UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA

UNESP 㵨 Assis

㪩㪼㫊㪼㫅㪿㪸㩷㪸㫇㫉㪼㫊㪼㫅㫋㪸㪻㪸㩷㪸㫆㩷㪺㫌㫉㫊㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㪟㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪸㩷㪚㫆㫅㫋㪼㫄㫇㫆㫉㬘㫅㪼㪸㩷㪠㪠㪅

Texto: SILVA, Francisco Carlos Teixeira da. Os fascismos. In REIS FILHO, D. A.;

FERREIRA, J.; ZENHA, C. 㪦㩷㫊㬟㪺㫌㫃㫆㩷㪯㪯㪅㩷㪩㫀㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㪡㪸㫅㪼㫀㫉㫆㪑㩷㪚㫀㫍㫀㫃㫀㫑㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷Brasileira, 2003.

pp. 109-164.

㪛㫆㪺㪼㫅㫋㪼㪑㩷㪧㪸㫌㫃㫆㩷㪚㪅㩷㪞㫆㫅㬝㪸㫃㫍㪼㫊

Discente: Lucas Schuab Vieira

㪧㪼㫉㬣㫆㪻㫆㪑㩷㪥㫆㫋㫌㫉㫅㫆

㪝㫉㪸㫅㪺㫀㫊㪺㫆㩷㪚㪸㫉㫃㫆㫊㩷㪫㪼㫀㫏㪼㫀㫉㪸㩷㪻㪸㩷㪪㫀㫃㫍㪸㩷㬟㩷㫇㫉㫆㪽㪼㫊㫊㫆㫉㩷 㫋㫀㫋㫌㫃㪸㫉㩷㪻㪼㩷㪟㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪸㩷㪤㫆㪻㪼㫉㫅㪸㩷㪼㩷

㪚㫆㫅㫋㪼㫄㫇㫆㫉㬘㫅㪼㪸㩷 㪻㪸㩷 㪬㫅㫀㫍㪼㫉㫊㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷 㪝㪼㪻㪼㫉㪸㫃㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㪩㫀㫆㩷 㪻㪼㩷 Janeiro. E faz parte do

㪣㪸㪹㫆㫉㪸㫋㬩㫉㫀㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㪜㫊㫋㫌㪻㫆㫊㩷㪻㫆㩷㪫㪼㫄㫇㫆㩷㪧㫉㪼㫊㪼㫅㫋㪼㪃㩷㪠㪝㪚㪪㪆㪬㪝㪩㪡㪅

Para o autor o fascismo converteu-se novamente em um movimento de massas;

㪼㫄㩷 㫄㫌㫀㫋㪸㫊㩷 㪺㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㫊㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫀㫄㫇㫆㫉㫋㪸㫅㫋㪼㫊㩷 㫇㪸㬣㫊㪼㫊㪃㩷 㫊㫀㫅㪸㪾㫆㪾㪸㫊㪃㩷 㪺㪼㫄㫀㫋㬟㫉㫀㫆㫊㪃㩷 㪹㪸㫉㪼㫊㩷 㪾㪸㫐㫊㪃㩷

estrangeiros e lugares de me㫄㬩㫉㫀㪸㩷㪻㫆㩷㪟㫆㫃㫆㪺㪸㫌㫊㫋㫆㩷㫊㬙㫆㩷㫌㫃㫋㫉㪸㫁㪸㪻㫆㫊㪅㩷㪥㪼㫊㫊㪼㩷㫊㪼㫅㫋㫀㪻㫆㩷㪼㫅㫋㬙㫆㪃㩷

㫆㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㫅㬙㫆㩷㫇㫆㪻㪼㩷㫊㪼㫉㩷㫋㫉㪸㫋㪸㪻㫆㩷㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷㫌㫄㩷㫄㫆㫍㫀㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷㫄㫆㫉㫋㫆㪃㩷㫇㪼㫉㫋㪼㫅㪺㪼㫅㫋㪼㩷㬖㩷㪿㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪸㩷㪼㩷

㫊㪼㫄㩷 㫈㫌㪸㫃㫈㫌㪼㫉㩷 㫇㪸㫇㪼㫃㩷 㫇㫆㫃㬣㫋㫀㪺㫆㩷 㪺㫆㫅㫋㪼㫄㫇㫆㫉㬘㫅㪼㫆㪅㩷 㪪㪸㪹㪼㫄㫆㫊㩷 㫈㫌㪸㫃㩷 㪸㩷 㫇㫉㬗㫋㫀㪺㪸㩷 㪼㩷 㪸㫊㩷

㪺㫆㫅㫊㪼㫈㬲㬠㫅㪺㫀㪸㫊㩷㪻㫆㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㪃㩷㪸㫊㫊㫀㫄㩷㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷㫆㩷㪽㪸㫋㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㫈㫌㪼㩷㫅㬙㫆㩷㬟㩷㫌㫄㩷㪽㪼㫅㬪㫄㪼㫅㫆㩷㫇㫌㫉㪸㫄㪼㫅㫋㪼㩷

㪿㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪺㫆㪃㩷㪸㫇㫉㫀㫊㫀㫆㫅㪸㪻㫆㩷㫅㫆㩷㫇㪸㫊㫊㪸㪻㫆㪃㩷㫇㫆㫉㫋㪸㫅㫋㫆㩷㫇㪸㫉㪸㩷㪼㫊㪺㫉㪼㫍㪼㫉㩷㫊㫆㪹㫉㪼㩷㫆㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㬟㩷㫇㫉㪼㪺㫀㫊㫆㩷

ter em mente o neofascismo e suas possibilidades.

㫿㩷㪻㪼㫅㫆㫄㫀㫅㪸㪻㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㫆㫌㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㫊㩷㫆㩷㪺㫆㫅㫁㫌㫅㫋㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㫄㫆㫍㫀㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㫊㩷㪼㩷㫉㪼㪾㫀㫄㪼㫊㩷

de extrema di㫉㪼㫀㫋㪸㩷㫈㫌㪼㩷㪻㫆㫄㫀㫅㫆㫌㩷㫌㫄㩷㪾㫉㪸㫅㪻㪼㩷㫅㫌㫄㪼㫉㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㫇㪸㬣㫊㪼㫊㩷㪼㫌㫉㫆㫇㪼㫌㫊㩷㪻㪼㫊㪻㪼㩷㫆㩷㫀㫅㬣㪺㫀㫆㩷

㪻㫆㫊㩷㪸㫅㫆㫊㩷㪉㪇㩷㪸㫋㬟㩷㪈㪐㪋㪌㪅

㪦㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㪺㫆㫅㪿㪼㪺㪼㫌㩷㪸㫇㬩㫊㩷㫆㩷㪽㫀㫅㪸㫃㩷㪻㪸㩷㪻㬟㪺㪸㪻㪸㩷㪻㪼㩷㪏㪇㩷㫌㫄㪸㩷㫍㫀㪾㫆㫉㫆㫊㪸㩷㫉㪼㫋㫆㫄㪸㪻㪸㩷㪻㪼㩷

㫀㫅㫋㪼㫉㪼㫊㫊㪼㪃㩷 㪺㫆㫄㩷 㫅㫆㫍㪸㫊㩷 㪸㪹㫆㫉㪻㪸㪾㪼㫅㫊㩷 㪼㩷 㫅㫆㫍㪸㫊㩷 㫋㪼㫆㫉㫀㪸㫊㩷 㪼㫏㫇㫃㫀㪺㪸㫋㫀㫍㪸㫊㪃㩷 㪾㫉㪸㬝㪸㫊㩷 㪸㫆㩷 㪸㪺㪼㫊㫊㫆㩷 㪸㩷

novas doc㫌㫄㪼㫅㫋㪸㬝㬫㪼㫊㩷 㪼㩷 㪸㫆㩷 㫉㪼㫊㫊㫌㫉㪾㫀㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷㪻㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷㫄㫆㫍㫀㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷 㪻㪼㩷㫄㪸㫊㫊㪸㫊㪅㩷

㪘㫊㫊㫀㫄㩷㫆㩷 㪽㪼㫅㬪㫄㪼㫅㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫋㪸㩷 㫊㫌㫉㪾㪼㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷㫌㫄㪸㩷㫇㫆㫊㫊㫀㪹㫀㫃㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷 㪻㪸㩷㫄㫆㪻㪼㫉㫅㪸㩷 㫊㫆㪺㫀㪼㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷 㪻㪼㩷

