estudogeral.uc.pt · 2021. 1. 7. · Agradecimentos “O agradecimento é a mais alta forma de...
Transcript of estudogeral.uc.pt · 2021. 1. 7. · Agradecimentos “O agradecimento é a mais alta forma de...
1
António Campos de Figueiredo
STUDY ON THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE
CHOROID TO THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF
DIABETIC RETINOPATHY
Tese no âmbito do Programa de Doutoramento em Ciências da Saúde – ramo de Medicina,
orientada pelos Professores Doutores Rufino Martins Silva e António Francisco Ambrósio, e
apresentada à Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra
Abril de 2020
António Campos de Figueiredo
STUDY ON THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE
CHOROID TO THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF
DIABETIC RETINOPATHY
Tese no âmbito do Programa de Doutoramento em Ciências da Saúde – ramo de Medicina,
orientada pelos Professores Doutores Rufino Martins Silva e António Francisco Ambrósio, e
apresentada à Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra
Abril de 2020
The clinical study was conducted at Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Ophthalmology
Department, Leiria, Portugal. The experimental research was performed at the Retinal
Dysfunction and Neuroinflammation Lab, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical
Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Agradecimentos
“O agradecimento é a mais alta forma de pensamento e a gratidão é a felicidade duplicada
pelo espanto”, G. K. Chesterton.
Aos meus pais, onde me dizem que tudo começou.
Aos Professores Doutores Rufino Silva e Francisco Ambrósio, pela orientação e revisões,
pela disponibilidade, proximidade, cumplicidade e pela paciência.
Ao Professor Doutor João Paulo Castro de Sousa, porque me ajudou numa altura em que
eu necessitava.
Ao Professor Doutor Joaquim Murta, pelo seu encorajamento e simpatia.
Aos Doutores Elisa e João, por todo o apoio, ajuda e cumplicidade; pela sua simpatia e
bondade. Sem eles o trabalho experimental teria sido bastante improvável.
À Dra Dulce Castanheira, que me motivou.
À Ann, pelo que me trouxe da mentalidade inglesa.
À minha família próxima e aos amigos, que são como os irmãos que não tive, pela minha
ausência.
Aos meus filhos, que são uma das maravilhas da minha vinda a este mundo.
À Anália, pela bondade, pelo mérito, pela humildade, pela beleza e pelo amor. A minha
casa.
A todos aqueles a quem não agradeci.
Aos meus amigos que se sentam nas estantes da sala de jantar: Hugo, Dickens,
Doistoiévski, Shakespeare, Wittgenstein e Chesterton. Foram um amparo durante todos
estes anos. Expressões como “reviver uma dor do passado no presente, é fazer outra dor
e sofrer novamente”, “sobre aquilo que não sabemos, o melhor é estar calado”, “nenhuma
corrente é mais forte que o seu elo mais fraco” e “quem acende uma luz é o primeiro a
beneficiar da claridade”, foram reconfortantes e inspiradoras.
A Maria, Mãe, que nunca me deixou experimentar a solidão.
A Jesus Cristo, a minha “raison d’être”.
Table of Contents
Resumo .......................................................................................................................... I
Abstract ......................................................................................................................... V
Publications ................................................................................................................ VIII
Communications .......................................................................................................... IX
List of abbreviations ...................................................................................................... X
List of figures .............................................................................................................. XIII
List of tables ............................................................................................................. XXV
List of supplementary videos .................................................................................. XXVII
Thesis outline .......................................................................................................... XXIX
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1
1.1. Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema ............................................... 2
1.2. Anatomy and physiology of the choroid .............................................................. 4
1.3. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) ...............................................................14
1.4. OCT and the choroid .........................................................................................15
1.5. Choroid and diabetes .........................................................................................17
1.5.1. Choroidal thickness in diabetes without retinopathy ....................................18
1.5.2. Choroidal thickness and retinopathy progression ........................................19
1.5.3. Choroidal thickness in diabetic macular edema ..........................................23
1.6. The influence of treatment on choroidal thickness .............................................24
1.6.1. Panretinal photocoagulation .......................................................................24
1.6.2. Intravitreal therapy ......................................................................................25
1.7. Choroidal thickness as a biomarker of progression or treatment response ........28
1.8. OCT angiography and the choriocapillaris .........................................................30
1.9. From bedside to bench ......................................................................................31
1.9.1. The animal as a model of man ....................................................................31
1.9.2. OCT in the animal .......................................................................................33
1.9.3. Visualization of the choroidal vasculature ...................................................35
1.9.4. Regulation, remodelling and inflammation .................................................37
1.9.4.1. Pericytes and mural cells ........................................................................37
1.9.4.2. Glia and the neuro-vascular unit .............................................................39
1.6. Objectives of the present study ..........................................................................41
1.7. References ........................................................................................................42
2. Choroidal thickness stratified by outcome in diabetic macular edema .......................53
2.1. Abstract .................................................................................................................54
2.2. Introduction ...........................................................................................................55
2.3. Methods ................................................................................................................55
2.4. Results ..................................................................................................................59
2.5 Discussion ..............................................................................................................66
2.6. References ........................................................................................................71
2.7. Supplementary files ...........................................................................................73
3. Markers of outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema ....................77
3.1. Abstract .................................................................................................................78
3.2. Introduction ...........................................................................................................79
3.3. Patients and Methods ............................................................................................80
3.4. Results ..................................................................................................................84
3.5. Discussion .............................................................................................................93
3.6. Conclusion ............................................................................................................96
3.7. References ........................................................................................................97
3.8. Supplementary files ...........................................................................................99
4. Inflammatory cells proliferate in the choroid and retina without choroidal thickness
change in Type 1 diabetes ............................................................................................. 105
4.1. Abstract ............................................................................................................... 106
4.2. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 107
4.3. Materials and Methods ........................................................................................ 108
4.4. Results ................................................................................................................ 113
4.5. Discussion ....................................................................................................... 124
4.6. References ...................................................................................................... 129
4.7. Supplementary files ......................................................................................... 132
5. Choroidal and retinal structural, cellular and vascular changes in Type 2 diabetes .... 145
5.1. Abstract ............................................................................................................... 146
5.2. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 147
5.3. Materials and Methods ........................................................................................ 148
5.4. Results ............................................................................................................ 153
5.5. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 164
5.6. References ...................................................................................................... 167
5.7. Supplementary files ......................................................................................... 171
6. Discussion and future perspectives......................................................................... 179
7. Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 191
Resumo
I
Resumo
Introdução: Estudos recentes indicam que a espessura da coroide pode ser
considerada fator de prognóstico na retinopatia diabética (RD) e no edema macular
diabético (EMD), embora os resultados sejam contraditórios.
A coroidopatia diabética e a natureza da RD, incluindo do EMD, têm características
complexas, que incluem um componente inflamatório. Alterações na coroide, como a
renovação vascular e a depleção capilar a nível da coriocapilar, e alterações na retina, tais
como a ativação e migração de células da glia, foram descritas em ratos diabéticos. No
entanto, o papel da espessura basal da coroide como fator de prognóstico no EMD não é
consensual. Em modelos animais de diabetes, desconhece-se como varia a espessura da
coroide e se existem alterações celulares e moleculares que ocorrem simultaneamente na
coroide e na retina.
Objetivos: Determinar o valor prognóstico da espessura basal da coroide e
pesquisar outros fatores de prognóstico em doentes com EMD.
Avaliar a espessura da coroide e alterações celulares e moleculares na coroide e
na retina em modelos animais de diabetes tipo 1 (T1D) e tipo 2 (T2D).
Métodos: Cento e vinte e seis olhos de 126 doentes com EMD foram incluídos num
estudo prospetivo, para avaliar o valor prognóstico da espessura coroideia subfoveal
(ECSF) inicial, definido como anatómico (baixa da espessura basal central da retina ≥
10%,) e como funcional (ganho na melhor acuidade visual corrigida, MAVC, basal ≥ 5 letras
ETDRS), na resposta ao tratamento com ranibizumab ou aflibercept, ao final de 3 e 6
meses. Para determinar o valor da ECSF como indicador de espessura coroideia
comparou-se a ECSF com espessuras da coroide à volta da fovea.
Resumo
II
Adicionalmente, 122 olhos de 122 doentes com EMD foram prospetivamente
incluídos, para determinar outros fatores de prognóstico no EMD recente sob tratamento
com anti-angiogénicos.
Relativamente à diabetes experimental, utilizaram-se dois modelos de ratos
diabéticos. Ratos Wistar em que foi induzida T1D através de uma injeção de
estreptozotocina (STZ, às 8 semanas de idade, com mais 8 semanas de duração da
diabetes) e ratos Goto-Kakizaki (GK) com um ano de idade, como modelo de T2D.
A espessura da coroide foi avaliada in vivo por tomografia de coerência ótica (OCT)
em ambos os modelos animais. A densidade vascular da coriocapilar e da coroide vascular,
média e externa, foi quantificada em explantes esclero-coroideus de olhos perfundidos por
perclorato de 1,1’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethilindocarbocianina (DiI). As
imunorreatividades do fator de crescimento do endotélio vascular (VEGF) e do seu recetor
2 (VEGFR2), assim como a da vimentina (marcador das células da macroglia), de Iba1 e
MHC II (marcadores da microglia/macrófagos não ativados e ativados, respetivamente), e
de NG2 (marcador de pericitos e células murais peri-vasculares), foram determinadas por
imuno-histoquímica na coroide e na retina, em criosecções e em explantes esclero-
coroideus.
As imagens foram adquiridas por microscopia de fluorescência ou confocal e a
imunofluorescência foi quantificada pelo ImageJ. Procedeu-se também à contagem de
células positivas para Iba1, MHC II e NG2.
Resultados: A espessura coroideia subfoveal diminuiu com o tratamento do EMD,
mas não revelou possuir valor prognóstico, quer anatómico quer funcional, precoce ou
tardio. A ECSF revelou-se um bom marcador da espessura coroideia, possuindo uma boa
correlação com os outros parâmetros de espessura coroideia. A existência basal de fluido
sub-retiniano revelou-se fator de bom prognóstico anatómico, enquanto que uma zona
elipsoide íntegra e um bom equilíbrio metabólico se revelaram fatores de bom prognóstico
funcional, quer precoces quer tardios.
Resumo
III
Nos modelos experimentais, observaram-se diferenças significativas entre os ratos
com diabetes induzida pela STZ (desequilíbrio metabólico acentuado) e os ratos GK (maior
duração de diabetes com desequilíbrio metabólico ligeiro/moderado). Observou-se um
aumento da espessura da coroide e uma diminuição da densidade vascular da coriocapilar,
in vivo, apenas em ratos GK. A imunorreactividade para o VEGFR2 aumentou na retina
dos ratos GK e diminuiu na retina dos ratos STZ. O número de células Iba1+ aumentou na
retina externa em ambos os modelos animais, embora apenas nos ratos STZ se
encontrasse aumentado no estroma da coroide. O número de células MHC II+ também
aumentou apenas na coroide de ratos STZ. Estes resultados indicam que o incremento das
células inflamatórias na coroide depende do estado metabólico e da duração da doença.
Além disso, também se observaram sinais de rarefação de pericitos a nível da coriocapilar
em ambos os modelos, embora essa alteração fosse mais evidente em ratos GK.
Conclusões: Embora a ECSF diminua no EMD sob tratamento, não se revelou um
fator de prognóstico para o EMD. Revelou-se apenas um indicador de duração de ação do
anti-angiogénico e um bom índice de espessura coroideia em geral. Um bom controlo
metabólico e uma zona elipsoide íntegra revelaram-se fatores de bom prognóstico
funcional, enquanto que o fluido subretiniano se revelou fator de bom prognóstico
anatómico.
A espessura coroideia aumentou e a densidade vascular da coroide diminuiu
apenas no modelo animal de T2D. O número de células Iba1+ e MHC II+ encontrava-se
aumentado na coroide e na retina dos ratos T1D e T2D, mas esse aumento variou com o
desequilíbrio metabólico e com a duração da doença. A imunorreactividade do VEGFR2
encontrava-se aumentada quando a duração da diabetes era mais prolongada e quando
existia apenas um desequilíbrio metabólico ligeiro/moderado. Pelo contrário, a
imunorreactividade do VEGFR2 revelou-se diminuída quando o desequilíbrio metabólico
era acentuado. A rarefação e o aumento da renovação vasculares a nível da coriocapilar
era uma característica que se acentuava numa situação de doença prolongada.
Resumo
IV
Palavras-chave:
Coroide, retina, espessura coroide, diabetes, edema macular, inflamação, glia,
pericitos, VEGFR2.
Abstract
V
Abstract
Background: Recent studies have reported that the choroidal thickness may be a
prognostic factor for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema (DME), but there are
conflicting results in the literature. Moreover, diabetic choroidopathy and the nature of
diabetic retinopathy, including macular edema, have been recognized as complex traits,
with an inflammatory component. Alterations in the choroid, such as vascular remodelling
and capillary depletion of the choriocapillaris, and in the retina, as glial cell reactivity and
migration, have been described in diabetic rats. However, there is no consensus about the
role of baseline choroidal thickness as a prognostic factor in DME under treatment.
Likewise, it is unknown how the choroidal thickness changes in animal models of diabetes,
as well as the cellular and molecular alterations occurring simultaneously in the choroid and
retina in diabetes.
Purpose: To determine the prognostic value of choroidal thickness and to search
other prognostic factors in patients with DME.
To evaluate the choroidal thickness and changes in cellular and molecular
signatures in the choroid and retina in the course of diabetes, in animal models of Type 1
and Type 2 diabetes.
Methods: In a prospective study, 126 eyes of 126 patients with DME were enrolled
to assess the anatomical (central retinal thickness, CRT, decrease ≥ 10% from baseline)
and functional (best corrected visual acuity, BCVA, gain ≥ 5 ETDRS letters from baseline)
prognostic value of baseline subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) on anti-vascular
endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), ranibizumab or aflibercept, treatment response after
3 (early outcome) and 6 months (late outcome). A comparison was made between SFCT
and other choroidal thicknesses collected at different locations from the fovea to establish
the value of SFCT as a surrogate of the choroidal thickness.
Abstract
VI
In addition, 122 eyes of 122 patients were prospectively enrolled to search for
anatomical (CRT) and functional (BCVA) baseline prognostic factors, other than SFCT, for
recent onset DME under anti-VEGF agents’ treatment.
Furthermore, two rat models of diabetes, streptozotocin (STZ)-induced Type 1
diabetes in Wistar rats (8 weeks-old; with further 8 weeks of diabetes duration) and Goto-
Kakizaki (GK) Type 2 diabetes rats (1 year old) were used. In vivo choroidal thickness was
evaluated in both models by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Vascular density of the
choriocapillaris and middle/outer choroid was quantified in sclerochoroidal whole mounts of
eyes perfused by 1,1’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI).
The immunoreactivity of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF-receptor 2
(VEGFR2), as well as the immunoreactivity of vimentin (marker of macroglial cells), Iba1
and MHC II (markers of non-activated and activated microglial cells/macrophages,
respectively) and NG2 (marker of pericytes and perivascular mural cells), were assessed
by immunohistochemistry, in the choroid and retina, in eye cryosections and in
sclerochoroidal whole mounts. Images were acquired by fluorescence and confocal
microscopy and the immunofluorescence was quantified by ImageJ. Moreover, Iba1, MHC
II and NG2 positive cells were counted.
Results: In diabetic patients, treatment of DME with anti-VEGF agents, ranibizumab
and aflibercept, decreased the choroidal thickness. However, the SFCT was not a predictor
of the anatomical or functional outcomes. SFCT was an excellent surrogate of the choroidal
thickness, showing an excellent correlation with the other choroidal thickness parameters
evaluated. The subretinal fluid was a predictor of the anatomical outcome, whereas the
ellipsoid zone status and a good metabolic control were predictors of functional outcome,
regardless of being early or late outcomes.
In experimental models, significant differences between STZ (serious metabolic-
imbalance) and GK (longer lasting diabetes and light metabolic-imbalance) rats were found.
In vivo choroidal thickness increased in GK rats only and the choriocapillaris vascular
Abstract
VII
density decreased in GK rats only, as well. Moreover, VEGFR2 immunoreactivity was
upregulated in the retina of GK rats, being downregulated in the retina of STZ rats. The
number of Iba1+ cells increased in the outer retina of both animal models. However, in the
choroid, the number of Iba1+ cells and MHC II+ cells increased in STZ rats only. The
aforementioned results for Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells indicate that the degree of such increase
may depend on metabolic status and/or disease duration. Signs of pericyte depletion at the
choriocapillaris were present in both models, being more evident in GK rats.
Conclusions: Although there were alterations in the SFCT in DME under anti-VEGF
treatment, the baseline SFCT was not a useful prognostic tool for DME. It was an indicator
of time-dependent anti-VEGF’s subsiding effect on the choroid instead, and a good
surrogate of the choroidal thickness as such. Good metabolic control and an intact ellipsoid
zone were predictors of functional outcome while subfoveal neuroretinal detachment was a
predictor of anatomic outcome only.
The number of Iba1+ cells and MHC II+ cells increased in the choroid and retina in
diabetic rats but the magnitude of such increase changed considerably when the metabolic
status was seriously imbalanced. VEGFR2 immunoreactivity increased in the retina in
longer diabetes duration and slighter metabolic imbalance. Conversely, VEGFR2
immunoreactivity decreased when there was a serious metabolic imbalance. Vascular
remodelling or vascular depletion at the choriocapillaris was also a trait of the long lasting
disease.
Keywords:
Choroid, retina, choroidal thickness, diabetes, macular edema, inflammation, glia,
pericytes, VEGFR2.
Publications and communications
VIII
Publications
1. António Campos; Elisa J. Campos; João Martins; António Francisco Ambrósio; Rufino
Silva. Viewing the choroid: where we stand, challenges and contradictions in diabetic
retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017; 95:446-459.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27545332. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13210.
2. António Campos; Elisa J. Campos; Anália do Carmo; Miguel Patrício; João P. Castro
de Sousa; António Francisco Ambrósio; Rufino Silva. Choroidal thickness changes
stratified by outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018; 256 (10):1857-1865.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30039271. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-4072-z.
3. António Campos; Elisa J Campos; Anália do Carmo; Francisco Caramelo; João Martins;
João P Sousa; António Francisco Ambrósio; Rufino Silva. Evaluation of markers of
outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema. Eye Vis (Lond). 2018; 11;
5:27. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386806. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-018-
0119-9.
4. António Campos, Elisa J. Campos, Anália do Carmo, Rufino Silva. Response to:
Choroidal thickness changes stratified by outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic
macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019; 257:243.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30191300. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-4128-0.
5. António Campos, Elisa J Campos, João Martins, Flávia SC Rodrigues, Rufino Silva,
António Francisco Ambrósio. Inflammatory cells proliferate in the choroid and retina
without choroidal thickness change in early Type 1 diabetes. Exp Eye Res. 2020
(submitted).
Publications and communications
IX
6. António Campos, João Martins, Elisa J. Campos, Rufino Silva, António Francisco
Ambrósio. Choroidal and retinal structural, cellular and vascular changes in a rat model
of Type 2 diabetes. Plos One. 2020 (submitted).
Communications
1. A. Campos; J. Sousa, A. do Carmo, E. Campos, F. Caramelo, A. F. Ambrosio, R. Silva.
Evaluation of markers of outcome in diabetic macular edema. 18th EURETINA
Congress, Vienna, September 20-23, 2018.
2. A. Campos, E. Campos, J. Martins, R. Silva, A. F. Ambrósio. Alterações da Coroide e
Retina num modelo experimental de Diabetes. Jornadas de Investigação do 62º
Congresso Português de Oftalmologia, Vilamoura, Dezembro 5, 2019.
List of abreviations
X
List of abbreviations
3M-EZ Re-rating of the ellipsoid zone at 3 months
ACs Amacrine cells
AFL Aflibercept
AGEs Advanced glycated end-products
AL Axial lenght
AMD Age related macular degeneration
Anti-VEGF Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor
ARVO Association for research in vision and ophthalmology
AUC Area under the curve
B Regression coefficient
BCs Bipolar cells
BCVA Best corrected visual acuity
BCVAi Baseline best corrected visual acuity
BRB Blood retinal barrier
CI-CSME Central involving clinical significant macular edema
CMT Central macular thickness
CNV Choroidal neovascularization
CRT Central retinal thickness
CSC Central serous chorioretinopathy
CSME Clinical significant macular edema
CT Choroidal thickness
CT1750i Choroidal thickness at 1750 µm inferior to the center of the fovea
CT1750n Choroidal thickness at 1750 µm nasal to the center of the fovea
CT1750s Choroidal thickness at 1750 µm superior to the center of the fovea
CT1750t Choroidal thickness at 1750 µm temporal to the center of the fovea
CT3500 Choroidal thickness of the area defined from 1750 µm temporal to 1750 µm nasal from the center of the fovea
D Diopters
DAPI 4’,6-diaminophenylindole
DBP Diastolic blood pressure
DC Diabetic choroidopathy
DCP Deep capillary plexus
Dif T0_T1 Difference between baseline and 3 months
DiI 1,1’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate
DM Diabetes mellitus
DME Diabetic macular edema
DR Diabetic retinopathy
List of abreviations
XI
DRIL Disruption of the inner retinal layers
EDI Enhanced deep imaging
ELM External limiting membrane
ER Early responders
ETDRS Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study
EZ Ellipsoid zone
GCL Ganglion cell layer
GK Goto-Kakizaki
Hb A1c Glycated hemoglobina A1c
HCs Horizontal cells
HR High resolution
HRS Hyper-reflective spots
I Inferior
Iba1 Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1
ICC Intra-class correlations
ICP Intermediate capillary plexus
ILM Inner limiting membrane
INL Inner nuclear layer
IPL Inner plexiform layer
L Letters
LR Late responders
LSM Laser scanning microscope
M Month
MAP Mean arterial blood pressure
MC Müller cells
MG Müller glia
MHC II Major histocompatibility complex II
N Nasal
n Number
NG2 Neuron-glial antigen 2
NG2/Cspg4 Neuron-glial antigen 2/chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan 4
NO Nitric oxide
NPDR Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy
NR Non-responders
OCT Optical coherence tomography
OCTA Optical coherence tomography angiography
OLM Outer limiting membrane
OLMPr Outer limiting membrane and photoreceptor outer segments
ONH Optic nerve head
ONL Outer nuclear layer
OPL Outer plexiform layer
OR Odds ratio
List of abreviations
XII
PBS Phosphate buffer saline
PDR Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
PFA Paraformaldehyde
PIGF Placental growth factor
PRN Pro re nata
PRP Panretinal photocoagulation
PRs Photoreceptors
RECA-1 Rat endothelial cell antibody 1
RGC Retinal ganglion cells
RMG Retinal Müller glial cells
RNFL Retinal nerve fiber layer
RNZ Ranibizumab
ROC Receiving operating characteristic curve
ROS Reactive oxygen species
RPE Retinal pigment epithelium
S Superior
SBP Systolic blood pressure
SCP Superficial capillary plexus
SD Square deviation
SD-OCT Spectral domain optical coherence tomography
SE Standard error
SEM Standard error mean
SFCT Subfoveal choroidal thickness
SND Subfoveal neuroretinal detachment
SPCA Short posterior ciliary arteries
SPSS Statistical package for social sciences
SS-OCT Swept source optical coherence tomography
STZ Streptozotocin
T Temporal
T1D Type 1 diabetes
T2D Type 2 diabetes
VEGF Vascular endothelial growth factor
VEGF-A Vascular endothelial growth factor A
VEGFR1 Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1
VEGFR2 Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2
y years
List of figures
XIII
List of figures
Figure 1.1. Anatomy of the choroid: In this diagram the anatomy of the choroid is depicted
from the Bruch’s membrane outwards to the suprachoroid. Artwork, courtesy from Anália
do Carmo, MD, MsC, PhD.
Figure 1.2. Expression of rat endothelial cell antibody 1 (RECA-1, Abcam 9774) in the rat
choriocapillaris, viewed from the choroidal side, visualized by laser scanning confocal
microscope LSM 710 (Zeiss, Germany), magnification 200x. A. Network of capillaries in the
rat choroid and B. Inward view with hexagonal shaped RPE cells (thin arrow) and capillaries
derived from a Sattler’s pre-terminal artery (thick arrow) [12].
Figure 1.3. The choriocapillaris and choroidal feeding vessels. A. Scanning electron
micrograph of the choriocapillaris network from vascular casts. Choroidal arteries (A) and
veins (V) beneath the coriocapillaris network (adapted from from Risco and Nopanitaya
[58]). Reproduced with permission. B. Histology of the choriocapillaris. Each feeder arteriole
at the Sattler’s layer supplies a hexagonally-shaped area of capillaries (adapted from
Forrester et al. [57]). Reproduced with permission.
Figure 1.4. The choriocapillaris structure and fenestrations. A. Scanning electron
micrographs of the endothelial surface of the choriocapillaris with numerous and uniformly
arranged fenestrations at the RPE-facing side. Scale bar: 500 nm (adapted from
Shimomura et al [60]). Reproduced with permission. B. Posterior pole coriocapillaris viewed
from the retinal aspect. The inferior retinal vessels are still visible and further deep the
lobular arrangement of the coriocapillaris may be identified though difficult to distinguish.
Scale bar: 250 µm (adapted from Olver, J.M. [56]). Reproduced with permission.
Figure 1.5. The lobular structure of the choriocapillaris in man and in the rat. A. Scanning
electron micrograph of the choriocapillaris viewed from retinal aspect. Lobular pattern is
apparent. Terminal parts of venules are visible as dilated channels (large fan-shaped) in the
periphery of lobules, in the choriocapillaris plane (black asterisks). Terminal arteries are
difficult to be viewed in the center of lobules from the retinal aspect. Scale bar: 250 µm.
Adapted from Olver, J.M. [56]. Reproduced with permission. B. Rat choriocapillaris
immunollabed with RECA-1 viewed from retinal aspect by confocal microscopy. Pre-venular
dilated sinuses at the same plane of the choriocapillaris are visible (white asterisks), but a
clear lobular arrangement of the choriocapillaris is absent. Scale bar: 150 µm.
List of figures
XIV
Figure 1.6. Diagrammatic representation of choriocapillaris and its watershed zones. A,
choroidal arteriole; V, choroidal vein (adapted from Hayreh SS [65]). Reproduced with
permission.
Figure 1.7. Functional end-arterial model of the choroidal circulation. Red and gray vascular
channels represent perfused and non-perfused status, respectively: (a) When a terminal
arteriole is obstructed, the choriocapillaris lobule becomes ischemic because the blood is
drained through the venous channel in the periphery of the lobule; (b) A sector becomes
ischemic when the posterior ciliary artery is occluded, as there is no arteriolar anastomosis
among the other sectors; (c) When triolein embolus flows down to a small arteriole,
perfusion of the choriocapillaris is restored owing to the extensive arteriolar anastomosis
within the sector (adapted from Lee JE et al. [71]). Reproduced with permission.
Figure 1.8. Three-dimensional drawing of the space between photoreceptor outer
segments (rods) and cells of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Thick sheaths (a) of RPE
enclose external portions of rod outer segments without intercellular junctions of any sort
(b). RPE finger-like villous processes (c) are found between photoreceptors and contain
pigment granules (d). Apical portion of RPE layer of cells at bottom contains numerous
pigment granules (e); mitochondria (f); a well-developed, smooth-surfaced endoplasmic
reticulum (g); a poorly developed, rough-surfaced endoplasmic reticulum (h); and scattered
free ribosomes. Stacks of rod outer segment discs are depicted in longitudinal section (i)
and in cross section (j). Periphery of discs shows scalloping (k). Microtubules originating in
basal body of rod cilium extend externally into the outer segment (l) (adapted from Hogan
et al. [68]). Reproduced with permission.
