 comoservidor
� Standalone as ‘Hyper-V Server’
� Snapshot & Quick Migration
� Gerenciado pelo Microsoft System Center
� Ainda não disponível
� Hypervisor nativo 64-bit
� Open Source, liberado sob os termos do GNU GPL
� Parte da maioria de distribuição Linux
� Paravirtualization
� Migração a “quente”
� Ferramentas de gerenciamento
VMware Xen‘Hyper-V’

Pag 28
Simplificando o ambiente de TI com IBM BladeCenter
FileServers
WebServers
SecurityGateway
WebSphere Application
Servers
NetworkServers
ApplicationServers
SecurityServers
ApplicationServers
Caching Appliances
Layer 2 Switches
SSL Appliances
SSL Appliances
Caching Appliances
Layer 4-7 Switches
Public Internet/Intranet Clients
Routers (Layer 3 Switches
)
Firewalls
SAN
Storage Fibre
Switches

Pag 29
Consolide 180 servidores com 4 procs Dual Core emum único Rack com Blades JS22
� 1440 cores no total de @ 2.1 GHz�Utilizando uma média de 20% da
máxima capacidade� 315,000 consumo em WATTS**
� 224 cores @ 4.0 GHz� Utilzando uma média de 60% da
capacidade máxima� 22,568 consumo em WATTS**
������������������������������,�� �����#-����������,�� �����#-����������,�� �����#-����������,�� �����#-��������3���3���3���3���
�4���� �555������6%��4���� �555������6%��4���� �555������6%��4���� �555������6%����7���������7���������7���������7������ #0#0#0#0
Redução de energia de 92%
Redução de espaço em 95%
Somente com a consolidação e redução na manutençãoem 3 anos – vc consegue comprar uma infra-estruturaigual a essa

Pag 30
�G0D-�/H����!���F%���>�������� ����B��������/IJ ����������K�L����M.H)����."�����������!���N
0
100.000
200.000
300.000
400.000
500.000
600.000
tpm
c
Transactional Performance (TPC-C)
IBM x3850M2HP DL580G5HP rx6600IBM x3850HP DL585G2
As of Oct. 16th 2007, http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/ DC = dual core, QC = quad core
Quadcore Quadcore Dualcore Dualcore Dualcore

Pag 31
�GED-�/#�����H����!����0@������ ����B��������K�������0@(�"%"&��!�����������
0100.000200.000300.000400.000500.000600.000700.000800.000900.000
tpm
c
Transactional Performance (TPC-C)IBM x3950M2Unisys ES7000/oneUnisys ES7000/oneIBM x3950HP DL580G5
As of Oct. 23th 2007, http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/
8Sockets
QuadCore
�+62%
16Sockets
DualCore
8Sockets
DualCore
8Sockets
DualCore
4Sockets
QuadCore

Pag 32
IBM z/Architecture®Power
Architecture™Cell Broadband
Engine™(1) X-Architecture®Research & Development
IBM Systems
Management technology and infrastructures
POWER.org
Linux
Blades.org
®
(1) Cell Broadband Engine is a trademark of Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
Soluções de Virtualização IBM
IBM Systems Director
IBM Cool Blue™ Portfolio
Capacidade on Demand
Service-Oriented Architecture
Tecnologias de auto gerenciamento
Information Lifecycle Management
Mainframe Systems
Power SystemsBladeCenter
Storage SystemsModular Systems
��������� ������*����� �� ��� $� ���7 ������������� � ����� ���� ����

Pag 33
ESS CPQ LCRB
IBM SAN VOLUME CONTROLLER
Node Node Node Node Node Node Node Node
IO-Group IO-Group IO-Group IO-Group
SANVirtualization
AtBlock Level
SVC Drivers SVC Drivers SVC Drivers
�8�������������"���2��9�������(������
SANSAN

Pag 34
2������ ����:7����������(�;<� ��������"��7�������(���
Traditional SANTraditional SAN
� Capacidade em ilhas
� Múltiplos pontos de gerenciamento
� Baixa utilização
SAN Volume ControllerSAN Volume Controller
� Agrega todo espaço num pool único
� Melhor utilização / reutilização
� Gerencia todos tipos de storage de um únicaconsole
� Provisionamento mais fácil
� Melhora na produtividade
SAN25%cap
25%capacity
95%capacity SAN
SANVolume Controller
A combined, more balanced capacity (55%)