㫄㪸㫊㫊㪸㫊㪃㩷㪼㩷㫅㬙㫆㩷㪸㫇㪼㫅㪸㫊㩷㪻㪼㩷㫌㫄㩷㫇㪼㫉㬣㫆㪻㫆㩷㪿㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪺㫆㩷㪻㪼㫋㪼㫉㫄㫀㫅㪸㪻㫆㪅

㪦㩷 㪸㫌㫋㫆㫉㩷 㪼㫄㩷 㪺㫆㫅㫊㫆㫅㬘㫅㪺㫀㪸㩷 㪺㫆㫄㩷 㪸㩷 㪿㫀㫊㫋㫆㫉㫀㫆㪾㫉㪸㪽㫀㪸㩷 㫄㪸㫀㫊㩷 㪸tual sobre o tema, na

㫌㫅㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷 㪹㬗㫊㫀㪺㪸㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㪽㪼㫅㬪㫄㪼㫅㫆㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㫀㫅㫊㪼㫉㪼-㫊㪼㩷 㫅㪸㩷 㫇㫉㪼㫆㪺㫌㫇㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪼㫄㩷 㪸㫇㫉㪼㫊㪼㫅㫋㪸㫉㩷

㫌㫄㪸㩷㫋㪼㫆㫉㫀㪸㩷㪼㫏㫇㫃㫀㪺㪸㫋㫀㫍㪸㩷㪾㪼㫉㪸㫃㩷㪻㪼㫊㫊㪼㩷㫋㫀㫇㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㫄㫆㫍㫀㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷㫇㫆㫃㬣㫋㫀㪺㫆㪃㩷㫊㫌㫇㪼㫉㪸㫅㪻㫆㩷㪸㫊㩷㪸㫅㬗㫃㫀㫊㪼㫊㩷

㪽㫉㪸㪾㫄㪼㫅㫋㪸㪻㪸㫊㩷㪼㫄㩷㪻㫀㫍㪼㫉㫊㪸㫊㩷㫅㪸㫉㫉㪸㫋㫀㫍㪸㫊㩷㪻㪼㫊㪺㫉㫀㫋㫀㫍㪸㫊㩷㪼㩷㪿㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪺㪸㫊㪃㩷㫆㫅㪻㪼㩷㫆㩷㪽㪸scismo aparece

㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷㫌㫄㪸㩷㪼㫋㪸㫇㪸㩷㪻㪸㩷㪿㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪸㩷㪻㪸㩷㪘㫃㪼㫄㪸㫅㪿㪸㪅

㪘㩷㫅㫆㫍㪸㩷㪿㫀㫊㫋㫆㫉㫀㫆㪾㫉㪸㪽㫀㪸㩷㫉㪼㫍㫆㫃㫍㪼㩷㫌㫄㩷㫋㪼㫉㫉㪼㫅㫆㩷㫆㫅㪻㪼㩷㪸㫊㩷㫀㪻㬟㫀㪸㫊㩷㪼㩷㫇㫉㬗㫋㫀㪺㪸㫊㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫋㪸㫊㩷㫁㬗㩷

㫍㫀㪺㪼㫁㪸㫍㪸㫄㩷 㪸㫅㫋㪼㫊㩷 㪻㪸㩷 㪾㫌㪼㫉㫉㪸㩷 㪼㪃㩷 㫋㫀㫍㪼㫉㪸㫄㩷 㫌㫄㩷 㪽㫆㫉㫋㪼㩷 㫇㪸㫇㪼㫃㩷 㫅㫆㩷 㬘㫅㫀㫄㫆㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㪾㫌㪼㫉㫉㪸㩷 㪼㩷 㫅㪸㫊㩷

㪻㪼㪺㫀㫊㬫㪼㫊㩷㫊㫆㪹㫉㪼㩷㪸㫊㩷 㫉㪼㫊㫀㫊㫋㬠㫅㪺㫀㪸㫊㩷㪼㩷 㪸㩷㪺㫆㫅㫋㫀㫅㫌㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷㪻㪸㩷 㫃㫌㫋㪸㪃㩷 㪺㫌㫃㫄㫀㫅㪸㫅㪻㫆㩷㫅㪸㩷㪺㫆㫃㪸㪹㫆㫉㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷

com o fascismo ocupante.

Coube a historiografia ocidental a busca do esquecimento ao lado de uma

㪺㫆㫅㪻㪼㫅㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷 㫈㫌㪸㫊㪼㩷 㫈㫌㪼㩷 㪼㫏㪺㫃㫌㫊㫀㫍㪸㩷 㪸㫆㩷 㫈㫌㪼㩷 㪻㪼㫅㫆㫄㫀㫅㪸㫍㪸㫄㩷 㪻㪼㩷 hitlerismo. Muitos dos

㫉㪼㪾㫀㫄㪼㫊㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㪺㫆㪸㫃㫀㫑㬙㫆㩷 㫅㪸㪺㫀㫆㫅㪸㫃㩷 㫈㫌㪼㩷 㪸㫊㫊㫌㫄㫀㪸㫄㩷 㫆㩷 㫇㫆㪻㪼㫉㩷 㫅㪸㩷 㫄㪸㫉㬟㩷 㫍㪸㫑㪸㫅㫋㪼㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷

㪼㫉㪸㫄㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫇㫆㫊㫋㫆㫊㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㪸㫃㫀㪸㪻㫆㫊㩷 㫇㫆㫃㬣㫋㫀㪺㫆㫊㩷 㪼㩷 㫀㫅㫊㫋㫀㫋㫌㪺㫀㫆㫅㪸㫀㫊㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫇㫉㫀㫄㪼㫀㫉㪸㩷 㪿㫆㫉㪸㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㪅㩷

㪘㫊㫊㫀㫄㪃㩷 㫆㩷 㪼㫊㫈㫌㪼㪺㫀㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷 㪻㫆㫊㩷 㫇㫉㫀㫄㪼㫀㫉㫆㫊㩷 㫋㪼㫄㫇㫆㫊㩷 㫊㫌㫉㪾㫀㪸㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷 㫇㫉㫆㫁㪼㫋㫆㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫉㪼㪺㫌㫇㪼㫉㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷

㫇㫆㫃㬣㫋㫀㪺㪸㩷 㪻㪸㩷 㪜㫌㫉㫆㫇㪸㩷 㪻㫀㫃㪸㪺㪼㫉㪸㪻㪸㪅㩷 㪥㫆㩷 㪺㪸㫊㫆㩷 㪘㫃㪼㫄㬙㫆㩷 㪸㩷 㪻㪼㫊㫅㪸㫑㫀㪽㫀㪺㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷 㬟㩷 㫄㪸㫉㪺㪸㪻㪸㫄㪼㫅㫋㪼㩷

㫀㫅㪺㫆㫄㫇㫃㪼㫋㪸㪃㩷㪼㩷㫇㪼㫉㫄㫀㫋㪼㩷㫌㫄㪸㩷㫇㫆㫅㫋㪼㩷㫍㫀㫊㬣㫍㪼㫃㩷㪼㫅㫋㫉㪼㩷㫆㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㪿㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪺㫆㩷㪼㩷㫆㩷㫅㪼㫆㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㪅

A historiografia sobre o fascismo entrou na guerra fria e consolidaram se

㪸㫃㪾㫌㫅㫊㩷㫄㫀㫋㫆㫊㪅㩷㪛㪼㩷㫌㫄㩷㫃㪸㪻㫆㩷㫆㫊㩷㪼㫊㪽㫆㫉㬝㫆㫊㩷㪻㪼㩷㫀㪻㪼㫅㫋㫀㪽㫀㪺㪸㫉㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫋㪸㫊㩷㪼㩷㫊㪼㫌㫊㩷㪸㫃㫀㪸㪻os; de outro,

㪸㩷㫇㫉㪼㫆㪺㫌㫇㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪺㫉㪼㫊㪺㪼㫅㫋㪼㩷㪼㫄㩷㪼㫊㫋㪸㪹㪼㫃㪼㪺㪼㫉㩷㫆㩷㫄㪸㫀㫊㩷㫉㬗㫇㫀㪻㫆㩷㫇㫆㫊㫊㬣㫍㪼㫃㩷㫆㩷㪼㫊㫈㫌㪼㪺㫀㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷㫊㫆㪹㫉㪼㩷

㪸㩷㪼㫏㫋㪼㫅㫊㬙㫆㩷㪻㫆㩷 㪽㪼㫅㬪㫄㪼㫅㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫋㪸㪅㩷㪘㫊㫊㫀㫄㪃㩷㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㪃㩷㫇㪸㫉㪸㩷㫄㫌㫀㫋㫆㫊㪃㩷 㪽㫀㪺㫆㫌㩷㪺㫀㫉㪺㫌㫅㫊㪺㫉㫀㫋㫆㩷