Figure 1.9. Inter-individual variability in choroidal thickness (CT) evaluated by SD-
Spectralis OCT, horizontal scans encompassing the fovea. Eyes from two different patients,
same age and refractive error difference of 0.50 D, were collected. Both OCTs were
obtained during the morning. Measures of total CT were taken from the outer limit of the
RPE to the choroid-scleral junction (yellow line in the right panel and purple line in the left
panel). Note that variability in CT may be about two fold from one another.
Figure 1.10. The structure of the choroid, SD-Spectralis OCT (horizontal scan
encompassing the upper macular ETDRS grid area). White squares signal large choroidal
vessels, with diameter ≥ 100 μm, belonging to the Haller’s layer. Large vessels push the
choriocapillaris/Sattler’s complex layer upwards leaving thick fingertip-like areas of the
List of figures
XV
choriocapillaris/Sattler’s layer in-between (red arrows). Yellow arrows signal the ‘cone of
shadow’ from the large vessels of the choroid that may be a confounding factor when
determining the choroid-scleral junction.
Figure 1.11. Sketches of a primate eye showing position of fovea and macula and the
peripheral retina. A. Central region indicating diameters of the foveola (the foveal pit), fovea,
and macula. At the foveola there is displacement of ganglion cell layer (GCL) and inner
nuclear layer (INL) cells. B. Sketch of peripheral retina showing its major cell classes -
photoreceptors (PRs), horizontal cells (HCs), bipolar cells (BCs), amacrine cells (ACs),
retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and Müller glia (MG), outer and inner plexiform (synaptic)
layers (OPL and IPL), outer and inner nuclear layers (ONL and INL), and ganglion cell layer
(GCL), (adapted from Peng et al., 2019 [172]). Reproduced with permission.
Figure 1.12. Choroidal thickness collected by SD-OCT in the rat using the EDI technique.
On the left panel, inverted image of the retina (A) and choroid (C) separated by the bright
hyper-reflective line of the RPE (B). While the inner boundary of the choroid follows the
linear outline of the RPE, the outer boundary swings in and out according to the vascular
profile of the large vessels. On the right panel, image shows the position where the scan
was acquired.
Figure 1.13. Automatic determination of the choroid boundaries from the segmentation
software InSight (Phoenix Research Labs) with manual correction. On the left side image,
the green line marks the inner limits of the choroid, while the blue line marks its outer limits,
that is, the choroid-scleral border. Top right side image is the image of the fundus where
the scan was collected. Bottom right side image shows a green line of choroidal thickness
magnitude resulting from collection of the 1024 raster scans all along the raster scan length.
Figure 1.14. Terminal choroidal arterioles visualized by DiI (red) in a 16-week Wistar rat. A.
Arteriole dividing in pre-terminal arteries that originate the multiple lobular network of the
choriocapillaries. Scale bar: 100 µm. 10x Full size: x: 850.19 µm, y: 850.19 µm. B. Pre-
terminal artery giving rise to the choriocapillaris at a right angle after a short trajectory as
previously described in vascular casts [56, 61]. Scale bar: 50 µm. 20x Full size: x: 425.1
µm, y: 425.1 µm. C. The lobular pattern is not self-evident in the coriocapillaris. Instead, a
honeycomb-like pattern is depicted. Scale bar: 50 µm. 20x Full size: x: 425.10 µm, y: 425.10
µm.
Figure 1.15. Composed visualization of the whole choroid in 16-week Wistar rat by DiI. The
List of figures
XVI
vascular profile exhibited is arterial-type with absence of the collecting vortex veins. A.
Orientation of the choroid: S = superior, N = nasal, I = inferior, T = temporal. B. Display of
the whole choroidal circulation resulting from gathering all orientated flat mounts. The
choroidal circulation is arterial end-terminal with pre-terminal arterial-arterial anastomoses,
branching in a bronchiolar pattern. C. Detail shows that anastomosis are frequent before
the emergence of the pre-terminal arteries (white arrows). Scale bar: A; 2mm, B; 1 mm and
C; 0.2 mm.
Figure 1.16. Pericytes and perivascular mural cells in the choriocapillaris and middle
choroid of a 16-week Wistar rat show distint morphology distribution. A. Perivascular mural
cells immunostained by desmin wrap around choroidal vessels, while they assume a linear
or stellate configuration at the choriocapillaris, corresponding to the scanty non-
circumferential distribution of pericytes (yellow arrows). B. Linear immunomarking of
pericytes by desmin near the hexagonal RPE cells’ plane (yellow thick arrows) show a
scanty non-circumferential distribution. C. Distinct morphology of mural cells
immunomarked by desmin wrapping around choroidal vessels while pericytes show a linear
morphology and scanty non-circumferential distribution at the choriocapillaris level (yellow
thick arrow). Scale bar: 50 µm. 10x Full size: x: 850.19 µm, y: 850.19 µm.
Figure 1.17. Cellular components of the inner blood-retinal barrier. Schematic
representation of the neuro-glio-vascular unit forming the inner blood-retinal barrier,
composed by vascular endothelial cells, pericytes (p), retinal Müller glial (RMG) cells,
astrocytes (a), microglia (mc). RMG cell projections are present at the level of all retinal
vascular plexuses (superficial, SCP; intermediate, ICP and deep, DCP), while astrocytes
are only present at the level of the superficial plexus. Adapted from Daruich et al. 2019
[188]. Reproduced with permission.
Figure 1.18. Presence of glial cells around vessels in the retina and in the choroid. A.
Retinal projection showing vessels RECA1+ (green) and Iba+ cells/microglia (red) mostly in
vessels’ vicinity. B. Choroid single confocal plane visualized from the RPE side, showing
choroidal medium-sized and large vessels surrounded by Iba+ cells (white arrows). Laser
scanning microscope LSM 710 (Zeiss), objective lens: 20x, numerical aperture 0.8,
magnification 200x. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 2.1. Choroidal thickness manually measured in the central 3500-μm area
underneath the RPE line, subfoveal (SFCT) and at 1750 μm nasal (CT1750n) and temporal
(CT1750t) from the center, in the plane defined by the horizontal line scan encompassing
List of figures
XVII
the fovea (Image J software, version 1.48, National Institutes of Health, USA). A similar
procedure was done in the plane defined by the vertical line encompassing the fovea to
obtain the superior (CT1750s) and inferior (CT1750i) choroidal thicknesses.
Figure 2.2. Evolution of mean central retinal thickness (CRT), mean subfoveal choroidal
thickness (SFCT), and mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) scored in ETDRS letters
collected from ETDRS charts with time in eyes with DME under anti-VEGF treatment. Note
that the evolution of the SFCT curve does not have the same profile as those of the CRT
and BCVA. Until 6M when the stratification by outcome was done, the slopes of the BCVA
curve and that of the CRT curve are also different, expressing a poor correlation between
anatomic and functional outcome as depicted in Tables 2.2 and 2.3.
Figure 2.3. Example on how variability in SFCT may introduce bias when dealing with small
samples: Scatterplot depicting the negative weak correlation between age and baseline
SFCT (μm), r = −0.328, p < 0.001. Though a wide inter-individual variability can be
observed, the average decrease of SFCT per decade was seen to be 25.45 μm.
Figure 2.4. Radar chart displaying the percentage of participants with decrease in the CT
parameters at different time points. SFCT subfoveal choroidal thickness (dotted black line);
CT temp choroidal thickness 1750 μm temporal to the fovea, in the plane defined by the
horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea (orange line); CT nasal same as the previous
but 1750 μm nasal to the fovea (purple line); CT sup choroidal thickness 1750 μm superior
to the fovea, in the plane defined by the vertical line scan encompassing the fovea (red
line); CT inf same as previous but 1750 μm inferior to the fovea (green line); CT area area
of choroidal thickness from 1750 μm nasal to 1750 μm temporal to the fovea, in the plane
defined by the horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea (blue line) (Image J software,
version 1.48, National Institutes of Health, USA). 3M = 3-month endpoint, 6M = 6-month
endpoint, 12M = 12- month endpoint, 18M = 18-month endpoint, 24M = 24-month endpoint.
Figure 2.5. ROC curve analysis comparing the decrease in SFCT from baseline to 3M with
a ≥ 5 L gain at EM (early functional response). Dif T0_T1 is the difference between mean
baseline SFCT and mean 3M SFCT; Sig is the P value. The Area (area under the curve,
AUC) of 0.529 means that the change in baseline SFCT at 3M does not predict visual gain.
Figure 2.6. Boxplot or figure of extremes and quartiles of the difference found in SFCT from
baseline to 3M in functional responders at 3M (gain of 5 L or more) and non-responders.
T0-T1 is the difference between baseline SFCT and 3M SFCT; NR + LR is the group of
List of figures
XVIII
non-responders at 3M (non-responders at 6M and late functional responders); ER is the
group of responders at 3M (early functional responders). The distribution of the Baseline -
3M SFCT of either group mostly overlaps, meaning that the decrease in the SFCT at 3M is
not a useful tool to mark functional gain.
Supplementary Figure 2.1. Descriptive values during follow-up for mean best corrected
visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and choroidal thickness. CRT = 1 mm
central retinal thickness; SFCT= subfoveal choroidal thickness; CT = choroidal thickness
measured at 1750 µm, nasal (CT1750n) and temporal (CT1750t) from the fovea in the plane
defined by the horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea; superior (CT1750s) and inferior
(CT1750i) from the fovea in the plane defined by the vertical line scan encompassing the
fovea; CT3500 µm (area) = choroidal thickness area underneath the fovea measured from
1750 µm nasal to 1750 µm temporal from the central fovea in the plane defined by the
horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea. 3M = 3 months, after the 3 injection loading
dose; 6M = 6 months; 12M = 12 months; 18M = 18 months; 24M = 24 months. All the
measures were performed at baseline (black bar), 3M (red bar), 6M (green bar), 12M (blue
bar), 18M (purple bar) and 24M (grey bar) after baseline. All measures were performed by
two independent graders and subsequently reached by consensus. Results related to areas
were analysed using the ImageJ software, version 1.48, National Institutes of Health, USA.
Results are presented as mean ± SD.
Supplementary Figure 2.2. Differences in the variables considered between each endpoint
and baseline in the laser-naives (white bars) and in the laser-treated subgroups (black
bars). Comparison between the differences exhibited in either group. CRT = 1 mm central
retinal thickness; SFCT= subfoveal choroidal thickness; CT = choroidal thickness measured
at 1750 µm, nasal (CT1750n) and temporal (CT1750t) from the fovea, in the plane defined
by the horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea; superior (CT1750s) and inferior
(CT1750i) from the fovea in the plane defined by the vertical line scan encompassing the
fovea; CT3500 µm (area) = choroidal thickness area underneath the fovea manually
measured from 1750 µm nasal to 1750 µm temporal from the central fovea in the plane
defined by the horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea (ImageJ software, version 1.48,
National Institutes of Health, USA). BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; 3M = 3 months,
after the 3 injection loading dose; 6M = 6 months; 12M = 12 months; 18M = 18 months;
24M = 24 months. Results are presented as mean ± SD. * p<0.05, correspond to
comparisons between the laser-naives and in the laser-treated groups and were obtained
using independent samples t-Student or Mann-Whitney tests.
List of figures
XIX
Figure 3.1. Re-rating the ellipsoid zone (EZ) after 3 injections of anti-VEGF. ETDRS grid
from the caliper tool set in place centered at the fovea. A. Horizontal scan, 500 μm each
side of the fovea to evaluate the EZ. Note that laser dots are outside the 1500 μm radius
(second circle of the ETDRS grid has a radius of 1750 μm) from the center of the foveola.
B. ETDRS grid set in place centered at the foveola. Vertical scan, 500 μm each side of the
fovea to evaluate the EZ.
Figure 3.2. Examples of the difficulties in rating the ellipsoid zone (EZ) at baseline and after
the 3-monthly injection of anti-VEGF. A. A small subfoveal neuroretinal detachment and in
the shadowing cone effect of a retinal cyst makes the rating of the EZ difficult. In this case
the EZ was rated as ‘disrupted’ by consensus. B. The EZ seems to be disrupted with an
intact external limiting membrane (ELM). C. and D. Eyes shown in A and B after the loading
dose. The EZ is now clearly visible, rated as ‘intact’ by both graders. E. EZ after the loading
dose being rated as ‘disrupted’.
Supplementary Figure 3.1. ETDRS grid in place centered at the fovea. Note that ETDRS
grid plotted (7.2 mm in diameter) is larger than the OCT-modified ETDRS grid (6 mm in
diameter) plotted to access central retinal thickness CRT. A. and B. HR horizontal scans
used to measure the SFCT. ETDRS grid inner circle is 1200 μm (a) and middle circle is
3600 μm wide (b). C. HR vertical scan with SFCT measured underneath the fovea.
Figure 4.1. Effect of Type 1 diabetes on the choroidal thickness. (A) Representative OCT
images of the retina and choroid of control and diabetic rats, at the beginning of the study
(baseline) and at 8 weeks after diabetes onset. Scale bar: 50 µm. (B) Choroidal thickness
of control and diabetic rats, at the baseline and 8 weeks after diabetes onset, based on in
vivo OCT line scans. Bars represent mean ± SEM (control rats, n = 12; diabetic rats, n =
16). (C) Vascular density analysis at the inner (≤10 µm from the outer RPE plane) and
middle + outer choroid (>10 µm from the outer RPE plane) in control and diabetic rats
assessed in sclerochoroidal wholemounts, at 8 weeks after diabetes onset, based on Dil
labelling of choroidal vessels. Bars represent mean ± SEM (control animals, n = 5; diabetic
animals, n = 7).
GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer
nuclear layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
Figure 4.2. Effect of T1D on the localization of mural and endothelial cells in the choroid
and retina. Representative images showing the immunolabelling pattern of (A) NG2 and (B)
RECA-1 in the choroid and retina of control and diabetic rats, 8 weeks after diabetes onset
List of figures
XX
(control animals, n = 7; diabetic animals, n = 9). Polarization in the disposition mural cells
is highlighted (white arrows). Scale bar: 100 µm.
GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer
nuclear layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
Figure 4.3. Effect of early T1D on the immunoreactivity of VEGF and VEGFR2 in the
choroid and retina. Representative images showing the immunoreactivity of (A) VEGF and
(B) VEGFR2 in the choroid and retina of control and diabetic rats, at 8 weeks after diabetes
onset. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) VEGF and VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in eye cryosections
based on 12 independent specimen counts per eye. VEGF and VEGFR2 immunoreactivity
was quantified as fluorescence intensity/area per layer. Counting was done for the right eye
only, in all animals. Bars represent mean ± SEM (control animals, n = 7; diabetic animals,
n = 9). Significance: *p < 0.05.
GCL + RNFL: ganglion cell layer and retinal nerve fibre layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer;
INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer; OLM: outer
limiting membrane; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
Figure 4.4. Co-localization of the immunoreactivity of vimentin and VEGF in the retina.
Representative eye cross-sections of (A) control and (B) diabetic rats, at 8 weeks after
diabetes onset, immunolabelled against vimentin and VEGF. Scale bar: 100 µm.
GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer
nuclear layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
Figure 4.5. Effect of Type 1 diabetes on microglial cell counts and reactivity in the choroid
and retina. Representative images showing the immunoreactivity of (A) Iba1+ and (B) MHC
class II+ cells in the choroid and retina of control and diabetic rats, at 8 weeks after diabetes
onset. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) Iba1+ cell counts in the retina, and (D) Iba1+ and MHC class
II+ cell counts in the choroid, collected from immunolabelling of eye cross-sections. Bars
represent mean ± SEM (control animals, n = 7; diabetic animals, n = 9). (E) Iba1+ and MHC
class II+ cells density in the choroid collected from sclerochoroidal wholemounts. Bars
represent mean ± SEM (control animals, n = 5; diabetic animals, n = 7). Significance: *p <
0.05; **p < 0.01.
MHC class II: major histocompatibility complex class II; IPL: inner plexiform layer; INL:
inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer.
Supplementary Figure 4.1. SD-OCT scan acquisition for choroidal thickness evaluation.
(A) Linear scans (blue line) were acquired above the optic nerve head (ONH), in the area
List of figures
XXI
within 1 to 3 ONH diameter from the optic disc. (B) Segmentation lines were manually drawn
at the inner (retinal pigment epithelium, RPE; green line) and outer (choroidal-scleral border;
yellow line) boundaries of the choroid. Scale bar: 50 µm.
GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer
nuclear layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
Supplementary Figure 4.2. Quantification of Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cells in
sclerochoroidal whole mounts (n = 5 controls; n = 7 diabetics). (A) Iba1+ cells were counted
in all depth planes of the choroid. (B) MHC class II+ cells marked using yellow dots to avoid
duplicate counting. Scale bar: 100 µm.
Supplementary Figure 4.3. Quantification of the vascular density in sclerochoroidal
wholemounts (defined as the percentage of total area covered by choriocapillaris vessels)
using the ‘image>adjust>threshold’ window tool of ImageJ to obtain the percentage of
vascular coverage (n = 5 controls; n = 7 diabetics). (A) at the inner choroid/choriocapillaris
(z-stacks collected at ≤10 µm from the posterior RPE cell plane), and (B) at middle and
outer choroid/medium and large vessels (z-stacks collected at >10 µm from the posterior
RPE cell plane). Scale bar: 50 µm.
Supplementary Figure 4.4. Body weight and glycaemia values of animals, since diabetes
onset. (A) At diabetes onset (0 weeks), both control (254.9 ± 7.5 g) and diabetic (267.8 ±
7.0 g) groups did not differ significantly for body weight; at 8 weeks after diabetes onset,
control rats were significantly heavier (control: 398.7 ± 8.5 g vs diabetic: 266.7± 0.8 g). (B)
Glycaemia was significantly higher in the diabetic rats, at diabetes onset (control: 109.6 ±
3.4 g/dL vs diabetic: 502.3 ± 27.7 g/dL), and 8 weeks later (control: 100.0 ± 2.1 g/dL vs
diabetic: 537.8 ± 17.1 g/dL). HbA1c was significantly higher in diabetic rats, at 8 weeks after
diabetes onset (control: 6.2 ± 0.1% vs diabetic: 8.3 ± 0.3%, t(13)=4.486, p = 0.001). Bars
represent mean ± SEM (control animals, n = 12; diabetic animals, n = 16). Significance: ***p
< 0.001.
Supplementary Figure 4.5. Interconnecting vessels between retinal plexuses were
observed in eye cross-sections immunolabelled against RECA-1: superficial and middle
plexuses (white arrow); middle and deep plexuses (yellow arrow); deep and superficial
plexuses (red arrow). Scale bar: 100 µm.
GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer
nuclear layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
List of figures
XXII
Figure 5.1. Choroidal thickness (CT) of GK and age-matched control Wistar Han rats (52
W). (A) Images resulting from five frames averaged, collected as inverted images using
OCT raster scans obtained in 1024 continuous points, by approaching the device to the
zero delay line. Horizontal raster scan line encompasses an area within 1 to 3 disk
diameters from the optic nerve head. Choroidal layer obtained by automatic segmentation
was manually corrected. A mean of three independent scores obtained from 3 different
located sets “five frames averaged” were used as the CT value per eye per time-point. (B)
CT values from all eyes of GK (n = 36) and age-matched control (n = 26) rats. Data are
expressed as mean ± SEM. Scale bar: 100 µm. Significance: ***p < 0.001.
GCL = ganglion cell layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, ONL = outer nuclear layer, RPE =
retinal pigment epithelium.
Figure 5.2. Vascular and cell profiles of the choroid of GK and age-matched control Wistar
Han rats (52 W). (A) Representative images of vascular density in the inner choroid (≤ 10
µm). (B) Choroidal Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells. Ramified cells (green arrows) and round cells
(red arrows) were highlighted. (C) Quantification of the choroidal vascular density in the
inner and outer choroid using the ‘image>adjust>threshold’ window tool of ImageJ to obtain
the percentage of vascular coverage, obtained from z-stacks collected at ≤ 10 µm or > 10
µm from the outer RPE plane, respectively. (D) Iba1+ and MHC II+ cell number in the choroid
in all in-depth z-stacks. Images were collected with Zeiss EC Plan-Neofluor 40x oil objective
lens, NA 1.3. Quantitative analyses were performed based on 14 independent counts per
eye in each and all in-depth z-stacks per specimen. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n
= 8, control group; n = 10, GK group). Scale bar: 50 µm. Significance: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 5.3. Microglial cells in the retina and choroid of GK and age-matched control Wistar
Han rats (52 W). (A) Representative eye cross-sections immunolabelled against Iba1 (left
panels), MHC-II (middle panels) and merge (right panels). Iba1+ cells are located in the
superficial and plexiform layers of the retina, mainly. Iba1+ cells located in the OPL of the
GK cohort only (green arrows). In GK rats, Iba1+ cells migrate from the IPL to the OPL,
crossing the INL (red arrow). (B) Quantification of Iba1+ and MHC II+ cell density of GK (n =
8) and age-matched control (n = 5) rats based on 12 independent specimen counts per eye.
Counting was done for the right eye only, in all animals. Data are expressed as mean ±
SEM. Scale bar: 100 µm. Significance: **p < 0.01.
GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, OPL =
outer plexiform layer, ONL = outer nuclear layer, RPE = retinal pigment epithelium.
Figure 5.4. Localization of mural and endothelial cells in the retina and choroid of GK and
List of figures
XXIII
age-matched control Wistar Han rats (52 W). (A) Representative eye cross-sections
immunolabelled against RECA-1(left panels), NG2 (middle panels) and merge (right
panels). The 3 plexuses of the retina are evidenced by RECA-1 immunostaining (white
arrows). Communications between (i) the superficial and middle plexuses of the retina (red
arrow), (ii) the middle and deep plexuses and (iii) the deep and superficial plexuses (green
arrow), are visible. RECA-1 immunoreactivity relates to the presence of endothelial cells
and fluorescence of the choriocapillaris endothelial cells is continuous with the RPE cell
plane (left panels). Conversely, NG2 immunostaining of pericyte/mural cells leaves focal
gaps between the RPE and the inner choroid, drawing a jagged pattern, more pronounced
in GK rats (blue arrows). (B) Quantification of RECA-1 and NG2 immunoreactivity in the
retina and choroid of GK (n = 8) and age-matched control (n = 5) rats. RECA-1 and the
proteoglycan NG2/Cspg4 (NG2) immunoreactivities were scored as fluorescence intensity
per area selected in the choroid (reference area selected of 10,737.08 ± 6,306.11 µm2),
while NG2+ cells and RECA-1 focal immunostaining were manually counted in the retina.
Counting was done for the right eye only, in 12 independent specimen counts per eye. Data
are expressed as mean ± SEM. Scale bar: 100 µm.
GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, OPL =
outer plexiform layer, ONL = outer nuclear layer, RPE = retinal pigment epithelium.
Figure 5.5. Immunoreactivity of VEGF and VEGFR2 of GK and age-matched control Wistar
Han rats (52 W). (A) Representative eye cross-sections immunolabelled against VEGF (left
panels), VEGFR2 (middle panels) and merge (right panels). VEGF immunoreactivity
spreads throughout the retina, increasing in the OPL, OLM, RPE and choroid. VEGFR2
immunoreactivity is higher in the innermost retina (retinal nerve fiber layer) and very low or
absent in the RPE and choroid. VEGFR2 immunoreactivity is still visible as a faint coloration
in the retinal layers other than the retinal nerve fiber layer of GK rats only (white arrows).
(B) Quantification of the VEGF and VGFR2 immunoreactivity in the retina and choroid of
GK rats (n = 8) and age-matched controls (n = 5) based on 12 independent specimen counts
per eye. VEGF and VEGFR2 immunoreactivities were quantified as fluorescence
intensity/area per layer. Counting was done for the right eye only, in all animals. Data are
expressed as mean ± SEM. Scale bar: 100 µm. Significance: *p < 0.05.
GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, OPL =
outer plexiform layer, ONL = outer nuclear layer, OLM = outer limiting membrane, RPE =
retinal pigment epithelium.
Supplementary Figure 5.1. Iba1+ and MHC II+ cell count by ImageJ. (A) Iba1+ cells were
quantified in all-dept planes. (B) For each plane, MHC II+ cells were marked with yellow
List of figures
XXIV
dots to avoid duplication.
Supplementary Figure 5.2. Quantification of the choroidal vascular density in the inner
and outer choroid (defined as the percentage of total area covered by choriocapillaris
vessels) using the ‘image>adjust>threshold’ window tool of ImageJ to obtain the percentage
of vascular coverage. (A) z-stacks collected at ≤ 10 µm (choriocapillaris). (B) z-stacks
collected at > 10 µm from the outer RPE plane (medium and large vessels).
Supplementary Figure 5.3. Body weight and glycemia in GK and in age-matched control
Wistar Han rats (52 W).
List of tables
XXV
List of tables
Table 1.1. Choroidal thickness and diabetic retinopathy stage
Table 1.2. Changes in the choroidal thickness with treatment of diabetic retinopathy or
diabetic macular edema
Table 2.1. Differences in the variables considered between each endpoint and baseline
Table 2.2. Comparison of outcome measures between anatomic responders and non-
responders at baseline, 3M and 6M
Table 2.3. Stratification of the population by functional outcome
Supplementary Table 2.1. Demographic and ocular characteristics
Table 3.1. Demographic and ocular characteristics
Table 3.2. Comparison of OCT baseline characteristics and outcome measures between
functional responders and non-responders
Table 3.3. Results of the multivariate linear regression model obtained using twelve
predictors of the increase of BCVA from baseline as independent variables
Supplementary Table 3.1. Baseline values for BCVA, CRT and SFCT. Differences in
BCVA, CRT and SFCT between endpoints and baseline, and number of injections given
Supplementary Table 3.2. Comparison of outcome measures between anatomic
responders and non-responders at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Supplementary Table 3.3. Comparison of outcome measures between anatomic
responders and non-responders using a cut-off for CRT of 350 μm
Supplementary Table 3.4. Demographic characteristics of functional responders and non-
responders
List of tables
XXVI
Supplementary Table 3.5. Logistic regression model using all predictors of BCVA increase
as independent variables entering the interaction between duration of diabetes and laser
treatment
Supplementary Table 4.1. Primary antibodies
Supplementary Table 4.2. Secondary antibodies
SupplementaryTable 4.3. Choroidal vascular density
Supplementary Table 4.4. NG2 and RECA-1 immunoreactivity in the retina and choroid
Supplementary Table 4.5. VEGF and VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in the retina and choroid
Supplementary Table 4.6. Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cell counts in the retina and choroid
based on immunolabelling of eye cryosections
Supplementary Table 4.7. Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cells density in the choroid based on
immunolabelling of sclerochoroidal whole mounts, after labelling of choroidal blood vessels
by cardiac perfusion with DiI
Supplementary Table 5.1. Primary antibodies
Supplementary Table 5.2. Secondary antibodies
Supplementary Table 5.3. Choroidal vascular density
Supplementary Table 5.4. Quantification of Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells in whole mounts of the
choroid
Supplementary Table 5.5. Quantification of Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells in cryosections of the
retina and choroid.