Pag 35
�������=�����������/������������"�����
�����!������ ��������
Disaster Recover Disaster Recover semsem VirtualizaVirtualizaççãoão
� Source e Target devem ser de mesmo fabricantede disco
� Software multipath dedicado por fabricante
� Software de gerenciamento de cópias dedicado
Disaster Recover com Disaster Recover com VirtualizaVirtualizaççãoão
� Independe do fabricante do disco
� Única plataforma de espelhamento
� Único software multipath comum para todosdiferentes
SAN
IBMDSx
IBMDSx
EMCSym
EMCSym
FlashCopyPPRC
TimeFinderSRDF
SANSANVolume Controller
IBMDSx
IBMDS4x
EMCSym
HPMA
SVC
IBMS-ATA
Virtual Disk Virtual Disk
Block

Pag 36
����>����!�������� ����<���.1"F5/
SPC-1 benchmark: Simulates I/O characteristics of OLTP workloads� SVC 4.2 delivers 75% better throughput than SVC 4.1: 272,500 SPC-1 IOPS
SPC-2 benchmark: Simulates heavy sequential workloads� SVC 4.2 delivers over 50% better throughput than SVC 4.1: 7,080 SPC-2 MB/s
SVC leads the industry in both SPC benchmarks
High SVC throughput supports virtualizing multiple storage systems
Measurements conducted using 8-node SVC configurations; SVC 4.1 used 8F4 nodes; SVC 4.2 used 8G4 nodes.For more information, see www.storageperformance.org/results

Pag 37
1���!���2������ �����>!;&������

Pag 38
#����!���2������ !�� ����������� �� O������ ���!���������>!����!��� ��� �� ����������
Logical Topology
Mainframe xSeries HP SUNLinux
Tape Drives
3584#1
Physical Topology
Power xSeries HP SUNLinux
SANSAN
Tape Drives
3584
Tape Drives
3584
Tape Drives
3584#2
Tape Drives
3584#512
Virtual Tape Server Tape Library Virtual Tape Server Tape Library
Virtual Volume 2Virtual Volume 1
Virtual Volume n
TapeVolume Cache
Power
SANSAN
Mainframe
Virtual Tape Virtual TapeVirtual Tape
7520 Virtual Engine4096 Virtual Tape Libraries
256.000 Virtual Drives1300 TB Cache

Pag 39
1���!��(��% "��������
Drives Drives virtuaisvirtuais�� SistemaSistema OperacionalOperacional enxergaenxerga unidadesunidades reaisreais�� A A arquiteturaarquitetura requerrequer menosmenos drives drives fisicosfisicos
CacheCache�� OndeOnde ocorreocorre a a gravagravaççãoão do backup (disco)do backup (disco)�� AcessoAcesso instantaneoinstantaneo, , eliminaelimina o delay o delay fisicofisico dada fitafita�� Read hits Read hits –– se o dado se o dado estestáá no cacheno cache�� Recalls Recalls –– se o dado se o dado nãonão estestáá no cache, no cache, masmas no no cartuchocartucho
fisicofisico
Volume StackingVolume Stacking�� EmpilhaEmpilha todostodos osos cartuchoscartuchos llóógicos(virtuaisgicos(virtuais))�� UtilizaUtilizaççãoão de 100% do de 100% do cartuchocartucho fisicofisico�� Drives Drives fisicosfisicos de de úúltimaltima gerageraççãoão (Jaguar/3592 (Jaguar/3592 ouou LTO ) LTO )

Pag 40
Peak Performance is a key measurement criteriaPeak Performance is a key measurement criteria
TimeTimeto Processto Process
Job1Job1
Job3Job3
Job nJob n14MB/s14MB/s
Job1Job1
Job2Job2
Job6Job6
Job nJob n
VirtualVirtualDevice Device
150150
152152
PhysicalPhysicalDevice Device
151151
max. nmax. n
153153
181181
~3MB/s~3MB/s
Total VTS Total VTS Bandwidth? Bandwidth?
14MB/s14MB/s
~3MB/s~3MB/s
~3MB/s~3MB/s
~3MB/s~3MB/s
~3MB/s~3MB/s
~3MB/s~3MB/s
~3MB/s~3MB/s Job4Job4
Job5Job5 Job7Job7Job2Job2 Job3Job3
Job4Job4180180
1���!��(��.!��8��� ����������8��������� ����

Pag 41
#�������P