㪸㫆㩷㫅㪸㫑㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㪼㩷㪸㫊㫊㫆㪺㫀㪸㪻㫆㩷㪼㫏㪺㫃㫌㫊㫀㫍㪸㫄㪼㫅㫋㪼㩷㬖㩷㪿㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪸㩷㪻㪸㩷㪘㫃㪼㫄㪸㫅㪿㪸㪅

A tese da un㫀㫍㪼㫉㫊㪸㫃㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷 㫇㫆㫊㫊㬣㫍㪼㫃㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㫀㫄㫇㫃㫀㪺㪸㩷 㪸㩷 㫉㪼㫁㪼㫀㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪻㪸㩷

㪼㫏㪺㫃㫌㫊㫀㫍㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷 㪸㫃㪼㫄㬙㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㪽㪼㫅㬪㫄㪼㫅㫆㪅㩷 㪥㪼㫊㫊㪼㩷 㫊㪼㫅㫋㫀㪻㫆㩷 㪸㫆㩷 㫃㪸㪻㫆㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㪮㫆㫃㪽㪾㪸㫅㪾㩷 㪪㪺㪿㫀㪼㪻㪼㫉㩷 㫆㩷

autor afirma que se reconhecem como fascistas movimentos nacionalistas extremistas

㪻㪼㩷 㪼㫊㫋㫉㫌㫋㫌㫉㪸㩷 㪿㫀㪼㫉㬗㫉㫈㫌㫀㪺㪸㩷 㪼㩷 㪸㫌㫋㫆㫉㫀㫋㬗㫉㫀㪸㩷 㪼㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫀㪻㪼㫆㫃㫆㪾㫀㪸㩷 㪸㫅㫋㫀㫃㫀㪹㪼㫉㪸㫃㪃㩷 㪸㫅㫋㫀㪻㪼㫄㫆㪺㫉㬗㫋㫀㪺㪸㩷 㪼㩷

anti-㫊㫆㪺㫀㪸㫃㫀㫊㫋㪸㩷㫈㫌㪼㩷 㪽㫌㫅㪻㪸㫉㪸㫄㩷㫆㫌㩷㫀㫅㫋㪼㫅㫋㪸㫉㪸㫄㩷㪽㫌㫅㪻㪸㫉㪃㩷㪸㫇㬩㫊㩷㪸㩷㪧㫉㫀㫄㪼㫀㫉㪸㩷㪞㫌㪼㫉㫉㪸㩷㪤㫌㫅㪻㫀㪸㫃㪃㩷

㫉㪼㪾㫀㫄㪼㫊㩷 㪼㫊㫋㪸㫋㪸㫀㫊㩷 㪸㫌㫋㫆㫉㫀㫋㬗㫉㫀㫆㫊㪅㩷 㪧㫆㪻㪼-㫊㪼㩷 㪸㪽㫀㫉㫄㪸㫉㩷 㪼㫅㫋㬙㫆㪃㩷 㫈㫌㪼㩷 㪸㫊㩷 㪼㫊㫇㪼㪺㫀㪽㫀㪺㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㫊㩷 㪻㫆㩷

㫅㪸㫑㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㫊㬙㫆㩷㪿㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪺㪸㫊㪃㩷㪻㪼㩷㪺㪸㫉㬗㫋㪼㫉㩷㫅㪸㪺㫀㫆㫅㪸㫃㪃㩷㪼㩷㫅㬙㫆㩷㫌㫄㪸㩷㪼㫊㫊㪼㫅㪺㫀㪸㫃㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㪃㩷㪸㫃㪾㫆㩷㬰㫅㫀㪺㫆㩷㪼㫄㩷

㫉㪼㫃㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪸㫆㫊㩷 㪻㪼㫄㪸㫀㫊㩷 㪽㪼㫅㬪㫄㪼㫅㫆㫊㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫋㪸㫊㪃㩷 㫇㫆㫉㫋㪸㫅㫋㫆㪃㩷 㫆㫊㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㫊㩷 㫇㫆㫊㫊㫌㫀㫉㫀㪸㫄㩷 㫊㫌㪸㫊㩷

㫇㫉㬩㫇㫉㫀㪸㫊㩷 㪼㫊㫇㪼㪺㫀㪽㫀㪺㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㫊㩷㫅㪸㪺㫀㫆㫅㪸㫀㫊㪃㩷 㫊㫌㪸㫊㩷㪿㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪸㫊㩷 㪼㫊㫇㪼㪺㬣㪽㫀㪺㪸㫊㪃㩷㫈㫌㪼㪃㩷㫇㫆㫉㩷 㫊㫌㪸㩷㫍㪼㫑㪃㩷㫅㬙㫆㩷

descaracterizariam a universalidade e autonomia do fe㫅㬪㫄㪼㫅㫆㩷㪼㫅㫋㫉㪼㩷㫆㫌㫋㫉㪸㫊㩷㪽㫆㫉㫄㪸㫊㩷㪻㪼㩷

autoritarismo.

㫿㩷㫅㪸㩷㪼㫊㫋㪼㫀㫉㪸㩷㪻㪼㫊㫊㪼㩷㪻㪼㪹㪸㫋㪼㩷㫈㫌㪼㩷㪽㫉㫌㫋㫀㪽㫀㪺㫆㫌㩷㪸㩷㫋㪼㫆㫉㫀㪸㩷㪻㫆㩷㫋㫆㫋㪸㫃㫀㫋㪸㫉㫀㫊㫄㫆㪅㩷㪫㪼㫅㪻㫆㩷㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷

㪼㫃㪼㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫌㫄㩷 㪸㫊㩷 㪺㫆㫅㪻㫀㬝㬫㪼㫊㩷 㪼㫊㫇㪼㪺㫀㪽㫀㪺㪸㫊㩷 㪻㪸㫊㩷 㫄㪸㫊㫊㪸㫊㩷 㫈㫌㪼㩷 㫇㫉㫆㫇㫀㪺㫀㪸㫉㫀㪸㫄㩷 㫆㩷 㪻㫆㫄㬣㫅㫀㫆㩷

㫋㫆㫋㪸㫃㫀㫋㬗㫉㫀㫆㪅㩷㪦㩷㪽㫌㫅㪻㫆㩷㪺㫆㫄㫌㫄㩷㫊㪼㫉㫀㪸㩷㪸㩷㫄㫆㪹㫀㫃㫀㫑㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㪸㫊㩷㫄assas contra um inimigo comum

objetivado.

㪦㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷 㪽㪼㫅㬪㫄㪼㫅㫆㩷 㪼㫏㪺㫃㫌㫊㫀㫍㫆㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫌㫄㪸㩷 㬟㫇㫆㪺㪸㩷 㫊㪼㩷 㪼㫅㪽㫉㪸㫈㫌㪼㪺㪼㩷 㫇㪼㫉㪸㫅㫋㪼㩷

㫅㫆㫍㪸㫊㩷 㪺㫀㫉㪺㫌㫅㫊㫋㬘㫅㪺㫀㪸㫊㩷 㪿㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪺㪸㫊㪃㩷 㫇㫆㫉㫋㪸㫅㫋㫆㪃㩷 㫆㩷 㫊㪼㫌㩷 㫉㪼㫊㫊㫌㫉㪾㫀㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷 㫅㫆㫊㩷 㫆㪹㫉㫀㪾㪸㩷 㪸㩷 㫃㪸㫅㬝㪸㫉㩷

㫄㬙㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷 㫌㫄㩷㫅㫆㫍㫆㩷 㪸㫉㫊㪼㫅㪸㫃㩷 㫋㪼㬩㫉㫀㪺㫆㩷 㪼㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫅㫆㫍㫆㫊㩷㫄㬟㫋㫆㪻㫆㫊㩷 㫈㫌㪼㩷 㫇㫆㫊㫊㪸㫄 explicar as duas

㫄㪸㫉㬟㫊㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫋㪸㫊㪃㩷㪼㩷㫄㪼㫊㫄㫆㪃㩷㫌㫅㫀㪽㫀㪺㪸㫉㩷㪸㩷 㫋㪼㫆㫉㫀㪸㩷㪼㫏㫇㫃㫀㪺㪸㫋㫀㫍㪸㩷㪻㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㪃㩷㫇㪼㫅㫊㪸㫅㪻㫆-o em