Supplementary Table 5.6. NG2 and RECA-1 immunoreactivity in cryosections of the retina
and choroid
Supplementary Table 5.7. VEGF and VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in cryosections of the
retina and choroid
List of videos
XXVII
List of supplementary videos
Video 4.1. Sequenced images showing the localization of Iba1+ cells (green) sparing the
innermost choroid outwards the RPE cell plane of a control rat, aged 16 weeks, at 8 weeks
after diabetes onset in diabetic rats. Slice thickness: 14.8 μm. AC and JM authored the
video: 18’’; 9,982 KB.
Video 4.2. Sequenced images showing the localization of Iba1+ cells (green) outwards the
inner choroidal vascular network (red) in a control rat aged 16 weeks, at 8 weeks after
diabetes onset in diabetic rats. Slice thickness: 23.1 μm. AC and JM authored the video:
20’’; 10,925 KB.
Video 4.3. Sequenced images showing the localization of Iba1+ cells (green) outwards the
inner choroidal vascular network perfused using DiI (red) in a diabetic rat, at 8 weeks after
diabetes onset. Slice thickness: 23.1 μm. AC and JM authored the video: 13’’; 7,188 KB.
Video 4.4. Sequenced images in the same location as in video 4.3, showing the localization
of MHC class II+ cells (purple) outwards the choriocapillaris perfused by DiI (red) in a
diabetic rat, at 8 weeks after diabetes onset. Slice thickness: 23.1 μm. AC and JM authored
the video: 14’’; 7,433 KB.
Video 4.5. Sequenced images in the same location as in videos 4.3 and 4.4, showing the
co-localization of Iba1+ cells (green) and MHC class II+ cells (purple) outwards the inner
choroidal vascular network perfused using DiI (red) in a diabetic rat, at 8 weeks after
diabetes onset. Slice thickness: 23.1 μm. AC and JM authored the video: 13’’; 7,107 KB.
Video 5.1. Sequenced images showing the localization of Iba1+ cells (green) sparing the
innermost choroid (red) outwards the RPE cell plane of a 52-week-old GK rat. Slice
thickness: 27.2 μm. AC and JM authored the video: 11’’; 40,221 KB.
Video 5.2. Sequenced images in the same location as in video 5.1, showing the localization
of MHC class II+ cells (cyan) outwards the choriocapillaris perfused by DiI (red) in a 52-
week-old GK rat. Slice thickness: 23.8 μm. AC and JM authored the video: 10’’; 25,306 KB.
Video 5.3. Sequenced images in the same location as in videos 5.1 and 5.2, showing the
co-localization of Iba1+ cells (green) and MHC II+ cells (cyan) outwards the choriocapillaris
List of videos
XXVIII
perfused by DiI (red) in a 52-week-old GK rat. Slice thickness: 30.6 μm. AC and JM authored
the video: 17’’; 30,465 KB.
Video 5.4. Sequenced images showing the localization of Iba1+ cells (green) outwards the
choriocapillaris (red) in a 52-week-old control Wistar Han rat. Slice thickness: 48 μm. AC
and JM authored the video: 16’’; 51,062 KB.
Video 5.5. Sequenced images showing the localization of MHC II+ cells (cyan) outwards
the inner choroidal vascular network perfused by DiI (red) in a 52-week-old control Wistar
Han rat. Slice thickness: 45 μm. AC and JM authored the video: 16’’; 49,140 KB.
Video 5.6. Sequenced images in the same location as in videos 5.4 and 5.5, showing the
co-localization of Iba1+ cells (green) and MHC II+ cells (cyan) outwards the choriocapillaris
perfused by DiI (red) in a 52-week-old control Wistar Han rat. Slice thickness: 45 μm. AC
and JM authored the video: 16’’; 63,560 KB.
Suplementary videos available at:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YWm9HQ8ijOKu0XWj6bytF7TpG7Lp_FDo?usp=s
haring
Thesis outline
XXIX
Thesis outline
This thesis is divided in six sections, defined by numerals, and conclusions.
The first section includes a general introduction to the thesis, covering fundamental
aspects of the anatomy and physiology of the human choroid, the role of the choroidal
thickness in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema, the use of OCT in rats, the
vascular profile of the choroid in the rat model, and the description molecular and cellular
signatures in the retina and choroid of the diabetic rat.
The research purpose, which states for the motivation and scope of the thesis,
concludes this section.
The second and third sections gather the data from clinical investigation. They
include two published clinical prospective studies about the role of the baseline choroidal
thickness as a prognostic factor for diabetic macular edema (section 2) and the search for
prognostic factors of anatomic or functional outcomes in diabetic macular edema (section
3).
The fourth and fifth sections are experimental. The vascular density of the
choriocapillaris and remaining choroid, the presence of Iba+ and MHC II+ cells, alteration of
pericytes and expression of VEGF and VEGFR2 in the choroid and retina of Type 1
streptozotocin-induced 16 weeks-old diabetic rats (section 4) and of 52 weeks-old Type 2
Goto-Kakizaki diabetic rats (section 5) are considered.
The sixth section includes an integrated conclusion arising from the main results and
presents an outlook into possible future directions in this field of research.
The thesis ends with bullet-point conclusions.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
1
1. Introduction1
1 The first part of section 1 is based on the article: Campos et al. Viewing the choroid: where we stand,
challenges and contradictions in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;
95:446-459.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
2
1.1. Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema
Diabetes mellitus (DM) has become one of the most dramatic challenges worldwide
[1]. Sedentary life, lack of exercise and overweight, are risk factors for diabetes and its
complications, including diabetic retinopathy (DR). The prevalence of Type 1 diabetes (T1D)
in the U.S. is 0.55% whereas that of Type 2 (T2D) is 8.6% (T2D encloses 94% of all
diabetics) [2]. In developed countries, DR is the leading cause of blindness in the active
population [3] and it became a burden on healthcare facilities [4, 5]. The overall prevalence
of DR is 35% and the 5-year cumulative incidence of DR for diabetics with no DR at baseline
ranges from 4% in T2D to 50% in T1D [6]. There are not many available studies assessing
the incidence of DR, but in a recent review the annual incidence of DR ranged from 2.2%
to 12.7% and the annual progression from 3.4% to 12.3% [7]. Progression is faster and
severity worse in T1D [6, 8, 9].
Progression of DR causes microvascular damage leading to increased permeability,
retinal ischemia, macular edema and neovascularization [8, 10]. Since DR may lead to loss
of vision, it is extremely important to evaluate the stage of DR in order to establish an
adequate follow-up and therapy [11]. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the leading cause
of visual loss in patients with DR [12]. The prevalence of DME increases from 0% to 3% in
individuals recently diagnosed up to 28%-29% in those with diabetes duration of over 20
years [13]. In a UK diabetic population an overall prevalence of DME has been estimated
as 13.9% [14].
The breakdown of the inner blood–retinal barrier (BRB) is believed to be the initial
event in the development of DR [15]. However, experimental studies demonstrated that the
BRB breakdown occurs at both the inner and outer BRB [16]. Inner and outer BRB
disruption leads to the accumulation of fluid, exudation and hemorrhages, thickening of the
macular region, resulting in DME [15].
DM is a complex metabolic disorder, characterized by chronic hyperglycemia along
with dyslipidemia, hypoinsulinemia and hypertension. For a long time, DR was considered
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
3
to be a pure microvascular complication, but the retinal microvasculature is intimately
associated with and governed by local neurons and glia, which may be affected prior to
clinically detectable vascular lesions. DR and its complications are commonly treated with
anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents [17, 18] and the greater focus has
been put on the role of VEGF on the pathogenesis of DR [19-21]. In fact, retinal hypoxemia
has been also related to the pathogenesis of DR [22, 23]. VEGF-driven BRB breakdown at
the venule side of the superficial retinal vasculature has been pointed as the earliest event
in DR [19] and it was related to pericyte loss and hypoxemia [23]. Nevertheless, retinal
hypoxemia was reported to be absent in the early stages of diabetes in rats [24]. Actually,
VEGF is not increased in the vitreous of all patients with DME while pro-inflammatory
markers were found to be increased [25]. Accordingly, about one third of patients with DME
fail to respond to anti-VEGF therapy [26, 27]. Furthermore, steroids proved to be effective
in treating post-surgical cystoid macular edema and DME [28, 29]. Those facts pointed DR
to be an inflammatory condition and that was confirmed experimentally [30-32].
Inflammation is a key player in DR [31], either in T1D or T2D [33, 34]. Retinal neuropathy
with evidence of neural apoptosis associated with DM has been reported [35, 36].
Mitochondrial superoxide production in response to hyperglycemia, rather than
hypoxemia, may be the first event to dislodge pericytes from the capillary wall. The retinal
resident innate immune system, which is primarily composed of tissue-resident
macrophage-like microglial cells, become activated and start to produce pro-inflammatory
mediators [32]. Overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leads to the increased
formation of advanced glycated end-products (AGEs), activation of protein kinase C, aldose
reductase, and nuclear factor kB, leading to pericyte loss, exposure of endothelial junction
proteins to VEGF, BRB breakdown and diabetic microangiopathies [37]. Despite the
alterations in the BRB are believed to be the main responsible for the development of DR
and DME, several studies indicate the choroid as an important player in the pathophysiology
of DR and DME, since the choroid nourishes the macula and the outer one third of the retina
[38-40]. The perspective of DR as inflammatory disease brought new attention on previous
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
4
Medium-size vessel layer
works describing choroidal inflammatory alterations in diabetes, named as ‘diabetic
choroidopathy’, including Brüch’s membrane deposits and increased thickness, and
choriocapillaris dropout [39, 41, 42]. Since the advent of optical coherence tomography
(OCT) [43], the choroidal thickness (CT) [44] has been sought as a surrogate of choroidal
flux, diabetic choroidopathy or DR, but the results are conflicting and disappointing to some
extent [45-49].
1.2. Anatomy and physiology of the choroid
The choroid is a highly vascularized and pigmented structure localized between the
lamina fusca of the sclera and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), extending anteriorly
from the ora serrata to the optic nerve posteriorly. The choroid is composed of the
choriocapillaris, the basal membrane of which forms the outer part of the 5-laminar structure
of Bruch’s membrane, the middle layer of medium-sized vessels (Sattler’s layer), the outer
layer of large vessels (Haller’s layer) originating from the short posterior ciliary arteries
(SPCA), and the suprachoroid, limited externally by the lamina fusca (Figure 1.1).
Figure 1.1. Anatomy of the choroid: In this diagram the anatomy of the choroid is depicted from the
Bruch’s membrane outwards to the suprachoroid. Artwork, courtesy from Anália do Carmo, MD,
MsC, PhD.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
5
The medium-sized arteries of the Sattler’s layer give rise to the patch-like structure
of the choriocapillaris (Figure 1.2 A and B) [50].
From the Sattler’s layer, at the level of the outer choriocapillaris, there are columns
of collagen fibres running between the capillaries and attaching to the outer fibrous layer of
the Bruch’s membrane probably supporting the capillaries network [51]. The Bruch’s
membrane is a five layered structure comprehending the basement membrane of the
choriocapillaris, an outer collagenous zone, an elastic layer, an inner collagenous zone, and
the basement membrane of the RPE [52].
Figure 1.2. Expression of rat endothelial cell antibody 1 (RECA-1, Abcam 9774) in the rat
choriocapillaris, viewed from the choroidal side, visualized by laser scanning confocal microscope
LSM 710 (Zeiss, Germany), magnification 200x. A. Network of capillaries in the rat choroid and B.
Inward view with hexagonal shaped RPE cells (thin arrow) and capillaries derived from a Sattler’s
pre-terminal artery (thick arrow) [12].
The Bruch´s membrane is structurally analogous to the renal glomerulus, with a
vascular intima, a subendothelial extracellular matrix and an elastic layer equivalent to the
internal elastic layer of blood vessels. Thus, it possesses a basal membrane in its abluminal
surface (RPE’s basal membrane, a parallel to Bowman’s capsule visceral layer) and a
fenestrated vascular endothelium with its own luminal basal lamina. As in the glomerulus,
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
6
transport and filtration are the most important functions of Bruch’s membrane [53]. The
suprachoroid lies between the choroid and the sclera, containing fibroblasts, collagen fibres
and melanocytes. The suprachoroid has large endothelial-lined spaces receiving fluid via
the uveoscleral route and from the remaining choroid due to an oncotic gradient, and
emptying into veins [54]. The 30 μm thick outmost layer of the suprachoroid is the lamina
fusca, consisting of several layers of melanocytes and fibroblast-like cells disposed in
plates, with bundles of myelinated axons [38].
Earlier experiences in guinea pigs, rats and post-mortem examinations of newborn
infants, using Indian ink perfusions and occlusion of the short posterior ciliary arteries,
showed they behave as terminal arteries, despite the existence of numerous anastomoses
revealed by pathology studies [55]. Therefore, the choriocapillaris is not an anastomotic
network but works as a group of independent lobular units. Actually, the choriocapillaris is
a single-layered network of fine fenestrated channels about 10-20 μm thick at the fovea,
thinning to about 8 μm at the periphery [56], arranged in a lobular hexagonal pattern (Figure
1.3 A and B) [57].
Figure 1.3. The choriocapillaris and choroidal feeding vessels. A. Scanning electron micrograph of
the choriocapillaris network from vascular casts. Choroidal arteries (A) and veins (V) beneath the
coriocapillaris network (adapted from from Risco and Nopanitaya [58]). Reproduced with permission.
B. Histology of the choriocapillaris. Each feeder arteriole at the Sattler’s layer supplies a hexagonally-
shaped area of capillaries (adapted from Forrester et al. [57]). Reproduced with permission.
A B
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
7
The pores of those capillaries are mainly facing the RPE and are permeable to
proteins, originating a high oncotic pressure in the stroma, directing the movement of fluids
out of the retina into the choroid (Figure 1.4 A) [56, 59-61].
Nowadays, the structure of the choroidal lobules, along with arterial-arterial and
venular-venular anastomoses, and blood flowing in the same direction in arteries and veins
has been confirmed by vascular casting studies (Figure 1.4 B) [56, 62].
Figure 1.4. The choriocapillaris structure and fenestrations. A. Scanning electron micrographs of the
endothelial surface of the choriocapillaris with numerous and uniformly arranged fenestrations at the
RPE-facing side. Scale bar: 500 nm (adapted from Shimomura et al [60]). Reproduced with
permission. B. Posterior pole coriocapillaris viewed from the retinal aspect. The inferior retinal
vessels are still visible and further deep the lobular arrangement of the coriocapillaris may be
identified though difficult to distinguish. Scale bar: 250 µm (adapted from Olver, J.M. [56]).
Reproduced with permission.
The position of the artery at the periphery [55, 63, 64] or at the center of the lobule
[61, 65] was disputed. Vascular cast studies in man evidenced a lobular arrangement of the
choriocapillaris with pre-venular sinuses at the same plane of the choriocapillaris (Figure
1.5 A), while central arteries were not visible from the retinal aspect, but only from its
choroidal aspect [56, 62]. Pre-venular sinuses at the plane of the choriocapillaris are
present, but the lobular structure of the choriocapillaris is not well defined in the rat (Figure
1.5 B) [66].
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
8
Angiographic studies in humans and monkeys made by Hayreh, confirmed that the
SPCAs and their branches, as well as the vortex veins, have a segmental distribution in the
choroid, and that the choroidal arteries are, in fact, end-arteries. Each piece of the jig-saw
pattern has a well-defined margin which forms the watershed zone between the adjacent
SPCAs [65].
Figure 1.5. The lobular structure of the choriocapillaris in man and in the rat. A. Scanning electron
micrograph of the choriocapillaris viewed from the retinal aspect. The lobular pattern is evidenced.
Terminal parts of venules are visible as dilated channels (large fan-shaped) in the periphery of
lobules, in the choriocapillaris plane (black asterisks). Terminal arteries are difficult to be viewed in
the center of lobules from the retinal aspect. Scale bar: 250 µm. Adapted from Olver, J.M. [56].
Reproduced with permission. B. Rat choriocapillaris immunollabed with RECA-1 viewed from retinal
aspect by confocal microscopy. Pre-venular dilated sinuses at the same plane of the choriocapillaris
are visible (white asterisks), but a clear lobular arrangement of the choriocapillaris is absent. Scale
bar: 150 µm.
A watershed zone is the border between the territories of distribution of any two end-
arteries. The significance of the watershed zones is that in the event of a decrease in the
perfusion pressure in the vascular bed of one or more of the end arteries, the watershed
zone, being an area of comparatively poor vascularity, is most vulnerable to ischemia [67].
These studies also evidenced that the location of the arteriole in the choroidal lobules was
at the center, while the venules were located at the periphery (Figure 1.6).
A
*
* *
*
B
*
*
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
9
Figure 1.6. Diagrammatic representation of choriocapillaris and its watershed zones. A, choroidal
arteriole; V, choroidal vein (adapted from Hayreh SS [65]). Reproduced with permission.
However, conflicting results remain as to whether the choroidal circulation is of end-
arterial nature, echoing from the early days. In the choroid, as stated by Hogan et al.,
'extensive anastomoses exist between the various branches of all the short ciliary arteries,
so that occlusion of one vessel ordinarily does not produce infarction of the choroid' [68].
Conversely, Duke-Elder commented in 1961, that 'the tendency for inflammatory and
degenerative diseases of the choroid to show a considerable degree of selective
localization, despite the fact that anatomically the vessels would appear to form a
continuous network, has given rise to speculations regarding the anatomical isolation of
specific choroidal areas' [69].
Angiographic studies support the end-arterial theory [70], while post-mortem studies
revealed that the choroidal circulation has multiple anastomosis at various levels [62]. An
end-arterial functional model was proposed after experiments in cats, reconciling the post-
mortem and the angiographic findings, featuring the choroid as composed of multiple
sectors, with the presence of anastomoses within sector, but with the continuous
coriocapillaris bed being end-arterial in nature and the drainage towards the collecting
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
10
venules for each lobule preventing blood from crossing the boundaries among lobules
(Figure 1.7) [61, 71].
Figure 1.7. Functional end-arterial model of the choroidal circulation. Red and gray vascular
channels represent perfused and non-perfused status, respectively: (a) When a terminal arteriole is
obstructed, the choriocapillaris lobule becomes ischemic because the blood is drained through the
venous channel in the periphery of the lobule; (b) A sector becomes ischemic when the posterior
ciliary artery is occluded, as there is no arteriolar anastomosis among the other sectors; (c) When
triolein embolus flows down to a small arteriole, perfusion of the choriocapillaris is restored owing to
the extensive arteriolar anastomosis within the sector (from Lee JE et al. [71]). Reproduced with
permission.
The RPE is so intimately related with the choroid and choriocapillaris under
homeostasis and disease that photoreceptors (PRs), RPE, Brüch’s membrane and
choriocapillaris, may be considered as the tapetoretinal unit [72]. The choriocapillaris
originates from the mesenchyme but needs to be in contact with the developing RPE,
derived from the neural crest, in order to differentiate [73]. It is the VEGF secreted by the
RPE that promotes the coriocapillaris fenestrations, essential for the nourishment of the
RPE and outer retina, including the macula. The embryonic retina releases retinoic acid
which in turn promotes the RPE differentiation. The tyrosinase promoter elaborated from
PRs contributes to melanogenesis within the RPE cells which is crucial for RPE maturation.
The 11-cis-retinal elaborated by the RPE is crucial for the PRs outer segment growing.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
11
Primordial PRs start to extend their outer segments and the RPE responds by elongating
its apical microvilli into the subretinal space [74]. The connection between the retina and
the RPE at the level of the outer segments of the PRs and of the microvilli of the RPE is not
mediated by any type of intercellular junctions, but only by metabolic, oncotic, hydrostatic
and electrostatic gradients (Figure 1.8).
The homeostasis and nourishment of the RPE and outer retina is intimately under
choroidal mediation as demonstrated by the age-related choroidal atrophy that goes along
with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [75]. Histopathologic comparisons of eyes
with early AMD to age-matched controls have shown correlations between choriocapillaris
loss and drusen density [76].
Figure 1.8. Three-dimensional drawing
of the space between photoreceptor
outer segments (rods) and cells of the
retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Thick
sheaths (a) of RPE enclose external
portions of rod outer segments without
intercellular junctions of any sort (b).
RPE finger-like villous processes (c) are
found between photoreceptors and
contain pigment granules (d). Apical
portion of RPE layer of cells at bottom
contains numerous pigment granules
(e); mitochondria (f); a well-developed,
smooth-surfaced endoplasmic reticulum
(g); a poorly developed, rough-surfaced
endoplasmic reticulum (h); and scattered
free ribosomes. Stacks of rod outer
segment discs are depicted in
longitudinal section (i) and in cross
section (j). Periphery of discs shows
scalloping (k). Microtubules originating in basal body of rod cilium extend externally into the outer
segment (l) (adapted from Hogan et al. [68]). Reproduced with permission.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
12
The main physiologic function of the choroid is to provide oxygen and nutrients to
the highly metabolic outer retinal layers, namely the central avascular fovea and the
prelaminar portion of the optic nerve [77].
The choroid provides most of the blood supply the retina needs. The choroid
receives more than 70% of the ophthalmic artery blood supply, which is the highest rate per
unit weight in any tissue, while only 2% enters the retinal vessels [61]. Due to the large area
of the coriocapillaris, the speed of the flow is slowed to 77% of the flow speed in the
capillaries of the retina [78].
PRs use about 90% of oxygen delivered to the retina, mainly under mesopic and
scotopic environments. In order to bypass the Bruch’s membrane and the RPE, specific
adaptations were needed: a blood flow in the choroid ten-fold higher than in the brain, a
high oxygen tension in the choroid (arterial/venous difference of about 3% compared with
38% in the retinal circulation) and the coriocapillaris pores disposed mainly on the Bruch’s
membrane side [64, 79-82]. Furthermore, a higher hemoglobin oxygen saturation level in
the vessels of the choroid, when compared with the vessels of the retina, and further rise in
that difference with inhalation of 100% oxygen, was demonstrated in vivo in human subjects
using a non-invasive spectrophotometric oximeter [83]. Capillary fenestration dependent on
VEGF secreted by the RPE [84], allows prompt delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the outer
retina and macula and is reversed by anti-VEGF agents [60]. In addition, the choroid is of
outmost importance in temperature regulation by conveying heat [38], accumulated due to
the focused light onto the macula and due to the high metabolism of the tapetoretinal unit
[85, 86].
Despite choroidal blood flow in the fovea compensates better for an increase in
arterial blood pressure than for an increase in intraocular pressure [87], a fundamental role
of the choroid in angle closure glaucoma mediated by choroidal expansion has been
demonstrated [88]. The choroid also plays a role in the drainage of the aqueous humour via
the uveoscleral pathway. This drainage is about 35% of the total aqueous drainage and is
enhanced by atropine, epinephrine and latanoprost, but blocked by pilocarpine.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
13
Additionally, non-vascular smooth muscle cells in the lamellae of the suprachoroid are
responsive to neurogenic stimulation and may account for variations in the choroidal
thickness (CT) as well as for the stabilization of the position of the fovea during
accommodation. Since there is no evidence hitherto of classic lymphatic vessels in the adult
human choroid, clearance of toxins and debris of metabolism might go through the
suprachoroid to the episcleral veins and to the vortex vein system [89].
The positive oncotic pressure at the level of the Brüch’s membrane, created by the
extravascular accumulation of large molecules, allows fluid to flow out of the retina into the
choroidal stroma and suprachoroid [90, 91]. Thus, one possible mechanism accounting for
the CT changes is the expansion of the lacunae in the suprachoroid. The lacunae expansion
is mediated by the synthesis of large proteoglycans [92], by the modulation of the size and
number of fenestrations in the choriocapillaris [93], by changes in the flux of the uveoscleral
pathway [54], by altered transport from the retina across the RPE [94] and by changes in
the tonus of the non-vascular smooth muscle of the suprachoroid [38]. Nitric oxide (NO)
synthase-positive axon terminals are found in the nonvascular smooth muscle cells of the
choroid, suggesting a role of NO in the regulation of the CT, by reducing the degree of
contraction of these cells [38].
Currently, it is considered that the choroid may contribute to the pathogenesis of
several retinal diseases. Choroidal atrophy seems to be associated with high myopic retinal
degeneration [95] and with atrophic AMD [75]. Several inflammatory conditions of the retina
are in fact choroiditis [96, 97]. It was also reported a general disturbance in the choroidal
blood flow of both eyes in central serous choroidopathy (CSC), with increased CT and
subfoveal neuroretinal detachment (SND), probably dependent on a mineralocorticoid
receptor mediation [98-100]. In diabetes, the choroid behaves as a pro-inflammatory
environment. In fact, inflammation, glial cell activation and cell migration from the retina to
the choroid, are involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy [101, 102].
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
14
1.3. Optical coherence tomography (OCT)
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was introduced as a non-invasive modality for
imaging transparent and translucent samples and tissues with a resolution of a few μm [43].
Since the eye is essentially transparent, it provides easy optical access to the retina and
therefore OCT was first investigated in ophthalmology [43, 103].
The introduction of the spectral domain (SD) principle changed the paradigm in the
OCT technology. Its improved sensitivity enabled to operate at 800 - 870 nm with a higher
acquisition speed, with light suffering minimal optical attenuation and scattering [73]. The
resolution of about 5 μm provides high-quality images of the retina, from the inner limiting
membrane (ILM) down to the RPE [104]. This wavelength is suitable to resolve all main
intra-retinal layers, but its penetration depth is limited by absorption and scattering at the
RPE level. Since the absorption of light by melanin is strongly wavelength-dependent, the
use of longer wavelengths as in Swept Source OCT (SS-OCT) may improve the penetration
depth into the choroid [105]. Unfortunately, when going towards longer wavelengths water
absorption of light increases. The advantage of a better tissue penetration, using longer
wavelength devices, is overshadowed by a poorer resolution in an organ consisting mostly
of water [73]. The signal double passing through the ocular media to the retina is
significantly attenuated (up to 50%) [106]. In addition, SS-OCT devices are large and not
easy to handle [107].
The enhanced deep imaging (EDI) is the approach developed to overcome these
difficulties. The 870 nm SD-OCT device is positioned closer to the eye in order to change
the focal point backwards to the choroid. This avoids the loss of signal caused by the RPE
[44, 108]. Moreover, a correlation has been found between data collected from the choroid
with the longer wavelength devices and the EDI procedure with the 870 nm SD-
SPECTRALIS® (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) device [109-112].
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
15
1.4. OCT and the choroid
Choroidal thickness was first evaluated in a focal fashion from the posterior edge of
the RPE to the choroid/sclera junction, at 500 μm intervals up to 2500 μm temporal and
nasal to the fovea [44]. The choroid is thicker in the subfoveal area and decreases to the
nasal and temporal choroid [109, 113], with the nasal CT being usually thinner [44, 114].
