COSO I e II

download COSO I e II

of 9

Transcript of COSO I e II

  • 7/29/2019 COSO I e II

    1/9

    I AS Conference 1 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    The COSOThe COSO riskrisk frameworkframework ::

    AA referencereference forfor internalinternal cont rol ?cont rol ?

    Transit ion f rom COSO I t o COSO I I

    Annie BressacAnnie BressacConsultantConsultant

    I AS ConferenceI AS Conference

    November 25t hNovember 25t h

    I AS Conference 2 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    COSO IICOSO II

    Enterprise Risk ManagementEnterprise Risk Management

    Integrated FrameworkIntegrated Framework

    ss Background & objectivesBackground & objectives

    ss InsightsInsights

  • 7/29/2019 COSO I e II

    2/9

    I AS Conference 3 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    u Every enti t y exists to real ize value for i tsshareholders

    u Every enti t y has to deal w ith uncertainty

    The COSO I I framework is designed toenable management :

    To deal effectively with potential future events thatcreate uncertainty

    To respond in a manner that reduces the likelihood ofdownside outcomes and increases the upside

    UnderlyingUnderlying principlesprinciples of COSOof COSO--ERM:ERM:

    I AS Conference 4 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    u Ent erprise Risk Management is :

    A process

    Effected by an entitys board of directors,management and other personnel,

    Applied in strategy setting and across theentity

    Designed to identify and manage potentialevents that may affect the entity, and

    To provide reasonable assurance regardingthe achievement of entity objectives.

    The ERMThe ERM DefinitionDefinition

  • 7/29/2019 COSO I e II

    3/9

    I AS Conference 5 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    1. The Enterpr ise RiskManagement framew orkhas eight int errelatedcomponents

    2. Ent it y objecti ves can beviewed in t he context offour categories

    Strategic

    Operations

    Reporting

    Compliance

    3. ERM considers activit iesat all levels of t heorganization

    The ERM Framew orkThe ERM Framew ork

    I AS Conference 6 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    u I n ternal environment includes :

    Risk management philosophy and risk culture

    Risk appetite : a high-level view of how much risk themanagement and the board are willing to accept

    All other aspects of how the organization's actions may affectits risk culture

    u Objecti ve Sett ing

    Is applied when management considers risks strategy in thesetting of objectives

    Objectives are set with regard to the risk appetite

    A level of variation is accepted for objectives (risk tolerance)

    The ERM Framew orkThe ERM Framew ork

  • 7/29/2019 COSO I e II

    4/9

    I AS Conference 7 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    u Event identi fication :

    Identify those incidents, occurring internally or externally, thatcould affect strategy and achievement of objectives

    Addresses how internal and external factors combine andinteract to influence the entity's risk profile

    Distinguishes risk and opportunity

    u Risk assessment :

    Allows an entity to understand the extent to which potentialevents might impact objectives

    Assesses risks : from two perspectives : likelihood and impact

    on both an inherent and residual basis

    Employs a combination of both qualitative and quantitative riskassessment methodologies

    The ERM Framew orkThe ERM Framew ork

    I AS Conference 8 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    u Risk response :

    Identifies and evaluates possible responses to risk : avoiding,accepting, reducing, sharing

    Evaluates options in relation to entitys risk appetite

    Selects and executes response based on evaluation of theportfolio of risks and responses

    u

    Contr ol activit ies : Policies and procedures that help ensure that risk responses

    are carried out

    Occur throughout the organization, at all levels and in allfunctions

    Include application controls and general informationtechnology controls

    The ERM Framew orkThe ERM Framew ork

  • 7/29/2019 COSO I e II

    5/9

    I AS Conference 9 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    u I nformation & Communication :

    Management identifies, captures, and communicatespertinent information in a form and timeframe that enablespeople to carry out their responsibilities

    Communication occurs in a broader sense, flowing down,across, and up the organization

    u Monitoring :

    Monitors the ongoing effectiveness of the other enterprise risk

    management components through :

    Ongoing monitoring activities Separate evaluations

    A combination of the two

    The ERM Framew orkThe ERM Framew ork

    I AS Conference 10 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    Roles and Responsibi lit iesRoles and Responsibi lit ies

    u Four broad areas of roles andresponsibilities:

    The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeingmanagements design and operation of ERM

    Management is responsible for the design of an entity'senterprise risk management framework

    Risk officers work with managers in establishing andmaintaining effective risk management

    Internal auditors contribute to the ongoing effectivenessof the enterprise risk management

  • 7/29/2019 COSO I e II

    6/9

    I AS Conference 11 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    COSO ERM :COSO ERM :

    AA referencereferenceforforinternalinternalcontrol ?control ?

    ss TransitionTransitionfromfromCOSO I toCOSO I to

    COSO IICOSO II

    ss Value and utilityValue and utility

    I AS Conference 12 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    u COSO I I doesnt replace COSO I w hich

    remains as a stand-alone internal control

    framework

    u COSO ERM incorporates the I C framew ork : A

    strong system of int ernal cont rol is essential

    t o effective enterprise risk management.

    u COSO ERM expands and elaborates on

    elements of internal contr ol as set out in COSO

    I nternal Control Framework

    TransitionTransition fromfrom COSO I t o COSO I ICOSO I t o COSO I I

  • 7/29/2019 COSO I e II

    7/9

    I AS Conference 13 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    TransitionTransition fromfrom COSO I t o COSO I ICOSO I t o COSO I I

    I AS Conference 14 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    COSO ERM brings to all t he cont rolstakeholders :

    A definition of risk management

    A vocabulary, concepts and principles shared by all the

    parties involved Criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of risk treatment

    strategies

    Guidelines for entities to improve their risk managementsystem

    Value and ut il it y of COSO ERMValue and u t il it y of COSO ERM

  • 7/29/2019 COSO I e II

    8/9

    I AS Conference 15 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    ERMERM processprocess improvesimproves capacitycapacity toto buildbuild valuevalue

    Align strategy with risk appetite

    Enhance risk response decisions

    Reduce the likelihood and/or impact of negative events

    and therefore operational losses

    Seize opportunities

    Identify and manage multiple and cross- enterprise

    risks

    Value and uti l i t y for m anagersValue and uti l i t y for managers

    I AS Conference 16 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    u Play an impor tant role in monit oring ERM, but

    u Do NOT have primary r esponsibilit y for it simplement ation or m aintenance.

    u Assist management and the board or audit

    commi t t ee in t he process by: Monitoring

    Evaluating

    Examining

    Reporting

    Recommending improvements

    Value and uti l i t y forValue and uti l i t y for internalinternal auditorsauditors

  • 7/29/2019 COSO I e II

    9/9

    I AS Conference 17 November 25th

    AnnieBressacConseil

    COSO I ICOSO I I extendsextends andand strengthensstrengthens

    thethe evolutionevolution init iatedinit iated by COSO Iby COSO I

    u Bring together r isk culture and control cul ture

    u Strengthen the l ink betw een internal contro l ,risks, and achievement of obj ect ives:

    Pertinence and legitimacy of internal control consideringits added value to an effective risk control

    Relevance of the controls implemented to the previous

    identification and assessment of risks