㫋㪼㫉㫄㫆㫊㩷㫄㪸㫀㫊㩷㪽㪼㫅㫆㫄㪼㫅㫆㫃㬩㪾㫀㪺㫆㫊㪃㩷㪼㫅㫈㫌㪸㫅㫋㫆㩷㫄㫆㪻㪼㫃㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㫉㪼㪸㬝㬙㫆㪃㩷㫆㫉㪾㪸㫅㫀㫑㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪼㩷㫇㪸㫉㫋㫀㪺㫀㫇㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷

de amplas camadas das massas populares nas modernas sociedades industriais ou em

㫋㫉㪸㫅㫊㫀㬝㬙㫆㩷 㬖㩷 㫀㫅㪻㫌㫊㫋㫉㫀㪸㫃㫀㫑㪸㬝㬙㫆㪃㩷 㪼㩷 㫄㫌㫀㫋㫆㩷 㫄㪼㫅㫆㫊㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷 㪽㪼㫅㬪㫄㪼㫅㫆㩷 㪼㫊㫇㪼㪺㫀㪽㫀㪺㫆㩷 㪻㪸㩷 㪿㫀㫊㫋㬩㫉㫀㪸㩷

㪸㫃㪼㫄㬙㩷㫆㫌㩷㫀㫋㪸㫃㫀㪸㫅㪸㩷㪻㫆㫊㩷㪸㫅㫆㫊㩷㪉㪇㪅

㪦㩷 㪸㫌㫋㫆㫉㩷 㫆㫇㫋㪸㩷 㫇㫆㫉㩷 㫉㪼㪺㫌㫇㪼㫉㪸㫉㩷 㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷 㪾㫉㪸㫅㪻㪼㩷 㫌㫅㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㪸㫅㬗㫃㫀㫊㪼㪃㩷

㪸㪾㫉㫌㫇㪸㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㪺㫆㫅㪽㫀㪾㫌㫉㪸㬝㬫㪼㫊㩷㫇㫆㫃㬣㫋㫀㪺㪸㫊㩷㪻㪼㩷㫋㫉㪸㬝㫆㫊㩷㪻㫀㫍㪼㫉㫊㫆㫊㪃㩷㫄㪸㫉㪺㪸do, entretanto, por

㪽㫆㫉㫋㪼㩷㪺㫆㪼㫉㬠㫅㪺㫀㪸㩷㫀㫅㫋㪼㫉㫅㪸㩷㪼㩷㪼㫏㫋㪼㫉㫅㪸㪅㩷㪧㫆㪻㪼-㫊㪼㩷㪻㪼㫊㫋㪸㪺㪸㫉㩷㫅㪼㫊㫊㪼㩷㫊㪼㫅㫋㫀㪻㫆㩷㪸㩷㪹㫌㫊㪺㪸㩷㪻㪼㩷㫉㪸㬣㫑㪼㫊㩷

㫅㪸㪺㫀㫆㫅㪸㫀㫊㩷㪼㩷㫉㪸㪺㫀㪸㫀㫊㪃㩷㫈㫌㪼㩷㪼㫏㫇㫃㫀㪺㪸㫉㫀㪸㫄㩷㪸㩷㪸㫌㫋㪼㫅㫋㫀㪺㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷㪻㫆㩷㫊㪼㫌㩷㫇㫉㬩㫇㫉㫀㫆㩷㫄㫆㫍㫀㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㪅㩷㪫㫆㪻㫆㫊㩷

㫆㫊㩷㫃㬣㪻㪼㫉㪼㫊㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫋㪸㫊㩷㫇㫉㫆㫇㫌㫅㪿㪸㫄㩷㫌㫄㩷㫄㪼㫊㫄㫆㩷㫇㫉㫆㪾㫉㪸㫄㪸㪃㩷㫇㪸㫉㫋㫀㫃㪿㪸㫍㪸㫄㩷㪸㩷㫄㪼㫊㫄㪸㩷㪺㫆㫅㪺㪼㫇㬝㬙㫆㩷

㪻㪼㩷 㫄㫌㫅㪻㫆㪃㩷 㪺㫉㫀㪸㫍㪸㫄㩷 㫄㪼㪺㪸㫅㫀㫊㫄㫆㫊㩷 㫊㫀㫄㫀㫃㪸㫉㪼㫊㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫄㪸㫅㫀㫇㫌㫃㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫄㪸㫊㫊㪸㫊㪃㩷 㪻㪼㫋㫀㫅㪿㪸㫄㩷 㫆㩷

㫄㪼㫊㫄㫆㩷 㬩㪻㫀㫆㩷 㪼㩷 㪻㪼㫊㫇㫉㪼㫑㫆㩷 㫇㪼㫃㫆㩷 㫃㫀㪹㪼㫉㪸㫃㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㪼㩷 㫇㪼㫃㫆㩷 㫊㫆㪺㫀㪸㫃㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㪼㩷 㫇㪼㫉㫊㪼㪾㫌㫀㪸㫄㩷 㪻㪸㩷 㫄㪼㫊㫄㪸㩷

forma minorias identificadas com a alteridade. O autor trabalha dessa forma, o

conceito 㪻㪼㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷㫌㫄㪸㩷㫌㫅㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷㪻㪼㩷㫋㫉㪸㬝㫆㫊㩷㪻㫀㫍㪼㫉㫊㫆㫊㩷㫈㫌㪼㩷㪻㬙㫆㩷㪺㫆㪼㫉㬠㫅㪺㫀㪸㩷㪸㩷㫌㫄㩷

㪽㪼㫅㬪㫄㪼㫅㫆㪅㩷㪦㩷㫄㫆㪻㪼㫃㫆㩷㫊㪼㫉㫍㪼㩷㪻㪼㩷㫀㫅㫊㫋㫉㫌㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷㫇㪼㫉㪸㫅㫋㪼㩷㫆㩷㫈㫌㪸㫃㩷㪸㫊㩷㪼㫊㫇㪼㪺㫀㪽㫀㪺㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㫊㩷㫋㫆㫉㫅㪸㫄-

se significativas.

㪥㪸㩷㪹㫌㫊㪺㪸㩷㪻㪼㩷㫌㫄㪸㩷㪽㪼㫅㫆㫄㪼㫅㫆㫃㫆㪾㫀㪸㩷㪻㫆㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㪃㩷㫃㪼㫍㪸㫅㪻㫆㩷㪼㫄㩷㪺㫆㫅㫊㫀㪻㪼㫉㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪸㩷㫌㫅㫀㬙㫆㩷

permanen㫋㪼㩷㪻㪼㩷㫃㫀㫅㪾㫌㪸㪾㪼㫄㩷㪼㩷㪻㪼㩷㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㫆㫊㩷㪸㪾㪼㫅㫋㪼㫊㩷㪺㪼㫅㫋㫉㪸㫀㫊㩷㪻㫆㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㪃㩷㫆㩷㪸㫌㫋㫆㫉㩷㪼㫃㪼㫅㪺㪸㩷

quatro itens importantes: (1) o antiliberalismo e antiparlamentarismo, (2) o estado

㫆㫉㪾㬘㫅㫀㪺㫆㩷 㪼㩷 㪸㩷 㫃㫀㪻㪼㫉㪸㫅㬝㪸㩷 㪺㪸㫉㫀㫊㫄㬗㫋㫀㪺㪸㪃㩷 㩿㪊㪀㩷 㪸㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫌㫅㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㫇㫆㫍㫆㩷 㪼㩷 㪸㩷 㫊㫆㪺㫀㪼㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷

corporativa; o fascism㫆㩷 㪼㫅㫈㫌㪸㫅㫋㫆㩷 㫉㪼㫍㫆㫃㫌㬝㬙㫆㩷 㩿㪋㪀㩷 㪼㩷 㫇㫆㫉㩷 㪽㫀㫄㩷 㪸㩷 㪻㪼㫊㫋㫉㫌㫀㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㪼㫌㩷 㪼㩷 㪸㩷

㫅㪼㪾㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㫆㩷㫆㫌㫋㫉㫆㪅

㪚㫆㫄㩷 㫉㪼㫃㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪸㫆㩷 㫇㫉㫀㫄㪼㫀㫉㫆㩷 㫀㫋㪼㫄㪃㩷 㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㪸㪺㫌㫊㪸㩷 㪸㫊㩷 㪽㫆㫉㫄㪸㫊㩷 㫃㫀㪹㪼㫉㪸㫀㫊㩷 㪻㪼㩷

㫆㫉㪾㪸㫅㫀㫑㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪼㩷㪻㪼㩷㫉㪼㫇㫉㪼㫊㪼㫅㫋㪸㬝㬙㫆㪃㩷㪼㫄㩷㪼㫊㫇㪼㪺㫀㪸㫃㩷㫆㩷㫇㪸㫉㫃㪸㫄㪼㫅㫋㪸㫉㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㫃㫀㪹㪼㫉㪸㫃㪃㩷㪻㪼㩷㫆㫉㫀㪾㫀㫅㪸㫉㪼㫄㩷