Margolis et al. reported a subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) of 287 ± 76 μm,
using a 870 nm device in the EDI mode [44] and others reported a SFCT up to 10-20 μm
thicker, using longer wavelength devices, and found reproducibility between one another
[109, 115]. There is great variability in the CT according to age [75], refraction, and even
the time of day [44]. Previous studies, using both OCT and histologic findings, have found
statistically significant negative correlations between CT and age (decreasing CT with
increasing age) [44, 109, 116]. It was reported that SFCT decreased 1.56 - 1.95 μm for
each additional year of age [44, 117], or 15.6 μm for each decade of life [44]. Therefore, in
a 80-year lifespan, the choroid loses approximately 1/3 of its SFCT. Based on histologic
evaluation, a decrease in CT of 1.1 μm per year of age was found, which represents a rough
estimation of the actual in vivo CT [116]. SFCT also decreases with increasing axial length
(AL), 31.96 μm for each 1-mm increase in AL [117]. In addition, a person with a normal
choroid may manifest differences in thickness at intervals of a few hours or days. Unlike the
retinal thickness, it has been reported that CT shows a diurnal variation of about 30 μm
(thinnest at 6 p.m. and thickest at 3 a.m.), decreasing roughly 8% from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
[118, 119]. Moreover, there is inter-individual variability in CT, independently of age, AL or
time of the day, which must be taken into account when including both eyes of the same
patient (Figure 1.9).
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
16
Figure 1.9. Inter-individual variability in choroidal thickness (CT) evaluated by SD-Spectralis OCT,
horizontal scans encompassing the fovea. Eyes from two different patients, same age and refractive
error difference of 0.50 D, were collected. Both OCTs were obtained during the morning. Measures
of total CT were taken from the outer limit of the RPE to the choroid-scleral junction (yellow line in
the right panel and purple line in the left panel). Note that variability in CT may be about two fold from
one another.
The layers of the choroid do not behave as the layers of the retina. Unlike the retina,
wherein layers are densely stacked as regular sheets upon one another, almost like pilled
sheets of paper, in the choroid visualized by OCT, the large vessels from underneath
(Haller’s layer) press upwards the layers above (Sattler’s and choriocapillaris layers),
leaving thicker areas in-between (Figure 1.10).
Figure 1.10. The structure of the choroid, SD-Spectralis OCT (horizontal scan encompassing the
upper macular ETDRS grid area). White squares signal large choroidal vessels, with diameter ≥ 100
μm, belonging to the Haller’s layer. Large vessels push the choriocapillaris/Sattler’s complex layer
upwards leaving thick fingertip-like areas of the choriocapillaris/Sattler’s layer in-between (red
arrows). Yellow arrows signal the ‘cone of shadow’ from the large vessels of the choroid that may be
a confounding factor when determining the choroid-scleral junction.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
17
This results in a generalized intertwined network of ‘hills and valleys’. This
fingerprint-like structure of the choroidal layers and the presence of the suprachoroid, make
the actual evaluation of the sublayers of the choroid and the correct identification of the
choroid-scleral border occasionally difficult.
1.5. Choroid and diabetes
Clinical and experimental findings suggest that a choroidal vasculopathy in DM may
play a role in the pathogenesis of DR. Diabetic choroidopathy (DC) was defined in DM using
indocyanine green angiography. Late phase choroidal hypoperfusion along with an inverted
inflow phenomenon have been related to DR severity and choroidal vascular resistance has
been related to retinal ischemia [40]. Large hyperfluorescent spots were associated with
high glycated hemoglobin (Hb A1c) levels and might be an indicator for choroidal
microangiopathy [120].
Histopathological studies of eyes in T2D reported decreased alkaline phosphatase
activity in the choriocapillaris, loss of viable endothelial cells, degeneration of the
choriocapillaris, obstruction and choroidal aneurysms, Brüch’s membrane degenerative
changes and choroidal neovascularization [121]. Lutty and McLeod demonstrated that the
decrease in the alkaline phosphatase enzyme activity is related to choriocapillaris loss in
DC [122]. NO synthase expression is increased in the retina even in early onset T1D [123]
or T2D [124]. The neuronal NO release in the parasympathetic perivascular nerve fibres of
the choroid may also result in a diabetes-induced neuronal damage. Therefore, DC may
encompass a microangiopathy along with a DR [125]. In fact, a previous study hypothesized
that the unexplained loss of visual acuity in diabetic patients, regardless of the inexistence
of retinopathy, might be due to DC [126]. Choroidal inflammation and ischemia may disturb
the outer BRB, leading to the accumulation of subretinal fluid or SND [127]. Indeed, there
is growing evidence indicating that the choroid is implicated in the onset of SND [40]. As
the nourishment of the macula depends on the choroid, DME with SND may be associated
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
18
with macular ischemia in some cases [128]. Furthermore, SND is a main feature of CSC, a
disease located primarily in the choroid [129]. Once disturbed the outer BRB, the inner BRB
would be further unbalanced since there is cross-talk between one another [16]. Despite
the alterations reported above, the cross-talk between the choriocapillaris and the BRB is
not fully understood yet.
1.5.1. Choroidal thickness in diabetes without retinopathy
When comparing CT between diabetic eyes without DR and controls, the results are
contradictory. Some studies reported that there is no difference [130-133], while other
studies reported either a significant increase [134] or, more commonly, a significant
decrease [115, 135-137].
In the Beijing Eye Study no correlation was found between DM and SFCT. However,
the range of CT reported was too wide (from 8 to 854 μm), which does introduce a bias
towards axial length (AL) dependent parameters [138]. A report issued later, using the same
sample corrected for AL and age, found DM to be related with choroidal thickening, but
added no additional risk to the DR stage. However, diabetics were only 12% of the total
number of subjects enrolled and 23 diabetic eyes only with DR (0.7%) with scarce numbers
in the different subgroups of DR [134].
Microalbuminuria has been correlated with a thinner choroid in eyes with early stage
DR [139]. Unfortunately, the study enrolled a small sample size, included both eyes, and
considered a small cut-off as significantly different for CT (15 μm). Time of day was not
taken into account and the difference of 2 diopters of refractive error between the comparing
groups might actually result in a difference in CT as great as 50 μm [140]. Considering small
differences as significant, the sensibility is overweighted at the expense of specificity. Small
differences in CT may not be independent from individual variability in CT, duration of
diabetes and hour of day for the collection of the OCT data.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
19
Therefore, CT seems to remain unchanged or to decrease in diabetic eyes without
DR, but consensus is lacking.
1.5.2. Choroidal thickness and retinopathy progression
A decrease in CT in diabetic eyes unrelated to the DR stage was reported in some
studies [115, 135, 137], while others found a decrease in CT related to progression of DR,
but not with DM without DR [130-133]. CT decrease has been associated with advanced
DR stages only, either DME or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) [113].
By opposition, Kim et al. related DR progression to an increase in CT [136]. This
report had important drawbacks, therefore evidence remains elusive (Table 1.1).
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
20
Table 1.1. Choroidal thickness and diabetic retinopathy stage
Author N diabetic
eyes/controls
Study type Device CT and DR
staging
CT and
DME
Strength Drawbacks
Kim et al. 2013
[136]
235/36
5 subgroups
Retrospective
Cross-
sectional
SD-
Spectralis
↑ ↑ Positive correlation HbA1c/CT
195 naïves
Excluded PRP treated eyes in the
latest year
Profile of the DME: SND type
No separation between T1D and T2D
Wide age range in groups with advanced disease
status. Wide CT range within group
Inclusion of both eyes
Recent onset DME, unbalanced DM status
Esmaelpour et
al. 2011 [115]
63/16 eyes
4 subgroups
Prospective,
Cross-
sectional
1060 nm
OCT
↓ in all DM
0 for DR
staging
0 Long wave OCT
CT maps
Wide age range
Small sample per group
Both eyes included
Querques et al.
2012 [135]
63/21
3 subgroups
Prospective
Cross-
sectional
SD-
Spectralis
↓ in all DM
0 for DR
staging
↓ One eye per patient
Naïve eyes
T2D only
Small sample size
Vujosevic et al.
2012 [131]
102/48
3 subgroups
Observational
Cross-
sectional
SD-Nidek ↓ 0 Corrected refraction above 3 D
No prior treatment
No EDI
Both Type 1 and Type 2
Wide age range
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
21
Regatieri et al.
2012 [113]
49 /24
3 subgroups
Retrospective
Cross-
sectional
Cirrus-HD ↓ ↓ T2D only No refraction or AL correction
No EDI procedure
Small number of patients per group
Lee HK et al.
2013 [130]
203/48
4 subgroups
Cross-
sectional,
institutional
SD -
Spectralis
↓ 0 Uncontrolled hypertension
excluded
Hb A1c
Age was a confounding factor, the authors were dealing
with an aged sample and a wide age range
No mention to diabetes Type
Unsal et al.
2014 [132]
151/40
3 subgroups
Retrospective
Cross-
sectional
Optovue
RT Vue
100-2
↓ ↓ Attempt to correlate CRT with CT
and Hb A1c with CRT and CT
Both eyes included in controls and in some diabetics
No EDI
Inner limit of the choroid was clearly mismarked
Absence of naïve DME eyes
Gerendas et al
2014 [107]
284/20 Cross-
sectional
SD OCT
Cirrus
# ↓ Automated segmentation with
manual correction
Volume measurements
Reading centers (n = 2)
Small control sample
No correction for age or refraction
No correlation searched for Hb A1c
Vascular profile excludes the suprachoroid
Rewbury et al
2016 [141]
145/0
6 subgroups
Retrospective
Cross-
sectional
SD-
Spectralis
↑ ↑ NS T2D only
Treatment naïves
Both eyes included
No mention of correction for age, refraction or Hb A1c
Small sample per group
Case et al 2016
[142]
172/57
5 subgroups
Retrospective
Cross-
sectional
SD OCT
Cirrus
↑ 0 Relation to systemic treatment
Treatment naïves
Both eyes included
T1D and T2D
Small samples in the DR late stages
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
22
Lains et al
2017 [46]
160/50
5 subgroups
Cross-
sectional
observational
SS - DRI
OCT-1
Atlantis
↓ 0 ETDRS Grid Sectors Both eyes included, multilevel mixed models
Two different populations included
Small sample per group
Previous PRP and anti-VEGF treatment included
Gupta et al
2018 [48]
82/86 Cross-
sectional
SD-
Spectralis
↑ NS ↑ naïves Both eyes included
No correction for age or refraction
Mohamed et al
2019 [47]
60/30
3 subgroups
Cross-
sectional
Institutional
RS-3000
advance;
NIDEK
0 0 One eye per patient
Data collected 8 - 10 a. m.
No mention to refraction
Wide age range (30-60 yo)
Small sample per group
Endo et al.
2020 [49]*
100/318
4 subgroups
Retrospective
Institutional
Cirrus
HD–OCT
# ↑ Hb A1c
Double organ bias, highly biased*
Small subgroups
(↑), Increase; (0), no change, (↓), decrease; AL = axial length; CT, choroidal thickness; D, diopters; DME, diabetic macular edema; DR, diabetic retinopathy; EDI, enhanced deep imaging;
NPDR, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; OCT, optical coherence tomography, PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PRP, panretinal photocoagulation; SND, subfoveal neuroretinal
detachment; ↓ in the fellow eye of the DME eye; NS, not statistically significant. # not searched. *Most bias were commented by me on journal site, available at:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/comment?id=10.1371/annotation/a880fd21-6bf1-477a-859b-212d56395a75.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
23
1.5.3. Choroidal thickness in diabetic macular edema
Most authors relate DME with decreased CT or decreased choroidal circulation
(Table 1.1) [107, 113, 132, 133, 135, 143].
Others do not confirm this finding, reporting no independent association between
DME and CT [46, 47, 115, 130, 131].
By opposition, some found that CT increases in eyes with DME and with the severity
of DR [40, 48, 136, 141]. Kim et al. found that the SFCT decreases in diabetic eyes with no
DR and with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). Ischemia of the choriocapillaris
in early DC would be responsible for such decrease. Nevertheless, in the more advanced
stages of DR, where the authors found an increase in SFCT, ischemia of the choriocapillaris
is likely to be present as well. The authors theorized that an increased secretion of VEGF
would account for the increased SFCT in the more advanced stages of DR. However, such
increased secretion of VEGF is also likely to occur in the early stages of ischemia where
SFCT was reduced. Perhaps more consistent, is the possibility that the increase in the
SFCT in the more advanced stages of DR was due to the presence of SND. SND might be
related with increased CT, increased choriocapillaris permeability and outer BRB
dysfunction. These alterations occur more frequently in naïve eyes with recent DME, where
SND is more likely to occur as well.
Therefore, SND may be related to, or result from, an increased thickness of the
choroid in early onset DME. Furthermore, SND is present in CSC where CT is increased
and patients are younger [129]. Unfortunately, the work of Kim et al. has important
drawbacks (Table 1.1). Heterogeneity is clearly expressed in the wide range of variation of
CT in all groups. The CT differences within cohort (± 58 to ± 108 μm) are greater than the
differences between cohorts (14 to 73 μm), except for the panretinal photocoagulation
(PRP) group (124 μm) [136].
The role of prior focal laser photocoagulation should be considered as a confounding
factor when comparing the effect on CT caused by DME or by DME treatment. The effect
of focal laser on CT has been discarded, but there were shortcomings: small cohort, no EDI
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
24
procedure, scans only within 500 μm away from the fovea where laser burns would be
unlikely to be present, short follow-up and set of data from focal scans only, without
determination of an area of CT [144].
In conclusion, most of the evidence hitherto available is mainly contradictory and the
studies have important shortcomings.
1.6. The influence of treatment on choroidal thickness
1.6.1. Panretinal photocoagulation
PRP alters choroidal blood flow in patients with PDR and it was reported to increase
SFCT [145], whereas in most studies PRP was associated with a decrease in SFCT, (Table
1.2) [113, 132, 136, 146, 147].
A study evaluating choroidal blood flow in the foveal area one month after PRP,
using a laser doppler flowmetry technique, showed that PRP induces an increase in both
choroidal blood flow and choroidal blood volume shortly after PRP [148]. An increase in
SFCT can be interpreted as either an increase in choroidal blood flow due to vasodilation
or choroidal effusion, induced by choroidal vascular obstruction from laser
photocoagulation. Another study found SFCT thickening after PRP, but OCT measurements
where made as soon as one week after PRP, and may reflect the effect of choroidal effusion
rather than a real vascular thickening of the choroid [145].
Evidence for a decrease in CT long after PRP, unbiased by choroidal effusion is
more consistent. It was found a significant SFCT thinning one month after either PRP or
anti-VEGF treatment [146]. These data relating choroidal thinning with the PRP aftermath
were confirmed by other studies [113, 132, 136].
A plausible explanation for this contradiction may be the time of measuring SFCT
after PRP. Studies where SFCT is found to be thinner after PRP had treatment completed
3 months before the study, while studies where SFCT was found to be increased collected
the measurements just 1 week to 1 month after PRP. Thus, increased blood flow,
vasodilation and effusion in the retina and choroid might account for such increase. A
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
25
possible confounding factor is that PDR may reduce CT along with PRP, thus contributing
to SFCT reduction attributed to PRP [46, 132, 133]. However, PRP often follows shortly
after the diagnosis of PDR, so it is unlikely that PDR masks the effect of PRP on CT. Long
term follow-up of PRP-treated eyes is crucial to evaluate the effect of PRP on CT. Indeed,
a longitudinal study showed the pattern described by other studies: an increase in CT one
week after PRP with a decrease in CT beneath the baseline at 12 weeks [147].
Unchanged CT after PRP was also reported, but there were some shortcomings in
the study: small sample, the eyes were previously treated for DME, and the period of follow-
up after PRP was very short (one month) [149]. Since the first endpoint to evaluate whether
neovascularization regresses in PDR eyes treated with PRP is 3 to 4 months [150, 151], it
would be more appropriate to check for a possible alteration in the CT after PRP at least
after a similar endpoint.
Overall, most studies indicate that PRP decreases CT in the long term (after 3
months of treatment).
1.6.2. Intravitreal therapy
Most studies correlate the use of anti-VEGF agents to treat DME with a decrease in
CT (Table 1.2) [113, 132, 136, 146, 152-154]. Nevertheless, there are some few studies
contradicting this finding.
One study found that anti-VEGF therapy does not affect SFCT. However, the
number of eyes enrolled was small, the EDI protocol was not used and the choroidoscleral
interface was not clearly identified in 36% of the eyes with DME [133].
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
26
Table 1.2. Changes in the choroidal thickness with treatment of diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema
Authors
Takahashi et
al 2008 [148]
Regatieri et
al 2012
[113]
Adhi et al
2013 [133]
Kim et al
2013 [136]
Cho et al
2013 [145]
Hwang et al
2014 [155]
Zhang et al
2015 [156]
Lains et al
2014 [152]
Lee SH et al
2014 [146]
Unsal et
al 2014
[132]
Yiu et al
2014 [153]
Sonoda et al
2014 [157]
Treatments and
Drawbacks
PRP ↑ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↑ 0 ↓ # ↓ ↓ # #
Anti-VEGF # ↓ 0 ↓ # # # ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ 0
Steroids # # # # # # # # # # # ↓
Drawbacks Data from 1
week to 1
month after
PRP
See Table
1.1
Small
sample for
anti-VEGF
treated
eyes
As in
Table 1.1
See
Table 1.1
Short follow
up (1 week
after PRP)
Short follow up
(1 month after
PRP)
Small Sample
Eyes with
previous
treatment for
DME included
Small
sample size
3 month
follow up
No control
group
Selection of
the worst
eye to treat
See
Table 1.1
See
Table 1.1
Small sample
Eyes until -6D
Non-uniform
treatment
regimen
Non-naïve eyes
Small sample
size
3 month follow
up
Only one
injection of
either drug
(↑), Increase; (0), no change, (↓), decrease; AL = axial length; CT, choroidal thickness; D, diopters; DR, diabetic retinopathy; DME, diabetic macular edema; PRP, panretinal photocoagulation; VEGF, vascular
endothelial growth factor; D, diopters. # not searched.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
27
Another study did not correlate CT with the treatment of DME, either with focal
laser or with anti-VEGF agents, but only with age. As this study found no correlation
between the severity of DME and the changes in CT, the authors concluded that the CT
is not an important factor in the pathophysiology of DME. However, this study was
retrospective, lacked a control group, included both eyes and enrolled small numbers in
each subgroup [158]. The finding of a not significant change in CT with anti-VEGF
treatment was also described in an uncontrolled, prospective, longitudinal study, with a
12-month follow-up period. Unfortunately, the number of eyes enrolled was rather small
(n = 23) and there was no available data on disease duration or previous treatments
[159].
A prospective study with a follow-up of 3 months correlated a decrease of CT
while treating DME with steroids but not with bevacizumab. However, only one injection
of either drug was used, the sample was small (n = 25 in the triamcinolone group and n
= 26 in the bevacizumab group) and the study was short-lasting [157].
It was described that the CT thins with anti-VEGF agents although with no
cumulative effect of the number of injections given [153]. Despite this study had a
longitudinal profile, with a follow-up of six months, it had some drawbacks. Eyes were
included until -6D without further correction for CT, and eyes were treated until three
months with different treatments, including PRP, focal laser and intravitreal steroids.
Additionally, it had a non-uniform treatment regimen with an average of 2.73 (range 1-6)
anti-VEGF injections over the 6 months of follow-up and a small number of eyes treated
(n = 33).
In summary, there seems to be plenty of agreement that the use of anti-VEGF
agents to treat DME decreases CT [146, 152-154], but there is some inconsistency with
respect to whether baseline CT may be taken as a prognostic factor of treatment
response.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
28
1.7. Choroidal thickness as a biomarker of progression
or treatment response
There are contradictory arguments as to CT may be taken as a biomarker for DR
progression or treatment response.
Data correlating SFCT thinning with anatomic and functional outcome was
reported in a study involving DME-naïve eyes. Unfortunately there were important
drawbacks: the use of Snellen charts, exquisite small numbers (standard error used and
not standard deviation, instead), wide age range, double organ bias, an odd criterion for
anatomical outcome, inclusion of T1D and T2D, short follow-up (3 months) and no
stratification for outcome [154]. Most of this drawbacks were present in a posterior study
pointing out in the same direction [160].
The study of Yiu et al. compared DME-eyes treated with anti-VEGF versus DME
non-treated eyes and found no association between the decrease in CT with the number
of anti-VEGF injections or with the anatomic outcome in the retina. Hence, the decrease
in CT did not seem to modulate or to be a good marker of DME response to treatment,
seeming to be a side effect of treatment instead [153]. Baseline DME was more severe
in treated than non-treated eyes, that is, higher baseline central retinal thickness (CRT)
and lower baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), while the CT was similar.
Therefore, CT could not be taken as a biomarker for the severity of DME. The
choroidal thinning resulting from the anti-VEGF treatment neither correlated with the
number of anti-VEGF injections nor with the improvement in BCVA or CRT. Hence, the
authors concluded that CT was not a good marker for response to treatment either. The
thinning of the choroid after the anti-VEGF therapy might just be a side effect rather than
a modulation of DME. Moreover, eyes with DME left untreated did not progress in
severity for six months, which probably was related to a less severe disease at baseline,
despite no differences in CT. More pronounced DME with higher retinal thickness was
an obvious choice to treat, but there was no difference in the baseline CT related to DME
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
29
severity. There were, however, confounding factors involved: none of the eyes had
history of previous anti-VEGF treatment, but several had a history of previous steroid
treatment, focal laser, PRP, or a combination, which is related to long-standing DME.
Additionally, the fact that cumulative injections did not cause further choroid thinning may
indicate the presence of long-standing DME [161].
A study by Lee et al. showed a decrease in CT with anti-VEGF therapy for DME
or DME+PDR but no correlation between CT changes and anatomic (CRT) or functional
(BCVA) outcome or the number of injections given. A correlation was found between the
decrease in CT and the first intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF, with no further reduction
after additional injections [146]. This was different from the floor effect after 3 injections
reported in AMD [162] or after 4 injections in DME [153]. As CRT increased and CT
decreased after PRP, whilst CRT and CT decreased after anti-VEGF therapy, the
authors concluded that CT was not a good biomarker of response to treatment. The study
had important drawbacks as well, including a non-uniform treatment regimen (1-3
injections), a small number of eyes in the anti-VEGF treated arm (n = 31), short follow-
up (3 months) and a low cut-off value for a significant CT decrease (5-14%).
A longitudinal study involving PRP-treated eyes, with a follow-up of 3 months,
confirmed that CT was not a good biomarker of anatomic or functional outcome shortly
after PRP. CRT increased very rapidly after PRP but took up to 12 weeks to decrease
down to the baseline level while CT increased at one week, returned to normal levels
after 4 weeks and decreased significantly at 12 weeks [147].
DME is not a homogeneous entity, as revealed by the RISE and RIDE and the
RESTORE studies. Eyes with long-standing DME (≥ 2 years) failed to reach the same
gain achieved by DME-eyes treated with anti-VEGFs right from the start [161]. In
addition, a treatment delay of one year took two additional years of treatment to close
the gap from the promptly treated [163]. Henceforth, the duration of DME will be of crucial
importance in considering outcomes and a thicker choroid might be related to early onset
DME and younger age.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
30
Therefore, a thicker choroid at baseline, may not be a biomarker of treatment
response, but a biomarker of younger age or short-standing DME. The evidence hitherto
available, is mostly contradictory. Additional effort is needed to cross-check the available
contradictory evidence.
1.8. OCT angiography and the choriocapillaris
OCT angiography (OCTA) calculates the differences between B-scans that arise
from red blood cells’ movement inside vessels when the backscattering from retinal
tissue outside the vessels remains static. There are two ways to detect change in
amplitude between B-scans: (i) speckle (or intensity) decorrelation, which detects
intensity changes in OCT structural images, and (ii) phase variance, which assesses
changes in the phase of a light wave. Based on the signals, OCTA can be full-spectrum
or split-spectrum [164]. OCTA depth resolved capability and high spatial resolution (~15-
20 µm laterally, ~6 µm axially) is suitable for vasculature quantification and in vivo
imaging of the choriocapillaris. Binarization of images allows to separate choriocapillaris
stroma from the vascular bed and, therefore is most useful to study choriocapillaris
remodelling or permanent damage [165, 166]. The ability to quantify the vasculature is
attributed to the power of OCTA to resolve the microvascular networks of the retina
because the inter-capillary distances are generally larger (71.30 ± 5.17 μm) than the
system’s lateral resolution (~15-20 μm). However, we should be aware that if two vessels
are separated with a distance similar to or less than the system’s lateral resolution, then
OCTA would not be able to tell them apart. Unlike the retinal microvasculature, the
choriocapillaris is a much denser capillary network (5-20 μm of inter-capillary distance in
the posterior pole). OCTA is able to examine nonperfusion but not detailed morphological
vascular patterns, since the choriocapillaris is as thin as 10-20 µm [167]. Besides, as
OCTA imaging is based on movement of erythrocytes inside vessels, it gives no
information about the suprachoroid [168].
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
31
1.9. From bedside to bench
1.9.1. The animal as a model of man
While the eye in mice and rats differs from the human eye, notably by the absence
of macula, a primate-specific structure in the mammalian, animal models have
extensively been used in translational science, in the preclinical research and testing of
new drugs, due to coexisting similarities. By opposition to primates and men, the mouse
retina has a single ganglion cell layer and the average number of retinal ganglion cells
(RGCs) goes from 50.000 in mice [169] and 100.000 in rats [170] to 500,000 – 1,000,000
in the primate retina [171, 172] and 700,000 – 1,500,000 in human’s, with an the overall
cone:ganglion cell ratio ranging from 2.9 to 7.5 [173, 174]. This huge difference is
explained in a great extent by the fact that half of the RGCs are related to the fovea, a
structure absent in rats. The fovea, mediates high acuity vision. Although it occupies
<1% of the retinal surface, it provides 50% of the input to the visual cortex (Figure 1.11)
[172, 175]. As for rat and man, the fovea and the peripheral retina relate one another in
many ways. Cell types from the fovea and periphery are genetically related, therefore it
is cell proportion and not type, that makes the greater difference between central and
peripheral retina [172]. Peripheral RGCs are supplied by dozens to hundreds of PRs
(rods and cones) each, enhancing sensitivity, whereas most RGCs in the fovea are
supplied by a single PR, which maximizes acuity [174]. While cell type conservation is
present between mouse and macaque at the level of the PRs with genetic analogy, the
major RGC types in primates lack clear counterparts in rats. Similarly, the molecular
distinctions between the fovea and the periphery are higher for RGCs than for PRs. This
profile suggests that the outer retina may comprise a conserved set of information
processors, while adaptation to species- and region-specific visual-processing
requirements begin at the level of RGCs [172]. Moreover, basic aspects of retinal
structure and function are shared by all retinal regions in all vertebrate species. PRs
convert light into electrical signals and pass them to interneurons (HCs, horizontal cells;
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
32
BCs, bipolar cells; ACs, amacrine cells). Interneurons process the information and
transfer it to RGCs, whose axons extend to the brain [176]. Selective type-specific
connectivity among interneurons and RGC types make each RGC type responsive to a
specific visual feature (Figure 1.11) [177].
Figure 1.11. Sketches of a primate eye showing position of fovea and macula and the peripheral
retina. A. Central region indicating diameters of the foveola (the foveal pit), fovea, and macula. At
the foveola there is displacement of ganglion cell layer (GCL) and inner nuclear layer (INL) cells.
B. Sketch of peripheral retina showing its major cell classes - photoreceptors (PRs), horizontal
cells (HCs), bipolar cells (BCs), amacrine cells (ACs), retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and Müller
glia (MG), outer and inner plexiform (synaptic) layers (OPL and IPL), outer and inner nuclear
layers (ONL and INL), and ganglion cell layer (GCL), (adapted from Peng et al., 2019 [172]).
Reproduced with permission.
Although rats are not blueprints for the diseased humans, they provide excellent
insights into the pathogenesis of diabetes [178]. Furthermore, rats are recognized as the
preeminent model for studying the choroid [52, 179]. Rats are the most used model for
studying human diseases and their choroidal structure is closest to human’s than
rabbits’, cats’ or guinea pigs’ [52, 179].
A B
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
33
1.9.2. OCT in the animal
OCT has been used in animals to check for retinal changes in diabetes, but not
for changes in the choroid [180]. OCT thickness measurements of the retinal layers have
been previously performed with 830 - 840 nm SD-OCTs customized for retinal imaging
of small animals, mainly in mice and rats [181, 182]. The choroid is better visualized and
the CT can be measured in vivo in the anesthetized animal by making a manual EDI
technique as described in section 1.3 [108]. The OCT is placed closer to the eye such
that an inverted image is obtained and the deeper structures are placed closer to zero-
delay (Figure 1.12).
Figure 1.12. Choroidal thickness collected by SD-OCT in the rat using the EDI technique. On the
left panel, inverted image of the retina (A) and choroid (C) separated by the bright hyper-reflective
line of the RPE (B). While the inner boundary of the choroid follows the linear outline of the RPE,
the outer boundary swings in and out according to the vascular profile of the large vessels. On
the right panel, image shows the position where the scan was acquired.
The 830nm SD-OCT Imagine System (Phoenix Micron IV, Phoenix Research
Labs, Pleasanton, CA), contains an OCT engine, a scan head, and a computer with
software to detect and photograph the retina. The SD-OCT engine has a spectrometer
covering 740 – 920 nm and is combined with a broadband super-luminescent diode with
a 3 dB bandwidth of >150 nm. The spectrometer runs an A-scan rate of 40,000 lines per
second and contains 2048 pixels. The scan mode length is about 1.8 mm on the X and
Y axes in rats and may be displaced or rotated within the entire scan region. The SD-
A
BC
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
34
OCT system is able to capture 10,000 – 20,000 A scans per second with an axial
resolution of 2 µm and a transverse resolution of 4 µm.
Thinning of the retina associated with a pre-diabetic state in the animal has been
reported [183], but research about CT in the animal with DM is lacking. For each location
the device collects a set of 1024 raster scans along the scan length. By averaging a set
of five images most of the noise observed on individual images is dramatically reduced.
Automatic measurements of the retinal layers or of the inner and outer choroid
boundaries are possible with the automatic segmentation software InSight (Phoenix
Research Labs), making manual corrections of the boundary lines when necessary
(Figure 1.13).
Figure 1.13. Automatic determination of the choroid boundaries from the segmentation software
InSight (Phoenix Research Labs) with manual correction. On the left side image, the green line
marks the inner limits of the choroid, while the blue line marks its outer limits, that is, the choroid-
scleral border. Top right side image is the image of the fundus where the scan was collected.
Bottom right side image shows a green line of choroidal thickness magnitude resulting from
collection of the 1024 raster scans all along the raster scan length.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
35
1.9.3. Visualization of the choroidal vasculature
Current methods to readily visualize the choroidal vessels in rats present
challenges as they result in incomplete labeling of choroidal capillaries, have nonspecific
staining, or are outside the visible spectrum. Recently, the fluorescent DyLight-594
conjugated tomato lectin (Lycopersicon esculentum agglutinin) has been used as a
surrogate markers for endothelial cells in mice and rats [184]. However, direct labelling
of blood vessels in the retina or in the choroid, by cardiac perfusion using a specially
formulated aqueous solution containing 1,1’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-
tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI), a lipophilic carbocyanine dye, which
incorporates into endothelial cell membranes upon contact, has an easier protocol and
achieves higher signal intensities that can be achieved by indirect labelling methods
[185] (Figures 1.14 and 1.15).
Figure 1.14. Terminal choroidal arterioles visualized by DiI (red) in a 16-week Wistar rat. A.
Arteriole dividing in pre-terminal arteries that originate the multiple lobular network of the
choriocapillaries. Scale bar: 100 µm. 10x Full size: x: 850.19 µm, y: 850.19 µm. B. Pre-terminal
artery giving rise to the choriocapillaris at a right angle after a short trajectory as previously
described in vascular casts [56, 61]. Scale bar: 50 µm. 20x Full size: x: 425.1 µm, y: 425.1 µm.
C. The lobular pattern is not self-evident in the coriocapillaris. Instead, a honeycomb-like pattern
is depicted. Scale bar: 50 µm. 20x Full size: x: 425.10 µm, y: 425.10 µm.
A B C
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
36
Figure 1.15. Composed visualization of the whole choroid in a 16-week Wistar rat by DiI. The
vascular profile exhibited is arterial-type with absence of the collecting vortex veins. A. Orientation
of the choroid: S = superior, N = nasal, I = inferior, T = temporal. B. Display of the whole choroidal
circulation resulting from gathering all orientated flat mounts. The choroidal circulation is arterial
end-terminal with pre-terminal arterial-arterial anastomoses, branching in a bronchiolar-like
pattern. C. Detail shows that anastomosis are frequent before the emergence of the pre-terminal
arteries (white arrows). Scale bar: A; 2mm, B; 1 mm and C; 0.2 mm.
S
N T
I
A
B
C
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
37
1.9.4. Regulation, remodelling and inflammation
1.9.4.1. Pericytes and mural cells
Perivascular mural cells, either smooth muscle cells or pericytes, contribute to
regulation and homeostasis of endothelial functions, sometimes responding differently
to vasoactive elements, such as adenosine, epinephrine, phenylephrine, aspartate,
glutamate, insulin, NO, endothelins, prostaglandins and others [186]. As there is a lack
of strictly pericyte-specific markers, the unambiguous identification of these cells often
requires immunostaining of multiple antigens or careful analysis of morphological criteria.
Pericytes directly contact capillary endothelial cells sharing a common basement
membrane. Pericytes share certain molecular markers, such as expression of the
proteoglycan NG2/Cspg4 or the intermediate filament protein desmin, with perivascular
smooth muscle cells. The latter, however, cover larger calibre arteries and veins, and
are separated by the subendothelial basement membrane from the underlying
endothelium monolayer. Pericytes emerge as important regulators of endothelial
sprouting and branch formation, mediated by the modulation of VEGF-A/vascular
endothelial receptor (VEGFR) 2 signaling activity via the expression of the receptor 1
(VEGFR1), mostly a decoy receptor [187]. There is evidence that brain, retinal and
choroidal pericytes derive, at least in part, from neural crests. VEGF-A and the related
placental growth factor (PlGF) have been shown to induce pericyte ablation. Their role
in the development and maintenance of the BRB has been demonstrated, with pericyte
depletion being associated with endothelial hyperplasia, microaneurism formation and
increased permeability [188]. Recently, pericytes were associated with blood flow control
within the deep and intermediate retinal capillary plexuses in a very similar modus as
their regulation of vasa recta in the kidney [189].
Disposition of pericytes at the choriocapillaris was described in intact
sclerochoroidal whole mounts of albino transgenic mice to be scanty and at its scleral
surface only (polarized distribution) and focal pericyte depletion has been related to
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
38
vascular remodeling. At the Sattler and Haller layers, pericytes or mural cells wrap
around vessels, showing contractile properties (Figure 1.16) [190].
Figure 1.16. Pericytes and perivascular mural cells in the choriocapillaris and middle choroid of
a 16-week Wistar rat show distint morphology distribution. A. Perivascular mural cells
immunostained by desmin wrap around choroidal vessels, while they assume a linear or stellate
configuration at the choriocapillaris, corresponding to the scanty non-circumferential distribution
of pericytes (yellow arrows). B. Linear immunomarking of pericytes by desmin near the hexagonal
RPE cells’ plane (yellow thick arrows) show a scanty non-circumferential distribution. C. Distinct
morphology of mural cells immunomarked by desmin wrapping around choroidal vessels while
pericytes show a linear morphology and scanty non-circumferential distribution at the
choriocapillaris level (yellow thick arrow). Scale bar: 50 µm. 10x Full size: x: 850.19 µm, y: 850.19
µm.
Although pericyte coverage of human capillaris decreases from 90% in the retina
to 11% in the choriocapillaris, perivascular mural cells located in close proximity to
endothelial cells of choroidal vessels are thought to play a role in regulating blood flow
and hence controlling metabolic supply to the outer retina. Inadequacy of this metabolic
supply (otherwise termed ‘‘choroidal insufficiency’’) has been hypothesized to be present
in retinal diseases [191], including in the formation of choroidal neovascularization (CNV)
[192], in the resistance to anti-VEGF agents [190] and in the impaired development of
the outer nuclear layer (ONL) in embryonic days [193].
A Desmin DesminB CDesmin NG2A B C
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
39
SCP
1.9.4.2. Glia and the neuro-vascular unit
The retinal neurovascular unit is composed of vasculature (namely the capillary
endothelia), neurons, glial cells, pericytes, and smooth muscle cells. The overriding
purpose of the neurovascular unit is to optimize regional metabolic efficiency (e.g., to
increase blood flow to sites of increased cellular activity and to preserve flow at sites of
low activity) [189]. There are three types of glial cells in the retina: astrocytes located in
the inner retina, vitreous surface and around vessels of the superficial vascular plexus;
microglial ramified cells located only in the inner retina and around vessels and Müller
cells (MC), also named Müller glia (MG) or retinal Müller glial cells (RMG), that are the
only cells that span the entire thickness of the sensory retina, from the ILM, which is the
basal membrane of the MC, to the outer limiting membrane (OLM), formed by cellular
connexions between MC and PRs inner segments (Figure 1.17).
Figure 1.17. Cellular components of the inner blood-retinal barrier. Schematic representation of
the neuro-glio-vascular unit forming the inner blood-retinal barrier, composed by vascular
endothelial cells, pericytes (p), retinal Müller glial (RMG) cells, astrocytes (a), microglia (mc). RMG
cell projections are present at the level of all retinal vascular plexuses (superficial, SCP;
intermediate, ICP and deep, DCP), while astrocytes are only present at the level of the superficial
plexus. Adapted from Daruich et al. 2019 [188]. Reproduced with permission.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
40
Microglia cells are distinguished in “surveillant” phenotype with highly ramified
units and “activated” (or ameboid) state with larger cell bodies and thicker processes.
They are the main players in neuro-vascular coupling in the retina (Figure 1.18). They
have a fundamental role in homeostasis, keeping a fine tuned environment for neuronal
survival in the retina, via regulating the blood flow through cytokines and pericytes, and
by removing neuronal debris [32, 189, 194].
Figure 1.18. Presence of glial cells around vessels in the retina and in the choroid. A. Retinal
projection showing vessels RECA1+ (green) and Iba+ cells/microglia (red) mostly in vessels’
vicinity. B. Choroid single confocal plane visualized from the RPE side, showing choroidal
medium-sized and large vessels surrounded by Iba+ cells (white arrows). Laser scanning
microscope LSM 710 (Zeiss), objective lens: 20x, numerical aperture 0.8, magnification 200x.
Scale bar = 50 µm.
Under the low level of chronic inflammation in the diabetic retina due to
hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and oxidative stress, tissue-resident macrophage-like
microglia cells, become activated, changing their morphologic appearance from
‘dendritic’ to ‘ameboid’, and start to produce proinflammatory mediators [32]. Glutamate,
metalloproteases and nitrous oxide produced by activated microglia, lead to neuronal
cell dysfunction, damage capillary pericytes and endothelial cells, exposing endothelia
to VEGF [195]. Migration of activated microglial cells from the retina to the choroid by
A B
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
41
transcytosis has been demonstrated in diabetes [102, 196]. However, the role of glia on
vascular remodelling of the choriocapillaris, on regulation of the choroidal blood flow and
interaction with choroidal pericytes/perivascular mural cells remains to be established.
1.6. Objectives of the present study
There are controversial data regarding the value of the CT as a marker of
prognosis in DME. Cellular and molecular signatures occurring simultaneously in the
choroid and retina in diabetes are not fully understood. The aims of this clinical and
experimental work are:
1 – In human subjects, prospectively, to find whether the CT might be a marker of
outcome of DME under anti-VEGF treatment and to test the reliability of SFCT as a
marker of CT (chapter 2).
2 - In human subjects, prospectively, to find markers of DME outcome other than CT or
SFCT, including independent demographic, metabolic and OCT parameters (chapter 3).
3 – To test whether there are CT changes in vivo, in two animal models of diabetes, T1D
(chapter 4) and T2D (chapter 5).
4 – To evaluate the impact of experimental T1D (Chapter 4) and T2D (Chapter 5) on glial
cells, pericytes, endothelial cells, VEGFR 2 and VEGF in the choroid and retina.
5 – To evaluate the impact of experimental T1D (chapter 4) and T2D (chapter 5) on
vascular density (relation vessel/stroma) in the choroid of sclerochoroidal whole mounts
assessed by confocal microscopy.
Acknowledgements: I am extremely grateful to Anália Carmo, MD, PhD, for drawing
Figure 1.1 for me and to Elisa J. Campos, PhD, for the adaptation of Figure 1.17.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
42
1.7. References
1. Wild, S., et al., Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care, 2004. 27(5): p. 1047-53.
2. Bullard, K.M., et al., Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes in Adults by Diabetes Type - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2018. 67(12): p. 359-361.
3. Williams, R., et al., Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and macular oedema: a systematic review. Eye (Lond), 2004. 18(10): p. 963-83.
4. Brown, M.M., et al., Utility values and diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol, 1999. 128(3): p. 324-30.
5. Javitt, J.C. and L.P. Aiello, Cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med, 1996. 124(1 Pt 2): p. 164-9.
6. Ting, D.S., G.C. Cheung, and T.Y. Wong, Diabetic retinopathy: global prevalence, major risk factors, screening practices and public health challenges: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2016. 44(4): p. 260-77.
7. Sabanayagam, C., et al., Incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2019. 7(2): p. 140-149.
8. Klein, R., et al., The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of diabetic retinopathy. XIV. Ten-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol, 1994. 112(9): p. 1217-28.
9. Romero-Aroca, P., et al., Differences in incidence of diabetic retinopathy between type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: a nine-year follow-up study. Br J Ophthalmol, 2017. 101(10): p. 1346-1351.
10. Engerman, R.L. and T.S. Kern, Retinopathy in animal models of diabetes. Diabetes Metab Rev, 1995. 11(2): p. 109-20.
11. Klein, R., B.E. Klein, and S.E. Moss, Visual impairment in diabetes. Ophthalmology, 1984. 91(1): p. 1-9.
12. Moss, S.E., R. Klein, and B.E. Klein, Ten-year incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population. Ophthalmology, 1994. 101(6): p. 1061-70.
13. Klein, R., et al., The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology, 1984. 91(12): p. 1464-74.
14. Keenan, T.D., et al., United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database Study: Diabetic Retinopathy; Report 1: prevalence of centre-involving diabetic macular oedema and other grades of maculopathy and retinopathy in hospital eye services. Eye (Lond), 2013. 27(12): p. 1397-404.
15. Cunha-Vaz, J., J.R. Faria de Abreu, and A.J. Campos, Early breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier in diabetes. Br J Ophthalmol, 1975. 59(11): p. 649-56.
16. Bento, C.F., et al., Methylglyoxal-induced imbalance in the ratio of vascular endothelial growth factor to angiopoietin 2 secreted by retinal pigment epithelial cells leads to endothelial dysfunction. Exp Physiol, 2010. 95(9): p. 955-70.
17. Wells, J.A., et al., Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology, 2016. 123(6): p. 1351-9.
18. Gross, J.G., et al., Five-Year Outcomes of Panretinal Photocoagulation vs Intravitreous Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2018. 136(10): p. 1138-1148.
19. Qaum, T., et al., VEGF-initiated blood-retinal barrier breakdown in early diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001. 42(10): p. 2408-13.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
43
20. Baharivand, N., et al., Relationship between vitreous and serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels, control of diabetes and microalbuminuria in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Clin Ophthalmol, 2012. 6: p. 185-91.
21. Shimada, H., et al., Concentration gradient of vascular endothelial growth factor in the vitreous of eyes with diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009. 50(6): p. 2953-5.
22. Arden, G.B. and S. Sivaprasad, Hypoxia and oxidative stress in the causation of diabetic retinopathy. Curr Diabetes Rev, 2011. 7(5): p. 291-304.
23. Hammes, H.P., et al., Pericytes and the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes, 2002. 51(10): p. 3107-12.
24. Lau, J.C. and R.A. Linsenmeier, Increased intraretinal PO2 in short-term diabetic rats. Diabetes, 2014. 63(12): p. 4338-42.
25. Funatsu, H., et al., Vitreous levels of interleukin-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor are related to diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology, 2003. 110(9): p. 1690-6.
26. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research, N., et al., Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology, 2010. 117(6): p. 1064-1077 e35.
27. Gonzalez, V.H., et al., Early and Long-Term Responses to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of Protocol I Data. Am J Ophthalmol, 2016. 172: p. 72-79.
28. Campos, A., et al., Deferred intravitreal triamcinolone in diabetic eyes after phacoemulsification. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2014. 30(9): p. 717-28.
29. Bellocq, D., et al., The Pattern of Recurrence in Diabetic Macular Edema Treated by Dexamethasone Implant: The PREDIAMEX Study. Ophthalmol Retina, 2018. 2(6): p. 567-573.
30. Adamis, A.P., Is diabetic retinopathy an inflammatory disease? Br J Ophthalmol, 2002. 86(4): p. 363-5.
31. Rubsam, A., S. Parikh, and P.E. Fort, Role of Inflammation in Diabetic Retinopathy. Int J Mol Sci, 2018. 19(4).
32. Sorrentino, F.S., et al., The importance of glial cells in the homeostasis of the retinal microenvironment and their pivotal role in the course of diabetic retinopathy. Life Sci, 2016. 162: p. 54-9.
33. Clark, M., C.J. Kroger, and R.M. Tisch, Type 1 Diabetes: A Chronic Anti-Self-Inflammatory Response. Front Immunol, 2017. 8: p. 1898.
34. Wellen, K.E. and G.S. Hotamisligil, Inflammation, stress, and diabetes. J Clin Invest, 2005. 115(5): p. 1111-9.
35. Antonetti, D.A., R. Klein, and T.W. Gardner, Diabetic Retinopathy. New England Journal of Medicine, 2012. 366(13): p. 1227-1239.
36. Barber, A.J., et al., Neural apoptosis in the retina during experimental and human diabetes. Early onset and effect of insulin. J Clin Invest, 1998. 102(4): p. 783-91.
37. Nishikawa, T., et al., Normalizing mitochondrial superoxide production blocks three pathways of hyperglycaemic damage. Nature, 2000. 404(6779): p. 787-790.
38. Nickla, D.L. and J. Wallman, The multifunctional choroid. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2010. 29(2): p. 144-68.
39. Hidayat, A.A. and B.S. Fine, Diabetic choroidopathy. Light and electron microscopic observations of seven cases. Ophthalmology, 1985. 92(4): p. 512-22.
40. Hua, R., et al., Imaging evidence of diabetic choroidopathy in vivo: angiographic pathoanatomy and choroidal-enhanced depth imaging. PLoS One, 2013. 8(12): p. e83494.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
44
41. Fryczkowski, A.W., S.E. Sato, and B.L. Hodes, Changes in the diabetic choroidal vasculature: scanning electron microscopy findings. Ann Ophthalmol, 1988. 20(8): p. 299-305.
42. Lutty, G.A., Effects of diabetes on the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2013. 54(14): p. ORSF81-7.
43. Huang, D., et al., Optical coherence tomography. Science, 1991. 254(5035): p. 1178-81. 44. Margolis, R. and R.F. Spaide, A pilot study of enhanced depth imaging optical coherence
tomography of the choroid in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol, 2009. 147(5): p. 811-5. 45. Campos, A., et al., Viewing the choroid: where we stand, challenges and contradictions
in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017. 95(5): p. 446-459.
46. Lains, I., et al., Choroidal Thickness in Diabetic Retinopathy Assessed with Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography. Retina, 2018. 38(1): p. 173-182.
47. Mohamed, D.M.F., et al., Subfoveal choroidal thickness in diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol, 2019. 13: p. 921-925.
48. Gupta, C., et al., Choroidal structural analysis in eyes with diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema-A novel OCT based imaging biomarker. PLoS One, 2018. 13(12): p. e0207435.
49. Endo, H., et al., Relationship between diabetic macular edema and choroidal layer thickness. PLoS One, 2020. 15(1): p. e0226630.
50. Hayreh, S.S., Segmental nature of the choroidal vasculature. Br J Ophthalmol, 1975. 59(11): p. 631-48.
51. Krebs, W. and I.P. Krebs, Ultrastructural evidence for lymphatic capillaries in the primate choroid. Arch Ophthalmol, 1988. 106(11): p. 1615-6.
52. Castro-Correia, J., Understanding the choroid. Int Ophthalmol, 1995. 19(3): p. 135-47. 53. Curcio, C.A. and M. Johnson, Structure, Function, and Pathology of Bruch's Membrane
in Retina, S.J. Ryan, Editor. 2013, Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA. p. 465–81. 54. Alm, A. and S.F. Nilsson, Uveoscleral outflow--a review. Exp Eye Res, 2009. 88(4): p. 760-
8. 55. Castro Correia, J., Anátomo-fisiologia da coroide. Thesis Doctorat, 1958: p. 52-126. 56. Olver, J.M., Functional anatomy of the choroidal circulation: methyl methacrylate
casting of human choroid. Eye (Lond), 1990. 4 ( Pt 2): p. 262-72. 57. Forrester J. V., et al., Anatomy of the eye and orbit, in The Eye (Fourth Edition), W.B.
Saunders, Editor. 2016, Saunders/Elsevier Edinburgh; New York. p. 1-102. 58. Risco, J.M. and W. Nopanitaya, Ocular microcirculation. Scanning electron microscopic
study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1980. 19(1): p. 5-12. 59. McLeod, D.S., et al., Relationship between RPE and choriocapillaris in age-related
macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009. 50(10): p. 4982-91. 60. Shimomura, Y., et al., Changes in choriocapillaris fenestration of rat eyes after
intravitreal bevacizumab injection. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2009. 247(8): p. 1089-94.
61. Torczynski, E. and M.O. Tso, The architecture of the choriocapillaris at the posterior pole. Am J Ophthalmol, 1976. 81(4): p. 428-40.
62. Yoneya, S., M.O. Tso, and K. Shimizu, Patterns of the choriocapillaris. A method to study the choroidal vasculature of the enucleated human eye. Int Ophthalmol, 1983. 6(2): p. 95-9.
63. Krey, H.F., Segmental vascular patterns of the choriocapillaris. Am J Ophthalmol, 1975. 80(2): p. 198-202.
64. McLeod, D.S. and G.A. Lutty, High-resolution histologic analysis of the human choroidal vasculature. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1994. 35(11): p. 3799-811.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
45
65. Hayreh, S.S., The choriocapillaris. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol, 1974. 192(3): p. 165-79.
66. Bhutto, I.A. and T. Amemiya, Microvascular architecture of the rat choroid: corrosion cast study. Anat Rec, 2001. 264(1): p. 63-71.
67. Hayreh, S.S., Posterior ciliary artery circulation in health and disease: the Weisenfeld lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2004. 45(3): p. 749-57; 748.
68. Hogan, M.J., J.A. Alvarado, and J.E. Weddell, Histology of the Human Eye — An Atlas and Textbook 1971, Philadelphia, London, Toronto: Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders. 403-497.
69. Duke-Elder, S., System of Ophthalmology. Vol. 2. 1961, London: Kimpton. 339, 346, 351. 70. Hayreh, S.S., In vivo choroidal circulation and its watershed zones. Eye (Lond), 1990. 4 (
Pt 2): p. 273-89. 71. Lee, J.E., et al., Functional end-arterial circulation of the choroid assessed by using fat
embolism and electric circuit simulation. Sci Rep, 2017. 7(1): p. 2490. 72. Dzhemileva, L.U., et al., [Molecular-genetic basis of tapetoretinal degeneration]. Mol
Biol (Mosk), 2008. 42(1): p. 3-11. 73. Mrejen, S. and R.F. Spaide, Optical coherence tomography: imaging of the choroid and
beyond. Surv Ophthalmol, 2013. 58(5): p. 387-429. 74. Strauss, O., The retinal pigment epithelium in visual function. Physiol Rev, 2005. 85(3):
p. 845-81. 75. Spaide, R.F., Age-related choroidal atrophy. Am J Ophthalmol, 2009. 147(5): p. 801-10. 76. Sohrab, M., K. Wu, and A.A. Fawzi, A pilot study of morphometric analysis of choroidal
vasculature in vivo, using en face optical coherence tomography. PLoS One, 2012. 7(11): p. e48631.
77. Hayreh, S.S., Blood flow in the optic nerve head and factors that may influence it. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2001. 20(5): p. 595-624.
78. Wajer, S.D., et al., Velocity measurements of normal and sickle red blood cells in the rat retinal and choroidal vasculatures. Microvasc Res, 2000. 60(3): p. 281-93.
79. Linsenmeier, R.A. and R.D. Braun, Oxygen distribution and consumption in the cat retina during normoxia and hypoxemia. J Gen Physiol, 1992. 99(2): p. 177-97.
80. Yu, D.Y. and S.J. Cringle, Oxygen distribution and consumption within the retina in vascularised and avascular retinas and in animal models of retinal disease. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2001. 20(2): p. 175-208.
81. Spitznas, M. and E. Reale, Fracture faces of fenestrations and junctions of endothelial cells in human choroidal vessels. Invest Ophthalmol, 1975. 14(2): p. 98-107.
82. Federman, J.L., The fenestrations of the choriocapillaris in the presence of choroidal melanoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, 1982. 80: p. 498-516.
83. Kristjansdottir, J.V., et al., Choroidal oximetry with a noninvasive spectrophotometric oximeter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2013. 54(5): p. 3234-9.
84. Blaauwgeers, H.G., et al., Polarized vascular endothelial growth factor secretion by human retinal pigment epithelium and localization of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors on the inner choriocapillaris. Evidence for a trophic paracrine relation. Am J Pathol, 1999. 155(2): p. 421-8.
85. Wangsa-Wirawan, N.D. and R.A. Linsenmeier, Retinal oxygen: fundamental and clinical aspects. Arch Ophthalmol, 2003. 121(4): p. 547-57.
86. Parver, L.M., C. Auker, and D.O. Carpenter, Choroidal blood flow as a heat dissipating mechanism in the macula. Am J Ophthalmol, 1980. 89(5): p. 641-6.
87. Polska, E., et al., Regulation of choroidal blood flow during combined changes in intraocular pressure and arterial blood pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2007. 48(8): p. 3768-74.
88. Quigley, H.A., Angle-closure glaucoma-simpler answers to complex mechanisms: LXVI Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol, 2009. 148(5): p. 657-669 e1.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
46
89. Schroedl, F., et al., Consensus statement on the immunohistochemical detection of ocular lymphatic vessels. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014. 55(10): p. 6440-2.
90. Saint-Geniez, M., et al., An essential role for RPE-derived soluble VEGF in the maintenance of the choriocapillaris. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009. 106(44): p. 18751-6.
91. Marmor, M.F., A.S. Abdul-Rahim, and D.S. Cohen, The effect of metabolic inhibitors on retinal adhesion and subretinal fluid resorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1980. 19(8): p. 893-903.
92. Wallman, J., et al., Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res, 1995. 35(1): p. 37-50.
93. Pendrak, K., et al., Choroidal vascular permeability in visually regulated eye growth. Exp Eye Res, 2000. 70(5): p. 629-37.