㪸㩷㪺㫉㫀㫊㪼㩷㪺㫆㫅㫋㪼㫄㫇㫆㫉㬘㫅㪼㪸㪅㩷㪜㫉㪸㩷㫅㪼㪺㪼㫊㫊㬗㫉㫀㫆㩷㫌㫄㩷㪼㫊㫋㪸㪻㫆㩷 㪽㫆㫉㫋㪼㪃㩷㪻㫆㫄㫀㫅㪸㪻㫆㫉㩷㫈㫌㪼㩷 㫀㫄㫇㪼㪻㫀㫉㫀㪸㩷㫆㩷

㪺㫆㫅㪽㫃㫀㫋㫆㩷㫊㫆㪺㫀㪸㫃㩷㫅㫆㩷㫇㫃㪸㫅㫆㩷㫀㫅㫋㪼㫉㫅㫆㩷㪼㩷㪽㫆㫉㫋㪸㫃㪼㪺㪼㫉㫀㪸㩷㫆㩷㫇㪸㬣㫊㩷㫅㫆㩷㫇㫃㪸㫅㫆㩷㪼㫏㫋㪼㫉㫅㫆㪃㩷㪼㫊㫇㪸㬝㫆㩷㫇㪼㫅㫊㪸㪻㫆㩷

㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷 㫌㫄㪸㩷 㫊㪼㫃㫍㪸㪃㩷 㫄㪸㫉㪺㪸㪻㫆㩷 㫇㪼㫃㪸㩷 㫍㫀㫆㫃㪼㫅㫋㪸㩷 㫃㫌㫋㪸㩷 㫇㪼㫃㪸㩷 㫊㫆㪹㫉㪼㫍㫀㫍㬠㫅㪺㫀㪸㪅㩷 㪪㪼㫅㪻㫆㪃㩷 㫇㫆㫉㫋㪸㫅㫋㫆㪃㩷

㫀㫄㫇㫆㫉㫋㪸㫅㫋㪼㩷 㪸㩷 㫀㪻㬟㫀㪸㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㪺㫆㪼㫊㬙㫆㩷 㫅㪸㪺㫀㫆㫅㪸㫃㪃㩷 㪼㩷 㪼㫊㫋㪸㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷 㫀㫄㫇㫆㫊㫊㬣㫍㪼㫃㩷 㫅㪸㩷 㫇㫉㫆㪾㫉㪸㫄㬗㫋㫀㪺㪸㩷 㪻㫆㩷

liberalismo.

㪜㫄㩷㫆㫇㫆㫊㫀㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪸㫆㩷 㫃㫀㪹㪼㫉㪸㫃㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㪻㪼㫊㪸㪾㫉㪼㪾㪸㪻㫆㫉㩷㪼㩷 㪸㫆㩷㪼㫊㫋㪸㪻㫆㩷 㫃㫀㪹㪼㫉㪸㫃㪃㩷㪻㫀㫃㪸㪺㪼㫉㪸㪻㫆㩷㫇㫆㫉㩷

querelas de grupos, o fascismo ofereceria uma variada gama de organicismos sociais,

onde o estado deveria ser visto d㪼㩷㪽㫆㫉㫄㪸㩷㪿㪸㫉㫄㫆㫅㫀㫆㫊㪸㪃㩷㪻㪼㫊㫇㫀㪻㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㪺㫆㫅㫋㫉㪸㪻㫀㬝㬫㪼㫊㩷㫅㫆㩷㫊㪼㫌㩷

㫇㫉㬩㫇㫉㫀㫆㩷 㫀㫅㫋㪼㫉㫀㫆㫉㪅㩷 㪘㫊㫊㫀㫄㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷 㫆㩷 㫇㪸㫉㫃㪸㫄㪼㫅㫋㪸㫉㫀㫊㫄㫆㪃㩷 㪺㫆㫄㩷 㪸㩷 㪸㫌㫋㫆㫅㫆㫄㫀㪸㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㫃㪼㪾㫀㫊㫃㪸㫋㫀㫍㫆㪃㩷

㪼㫉㪸㫄㩷 㪼㫃㫀㫄㫀㫅㪸㪻㫆㫊㩷 㪻㪼㫍㪼㫅㪻㫆㩷 㫊㪼㫉㩷 㫊㫌㪹㫊㫋㫀㫋㫌㬣㪻㫆㫊㩷 㫇㪼㫃㫆㩷 㪜㫊㫋㪸㪻㫆㩷 㪸㫌㫋㫆㫉㫀㫋㬗㫉㫀㫆㩷 㫆㫅㪻㪼㩷 㪿㬗㩷 㪸㩷 㫌㫅㫀㬙㫆㩷

㪼㫅㫋㫉㪼㩷 㪜㫊㫋㪸㪻㫆㩷 㪼㩷 㫇㪸㫉㫋㫀㪻㫆㩷 㬰㫅㫀㪺㫆㪅㩷 㪧㫆㫉㫋㪸㫅㫋㫆㩷 㫅㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㫆㩷 㪜㫊㫋㪸㪻㫆㩷 㬟㩷 㫀㫅㫊㫋㫉㫌㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷

㪽㫌㫅㪻㪸㫄㪼㫅㫋㪸㫃㩷㫇㪸㫉㪸㩷㪽㫀㫅㫊㩷㪾㪸㫉㪸㫅㫋㫀㪻㫆㫉㪼㫊㩷㪻㪸㩷㫇㫉㬩㫇㫉㫀㪸㩷㪼㫏㫀㫊㫋㬠㫅㪺㫀㪸㩷㪻㪸㩷㪺㫆㫄㫌㫅㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷㫅㪸㪺㫀㫆㫅㪸㫃㪅

Segundo o autor longe de caracterizar-se como uma autocracia, o estado

㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫋㪸㩷 㫊㫌㫉㪾㪼㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷 㫌㫄㪸㩷 㫇㫆㫃㫀㪺㫉㪸㪺㫀㪸㪃㩷 㪺㫆㫄㩷 㪽㫆㫅㫋㪼㫊㩷 㪸㫌㫋㬪㫅㫆㫄㪸㫊㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫇㫆㪻㪼㫉㪃㩷 㫉㪼㫌㫅㫀㪻os em

torno de uma doutrina que serve de argamassa, gravitando em torno de uma

㫇㪼㫉㫊㫆㫅㪸㫃㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷㪸㫌㫋㫆㫉㫀㫋㬗㫉㫀㪸㩷㪼㩷㪺㪸㫉㫀㫊㫄㬗㫋㫀㪺㪸㪃㩷㫆㩷㫃㬣㪻㪼㫉㩷㫅㪸㪺㫀㫆㫅㪸㫃㪅

Esse Estado desconhece as fronteiras do Estado liberal, avassalando as

㫀㫅㫊㫋㫀㫋㫌㫀㬝㬫㪼㫊㪃㩷㫀㫅㫋㪼㫉㫍㫀㫅㪻㫆㩷㪼㩷㫉㪼㪾㪼㫅㪻㫆㩷㫆㩷㪻㫆㫄㬣㫅㫀㫆㩷㫇㬰㪹㫃㫀㪺㫆㩷㪼㩷㫇㫉㫀㫍㪸㪻㫆㪃㩷㫀㫅㪺㫃㫌㫊㫀㫍㪼㩷㪸㩷㪼㪺㫆㫅㫆㫄㫀㪸㩷㪼㩷

㪸㩷㪽㪸㫄㬣㫃㫀㪸㪅㩷㪦㩷㫋㪼㫉㫉㫆㫉㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㪼㩷㪸㫊㩷㫃㫌㫋㪸㫊㩷㪻㪼㩷㫉㫌㪸㩷㪽㫆㫉㪸㫄㩷㪸㫊㩷㪸㫉㫄㪸㫊㩷㪹㬗㫊㫀㪺㪸㫊㩷㪻㪸㫊㩷㫄㫀㫃㬣㪺㫀㪸㫊㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫋㪸㫊㩷

㫅㪸㩷㪻㪼㫊㫋㫉㫌㫀㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㫆㩷㪜㫊㫋㪸㪻㫆㩷㫃㫀㪹㪼㫉㪸㫃㩷㪼㪃㩷㪸㫆㩷㫄㪼㫊㫄㫆㩷㫋㪼㫄㫇㫆㪃㩷㫌㫄㪸㩷㪽㫆㫉㫄㪸㩷㪼㫏㪸㪺㪼㫉㪹㪸㪻㪸㩷㪻㪼㩷㪽㪸㫑㪼㫉㩷

㫇㫆㫃㬣㫋㫀㪺㪸㪃㩷㪺㪸㫇㪸㫑㩷㪻㪼㩷㫃㫀㪹㪼㫉㪸㫉㩷㫋㫆㪻㫆㫊㩷㫆㫊㩷㬩㪻㫀㫆㫊㩷㪼㫏㫀㫊tentes.