94. Liang, H., et al., Structural and elemental evidence for edema in the retina, retinal pigment epithelium, and choroid during recovery from experimentally induced myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2004. 45(8): p. 2463-74.
95. Wang, S., et al., Choroidal thickness and high myopia: a cross-sectional study and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol, 2015. 15(1): p. 70.
96. Jampol, L.M., et al., Subretinal Neovascularization with Geographic (Serpiginous) Choroiditis. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 88(4): p. 683-689.
97. Campos, J., et al., Punctate inner choroidopathy: a systematic review. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol, 2014. 3(3): p. 76-82.
98. Zhao, M., et al., Mineralocorticoid receptor is involved in rat and human ocular chorioretinopathy. J Clin Invest, 2012. 122(7): p. 2672-9.
99. Imamura, Y., et al., Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina, 2009. 29(10): p. 1469-73.
100. Scheider, A., J.E. Nasemann, and O.E. Lund, Fluorescein and indocyanine green angiographies of central serous choroidopathy by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol, 1993. 115(1): p. 50-6.
101. Grigsby, J.G., et al., The Role of Microglia in Diabetic Retinopathy. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2014. 2014: p. 15.
102. Omri, S., et al., Microglia/macrophages migrate through retinal epithelium barrier by a transcellular route in diabetic retinopathy: role of PKCzeta in the Goto Kakizaki rat model. Am J Pathol, 2011. 179(2): p. 942-53.
103. Fercher, A.F., et al., In vivo optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol, 1993. 116(1): p. 113-4.
104. Geitzenauer, W., C.K. Hitzenberger, and U.M. Schmidt-Erfurth, Retinal optical coherence tomography: past, present and future perspectives. Br J Ophthalmol, 2011. 95(2): p. 171-7.
105. Drexler, W., Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt, 2004. 9(1): p. 47-74.
106. Unterhuber, A., et al., In vivo retinal optical coherence tomography at 1040 nm - enhanced penetration into the choroid. Opt Express, 2005. 13(9): p. 3252-8.
107. Gerendas, B.S., et al., Three-dimensional automated choroidal volume assessment on standard spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and correlation with the level of diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014. 158(5): p. 1039-48.
108. Spaide, R.F., H. Koizumi, and M.C. Pozzoni, Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol, 2008. 146(4): p. 496-500.
109. Ikuno, Y., et al., Reproducibility of retinal and choroidal thickness measurements in enhanced depth imaging and high-penetration optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011. 52(8): p. 5536-40.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
47
110. Tan, C.S., W.K. Ngo, and K.X. Cheong, Comparison of choroidal thicknesses using swept source and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in diseased and normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol, 2015. 99(3): p. 354-8.
111. Waldstein, S.M., et al., Comparison of penetration depth in choroidal imaging using swept source vs spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Eye (Lond), 2015. 29(3): p. 409-15.
112. Sala-Puigdollers, A., et al., Repeatability and reproducibility of retinal and choroidal thickness measurements in Diabetic Macular Edema using Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography. PLoS One, 2018. 13(7): p. e0200819.
113. Regatieri, C.V., et al., Choroidal thickness in patients with diabetic retinopathy analyzed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Retina, 2012. 32(3): p. 563-8.
114. Noori, J., et al., Choroidal mapping; a novel approach for evaluating choroidal thickness and volume. J Ophthalmic Vis Res, 2012. 7(2): p. 180-5.
115. Esmaeelpour, M., et al., Mapping choroidal and retinal thickness variation in type 2 diabetes using three-dimensional 1060-nm optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011. 52(8): p. 5311-6.
116. Ramrattan, R.S., et al., Morphometric analysis of Bruch's membrane, the choriocapillaris, and the choroid in aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1994. 35(6): p. 2857-64.
117. Ouyang, Y., et al., Spatial distribution of posterior pole choroidal thickness by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011. 52(9): p. 7019-26.
118. Usui, S., et al., Circadian changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness and the relationship with circulatory factors in healthy subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012. 53(4): p. 2300-7.
119. Tan, C.S., et al., Diurnal variation of choroidal thickness in normal, healthy subjects measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012. 53(1): p. 261-6.
120. Shiragami, C., et al., Risk factors for diabetic choroidopathy in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2002. 240(6): p. 436-42.
121. Fukushima, I., D.S. McLeod, and G.A. Lutty, Intrachoroidal microvascular abnormality: a previously unrecognized form of choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol, 1997. 124(4): p. 473-87.
122. Lutty, G.A. and D.S. McLeod, Phosphatase enzyme histochemistry for studying vascular hierarchy, pathology, and endothelial cell dysfunction in retina and choroid. Vision Res, 2005. 45(28): p. 3504-11.
123. do Carmo, A., et al., Nitric oxide synthase activity and L-arginine metabolism in the retinas from streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Gen Pharmacol, 1998. 30(3): p. 319-24.
124. Carmo, A., et al., Nitric oxide synthase activity in retinas from non-insulin-dependent diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats: correlation with blood-retinal barrier permeability. Nitric Oxide, 2000. 4(6): p. 590-6.
125. Sakurai, M., et al., Characterization and diabetes-induced impairment of nitric oxide synthase in rat choroid. Curr Eye Res, 2002. 24(2): p. 139-46.
126. Cao, J., et al., Choriocapillaris degeneration and related pathologic changes in human diabetic eyes. Arch Ophthalmol, 1998. 116(5): p. 589-97.
127. Kaur, C., W.S. Foulds, and E.A. Ling, Blood-retinal barrier in hypoxic ischaemic conditions: basic concepts, clinical features and management. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2008. 27(6): p. 622-47.
128. Koleva-Georgieva, D. and N. Sivkova, Assessment of serous macular detachment in eyes with diabetic macular edema by use of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2009. 247(11): p. 1461-9.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
48
129. Gemenetzi, M., G. De Salvo, and A.J. Lotery, Central serous chorioretinopathy: an update on pathogenesis and treatment. Eye (Lond), 2010. 24(12): p. 1743-56.
130. Lee, H.K., J.W. Lim, and M.C. Shin, Comparison of choroidal thickness in patients with diabetes by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Korean J Ophthalmol, 2013. 27(6): p. 433-9.
131. Vujosevic, S., et al., Macular and peripapillary choroidal thickness in diabetic patients. Retina, 2012. 32(9): p. 1781-90.
132. Unsal, E., et al., Choroidal thickness in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Clin Ophthalmol, 2014. 8: p. 637-42.
133. Adhi, M., et al., Analysis of morphological features and vascular layers of choroid in diabetic retinopathy using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2013. 131(10): p. 1267-74.
134. Xu, J., et al., Subfoveal choroidal thickness in diabetes and diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology, 2013. 120(10): p. 2023-8.
135. Querques, G., et al., Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography in type 2 diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012. 53(10): p. 6017-24.
136. Kim, J.T., et al., Changes in choroidal thickness in relation to the severity of retinopathy and macular edema in type 2 diabetic patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2013. 54(5): p. 3378-84.
137. Esmaeelpour, M., et al., Choroidal thinning in diabetes type 1 detected by 3-dimensional 1060 nm optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012. 53(11): p. 6803-9.
138. Wei, W.B., et al., Subfoveal choroidal thickness: the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology, 2013. 120(1): p. 175-80.
139. Farias, L.B., et al., Choroidal Thickness in Patients with Diabetes and Microalbuminuria. Ophthalmology. 121(10): p. 2071-2073.
140. Tan, C.S., K.X. Cheong, and L.W. Lim, Re: Farias et al.: Choroidal thickness in patients with diabetes and microalbuminuria (Ophthalmology 2014;121:2071-3). Ophthalmology, 2015. 122(7): p. e42-3.
141. Rewbury, R., et al., Subfoveal choroidal thickness in patients with diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. Eye (Lond), 2016. 30(12): p. 1568-1572.
142. Kase, S., et al., Choroidal thickness in diabetic retinopathy in relation to long-term systemic treatments for diabetes mellitus. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2016. 26(2): p. 158-62.
143. Nagaoka, T., et al., Alteration of choroidal circulation in the foveal region in patients with type 2 diabetes. Br J Ophthalmol, 2004. 88(8): p. 1060-3.
144. Adhi, M., A.A. Alwassia, and J.S. Duker, Analysis of choroidal thickness in eyes treated with focal laser photocoagulation using SD-OCT. Can J Ophthalmol, 2013. 48(6): p. 535-8.
145. Cho, G.E., H.Y. Cho, and Y.T. Kim, Change in subfoveal choroidal thickness after argon laser panretinal photocoagulation. Int J Ophthalmol, 2013. 6(4): p. 505-9.
146. Lee, S.H., et al., Changes of choroidal thickness after treatment for diabetic retinopathy. Curr Eye Res, 2014. 39(7): p. 736-44.
147. Zhang, Z., et al., Changes in Choroidal Thickness After Panretinal Photocoagulation for Diabetic Retinopathy: A 12-Week Longitudinal StudyChanges in Choroidal Thickness After PRP for DR. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2015. 56(4): p. 2631-2638.
148. Takahashi, A., et al., Effect of panretinal photocoagulation on choroidal circulation in the foveal region in patients with severe diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol, 2008. 92(10): p. 1369-73.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
49
149. Hwang, D., S. Woo, and K. Park, Changes in Choroidal Thickness and Volume in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy after Panretinal Photocoagulation by Using a Choroidal Thickness Map. J Diabetes Metab, 2014. 5(405): p. 2.
150. Bressler, N.M., R.W. Beck, and F.L. Ferris, Panretinal Photocoagulation for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. New England Journal of Medicine, 2011. 365(16): p. 1520-1526.
151. Mohamed, Q., M.C. Gillies, and T.Y. Wong, Management of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review. JAMA, 2007. 298(8): p. 902-16.
152. Lains, I., et al., Choroidal thickness in diabetic retinopathy: the influence of antiangiogenic therapy. Retina, 2014. 34(6): p. 1199-207.
153. Yiu, G., et al., Effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy on choroidal thickness in diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014. 158(4): p. 745-751 e2.
154. Rayess, N., et al., Baseline choroidal thickness as a predictor for response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015. 159(1): p. 85-91 e1-3.
155. Hwang DJ, Woo SJ, and P. KH, Changes in Choroidal Thickness and Volume in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy after Panretinal Photocoagulation by Using a Choroidal Thickness Map. J Diabetes Metab, 2014. 5(7): p. 1-7.
156. Zhang, Z., et al., Changes in Choroidal Thickness After Panretinal Photocoagulation for Diabetic Retinopathy: A 12-Week Longitudinal Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2015. 56(4): p. 2631-8.
157. Sonoda, S., et al., Effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide or bevacizumab on choroidal thickness in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014. 55(6): p. 3979-85.
158. Manjunath, V., et al., Effect of Focal Laser and anti-VEGF Therapy on Choroidal Thickness in Diabetic Macular Edema as measured by Enhanced-Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2013. 54(15): p. 2363-2363.
159. Giorno, P., et al., Retinal-choroidal changes after intravitreal ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema:12 months follow-up. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2014. 55(13): p. 576-576.
160. Nourinia, R., et al., Changes in Central Choroidal Thickness after Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Intravitreal Bevacizumab Correlation with Central Macular Thickness and Best-Corrected Visual Acuity. Retina, 2018. 38(5): p. 970-975.
161. Brown, D.M., et al., Long-term outcomes of ranibizumab therapy for diabetic macular edema: the 36-month results from two phase III trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology, 2013. 120(10): p. 2013-22.
162. Yamazaki, T., et al., Subfoveal choroidal thickness after ranibizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 12-month results. Ophthalmology, 2012. 119(8): p. 1621-7.
163. Schmidt-Erfurth, U., et al., Three-year outcomes of individualized ranibizumab treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema: the RESTORE extension study. Ophthalmology, 2014. 121(5): p. 1045-53.
164. Conti, F.F., et al., Choriocapillaris and retinal vascular plexus density of diabetic eyes using split-spectrum amplitude decorrelation spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol, 2019. 103(4): p. 452-456.
165. Nicolo, M., et al., Choroidal Vascular Flow Area in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2017. 58(4): p. 2002-2010.
166. Carnevali, A., et al., Optical coherence tomography angiography analysis of retinal vascular plexuses and choriocapillaris in patients with type 1 diabetes without diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol, 2017. 54(7): p. 695-702.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
50
167. Chu, Z., et al., Quantification of Choriocapillaris with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Comparison Study. Am J Ophthalmol, 2019. 208: p. 111-123.
168. Borrelli, E., et al., OCT angiography and evaluation of the choroid and choroidal vascular disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2018. 67: p. 30-55.
169. Jeon, C.J., E. Strettoi, and R.H. Masland, The major cell populations of the mouse retina. J Neurosci, 1998. 18(21): p. 8936-46.
170. Danias, J., et al., Cytoarchitecture of the retinal ganglion cells in the rat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2002. 43(3): p. 587-94.
171. Spear, P.D., et al., Relationship between numbers of retinal ganglion cells and lateral geniculate neurons in the rhesus monkey. Vis Neurosci, 1996. 13(1): p. 199-203.
172. Peng, Y.R., et al., Molecular Classification and Comparative Taxonomics of Foveal and Peripheral Cells in Primate Retina. Cell, 2019. 176(5): p. 1222-1237 e22.
173. Curcio, C.A. and K.A. Allen, Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol, 1990. 300(1): p. 5-25.
174. Bringmann, A., et al., The primate fovea: Structure, function and development. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2018. 66: p. 49-84.
175. Provis, J.M., et al., Adaptation of the central retina for high acuity vision: cones, the fovea and the avascular zone. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2013. 35: p. 63-81.
176. Masland, R.H., The neuronal organization of the retina. Neuron, 2012. 76(2): p. 266-80. 177. Gollisch, T. and M. Meister, Eye smarter than scientists believed: neural computations in
circuits of the retina. Neuron, 2010. 65(2): p. 150-64. 178. Portha, B., et al., The GK rat: a prototype for the study of non-overweight type 2 diabetes.
Methods Mol Biol, 2012. 933: p. 125-59. 179. Sengupta, P., The Laboratory Rat: Relating Its Age With Human's. Int J Prev Med, 2013.
4(6): p. 624-30. 180. Masser, D.R., et al., Functional changes in the neural retina occur in the absence of
mitochondrial dysfunction in a rodent model of diabetic retinopathy. J Neurochem, 2017. 143(5): p. 595-608.
181. Berger, A., et al., Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the rodent eye: highlighting layers of the outer retina using signal averaging and comparison with histology. PLoS One, 2014. 9(5): p. e96494.
182. Lin, C.H., et al., Long-term Fluorometholone Topical Use Induces Ganglion Cell Damage in Rats Analyzed With Optical Coherence Tomography. Toxicol Sci, 2015. 147(2): p. 317-25.
183. Alves, M.R.P., et al., Subtle thinning of retinal layers without overt vascular and inflammatory alterations in a rat model of prediabetes. Mol Vis, 2018. 24: p. 353-366.
184. Sohn E. H., et al., Visualization of mouse choroidal and retinal vasculature using fluorescent tomato lectin perfusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2019. 60(9): p. 1252.
185. Li, Y., et al., Direct labeling and visualization of blood vessels with lipophilic carbocyanine dye DiI. Nat Protoc, 2008. 3(11): p. 1703-8.
186. Yu, D.Y., et al., Functional and morphological characteristics of the retinal and choroidal vasculature. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2014. 40: p. 53-93.
187. Eilken, H.M., et al., Pericytes regulate VEGF-induced endothelial sprouting through VEGFR1. Nat Commun, 2017. 8(1): p. 1574.
188. Daruich, A., et al., Mechanisms of macular edema: Beyond the surface. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2018. 63: p. 20-68.
189. Chandrasekera, E., et al., Three-Dimensional Microscopy Demonstrates Series and Parallel Organization of Human Peripapillary Capillary Plexuses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2018. 59(11): p. 4327-4344.
Choroid and diabetes Introduction
51
190. Condren, A.B., et al., Perivascular mural cells of the mouse choroid demonstrate morphological diversity that is correlated to vasoregulatory function. PLoS One, 2013. 8(1): p. e53386.
191. Lutty, G.A., Diabetic choroidopathy. Vision Res, 2017. 139: p. 161-167. 192. Motiejunaite, R. and A. Kazlauskas, Pericytes and ocular diseases. Exp Eye Res, 2008.
86(2): p. 171-7. 193. Morita, A., et al., Establishment of an abnormal vascular patterning model in the mouse
retina. J Pharmacol Sci, 2018. 136(4): p. 177-188. 194. Metea, M.R. and E.A. Newman, Glial cells dilate and constrict blood vessels: a
mechanism of neurovascular coupling. J Neurosci, 2006. 26(11): p. 2862-70. 195. Ferrara, N., H.P. Gerber, and J. LeCouter, The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med,
2003. 9(6): p. 669-76. 196. Omri, S., et al., PKCzeta mediates breakdown of outer blood-retinal barriers in diabetic
retinopathy. PLoS One, 2013. 8(11): p. e81600.
52
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
53
2. Choroidal thickness stratified by outcome in
diabetic macular edema2
2 Section 2 is based on two articles: Campos A. et al., Choroidal thickness changes stratified by outcome in
real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2018. 256 (10):1857-
1865 and Campos A. et al., Response to: Choroidal thickness changes stratified by outcome in real-world
treatment of diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2019. 257 (1):243-244.
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
54
2.1. Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) as a marker of outcome
while treating diabetic macular edema (DME) and to correlate different choroidal
thickness (CT) parameters.
Methods: Prospective interventional case series included a total of 126 eyes from 126
patients with recently diagnosed DME treated with a 3-monthly loading dose of
ranibizumab or aflibercept and PRN thereafter until 24 months (M). SD OCT was used
to measure CT and central retinal thickness (CRT). CT was manually measured, in the
central 3500 μm area, subfoveally (SFCT) and at 1750 μm right and left from the center,
in the horizontal plane, and 1750 μm up and down from the center in the vertical plane.
Anatomic (10% decrease in CRT) and functional (BCVA gain ≥ 5 letters) responses were
assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. The areas under ROC curves were
used to assess whether baseline SFCT was a predictor of outcome.
Results: CT significantly decreased in all follow-ups (3 months after the 3 injections’
loading dose (3M), 6 months (6M), 12 months (12M), 18 months (18M), 24 months
(24M)). SFCT and other CT parameters are correlated. SFCT decrease from baseline
was related with treatment (p = 0.003 to p < 0.001) but not with anatomic (3M, p = 0.858;
6M p = 0.762) or functional response (3M, p = 0.746; 6M, p = 0.156). SFCT was not
found to be predictive of anatomic (AUC = 0.575, p = 0.172) or functional (AUC = 0.515,
p = 0.779) outcome.
Conclusions: SFCT is a reliable marker of choroid thickness. Baseline SFCT decreased
with anti-VEGF treatment but did not predict DME outcome.
Keywords: diabetic macular edema; choroidal thickness; subfoveal choroidal thickness;
outcome.
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
55
2.2. Introduction
Treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) shifted from laser to anti-VEGF
agents [1]. Most patients respond well to therapy while others do not so well [2]. Several
attempts have been made to find markers of prognosis or predictors of treatment
response in DME. The choroidal thickness (CT) or the subfoveal choroidal thickness
(SFCT) were suggested as a predictors of treatment response in DME, but the use of
the SFCT as a marker of the CT needs further evidence [2]. A diabetic choroidopathy
has been demonstrated [3], therefore the choroid has been looked out in search for
markers of the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy (DR) or of the response to treatment.
The availability of the OCT was a step forward in order to easily assess and monitor CT
[4]. Despite growing evidence demonstrating alterations of the SFCT in DME and with
DME treatment [5], its use as a marker of prognosis and of response to anti-VEGF
therapy has not been fully elucidated. Previous studies used different approaches that
originated contradictory data [4].
The present study was designed to investigate whether baseline SFCT is a
predictor of anatomic or functional response to anti-VEGF therapy and whether
measuring the choroid at different locations from the center correlates with SFCT.
2.3. Methods
In a prospective interventional case series, Type 2 diabetic patients with NPDR,
diagnosed with recent onset DME in at least one eye, naïve to intravitreal treatment,
were included after approval from the Ethical Committee of the Leiria Hospital. Informed
consent was given before inclusion. The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration
of Helsinki and to the standards of Good Clinical and Scientific Practice of the Faculty of
Medicine of the University of Coimbra.
Diagnostic criteria for DR and DME were based on past ophthalmic history and
complete ophthalmic evaluation, including a dilated fundus examination, fundus
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
56
photography, OCT imaging and fluorescein angiography in selected cases. Data
included patient age, sex, blood pressure, duration of diabetes, glycated hemoglobin
level (Hb A1c), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), biomicroscopic examination, past
laser therapy and length of follow-up. DME was considered when clinical significant
macular edema (CSME) involving the central macula (CI-CSME) [6] or a central (1 mm
central subfield thickness in the OCT-modified ETDRS grid) retinal thickness (CRT) ≥
300 μm, were present. Eyes were included when baseline BCVA ranged from 24 to 78
ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 20/320-20/32, logMAR 1.22-0.14). When DME was
bilateral at baseline, the right eye was included in patients whose year of birth was an
even number and the left eye was included when the year of birth was an odd number
[7]. Patients were excluded if they had any other treatments related to their NPDR,
except for focal laser for more than 6 months. Individuals were excluded if they had any
ocular diseases aside from DME in the treated eye. Eyes with a myopic refractive error
of greater than 4 diopters (D) were also excluded [4, 8].
Eyes were treated with a 3-monthly loading dose of ranibizumab or aflibercept and
on a pro re nata (PRN) regimen thereafter. Eyes that developed proliferative diabetic
retinopathy and needed panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), eyes that were rescued with
focal/grid laser and eyes that were switched to intravitreal steroids were discontinued
from follow-up. Eyes were allowed to be switched from ranibizumab to aflibercept. Data
from BCVA using the ETDRS standardized chart and SD-OCT were collected in every
visit (baseline, 3M, 6M, 12M, 18M and 24M). Top score allowed in the ETDRS chart was
85L (20/20).
Enhanced depth imaging (EDI) optical coherence tomography mode was selected
(Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) and a 6-mm x 6-mm macular
cube scan was performed using the high-resolution (HR) scanning mode. HR star scan
mode (6 scans, each made up of 1536 A scans, 30° apart from each other cutting through
the fovea) and HR map scan mode (comprising 61 horizontal B-scans, 120 μm apart
from each other, each made up of 1536 A-scans, 1536 × 1536 pixels, lateral resolution
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
57
of 6 μm/pixel) were acquired. A signal strength greater than 20 was required for all scans.
CT was evaluated manually after plotting a 7.2 mm-ETDRS grid centered at the fovea
and CRT was evaluated automatically using a 6 mm-OCT modified ETDRS grid. The
fovea was always checked and the center of the OCT star mode was re-centered at the
fovea whenever needed before performing the scans and thereafter. CT was manually
measured using the digital caliper tool in the Heidelberg Eye Explorer software, from the
hyperreflective line of the Bruch’s membrane to the hyperreflective line of the
choroidoscleral interface, in the central 3500 μm area, subfoveally, and at a distance of
1750 μm right and left from the center in the horizontal plane, and 1750 μm up and down
from the center in the vertical plane. The CT area underneath the 3500 μm central
macula (square inches) in the plane defined by the horizontal line scan encompassing
the fovea, was calculated manually from the RPE hiperreflective line to the
choroidoscleral junction, by Image J software (version 1.48, National Institutes of Health,
USA), (Figure 2.1).
Figure 2.1. Choroidal thickness manually measured in the central 3500-μm area underneath the
RPE line, subfoveal (SFCT) and at 1750 μm nasal (CT1750n) and temporal (CT1750t) from the
center, in the plane defined by the horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea (Image J software,
version 1.48, National Institutes of Health, USA). A similar procedure was done in the plane
defined by the vertical line encompassing the fovea to obtain the superior (CT1750s) and inferior
(CT1750i) choroidal thicknesses.
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
58
Two independent raters (AC, do Carmo) measured the scans masked to the
subject’s outcome in a prospective way and final measures were the mean of the two
scored for each location and follow-up period. Both raters retrospectively reviewed all
scans masked to subjects’ outcome at the end of the study and when the gap from one
another was greater, final measures were reached by consensus. All scans were
performed from 9.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. To evaluate whether baseline SFCT might predict
clinically relevant response to treatment, we defined anatomic responders as eyes
having a ≥ 10% decrease in baseline CRT (≥ 300 µm). Eyes with BCVA gains of ≥ 5
letters from baseline at 3M were defined as early functional responders, while eyes with
BCVA gains of ≥ 5 letters from baseline at 6M only, were defined as late functional
responders. Only the eyes followed for 6M were considered for these calculations, n =
122 eyes.
Statistical analysis
Nominal data were described by absolute and relative frequencies. Quantitative
data were described by using the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and
maximum in the sample characterization. Median, minimum and maximum were omitted
in the tables for convenience. Quantitative variables were assessed for normality with
Shapiro-Wilk tests. Comparisons between two measures, in different time points, of the
same variable, were performed resorting to paired sample t-tests or Wilcoxon tests,
taking normality requirements into account. Comparisons of quantitative variables
between two groups were performed with t-Student or Mann-Whitney tests, as
applicable. Intra-class correlations (ICC) were used to compare CT measurements
between raters at all locations and time points. A ROC analysis was undertaken to
assess how accurately SFCT baseline values could be used to predict anatomic or
functional response. Correlations between quantitative variables were assessed by
computing Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients, depending on whether
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
59
normality requirements were met or not. The statistical analyses were performed on IBM
SPSS Statistics 24 and on statistic platform R v3.3.2, The R Foundation Vienna, Austria.
The level of significance adopted was 0.05.
2.4. Results
From June 2014 to November 2017, a total of 126 eyes from 126 patients were
prospectively included. A total of 113 eyes were treated with a loading dose of 0.5 mg
ranibizumab, 13 eyes were treated with a loading dose of 2 mg aflibercept and 18 were
switched from ranibizumab to aflibercept. Baseline demographic and ocular
characteristics are outlined in Supplementary Table 1.1. A total of 126 eyes were
followed by 3 months, 122 eyes were followed by 6 months, 60 eyes were followed by
12 months, 29 eyes were followed by 18 months and 26 eyes were followed by 24
months.
The mean number of injections given was 3.0 at 3M, 4.6 ± 1.3 (3-7, median 4) at
6M, 5.3 ± 2.0 (3-10, median 6) at 12M, 7.6 ± 2.5 (3-12, median 8) at 18M and 8.0 ± 4.0
(3-15, median 7.5) at 24M. The mean baseline BCVA improved significantly, the mean
baseline CRT and the mean baseline SFCT decreased significantly (Table 2.1 and
Figure 2.2).
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
60
Table 2.1. Differences in the variables considered between each endpoint and baseline
Baseline
(n = 126)
3M
(n = 126)
6M
(n = 122)
12M
(n = 60)
18M
(n = 29)
24M
(n = 26)
CRT 432.4 ± 107.0 -92.8 ± 103.9 -95.7 ± 108.6 -83.9 ± 96.0 -78.0 ± 85.3 -81.5 ± 112.4
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.002
SFCT 346.6 ± 75.6 -22.5 ± 35.8 -25.6 ± 44.8 -31.8 ± 41.7 -33.7 ± 45.9 -31.2 ± 53.4
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.006
CT1750t 307.9 ± 71.5 -16.5 ± 38.3 -13.5 ± 44.5 -19.3 ± 51.4 -14.7 ± 48.2 -20.2 ± 54.2
<0.001 0.005 0.005 0.126 0.070
CT1750n 253.1 ± 71.2 -15.7 ± 39.6 -15.9 ± 41.2 -23.2 ± 43.8 -31.3 ± 47.1 -25.9 ± 40.1
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.002 0.003
CT1750s 320.1 ± 66.7 -10.2 ± 40.4 -14.2 ± 44.7 -29.1 ± 53.9 -26.3 ± 37.8 -19.8 ± 65.1
0.006 0.003 <0.001 0.001 0.134
CT1750i 283.4 ± 71.3 -11.0 ± 36.6 -13.0 ± 40.4 -21.6 ± 41.8 -32.1 ± 54.5 -10.9 ± 53.5
0.001 0.003 <0.001 0.005 0.308
CT3500a 5791.4 ± -344.4 ± 621.8 -338.8 ± 659.2 -440.1 ± 796.2 -416.6 ± 760.7 -368.5 ± 941.2
± 1272.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0010 0.057
BCVA 63.2 ± 12.7 5.9 ± 7.1 9.5 ± 7.9 7.1 ± 9.5 7.3 ± 9.1 8.4 ± 9.2
<0.001
60.6%*
<0.001
77.9%*
<0.001
61.7%*
0.001
65.4%*
<0.001
65.4%*
N Injections 3.0 ± 0.0 4.6 ± 1.3 5.3 ± 2.0 7.6 ± 2.5 8.0 ± 4.0
(3.0 – 3.0) (3.0 – 7.0) (3.0 – 10.0) (3.0 - 12.0) (3.0 – 15.0)
Abbreviations: CRT = 1 mm central retinal thickness; SFCT= subfoveal choroidal thickness; CT = choroidal thickness measured at 1750 µm, nasal (CT1750n) and temporal
(CT1750t) from the fovea in the plane defined by the horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea and superior (CT1750s) and inferior (CT1750i) from the fovea in the plane defined
by the vertical line scan encompassing the fovea; CT3500a = choroidal thickness area underneath the fovea measured from 1750 µm nasal to 1750 µm temporal from the central
fovea in the plane defined by the horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea; BCVA = best corrected visual acuity collected from ETDRS charts; 3M = 2-3 months after the 3
injections’ loading dose; 6M = 6 months; 12M = 12 months; 18M = 18 months; 24M = 24 months. Results are presented as mean ± SD. For each variable except for BCVA, the
percentages relate to the proportion of individuals for which a decrease in the variable was observed when compared to the baseline value. * For BCVA, the percentages relate
to the proportion of eyes that displayed an increase of ≥ 5 letters when compared to the baseline.
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
61
Figure 2.2. Evolution of mean central retinal thickness (CRT), mean subfoveal choroidal
thickness (SFCT), and mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) scored in ETDRS letters
collected from ETDRS charts with time in eyes with DME under anti-VEGF treatment. Note that
the evolution of the SFCT curve does not have the same profile as those of the CRT and BCVA.
Until 6M when the stratification by outcome was done, the slopes of the BCVA curve and that of
the CRT curve are also different, expressing a poor correlation between anatomic and functional
outcome as depicted in Tables 2.2 and 2.3.
The distribution of baseline SFCT showed a wide range of variability although it
decreased by 25.45 μm per each decade of life (Figure 2.3).
Figure 2.3. Example on how variability in SFCT may introduce bias when dealing with small
samples: Scatterplot depicting the negative weak correlation between age and baseline SFCT
(μm), r = −0.328, p < 0.001. Though a wide inter-individual variability can be observed, the
average decrease of SFCT per decade was seen to be 25.45 μm.
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
62
The mean CT decreased at all locations in all follow-up intervals (Supplementary
Figure 2.1). The percent decrease in the SFCT and in the other CT parameters were
correlated in all follow-up intervals, more prominently between the SFCT and CT areas
until 6M (Figure 2.4). ICC between raters was 0.98, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98, according
to the locations. The mean inter-observer difference was 6.8 μm.
From the 126 eyes enrolled, 64 eyes (50.8%) had past history of macular
photocoagulation, but past laser history did not significantly affect the CT parameters at
any follow-up interval (Supplementary Figure 2.2). A total of 98 eyes from the 119 eyes
with baseline CRT ≥ 300 μm decreased CRT 10% from baseline (82.4%), and were
considered anatomic responders. A total of 74 eyes (60.7%) at 3M and an additional 22
eyes (18.0%) at 6M were functional responders (96 eyes out of 122, 78.7%).
Figure 2.4. Radar chart displaying the percentage of participants with decrease in the CT
parameters at different time points. SFCT subfoveal choroidal thickness (dotted black line); CT
temp choroidal thickness 1750 μm temporal to the fovea, in the plane defined by the horizontal
line scan encompassing the fovea (orange line); CT nasal same as the previous but 1750 μm
nasal to the fovea (purple line); CT sup choroidal thickness 1750 μm superior to the fovea, in the
plane defined by the vertical line scan encompassing the fovea (red line); CT inf same as previous
but 1750 μm inferior to the fovea (green line); CT area area of choroidal thickness from 1750 μm
nasal to 1750 μm temporal to the fovea, in the plane defined by the horizontal line scan
encompassing the fovea (blue line) (Image J software, version 1.48, National Institutes of Health,
USA). 3M = 3-month endpoint, 6M = 6-month endpoint, 12M = 12- month endpoint, 18M = 18-
month endpoint, 24M = 24-month endpoint.
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
63
SFCT was not significantly different when comparing either anatomic responders versus
non-responders (Table 2.2) or functional responders versus non-responders (Table 2.3).
Table 2.2. Comparison of outcome measures between anatomic responders and non-responders
at baseline, 3M and 6M
Anatomic
non-responders
(n = 21)
Anatomic responders
(n = 98)
p-value
BCVA Baseline 67.4 ± 11.1 61.9 ± 12.9 0.037
3M 72.7 ± 11.5 68.2 ± 12.6 0.088
6M 75.7 ± 10.7 71.9 ± 11.6 0.109
Percentage increasing ≥ 5L 61.9% 62.2% 1.000
CRT
Baseline 367.8 ± 58.2 450.6 ± 108.3 <0.001
3M 366.2 ± 71.8 336.4 ± 72.3 0.026
6M 367.2 ± 71.2 332.1 ± 74.3
SFCT
Baseline 350.6 ± 73.7 347.3 ± 76.1 0.859
3M 322.9 ± 72.0 326.0 ± 82.3
0.858
6M 326.7 ± 70.6 321.0 ± 78.9 0.762
p-value 3M 0.003 <0.001
p-value 6M 0.036 <0.001
Laser
Yes 14 (66.7%) 51 (52.0%) 0.239
No 7 (33.3%) 47 (48.0%)
Number of injections 4.0 ± 1.2 4.8 ± 1.3 0.016
Abbreviations: BCVA = best corrected visual acuity scored using the ETDRS letter scale: 62 letters (L)
are Snellen 20/58, 67L (20/46), 68L (20/44), 72L (20/36), 73L (20/35) and 76L (20/30); 3M = 3 month
endpoint after the loading dose; 6M = 6 month endpoint; CRT = 1 mm central retinal thickness; SFCT =
subfoveal choroidal thickness; SND = subfoveal neuroretinal detachment. For anatomic responders’
calculation, only eyes with baseline CMT ≥300 μm were considered, n = 119 eyes. Eyes were considered
responders if they had a 10% decrease from baseline CRT. The difference in vision gain between
anatomic responders and non-responders was not statistically significant. A higher mean baseline CRT
correlated with anatomic response. The mean baseline SFCT decreased significantly with treatment in
both groups with no statistically significant difference between them.
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
64
Table 2.3 – Stratification of the population by functional outcome
Functional non-responders
(n = 26)
Early functional responders
(n = 74)
Late functional responders
(n = 22)
p-valuea
BCVA Baseline 65.3 ± 10.5 62.3 ± 13.2 63.8 ± 13.4 0.535
3M 63.9 ± 13.4 72.2 ± 11.0 65.1 ± 12.6 0.009
6M 64.7 ± 12.0 75.5 ± 9.6 72.7 ± 11.8 <0.001
CRT Baseline 420.7 ± 99.1 435.8 ± 109.5 434.9 ± 111.1 0.563
3M 346.9 ± 90.3 334.4 ± 62.0 348.3 ± 86.7 0.712
6M 370.4 ± 111.4 332.3 ± 61.5 311.7 ± 44.4 0.455
SFCT Baseline
339.3 ± 63.4 343.7 ± 82.6 365.3 ± 62.5 0.532
3M 328.2 ± 71.9 319.3 ± 76.2 335.4 ± 57.5 0.746
6M 303.6 ± 66.4 326.9 ± 83.2 321.7 ± 66.2 0.156
Laser Yes 22 (84.6%) 36 (48.6%) 10 (45.5%) <0.001
No 4 (15.4%) 38 (51.4%) 12 (54.5%)
N Injections
4.4 ± 1.3 4.7 ± 1.3 4.8 ± 1.3 0.267
Abbreviations: BCVA = best corrected visual acuity scored using the ETDRS letters chart. ETDRS 62 letters
(L) are Snellen 20/58; 64L (20/53); 65L (20/50); 72L (20/36); 73L (20/35) and 76L (20/30). 3M = 3 month
endpoint after the loading dose; 6M = 6 month endpoint. CRT = 1 mm central retinal thickness; SFCT =
subfoveal choroidal thickness. Early functional responders is the group of eyes gaining ≥ 5 letters at 3M and
late functional responders is the group of eyes gaining ≥ 5 letters at 6M only. aComparison responders vs
non-responders. CRT changes from baseline do not show a statistically significant difference between
responders and non-responders, displaying the poor correlation between functional response and anatomic
response. SFCT does not show a statistically significant difference between responders and non-
responders, meaning that while decreasing with anti-VEGF treatment it is not a marker of outcome, once
the population is stratified by outcome.
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
65
The ROC analyses showed that baseline SFCT was not found to be a statistically
significant predictor of being an anatomic responder, (area under the curve, AUC =
0.575, p = 0.172) nor of being a functional responder (sorting out early functional
responders from non-responders) (AUC = 0.515, p = 0.779). Since baseline SFCT was
not found to be a marker of outcome at 6M but changed more prominently in the first 3
months, a new ROC curve was calculated to correlate the early SFCT decrease and
early functional outcome (Figure 2.5).
Area Under the Curve
Test Result Variable(s): difT0 T1
Area Std. Errora Asymptotic Sig.b
Asymptotic 95% Confidence
Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
0.529 0.055 0.589 0.422 0.636
Figure 2.5. ROC curve analysis comparing the decrease in SFCT from baseline to 3M with a ≥5
L gain at EM (early functional response). Dif T0_T1 is the difference between mean baseline
SFCT and mean 3M SFCT; Sig is the p value. The Area (area under the curve, AUC) of 0.529
means that the change in baseline SFCT at 3M does not predict visual gain.
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
1 - Specificity
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Sen
siti
vit
y
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
66
The baseline SFCT was not found to be a marker of early outcome either (AUC
= 0.529, p = 0.589). This absence of a significant difference between SFCT decreases
between functional responders and non-responders from baseline to 3M is depicted in a
boxplot (Figure 2.6).
Figure 2.6. Boxplot or figure of extremes and quartiles of the difference found in SFCT from
baseline to 3M in functional responders at 3M (gain of 5 L or more) and non-responders. T0-T1
is the difference between baseline SFCT and 3M SFCT; NR + LR is the group of non-responders
at 3M (non-responders at 6M and late functional responders); ER is the group of responders at
3M (early functional responders). The distribution of the Baseline - 3M SFCT of either group
mostly overlaps, meaning that the decrease in the SFCT at 3M is not a useful surrogate of
functional gain.
2.5 Discussion
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the mean baseline SFCT is a
predictor of outcome in DME. Additional outcomes were to study how the CT changes
with anti-VEGF agents and to correlate SFCT with other CT data (collected focally
around the center of the fovea or from an area underneath the fovea).
As previously reported, the choroid thinned under anti-VEGF treatment at variable
degrees with time [4, 9]. The mean SFCT and the mean CRT decreased while the mean
BCVA increased. Therefore, it is mathematically possible to find a correlation between
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
67
the evolution of the mean SFCT, the mean CRT and the mean BCVA [5]. However, when
the eyes are stratified by outcome, that association is actually accidental, reflecting not
a prognostic value but only the effectiveness of the anti-VEGF therapy.
A similar behavior was observed between SFCT, which is the CT marker most
commonly used, and the other CT data collected at other locations around the fovea
(Supplementary Figure 2.1 and Figure 2.4).
There were previous retrospective studies pointing out in different directions, while
considering the value of SFCT as a marker of outcome [10-12]. All had considerable
drawbacks: inclusion of both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, eyes with proliferative
retinopathy included, short follow-up [10-12], the use of Snellen charts to assess BCVA,
an odd definition of anatomic response and double organ bias [7, 12]. Snellen charts are
not logarithmic and do not evaluate BCVA accurately bellow 20/50, and the choroid is
actually thicker in Type 1 diabetics [4].
About half of the eyes included had previous focal laser treatment, but focal laser
does not seem to change SFCT [13]. In the population included, previous history of laser
did not change the CT parameteres’ profile with time, and the differences found with
laser-naïves were not significantly different from laser-treated (Supplementary Figure
2.2).
Outcome calculations were done at 6 M. At this time point, none of the eyes were
excluded from follow-up due to laser rescue, need of PRP or switch to steroids. Two
eyes were treated with PRP after the 12M of follow-up and 6 were treated with steroids
(2 after 12M and 4 after 18 M, data not shown). None was rescued with focal laser, until
12 M, because, in our department, rescues apply only after 12 M of anti-VEGF treatment,
since the role of laser rescue is questionable [14]. Less patients were included in the
longer follow-ups due to the prospective profile of the study, with the later patients
included having a shorter follow-up, but that has not biased the assessment, once the
longest outcome evaluated was the 6 months’. We included eyes treated with aflibercept
and ranibizumab since they are very similar drugs in the treatment of DME. It is known
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
68
that differences in the outcome were observed for patients with BCVA ≤ 20/50 at year 1
only [15]. If aflibercept treated eyes were expected to have a better outcome and if SFCT
would be a marker of outcome, it would be pointless to this relative relation which drug
was to be used. Moreover, there is some controversy about the first year results of the
Protocol T study and patients with BCVA ≤ 20/50 had better functional outcome but had
no significant differences in the baseline CRT [16]. This issue will be addressed in detail
in Chapter 3 wherein prognostic factors of DME will be tested with linear multivariate
regression models.
As expected, the baseline SFCT decreased with age [17]. Nevertheless, the
distribution was widespread and there were several outliers, indicating that small
samples or double organ inclusion may mislead data when studying the choroid in cross
sectional studies (Figure 2.3).
A recovery of the mean BCVA and mean CRT that fluctuates over time was
observed, as that is the hallmark of the reactive regimens such as PRN (in this study 4.6
± 1.3 injections at 6M and 5.3 ± 2.0 injections at 12M). However, the evolution of SFCT
did not mimic that profile (Figure 2.2). The thickness of the retina decreases more sharply
than the thickness of the choroid (Figure 2.2). In the retina, the edema is mostly
composed of liquid material, at least in its early phases, and may increase the CRT up
to two- or threefold. On the other hand, the choroid is mostly composed of medium and
large vessels (Sattler and Haller layers), the choriocapillaris being less than 10% of the
total choroid thickness. Therefore, the decrease in the thickness of the choroid mediated
by the anti-VEGF use is probably due to liquid reabsorption, mainly from the stroma and
from the lamellae of the suprachoroidal space [4]. Anti-VEGF agents act upon blood
vessel permeability, decreasing retinal edema, by improving inner blood-retinal barrier
and probably by restoring outer retinal barrier homeostasis. RPE under homeostasis
produces VEGF to assure the choriocapillaris fenestrations, needed to establish the
routes for RPE and outer retina nutrition and for water clearance from the retina [4]. One
may speculate that in diabetes, an overproduction of VEGF by a RPE under metabolic
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
69
stress may lead to an increased permeability of the outer blood retinal barrier,
contributing to DME, sometimes with subfoveal neuroretinal detachment (SND) in the
acute phases. These changes can be reversed by the use of anti-VEGF agents. As the
choroid thins under anti-VEGF administration, a link between the decrease in CRT, visual
restoration and a decrease in SFCT, seemed unquestionable [5]. Indeed, the idea that
the thinning of the choroid under the action of anti-VEGF may predict the homeostasis
of the retina, the water clearance from the retina, resolution of the edema, and visual
recovery, is appealing. Unfortunately, the thickening of the choroid in diabetic macular
edema is controversial [4]. More importantly, DME behaves more like a group of
diseases than as a single well-defined disease. As we pointed out in a previous review
[4], and as stated by another group [18], the presence of SND probably signals an acute
form of DME with outer blood retinal barrier dysfunction, very prone to be a good
anatomic responder. It is possible that in such cases, the thinning of the choroid mirrors
somehow the restoration of the outer blood retinal barrier homeostasis. It is doubtful,
though, that this applies to all forms of DME, most notably those forms with persistent
cysts or retinal thickening where there is only limited or poor response to anti-VEGFs
and nevertheless the choroid thins. Furthermore, it is controversial that the SFCT
decrease would differentiate those eyes that would recover vision or retinal edema from
those that would not. When stratified by outcome, the mean SFCT decrease seems to
be a side effect of the anti-VEGFs only. Nevertheless, data from area measurements
seem to indicate that the percentage of the choroidal thinning may be an indicator of
undertreatment in non-fixed regimens (Figure 2.4). In Table 2.3, we see that there is a
poor correlation of baseline CRT and functional outcome. The decrease in the CRT is
not significantly different in functional responders and non-responders. This poor
correlation between anatomic response and functional response has been previously
reported [19].
HR scan mode was used as it gives a higher quality image and allows a good
visualization of the choroid-scleral border. Unlike the automatic segmentation modes that
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
70
only include the choroidal vessels [20], this method includes the suprachoroidal space,
most prone to change, and gives higher scores for the CT, even when dealing with Type
2 diabetics only. Furthermore, SD-Spectralis OCT collects an amplified image and has
a higher normative data than other devices [21]. Automatic segmentation was not used
because it was not available in the EDI mode of the software version 6.9.4.0 we used.
The central 1 mm cube automatic acquired volume for the choroid is not available either,
even while using the normal non-EDI mode. However, as long as automatic
segmentation does not overpass its most relevant shortcoming, that is, the need for
manual correction of the border lines, its relevance is questionable.
The results indicating that the baseline SFCT does not predict outcome in DME do
not exclude a role of the choroid in the pathogenesis of DME or DR, for which there is
plenty of evidence [3, 4].
The biggest limitation of this study is not to be a randomized controlled trial or
involving multiple centers and the small number of eyes in the longer follow-ups.
The strengths of this study are related to its prospective profile, the stratification of
the eyes treated by outcome, the correlation of the SFCT with outcome, the inclusion of
one eye per patient only [22], the inclusion of Type 2 diabetics only, the use of the HR
scan mode, the multiple locations for CT evaluation and the use of the ETDRS charts for
the evaluation of BCVA.
In conclusion: the choroidal thins with anti-VEGF therapy but SFCT is not a
predictor of outcome in DME. The amount of the choroid thinning may be an indicator of
undertreatment in non-fixed regimens.
Funding
This work was funded by Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Fundacao
para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, FCT), Strategic Project (UID/NEU/04539/2013), and
COMPETE-FEDER (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007440). EJC was financially supported by
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
71
the FCT Postdoctoral Fellowship SFRH/BPD/93672/2013, through European Union and
National funds and co-funded by Human Capital Operating Programme (Programa
Operacional do Capital Humano, POCH).
The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
Conflict of Interest: All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in
any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational
grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies,
stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing
arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships,
affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this
manuscript.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance
with the ethical standards of the Ethical Committee of the Leiria Hospital and with the
1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants
included in the study.
2.6. References
1. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research, N., et al., Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology, 2010. 117(6): p. 1064-1077 e35.
2. Ashraf, M., A. Souka, and R. Adelman, Predicting outcomes to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in diabetic macular oedema: a review of the literature. Br J Ophthalmol, 2016. 100(12): p. 1596-1604.
3. Lutty, G.A., Diabetic choroidopathy. Vision Res, 2017. 139: p. 161-167. 4. Campos, A., et al., Viewing the choroid: where we stand, challenges and contradictions
in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017. 95(5): p. 446-459.
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
72
5. Nourinia, R., et al., Changes in Central Choroidal Thickness after Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Intravitreal Bevacizumab Correlation with Central Macular Thickness and Best-Corrected Visual Acuity. Retina, 2018. 38(5): p. 970-975.
6. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol, 1985. 103(12): p. 1796-806.
7. Esen, F., et al., Double-Organ Bias in Published Randomized Controlled Trials of Glaucoma. J Glaucoma, 2016. 25(6): p. 520-2.
8. Meng, W., et al., Axial length of myopia: a review of current research. Ophthalmologica, 2011. 225(3): p. 127-34.
9. Lains, I., et al., Choroidal thickness in diabetic retinopathy: the influence of antiangiogenic therapy. Retina, 2014. 34(6): p. 1199-207.
10. Lee, S.H., et al., Changes of choroidal thickness after treatment for diabetic retinopathy. Curr Eye Res, 2014. 39(7): p. 736-44.
11. Yiu, G., et al., Characterization of the choroid-scleral junction and suprachoroidal layer in healthy individuals on enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2014. 132(2): p. 174-81.
12. Rayess, N., et al., Baseline choroidal thickness as a predictor for response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015. 159(1): p. 85-91 e1-3.
13. Adhi, M., A.A. Alwassia, and J.S. Duker, Analysis of choroidal thickness in eyes treated with focal laser photocoagulation using SD-OCT. Can J Ophthalmol, 2013. 48(6): p. 535-8.
14. Regnier, S., et al., Efficacy of anti-VEGF and laser photocoagulation in the treatment of visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2014. 9(7): p. e102309.
15. Wells, J.A., et al., Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology, 2016. 123(6): p. 1351-9.
16. Sivaprasad, S., et al., Using Patient-Level Data to Develop Meaningful Cross-Trial Comparisons of Visual Impairment in Individuals with Diabetic Macular Edema. Adv Ther, 2016. 33(4): p. 597-609.
17. Margolis, R. and R.F. Spaide, A pilot study of enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol, 2009. 147(5): p. 811-5.
18. Vujosevic, S., et al., Diabetic Macular Edema With and Without Subfoveal Neuroretinal Detachment: Two Different Morphologic and Functional Entities. Am J Ophthalmol, 2017. 181: p. 149-155.
19. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research, N., et al., Relationship between optical coherence tomography-measured central retinal thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology, 2007. 114(3): p. 525-36.
20. Gerendas, B.S., et al., Three-dimensional automated choroidal volume assessment on standard spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and correlation with the level of diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014. 158(5): p. 1039-48.
21. Grover, S., et al., Normative data for macular thickness by high-definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (spectralis). Am J Ophthalmol, 2009. 148(2): p. 266-71.
22. Armstrong, R.A., Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2013. 33(1): p. 7-14.
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
73
2.7. Supplementary files
Table 2.1. Demographic and ocular characteristics
Demographic characteristics
(n = 126 eyes of 126 patients; 68 RE and 58 LE )
Age (y)
Mean ± SD 66.2 ± 9.4
Median (range) 67 (46-85)
Sex
Female 60 (47.6%)
Male 66 (52.4%)
Duration of diabetes (y)
1 - 15 58 (46.0%)
16 - 25 52 (41.3%)
> 25 16 (12.7%)
Hb A1c (%)
≤ 7 33 (26.2%)
> 7 and ≤ 8 46 (36.5%)
> 8 47 (37.3%)
Hypertensiona
Yes 79 (62.7%)
No 47 (37.3%)
Insulin
Yes 67 (53.2%)
No 59 (46.8%)
Ocular characteristics (n = 126 eyes)
Lens status
Phakic 78 (61.9%)
Pseudophakic 48 (38.1%)
Injection received
RNZ only 95 (75.4%)
AFL only 13 (10.3%)
Both 18 (14.3%)
Laser
Yes 68 (55.7%)
No 54 (44.3%)
Baseline BCVA
Mean ± SD 63.2 ± 12.7
Median (range) 65.0 (24.0 -78.0)
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
74
Baseline CRT
Mean ± SD 432.4 ± 107.0
Median (range) 381 (291.0 - 749.0)
Baseline SFCT
Mean ± SD 346.6 ± 75.6
Median (range) 346.0 (124.0 - 552.0)
Baseline CT area
Mean ± SD 5791.4 ± 1272.5
Median (range) 5759.5 (2306.0 - 9576.0)
Abbreviations: RE = right eye; LE = left eye; RNZ = ranibizumab 0.5 mg; AFL = aflibercept 2 mg;
BCVA = best corrected visual acuity collected from ETDRS charts; CRT = central retinal thickness;
SFCT = subfoveal choroidal thickness; CT area = choroidal thickness area underneath the fovea
measured from 1750 µm nasal to 1750 µm temporal from the central fovea in the plane defined by
the horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea. aSystolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures
were collected in every visit to the hospital. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was calculated
according with the formula DBP + 1/3 (SBP – DBP). The patient was rated as hypertensive whenever
2 MAP values above 110 mmHg were recorded in two separate visits to the hospital.
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
75
Figure 2.1. Descriptive values during follow-up for mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and choroidal thickness. CRT = 1 mm central retinal
thickness; SFCT= subfoveal choroidal thickness; CT = choroidal thickness measured at 1750 µm, nasal (CT1750n) and temporal (CT1750t) from the fovea in the plane defined
by the horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea; superior (CT1750s) and inferior (CT1750i) from the fovea in the plane defined by the vertical line scan encompassing the
fovea; CT3500 µm (area) = choroidal thickness area underneath the fovea measured from 1750 µm nasal to 1750 µm temporal from the central fovea in the plane defined by the
horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea. 3M = 3 months, after the 3 injection loading dose; 6M = 6 months; 12M = 12 months; 18M = 18 months; 24M = 24 months. All the
measures were performed at baseline (black bar), 3M (red bar), 6M (green bar), 12M (blue bar), 18M (purple bar) and 24M (grey bar) after baseline. All measures were performed
by two independent graders and subsequently reached by consensus. Results related to areas were analysed using the ImageJ software, version 1.48, National Institutes of
Health, USA. Results are presented as mean ± SD.
Choroid and diabetes Choroidal thickness changes in DME
76
Figure 2.2. Differences in the variables considered between each endpoint and baseline in the laser-naives (white bars) and in the laser-treated subgroups (black bars).
Comparison between the differences exhibited in either group. CRT = 1 mm central retinal thickness; SFCT= subfoveal choroidal thickness; CT = choroidal thickness measured
at 1750 µm, nasal (CT1750n) and temporal (CT1750t) from the fovea, in the plane defined by the horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea; superior (CT1750s) and inferior
(CT1750i) from the fovea in the plane defined by the vertical line scan encompassing the fovea; CT3500 µm (area) = choroidal thickness area underneath the fovea manually
measured from 1750 µm nasal to 1750 µm temporal from the central fovea in the plane defined by the horizontal line scan encompassing the fovea (ImageJ software, version
1.48, National Institutes of Health, USA). BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; 3M = 3 months, after the 3 injection loading dose; 6M = 6 months; 12M = 12 months; 18M = 18
months; 24M = 24 months. Results are presented as mean ± SD. * p<0.05, correspond to comparisons between the laser-naives and in the laser-treated groups and were
obtained using independent samples t-Student or Mann-Whitney tests.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
77
3. Markers of outcome in real-world treatment of
diabetic macular edema3
3 Section 3 is based on the article: Campos A et al., Evaluation of markers of outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema. Eye Vis (Lond), 2018. 5:27.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
78
3.1. Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate short-term markers of outcome in diabetic macular edema (DME).