㪦㩷 㪜㫊㫋㪸㪻㫆㩷 㫇㫆㫊㫊㫌㫀㩷 㫌㫄㩷 㪺㪸㫉㬗㫋㪼㫉㩷 㫀㫅㫋㪼㫉㫍㪼㫅㪺㫀㫆㫅㫀㫊㫋㪸㪃㩷 㫇㫆㫀㫊㩷 㬟㩷 㪼㫃㪼㩷 㫈㫌㪼㩷 㫆㫉㪾㪸㫅㫀㫑㪸㪃㩷

normatiza e dirige a sociedade, com total desprezo por qualquer esfera exclusiva do

㫇㫉㫀㫍㪸㪻㫆㪅㩷 㪥㪼㫊㫋㪼㩷 㪺㪸㫄㫇㫆㩷 㪸㩷 㫇㫉㫀㫅㪺㫀㫇㪸㫃㩷 㫋㪸㫉㪼㪽㪸㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㬟㩷 㪽㪸㫑㪼㫉㩷 㪺㪼㫊㫊㪸㫉㩷 㪸㫊㩷 㪺㪸㫌㫊㪸㫊㩷 㪻㪸㩷

㪻㪼㫊㪸㪾㫉㪼㪾㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㫊㫆㪺㫀㪸㫃㩷㪼㪃㩷 㪸㫊㫊㫀㫄㪃㩷 㫋㫉㪸㫅㫊㪺㪼㫅㪻㪼㫉㩷㪸㫆㩷㪼㫊㫋㫉㪸㫅㪿㪸㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷㪻㫆㫊㩷 㫀㫅㪻㫀㫍㬣㪻㫌㫆㫊㩷㪼㩷㪻㫆㫋㬗-

㫃㫆㫊㩷㪻㪼㩷㫌㫄㪸㩷㫀㪻㪼㫅㫋㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷㪸㫌㫋㬠㫅㫋㫀㪺㪸㪅

㪥㫆㩷 㫇㫃㪸㫅㫆㩷 㪼㪺㫆㫅㬪㫄㫀㪺㫆㪃㩷 㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㫇㫉㫆㫇㫌㫅㪿㪸㩷 㫌㫄㩷 㪜㫊㫋㪸㪻㫆㩷 㫈㫌㪼㩷 㫊㪼㩷 㪸㫇㫉㪼㫊㪼㫅㫋㪸㫉㫀㪸㩷

㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷㪸㩷㪺㫆㫉㫇㫆㫉㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㫆㩷㫋㫉㪸㪹㪸㫃㪿㫆㪃㩷㫊㫌㫇㫉㪸㪺㫃㪸㫊㫊㫀㫊㫋㪸㩷㪼㩷㪸㪺㫀㫄㪸㩷㪻㫆㫊㩷㫀㫅㫋㪼㫉㪼㫊㫊㪼㫊㩷㫇㫉㫀㫍㪸㪻㫆㫊㩷㪼㩷㪻㪼㩷

s㫌㪸㫊㩷㫉㪼㫇㫉㪼㫊㪼㫅㫋㪸㬝㬫㪼㫊㩷㫇㪸㫉㫋㫀㪻㬗㫉㫀㪸㫊㪅㩷㪫㪼㫅㪻㫀㪸㩷㪸㩷㫉㪼㪺㫌㫇㪼㫉㪸㫉㩷㫆㩷㫇㫉㫀㫄㪸㪻㫆㩷㫇㫆㫃㬣㫋㫀㪺㫆㩷㫊㫌㪹㫄㪼㫋㪼㫅㪻㫆㩷㫆㩷

㪼㪺㫆㫅㬪㫄㫀㪺㫆㩷 㪸㩷 㪼㫊㫋㫉㪼㫀㫋㫆㩷 㪻㫀㫉㫀㪾㫀㫊㫄㫆㪅㩷 㪘㩷 㫀㪻㬟㫀㪸㩷 㪹㬗㫊㫀㪺㪸㩷 㪼㫉㪸㩷 㪺㪼㫅㫋㫉㪸㪻㪸㩷 㫅㪸㩷 㫉㪼㫃㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪻㫀㫉㪼㫋㪸㪃㩷 㪻㪼㩷

㪺㫆㫃㪸㪹㫆㫉㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪼㫅㫋㫉㪼㩷 㪺㪸㫇㫀㫋㪸㫃㩷 㪼㩷 㫋㫉㪸㪹㪸㫃㪿㫆㪃㩷 㪺㫆㫅㪽㫆㫉㫄㪼㩷 㫆㩷 㫄㫆㪻㪼㫃㫆㩷 㪺㫆㫉㫇㫆㫉㪸㫋㫀㫍㫀㫊㫋㪸㪅㩷 㪘㩷 㫇㫆㫃㬣㫋㫀㪺㪸㩷

㪼㪺㫆㫅㬪㫄㫀㪺a pretendida pelos regimes fascistas era denominada autarquia.

㪘㫇㬩㫊㩷 㪸㩷 㪺㫆㫅㫈㫌㫀㫊㫋㪸㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㪜㫊㫋㪸㪻㫆㪃㩷 㪺㪸㪹㫀㪸㩷 㫆㩷 㫉㪼㫊㫋㪸㪹㪼㫃㪼㪺㫀㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷 㪻㪸㩷 㫆㫉㪻㪼㫄㪅㩷 㪘㩷

㫍㪸㫃㫆㫉㫀㫑㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㪸㩷㫇㫉㫆㪻㫌㬝㬙㫆㩷㪺㫆㫉㫉㪼㫊㫇㫆㫅㪻㫀㪸㩷㬖㩷㪼㫃㫀㫄㫀㫅㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㪸㩷㫃㫌㫋㪸㩷㪻㪼㩷㪺㫃㪸㫊㫊㪼㫊㪃㩷㪸㫆㫊㩷㫀㫅㫋㪼㫉㪼㫊㫊㪼㫊㩷

coletivos, nacionais, evitando-se o sectarismo e os particularismos da vida e da luta

㫊㫀㫅㪻㫀㪺㪸㫃㪃㩷㪺㫉㫀㪸㫅㪻㫆㩷㪸㫊㩷㪺㫆㫅㪻㫀㬝㬫㪼㫊㩷㪻㪸㩷㪾㫆㫍㪼㫉㫅㪸㪹㫀㫃㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫋㪸㪅㩷㪦㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㫉㪼㫍㫆㫃㫌㪺㫀㫆㫅㬗㫉㫀㫆㪃㩷

㬩㫋㫀㫄㫆㩷㫅㪸㩷㫋㪸㫉㪼㪽㪸㩷㪻㪼㩷㪻㪼㫊㫋㫉㫌㫀㫉㩷㫆㩷㪜㫊㫋㪸㪻㫆㩷㫃㫀㪹㪼㫉㪸㫃㪃㩷㪻㪼㫍㪼㫉㫀㪸㩷㫊㪼㫉㩷㪼㫃㫀㫄㫀㫅㪸㪻㫆㪅

㪚㫆㫄㩷㫉㪼㫃㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㬖㩷㪻㪼㫊㫋㫉㫌㫀㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㫆㩷㪼㫌㩷㪼㩷㪸㩷㫅㪼㪾㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㫆㩷㫆㫌㫋㫉㫆㩷㫆㩷㪽ascismo, em virtude

㪻㪸㩷㪹㪸㫉㪹㬗㫉㫀㪼㩷㪻㫆㩷 㪿㫆㫃㫆㪺㪸㫌㫊㫋㫆㪃㩷 㪽㫀㪺㫆㫌㩷㪻㪼㪽㫀㫅㫀㫋㫀㫍㪸㫄㪼㫅㫋㪼㩷㫄㪸㫉㪺㪸㪻㫆㩷㫇㪼㫃㫆㩷 㪸㫅㫋㫀-semitismo, pelo

㬩㪻㫀㫆㩷 㪸㫆㩷 㫁㫌㪻㪼㫌㪃㩷 㪹㪼㫄㩷 㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷 㪸㩷 㫆㫌㫋㫉㫆㫊㩷 㪾㫉㫌㫇㫆㫊㩷 㫄㫀㫅㫆㫉㫀㫋㬗㫉㫀㫆㫊㪅㩷 㪦㩷 㪸㫅㫋㫀-semitismo era

partilhado por todas as formas nacionais de fascismo, mas foi na Alemanha que 㫆㩷㬩㪻㫀㫆㩷

㪸㫆㫊㩷㫁㫌㪻㪼㫌㫊㩷㫋㫆㫄㫆㫌㩷㪸㫊㫇㪼㪺㫋㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㫇㫆㫃㬣㫋㫀㪺㪸㩷㪻㪼㩷㪜㫊㫋㪸㪻㫆㪃㩷㫆㪹㫁㪼㫋㫀㫍㫆㩷㫅㪸㪺㫀㫆㫅㪸㫃㪅㩷㪘㫉㫄㪸㪻㫆㩷㪺㫆㫄㩷㫌㫄㩷

㫊㫀㫊㫋㪼㫄㪸㩷 㫀㪻㪼㫆㫃㬩㪾㫀㪺㫆㩷 㪼㩷 㫄㪼㫅㫋㪸㫃㩷 㪸㪻㪼㫈㫌㪸㪻㫆㪃㩷 㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㫀㪻㪼㫅㫋㫀㪽㫀㪺㪸㩷 㪼㫄㩷 㫊㫀㩷 㫄㪼㫊㫄㫆㩷 㫍㪸㫃㫆㫉㪼㫊㩷

㪸㪹㫊㫆㫃㫌㫋㫆㫊㩷㪼㩷㫈㫌㪸㫃㫈㫌㪼㫉㩷㪻㫀㪽㪼㫉㪼㫅㬝㪸㩷㫀㪻㪼㫅㫋㫀㪽㫀㪺㪸㪻㪸㫊㩷㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷㪺㪸㫋㪼㪾㫆㫉㫀㪸㫊㩷㪸㫅㫋㫀㫅㪸㪺㫀㫆㫅㪸㫀㫊㩷㫋㫆㫉㫅㪸㫉-se-

㬗㩷㫆㪹㫁㪼㫋㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㪼㫃㫀㫄㫀㫅㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㫍㫀㫆㫃㪼㫅㫋㪸㪅㩷

㫿㩷㪸㩷㪸㫅㪸㫋㫆㫄㫀㪸㩷㪻㫆㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫋㪸㩷㫈㫌㪼㩷㪼㫏㫇㫃㫀㪺㪸㩷㫊㪼㫌㫊㩷㪺㫉㫀㫄㪼㫊㩷㪼㩷㫅㬙㫆㩷㪸㩷㪻㪸㫊㩷㫍㫀㫋㫀㫄㪸㫊㪅㩷㫿㩷㫅㪼㫊㫋㪼㩷

㫊㪼㫅㫋㫀㪻㫆㩷㫈㫌㪼㩷㪸㫊㩷㫆㪹㫊㪼㫉㫍㪸㬝㬫㪼㫊㩷㪻㪼㩷㪘㪻㫆㫉㫅㫆㩷㪼㩷㪥㪼㫌㫄㪸㫅㫅㩷㫅㫆㫊㩷㪸㫁㫌㪻㪸㫄㩷㪸㩷㫇㪼㫅㫊㪸㫉㩷㫆㩷㪟㫆㫃㫆㪺㪸㫌㫊㫋㫆㩷

judaico e todos aqueles que foram assassinados apenas por serem diferentes de um

㫋㫀㫇㫆㩷㫀㫄㪸㪾㫀㫅㬗㫉㫀㫆㩷㪸㫃㪸㫉㪻㪼㪸㪻㫆㩷㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷㫇㪸㪻㫉㬙㫆㪅㩷㪘㩷㪺㪸㫉㪸㪺㫋㪼㫉㬣㫊㫋㫀㪺㪸㩷㪹㬗㫊㫀㪺㪸㩷㪻㫆㫊㩷㫊㪼㫌㫊㩷㪸㫃㪾㫆㫑㪼㫊㩷㪽㫆㫀㩷㩿㪼㩷

㪸㫀㫅㪻㪸㩷 㫆㩷 㬟㪀㩷 㪸㩷 㪽㫉㫀㪼㫑㪸㪃㩷 㫆㩷 㪻㫀㫊㫋㪸㫅㪺㫀㪸㫄㪼㫅㫋㫆㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㫆㫌㫋㫉㫆㪃㩷 㪼㫅㫈㫌㪸㫅㫋㫆㩷 㫇㪼㫊㫊㫆㪸㪃㩷 㪼㫄㩷 㪽㪸㫍㫆㫉㩷 㪻㪸㩷

㫀㪻㪼㫅㫋㫀㪽㫀㪺㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪺㫆㫄㩷 㫌㫄㩷 㪺㫆㫃㪼㫋㫀㫍㫆㩷 㪸㫅㬪㫅㫀㫄㫆㪃㩷 㫇㫆㫉㫋㪸㫅㫋㫆㪃㩷 㪼㫊㫋㪼㫊㩷 㫅㬙㫆㩷 㫊㪼㩷 㪿㪸㪹㫀㫃㫀㫋㪸㫉㪸㫄㩷 㫇㪸㫉㪸 o

amor.

㪜㫄㩷 㪻㫀㫉㪼㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪸㩷 㫌㫄㪸㩷 㫋㪼㫆㫉㫀㪸㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㫆㩷 㪸㫌㫋㫆㫉㩷 㫉㪼㫊㫊㪸㫃㫋㪸㩷 㫈㫌㪼㩷 㫆㫊㩷 㫇㫆㫅㫋㫆㫊㪑㩷

㪸㫅㫋㫀㫃㫀㪹㪼㫉㪸㫃㫀㫊㫄㫆㪃㩷㪸㫅㫋㫀㫄㪸㫉㫏㫀㫊㫄㫆㪃㩷㫆㫉㪾㪸㫅㫀㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㫊㫆㪺㫀㪸㫃㪃㩷㫃㫀㪻㪼㫉㪸㫅㬝㪸㩷㪺㪸㫉㫀㫊㫄㬗㫋㫀㪺㪸㩷㪼㩷㫅㪼㪾㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㪸㩷

㪻㫀㪽㪼㫉㪼㫅㬝㪸㪃㩷 㫄㪸㫉㪺㪸㫄㩷 㪸㩷 㫇㫆㫊㫊㫀㪹㫀㫃㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫀㪻㪼㫅㫋㫀㪽㫀㪺㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷 㪼㫅㫈㫌㪸㫅㫋㫆㩷 㫉㪼㪾㫀㫄㪼㩷 㫆㫌㩷

forma de do㫄㫀㫅㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪼㫊㫇㪼㪺㬣㪽㫀㪺㪸㪅㩷 㪥㪼㫊㫋㪼㩷 㫊㪼㫅㫋㫀㪻㫆㩷 㪼㫃㪼㩷 㫀㫅㫊㫀㫊㫋㪼㩷 㪼㫄㩷 㪻㫀㪽㪼㫉㪼㫅㪺㫀㪸㫉㩷 㫆㩷 㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷

㪻㪸㫊㩷 㪻㫀㫍㪼㫉㫊㪸㫊㩷 㫍㪼㫉㫋㪼㫅㫋㪼㫊㩷 㫇㫆㫃㬣㫋㫀㪺㪸㫊㩷 㫇㫆㫊㫊㬣㫍㪼㫀㫊㩷 㪼㫏㫀㫊㫋㪼㫅㫋㪼㫊㩷 㫅㫆㩷 㫀㫅㫋㪼㫉㫀㫆㫉㩷 㪻㪸㩷 direita.

Diferentemente do conservadorismo, do reacionarismo, dos autoritarismos militares

㫆㫌㩷㫇㪸㫉㫋㫀㪻㬗㫉㫀㫆㫊㪃㩷㫆㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊mo distingue-㫊㪼㩷㫇㫆㫉㩷㫊㪼㫌㩷㪺㪸㫉㬗㫋㪼㫉㩷㫄㪼㫋㪸㫇㫆㫃㬣㫋㫀㪺㫆㪃㩷㫄㫆㪹㫀㫃㫀㫑㪸㪻㫆㩷㫇㪸㫉㪸㩷

㪸㩷 㫀㫅㪺㫆㫉㫇㫆㫉㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪻㪸㩷 㫅㪸㬝㬙㫆㪃㩷 㪻㫆㫊㩷 㫊㪼㫌㫊㩷 㪺㫆㫉㪸㬝㬫㪼㫊㩷 㪼㩷㫄㪼㫅㫋㪼㫊㪃㩷 㫅㫌㫄㪸㩷 㪺㫆㫅㪺㪼㫇㬝㬙㫆㩷 㪻㪼㩷㫄㫌㫅㪻㫆㩷

㬰㫅㫀㪺㪸㪃㩷㪼㫏㪺㫃㫌㪻㪼㫅㫋㪼㩷㪼㩷㫋㪼㫉㫉㫆㫉㫀㫊㫋㪸㪅

㪪㬙㫆㩷 㪼㫊㫋㪼㫊㩷 㫋㪼㫄㫇㫆㫊㩷 㫄㫆㪻㪼㫉㫅㫆㫊㩷 㫈㫌㪼㩷 㪺㫉㫀㪸㫄㩷 㪸㫊㩷 㪺㫆㫅㪻㫀㬝㬫㪼㫊㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫉㪼㫍㫆㫃㫋㪸㩷 㪺㫆㫅㫋㫉㪸㩷 㫌㫄㪸㩷

㫊㫆㪺㫀㪼㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷 㫆㫅㪻㪼㩷 㫆㫊㩷 㪸㫅㫋㪼㫇㪸㫉㫆㫊㩷 㫊㫆㪺㫀㪸㫀㫊㪃㩷 㫆㫊㩷 㪾㫉㫌㫇㫆㫊㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫊㫆㫃㫀㪻㪸㫉㫀㪼㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷 㫆㫉㫀㪾㫀㫅㬗㫉㫀㫆㫊㪃㩷 㫈㫌㪼㩷

㪻㪸㫍㪸㫄㩷㫀㪻㪼㫅㫋㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷㪼㩷㫊㪼㪾㫌㫉㪸㫅㬝㪸㪃㩷㫊㬙㫆㩷㪻㫀㫊㫊㫆㫃㫍㫀㪻㫆㫊㩷㪼㫄㩷㫄㪼㫀㫆㩷㪸㩷㫄㫌㫃㫋㫀㪻㬫㪼㫊㩷㪸㫅㬪㫅㫀㫄㪸㫊㪅㩷

㪦㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㪻㫀㫉㪼㪺㫀㫆㫅㪸㩷㫋㪸㫃㩷㬩㪻io contra alvos que apresentem a possibilidade de,

㪺㫆㫄㫆㩷 㫅㫌㫄㩷 㪼㫊㫇㪼㫃㪿㫆㩷 㫀㫅㫍㪼㫉㫋㫀㪻㫆㪃㩷 㫄㫆㫊㫋㫉㪸㫉㩷 㪸㫋㫉㪸㫍㬟㫊㩷 㪻㪸㩷 㪽㪼㫃㫀㪺㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㪃㩷 㪻㫆㩷 㫃㫀㫍㫉㪼㩷 㪼㫏㪼㫉㪺㬣㪺㫀㫆㩷 㪻㫆㩷

㫇㫉㪸㫑㪼㫉㪃㩷㪻㪸㩷㫊㫆㫃㫀㪻㪸㫉㫀㪼㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷㪽㪸㫄㫀㫃㫀㪸㫉㪃㩷㫆㩷㫈㫌㪸㫅㫋㫆㩷㪻㪸㩷㪻㫆㫉㩷㬟㩷㪸㫌㫋㫆-infligida, querida e cultivada,

㫅㫌㫄㪸㩷 㫊㫆㪺㫀㪼㪻㪸㪻㪼㩷 㪹㪸㫊㪼㪸㪻㪸㩷 㪼㫄㩷 㫇㫉㫀㫅㪺㬣㫇㫀㫆㫊㩷 㪸㫌㫋㫆㫉㫀㫋㬗㫉㫀㫆㫊㩷 㪼㩷 㫊㪸㪻㫆㫊㩷 㫄㪸㫊㫆㫈㫌㫀㫊㫋㪸㫊㪅㩷 㪪㪼㫉㩷 㪻㫌㫉㫆㩷

consigo mesmo abriria o caminho para ser cruel com o outro.

㪣㫀㫄㫇㪸㫉㩷 㫆㩷 㫇㪸㬣㫊㩷 㪻㫆㫊㩷 㪸㫅㫋㫀㫅㪸㪺㫀㫆㫅㪸㫀㫊㩷 㫅㫆㩷 㫇㪸㫊㫊㪸㪻㫆㩷 㫆㫌㩷 㪼㫏㫇㫌㫃㫊㪸㫉㩷 㫆㩷 㫀㫄㫀㪾㫉㪸㫅㫋㪼㩷

㪼㫊㫋㫉㪸㫅㪾㪼㫀㫉㫆㩷 㪿㫆㫁㪼㩷 㬟㩷 㫌㫄㩷 㫆㪹㫁㪼㫋㫀㫍㫆㩷 㫈㫌㪼㩷 㪸㫇㪼㫅㪸㫊㩷 㫉㪼㫊㫋㪸㪹㪼㫃㪼㪺㪼㪃㩷 㫅㫌㫄㩷 㫅㬣㫍㪼㫃㩷 㫀㫄㪸㪾㫀㫅㬗㫉㫀㫆㪃㩷 㫌㫄㪸㩷

ordem voltada para o passado, expulsa o debate em torno das causas do mal estar e

㫀㪻㪼㫅㫋㫀㪽㫀㪺㪸㩷㫌㫄㩷㪸㫃㫍㫆㩷㫇㪸㫉㪸㩷㪸㩷㫉㪼㪸㫃㫀㫑㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㫆㩷㬩㪻㫀㫆㪅

㪦㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫄㫆㩷㫉㫆㫄㫇㪼㩷㪺㫆㫄㩷㪸㩷㫋㫉㪸㪻㫀㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㪼㩷㫇㪸㫉㫋㫀㪺㫀㫇㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㫇㫆㫃㬣㫋㫀㪺㪸㩷㪻㫆㩷㪦㪺㫀㪻㪼㫅㫋㪼㩷㪼㪃㩷㫇㫆㫉㩷

isso mesmo, aproxima-㫊㪼㩷 㫋㪸㫅㫋㫆㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㫇㫆㫊㫋㫌㫉㪸㫊㩷 㫄㬣㫊㫋㫀㪺㪸㫊㩷 㪼㩷 㪺㫌㫃㫋㫀㫍㪸㩷 㪺㪼㫉㫀㫄㫆㫅㫀㪸㫀㫊㩷 㪺㬣㫍㫀㪺㫆㫊㩷

㪺㫆㫃㪼㫋㫀㫍㫆㫊㪅㩷 㪘㫊㫊㫀㫄㪃㩷 㫅㫌㫄㪸㩷 㫉㪼㫃㫀㪾㫀㬙㫆㩷 㪻㪼㩷 㪜㫊㫋㪸㪻㫆㪃㩷 㪼㫅㫍㫆㫃㫍㪼㩷 㫆㩷 㫀㫅㪻㫀㫍㫀㪻㫌㫆㩷 㪼㫄㩷 㫀㪻㪼㫅㫋㫀㪻㪸㪻㪼㫊㩷

㪺㫆㫃㪼㫋㫀㫍㪸㫊㪃㩷㫉㪼㪸㫃㫀㫑㪸㫅㪻㫆㩷㫌㫄㪸㩷㪽㪸㫃㫊㪸㩷㪺㫆㫅㪺㫉㪼㫋㫀㫑㪸㬝㬙㫆㩷㪻㫆㩷㪼㫅㪺㫆㫅㫋㫉㫆㩷㪻㫆㩷㪿㫆㫄㪼㫄㩷㪺㫆㫅㫊㫀㪾㫆㩷㫄㪼㫊㫄㫆㪅㩷

㪛㪼㫊㫋㪼㩷㫄㫆㪻㫆㩷㫆㩷㪿㫆㫄㪼㫄㩷㫅㫆㫍㫆㩷㪽㪸㫊㪺㫀㫊㫋㪸㩷㬟㩷㪸㫅㫋㪼㫊㩷㪻㪼㩷㫋㫌㪻㫆㩷㪸㩷㪽㪸㫃㫊㪸㩷㫇㫉㫆㫁㪼㬝㬙㫆㩷㪺㫆ncretizada de

㫋㫌㪻㫆㩷㪸㫈㫌㫀㫃㫆㩷㫈㫌㪼㩷㫇㪸㫉㪸㩷㪼㫃㪼㩷㫄㪼㫊㫄㫆㩷㬟㩷㫌㫄㪸㩷㫇㪼㫉㪻㪸㪅