Methods: Prospective interventional case series included 122 eyes of 122 patients with
recently diagnosed DME. Eyes were treated with a 3-monthly loading dose of
ranibizumab or aflibercept and pro re nata thereafter. Serial enhanced deep imaging SD-
OCT high resolution scans were used to measure subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT)
and central retinal thickness (CRT). Anatomic (≥ 10% CRT decrease) and functional
responses (best corrected visual acuity, BCVA gain ≥ 5 letters) were assessed at 3
months and 6 months using univariate and multivariate analyses. Parameters tested
were gender, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, hypertension, CRT, SFCT, BCVA, ellipsoid
zone (EZ) status, subfoveal neuroretinal detachment (SND), anti-VEGF used and laser
naivety. A logistic regression model was applied to find independent markers of outcome.
Results: BCVA increased, CRT and SFCT decreased at 3M and 6M. Good metabolic
control (p = 0.003), intact baseline EZ (p = 0.030), EZ re-grading at 3M (p < 0.001) and
laser naivety (p = 0.001) were associated with better functional outcome. The regression
model showed that baseline SND and CRT are predictors of anatomic response, while
lower baseline BCVA and intact EZ are predictors of functional response.
Conclusions: The presence of SND predicts anatomic response only, while an intact
EZ is critical to achieve a good functional outcome in DME.
Keywords: diabetic macular edema, outcome factors, spectral-domain optical
coherence tomography, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, laser.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
79
3.2. Introduction
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the leading cause of blindness in patients with
diabetic retinopathy (DR) worldwide [1]. Blood retinal barrier dysfunction, inflammation
and choroidopathy seem to contribute to DME pathogenesis [2]. Optical coherence
tomography (OCT) became the most useful tool for the evaluation and follow-up of DME
and enhanced deep imaging spectral domain optical coherence tomography (EDI SD-
OCT) was successfully used in evaluating choroidal thickness [2]. Treatment of DME
shifted from laser photocoagulation to anti-VEGF therapy. However, DME exhibits wide
variability and heterogeneity [3, 4], as well as different patterns of response to anti-VEGF
treatment [5]. In Protocol T, up to half of the eyes treated were rescued with laser after
24 weeks of treatment [6]. Several attempts have been made to find markers of
prognosis or predictors of treatment response in DME. The ellipsoid zone (EZ) [7],
external limiting membrane (ELM) [8], disruption of the inner retinal layers (DRIL) [9],
hyper-reflective retinal spots (HRS) [3], subfoveal neuroretinal detachment (SND) [4],
central retinal thickness (CRT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) [10], among others
[5], have been suggested as predictors. However, some of these reports have limitations,
including retrospective profiles, small sample sizes, symmetry bias and the inclusion of
both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients while evaluating the choroid [2].
The present study attempted to avoid those limitations and was designed to
evaluate some of the predictors of outcome in eyes with recent onset DME, with special
focus on SND, EZ, metabolic control, hypertension, SFCT, CRT, baseline best corrected
visual acuity (BCVA), gender, duration of diabetes and history of macular laser.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
80
3.3. Patients and Methods
After approval from the Ethical Committees of the Faculty of Medicine of the
University of Coimbra and of the Leiria Hospital, Type 2 diabetic patients with NPDR and
recent onset DME, naive to intra-vitreal treatment, were included consecutively in a
prospective, institutional study, from June 2014 to June 2017. Each patient gave
informed consent before inclusion in the study.
The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and the standards
of Good Scientific Practice of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Coimbra.
Patients were included either to be treated with ranibizumab 0.5 mg or with aflibercept 2
mg, depending on the availability of aflibercept (June 2015) and baseline BCVA
according to the results at one year of the Protocol T study [6].
Diagnostic criteria for DR and DME were based on past ophthalmic history and
ophthalmic evaluation, including a dilated fundus examination, fundus photography, SD-
OCT, and fluorescein angiography in selected cases.
Patient data including age, gender, blood pressure, duration of diabetes, baseline
glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and previous focal laser therapy were recorded.
DME was considered when clinically significant macular edema (CSME) involving
the central macula (CI-CSME) or a CRT (1 mm central subfield thickness in the OCT-
modified ETDRS grid) ≥ 300 μm was present. Eyes were included when baseline BCVA
ranged from 24 to 78 ETDRS letters (L) (Snellen equivalent 20/320-20/32, LogMAR 1.22-
0.14). When both eyes had DME, only one eye per patient was included [11]. The right
eye was included in patients whose year of birth was an even number and the left eye
was included when the year of birth was an odd number. Eyes with prior focal laser
treatment were not excluded, as long as laser treatment was dated more than six months
prior to enrollment and laser burns did not involve the fovea.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
81
Patients were excluded if they had any other previous DR treatment other than
focal photocoagulation or any ocular diseases aside from NPDR in the treated eye. Eyes
with a myopic refractive error of greater than 4 diopters (D) were also excluded [12].
Patients whose eyes had visually significant cataract graded at more than N03 or
NC3 according to the Lens Opacity Classification Scheme were excluded.
Follow-up included baseline, 3 months (3M) and 6 months (6M). BCVA was
measured at every visit using the ETDRS standardized scale at 4 meters distance. Top
score allowed for records in the ETDRS scale was 85 L (Snellen 20/20). Patients were
treated with a monthly 3 injections’ loading dose and on a pro re nata (PRN) regimen
thereafter.
Imaging
EDI SD-OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) scans
were performed monthly in all eyes included and guided PRN decision to treat, after the
loading dose. For each study eye, a 6 mm × 6 mm macular cube scan was performed
using the high resolution (HR) posterior pole scanning mode comprising 61 horizontal B-
scans, 120 µm apart from each other, each made up of 1536 A-scans, and a 6-line star
scan, each made up of 1536 A scans, 30º apart from each other, cutting through the
fovea. Two independent raters (AC, do Carmo) measured all scans in a prospective way
and reviewed all of them at the end of the study being masked to the subjects’ outcomes,
and definitive measures were reached by consensus.
The average thickness of the central 1 mm field of the 6 mm OCT-modified
ETDRS grid was used to evaluate changes in the CRT over time. The presumed fovea
was considered as the region with the photoreceptor layer alone and was checked again
retrospectively using the device’s automatic follow-up tool. SFCT was measured using
the horizontal scan of the star scan mode centered at the fovea. Scans were evaluated
by the two scorers after marking the choroid-scleral border (1 scan × rater × follow-up
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
82
period). SFCT was manually measured from the hyperreflective line of the Bruch’s
membrane to the hyperreflective line of the choroid-scleral interface (Supplementary
Figure 3.1) using the digital caliper tool in the Heidelberg Eye Explorer software.
Whenever there were doubts about the choroid-scleral border, measurements were
compared with the horizontal line scan bypassing the fovea of the macular cube scan.
The integrity of the EZ was evaluated at baseline and after the loading dose, in the central
500 μm in either direction of the fovea (Figure 3.1 A and 3.1 B).
Figure 3.1. Re-rating the ellipsoid zone (EZ) after 3 injections of anti-VEGF. ETDRS grid from
the caliper tool set in place centered at the fovea. A. Horizontal scan, 500 μm each side of the
fovea to evaluate the EZ. Note that laser dots are outside the 1500 μm radius (second circle of
the ETDRS grid has a radius of 1750 μm) from the center of the foveola. B. ETDRS grid set in
place centered at the foveola. Vertical scan, 500 μm each side of the fovea to evaluate the EZ.
The EZ was considered disrupted when there was any focal absence of the second
hyperreflective band in the central 1000 µm either in the horizontal or in the vertical line
scans centered at the fovea of the star scan mode and that could not be attributed to the
A
B
503 µm
503 µm
503 µm
503 µm
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
83
shadowing effect of cysts or retinal vessels [13]. Whenever the raters did not agree, the
ellipsoid zone was considered unreadable. All scans were performed from 9.00 a.m. to
1.00 p.m.
Evaluation of outcome
For anatomic responders’ calculation, only baseline CRT values ≥ 300 μm were
considered. Eyes with CSME or cysts in the central 1000 μm, but with CRT < 300 μm,
were included in this study but were not considered when checking for anatomic
responders. We defined anatomic responders as eyes having a 10% reduction in the
baseline CRT either at 3M (early) or at 6M (late). Functional responders were also
divided into early and late functional responders. Eyes with BCVA gains of ≥ 5 L from
baseline at 3M were defined as early responders, while eyes with BCVA gains of ≥ 5 L
from baseline at 6M only, were defined as late responders [5].
Statistical analysis
Nominal data were described by absolute and relative frequencies. Quantitative
data were described using the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and
maximum in the sample characterization. For other quantitative data, median, minimum
and maximum were calculated but were omitted in the tables for convenience.
Quantitative variables were assessed for normality with Shapiro-Wilk test.
Comparisons between two measures, in different time points, of the same variable, were
analyzed using the paired sample t-test or Wilcoxon test, taking normality requirements
into account. Comparisons of quantitative variables between two groups were performed
with t-Student or Mann-Whitney tests, as applicable. The association between
categorical variables was assessed with Fisher’s test.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
84
Linear multivariate regression models, where being an anatomic responder or
being a functional responder were the dependent variables (baseline compared to 6M),
were built up using 12 predictors as independent variables: male gender, baseline BCVA
< 65L (Snellen < 20/50), intact baseline EZ, laser non-naivety, HbA1c, hypertension,
baseline CRT, baseline SFCT, baseline SND, ranibizumab or aflibercept use and
duration of diabetes. In both cases, the predictors were those that bore clinical
significance in addition to those variables found to be statistically relevant (the criterion
was p < 0.1). To evaluate whether laser treatment as a predictor of functional response
was associated with the duration of diabetes, a Fisher’s test was employed. An
interaction variable between diabetes duration and laser treatment was constructed and
a logistic regression model was performed. The interaction variable was built with four
different categories, which were DM ≤ 15 years and no laser treatment, DM > 15 years
and no laser treatment, DM ≤ 15 years and laser treatment, DM > 15 years and laser
treatment. This interaction variable entered in the regression model as a set of three
dummy variables representing the last three categories described before (dummy 1 =
‘DM > 15 years and no laser treatment’, dummy 2 = ’DM ≤ 15 years and laser treatment’,
dummy 3 = ’DM > 15 years and laser treatment’). The assumptions of the model
regarding residuals were observed as well as collinearity. Correlations between
quantitative variables were assessed by computing Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation
coefficients, depending on whether normality requirements were met or not. The
statistical analyses were performed on the IBM SPSS Statistics 24 and on statistic
platform R v3.3.2, The R Foundation Vienna, Austria. The level of significance adopted
was 0.05.
3.4. Results
From June 2014 to June 2017, 122 eyes from 122 patients were prospectively
included and were followed for 6M. Baseline demographic and ocular characteristics are
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
85
outlined in Table 3.1. Baseline SND was present in 27 eyes (22.1%). Baseline EZ was
intact in 80 eyes (65.5%), disrupted in 41 eyes (33.6%) and declared unreadable in 1
eye (0.8%). Graders disagreed in 14 eyes (11.1%) and a final decision was reached by
consensus (Figure 3.2 A and 3.2 B). The EZ was graded again at 3M. It was graded as
intact in 89 eyes (73.0%, Figure 3.2 C and 3.2 D) and disrupted in 33 eyes (27.0%, Figure
3.2 E).
Table 3.1. Demographic and ocular characteristics
Demographic characteristics (n = 122 patients; 68 RE and 54 LE )
Age (y)
Mean ± SD 65.2 ± 8.9
Median (range) 66 (46-85)
Sex Male 66 (54.1%)
Female 56 (45.9%)
Duration of diabetes (y)
1-15 55 (45.1%)
16-25 52 (42.6%)
>25 15 (12.3%)
HbA1c (%)
≤7 31 (25.4%)
>7 and <8 44 (36.1%)
≥8 47 (38.5%) Hypertensiona
Yes 75 (61.5%)
No 47 (38.5%)
Insulin
Yes 64 (52.5%)
No 58 (47.5%)
Ocular characteristics (n = 122 eyes)
Lens status
Phakic 80 (65.6%)
Pseudophakic 42 (34.4%)
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
86
Intravitreal injection received
RNZ only 93 (76.2%)
AFL only 14 (11.5%)
Both 15 (12.3%)
Laser
Yes 68 (55.7%)
No 54 (44.3%)
Baseline BCVA (ETDRS letters)
Mean ± SD 63.2 ± 12.7
Median (range) 67.0 (24.0 - 78.0)
Baseline CRT
Mean ± SD 432.4 ± 107.0
Median (range) 400.5 (289.0 - 776.0)
Baseline SFCT
Mean ± SD 346.6 ± 75.6
Median (range) 345.0 (124.0 - 580.0)
Baseline EZ
Intact 80 (65.6%)
Disrupted
Unreadable
41 (33.6%)
1 (0.8%)
3M EZ
Intact 89 (73.0%)
Disrupted 33 (27.0%)
Baseline SND
Yes 27 (22.1%)
No 95 (77.9%)
Abbreviations: RE = right eye; LE = left eye; Hb A1c = level of glycated haemoglobin; RNZ =
ranibizumab; AFL = aflibercept; BCVA = best corrected visual acuity collected from ETDRS charts;
CRT = central retinal thickness; SFCT = subfoveal choroidal thickness; EZ = ellipsoid zone; 3M EZ =
re-rating of the EZ after the loading dose; SND = subfoveal neuroretinal detachment. SBP = systolic
blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; MAP = mean arterial blood pressure. aSBP and DBP
were measured at baseline and whenever coming back to the hospital, including visits and injections.
MAP was determined using the formula: MAP = DBP + 1/3 (SBP – DBP). The patient was rated as
hypertensive whenever 2 MAP values above 110 mmHg were recorded in two separate visits to the
hospital.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
87
Figure 3.2. Examples of the difficulties in rating the ellipsoid zone (EZ) at baseline and after the
3-monthly injection of anti-VEGF. A. A small subfoveal neuroretinal detachment and in the
shadowing cone effect of a retinal cyst makes the rating of the EZ difficult. In this case the EZ
was rated as ‘disrupted’ by consensus. B. The EZ seems to be disrupted with an intact external
limiting membrane (ELM). C. and D. Eyes shown in A and B after the loading dose. The EZ is
now clearly visible, rated as ‘intact’ by both graders. E. EZ after the loading dose being rated as
‘disrupted’.
A
B
C
D
E
502 µm
503 µm
503 µm
502 µm
503 µm
502 µm
503 µm
502 µm
503 µm
503 µm
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
88
At 3M, graders agreed totally in EZ grading. The mean number of injections given
was 3.0 at 3M and 4.6 ± 1.3 (3 – 7) at 6M.
The mean baseline BCVA improved significantly, while the mean baseline CRT
and the mean baseline SFCT decreased significantly, at 3M and 6M (Supplementary
Table 3.1).
A total of 119 eyes out of 122 had baseline CRT values ≥ 300 μm and were
considered for anatomic response calculation. Mean baseline CRT for a total of 98 eyes
(82.4%) decreased significantly (anatomic responders) while 21 (17.6%) were non-
responders. Baseline BCVA was significantly higher and CRT was significantly lower in
anatomic non-responders. The mean number of injections given was also lower in the
anatomic non-responders (Supplementary Table 3.2).
To test whether these differences might be attributable to eyes with baseline
lower CRTs and better BCVA owing to a ‘floor effect’ that decreased CRT less than 10%,
we re-calculated anatomic response to include eyes with CRT above 350 µm only.
Thereby, allowing for a 10% decrease until 315 µm, which was previously suggested as
the cut-off value for Spectralis SD-OCT [14]. Following this criterion, the differences in
baseline BCVA and CRT between anatomic responders and non-responders did not
stand (Supplementary Table 3.3).
A total of 74 eyes (60.7%) at 3M and an additional 22 eyes (18.0%) at 6M
improved BCVA ≥ 5L and were considered functional responders (96 eyes, 78.7%). A
total of 26 eyes (21.3%) were functional non-responders (Table 3.2).
Metabolic control (HbA1c) was significantly better in functional responders (p =
0.003), whereas the duration of diabetes was not significantly different (p = 0.432)
(Supplementary Table 4).
Laser naivety was strongly associated with being a functional responder (Table
3.2 and Supplementary Table 3.4). Intact baseline EZ was associated with early
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
89
functional response and EZ re-rating at 3M was even more significantly associated with
being a functional responder.
Table 3.2. Comparison of OCT baseline characteristics and outcome measures between functional
responders and non-responders
Functional
nonresponders
(n = 26)
Early
functional
responders
(n = 74)
Late functional
responders
(n = 22)
p-
valuea
p-
valueb
BCVA
Baseline 65.3 ± 10.5 62.3 ± 13.2 63.8 ± 13.4 0.535 0.447
3M 63.9 ± 13.4 72.2 ± 11.0 65.1 ± 12.6 0.009 0.001
p-value 3M 0.506 <0.001 0.13
6M 64.7 ± 12.0 75.5 ± 9.6 72.7 ± 11.8 <0.001 <0.001
p-value 6M 0.847 <0.001 <0.001
CRT
Baseline 420.7 ± 99.1 435.8 ± 109.5 434.9 ± 111.1 0.563 0.553
3M 346.9 ± 90.3 334.4 ± 62.0 348.3 ± 86.7 0.712 0.792
p-value 3M <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
6M 370.4 ± 111.4 332.3 ± 61.5 311.7 ± 44.4 0.455 0.460
p-value 6M 0.001 <0.001 <0.001
SFCT
Baseline 339.3 ± 63.4 343.7 ± 82.6 365.3 ± 62.5 0.532 0.783
3M 328.2 ± 71.9 319.3 ± 76.2 335.4 ± 57.5 0.746 0.597
p-value 3M 0.061 <0.001 0.003
6M 303.6 ± 66.4 326.9 ± 83.2 321.7 ± 66.2 0.156 0.157
p-value 6M <0.001 0.001 <0.001
Baseline SND
Yes 3 (11.5%) 21 (28.4%) 3 (13.6%) 0.187 0.111
No 23 (88.5%) 53 (71.6%) 19 (86.4%)
Baseline EZ
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
90
Intact 13 (50.0%) 54 (72.9%) 13 (59.1%) 0.063 0.030
Disrupted 13 (50.0%) 19 (25.7%)c 9 (40.9%)
3M EZ
Intact 12 (46.2%) 62 (83.8%) 15 (68.2%) 0.001 <0.001
Disrupted 14 (53.8%) 12 (16.2%) 7 (31.8%)
Laser
Yes 22 (84.6%) 36 (48.6%) 10 (45.5%) <0.001 0.001
No 4 (15.4%) 38 (51.4%) 12 (54.5%)
Number of Injections
4.4 ± 1.3 4.7 ± 1.3 4.8 ± 1.3 0.267 0.334
Abbreviations: BCVA = best corrected visual acuity scored using the ETDRS letters chart. ETDRS 62 letters (L) are
Snellen 20/58; 64L (20/53); 65L (20/50); 72L (20/36); 73L (20/35) and 76L (20/30). 3M = 3 month endpoint after the
loading dose; 6M = 6 month endpoint. CRT = 1 mm central retinal thickness; SFCT = subfoveal choroidal thickness;
SND = subfoveal neuroretinal detachment; EZ = ellipsoid zone; 3M EZ = re-rating of the ellipsoid zone after the loading
dose. aComparison responders vs non-responders; bcomparison early responders vs non-responders. cOne eye with
unreadable EZ. BCVA increased significantly only in functional responders. CRT and SFCT changes from baseline do
not show a statistically significant difference between responders and non-responders displaying the poor correlation
between functional response and anatomic response. An intact EZ at baseline was present in a higher proportion
among functional responders and that was even more significant with the 3M re-rating. Laser naivety was more
commonly found in functional responders.
Baseline predictors for anatomic responders
According to the multivariate linear regression model, CRT and SND were found
to significantly contribute as predictors. Indeed, following this criterion, the anatomic non-
responders displayed a mean baseline CRT of 367.8 ± 58.2 µm, whereas the anatomic
responders displayed a mean baseline CRT of 450.6 ± 108.3 µm (p < 0.001). SND was
absent in all anatomic non-responders. The model was statistically significant (𝑂𝑚𝑛𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑠
𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 χ2(2) = 33.27, p < 0.001), the variance explained was 47%, 𝑅2𝑁𝑎𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑘𝑒𝑟𝑘𝑒 = 0.470.
To evaluate the model, a ROC analysis was performed, obtaining an area under the
curve (AUC) equal to 0.913 (p < 0.001, CI 95% [0.861; 0.965]).
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
91
Baseline predictors for functional responders
The multivariate linear regression model indicated low baseline BCVA, laser
naivety, lower HbA1c and intact baseline EZ as strong predictors of being a functional
responder (Table 3.3). Since laser treatment was found to be associated with the
duration of diabetes (Fisher’s test, p = 0.045, OR = 2.150), an interaction variable
between diabetes duration and laser treatment was constructed and a logistic regression
model was performed. According to the new model, laser naivety was not found to be
independent as a predictive factor (Supplementary Table 3.5).
Considering the proportion of eyes that attained higher BCVA scores at 6M, from
the 41 eyes with disrupted baseline EZ, only 11 (26.8%) attained a BCVA ≥ 75 L (Snellen
20/32). However, from the 80 eyes with intact baseline EZ, 61 (76.3%) attained a BCVA
≥ 75 L (p < 0.001), a probability 9 times greater (OR = 8.8, CI 95% [3.7, 20.7]).
As expected, low baseline BCVA (< 65 L, Snellen < 20/50) suggested poor
chances of attaining a high BCVA (≥ 75 L, Snellen ≥ 20/32) at 6M. Indeed, out of the 50
eyes for which low BCVA values were observed, only 14 (28.0%) attained high BCVA
scores. Furthermore, out of the 72 eyes for which BCVA values at baseline were ≥ 65L,
58 (80.6%) attained high BCVA scores, a probability 11 times greater (OR = 10.7, CI
95% [4.6, 24.9]) to achieve a BCVA ≥ 75 L at 6M.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
92
Table 3.3. Results of the multivariate linear regression model obtained using twelve predictors of the increase of BCVA from baseline as independent variables
Unstandartized Coefficients Standartized Coefficients 95% Confidence Interval for B
Model B SE Beta t p Lower Bound Upper Bound
(Constant) 38.773 4.219 9.190 0.000 30.414 47.131
BCVAi (L) -0.386 0.056 -0.611 -6.862 0.000 -0.497 -0.274a
Baseline EZ 4.291 1.407 0.257 3.049 0.003 1.502 7.079b
Laser -2.457 1.212 -0.155 -2.027 0.045 -4.858 -0.055c
HbA1c_bin -4.188 1.350 -0.232 -3.102 0.002 -6.862 -1.513d
DM_bin -0.960 1.193 -0.061 -0.805 0.423 -3.323 1.403
RNZ -1.523 2.469 -0.062 -0.617 0.538 -6.415 3.368
AFL -1.588 1.811 -0.086 -0.877 0.382 -5.176 1.999
Abbreviations: BCVAi (L) = baseline best corrected visual acuity in ETDRS letters; EZ = ellipsoid zone; HbA1c_bin = glycated haemoglobin level entered as a dichotomous variable (≤ 7 versus >
7); DM_bin = diabetes duration entered as a dichotomous variable (≤ 15 years versus > 15 years); RNZ = ranibizumab; AFL = aflibercept; B = regression coefficient; SE = standard error for B.
aBaseline BCVA: for each unity of increase in the baseline BCVA there is an average decrease of 0.386 letters in the dependent variable (increase of BCVA after 6 months); bBaseline EZ: eyes
with intact EZ have an average increase of 4.291 letters in the BCVA after 6 months; cLaser: eyes with history of macular photocoagulation have an average decrease of 2.457 letters in the
dependent variable (increase of BCVA after 6 months); dHbA1c: eyes with HbA1c > 7 have an average decrease of 4.188 letters in the dependent variable. In this model, diabetes duration and the
use of ranibizumab or aflibercept were not statistically significant. The regression model obtained was statistically significant (F(4,116) = 14.791, p < 0.001) and the variables explained about 32%
of the variance (R_adj = 0.315). The assumptions of the model regarding residuals were observed as well as collinearity.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
93
3.5. Discussion
The aim of this study was to evaluate markers of outcome in DME. Baseline CRT
and baseline SND were predictors of anatomic response to treatment. An intact EZ, good
metabolic control and lower BCVA were found to be baseline predictors of a better
functional response. Moreover, laser naivety was found to be an indicator of better
functional response.
Low baseline BCVA was predictive of having a large recovery (larger number of
letters gained) but not of getting higher final BCVA scores. Therefore, the lower the
baseline BCVA is, the better is the chance of getting a higher recovery in letters
(functional response). However, due to the ‘ceiling effect’ existing in eyes with higher
baseline BCVA, a higher baseline BCVA has a smaller chance of closing a wider gap in
the recovery of letters.
The presence of an intact EZ and better BCVA at baseline, were important for
attaining higher final BCVA scores. The 3M re-rating of the EZ strongly correlated with
being a functional responder. It is not clear whether the improvement of the EZ at 3M
was due to re-arrangement of the photoreceptors, true neuronal regeneration or just
better definition of the OCT scan.
Laser naivety was found to be a predictor of better functional outcome, using the
multivariate linear regression model. This is an important issue since laser was widely
used in most randomized clinical trials [6]. Laser rescue seems to decrease the number
of injections and CRT, at a cost of a lesser gain in the BCVA [15], making the role of
laser rescue questionable [16]. However, when using the logistic regression model, laser
naivety was not independent from the duration of diabetes. This association of a factor
that indicates better prognosis (laser naivety, using the multivariate regression model)
with a factor that does not (duration of diabetes) may be attributed to the shift in DME
treatment, from laser to anti-VEGFs, where laser naivety would be a real prognostic
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
94
factor indeed or, on the other hand, may indicate that eyes with a history of laser
photocoagulation had prior history of DME, therefore worsening the prognosis [17].
Good metabolic control was associated with being a functional responder, and it
was confirmed to be an independent marker when using the linear multivariate
regression model. These data enhance the importance of good metabolic control when
using non-fixed regimens of treatment. Our results partially agree with the results of a
previous retrospective study in DME patients whose eyes were treated with
bevacizumab, where previous macular laser was correlated with poor functional
response [18].
SND and CRT were powerful markers of anatomic response. Furthermore, as
previously described [19], we found a poor association between anatomic and functional
response that withstood even when the milder forms of DME were withdrawn
(Supplementary Table 3.3). These data correlate with the fact that SND is a marker of
anatomic response only, while an intact EZ is a marker of functional response.
Furthermore, SND probably is a marker of very recent or acute onset DME, particularly
prone to a swift response to treatment, but the final BCVA lies beyond the resolution of
the retinal edema, on photoreceptor integrity [2, 4, 13]. Similar to the study by Vujosevic
et al., we also did not find SND to be a marker of functional outcome [4].
Our results do not agree with previous results that pointed baseline SFCT and
CRT as predictors of outcome [10]. We found baseline SFCT lacking value as a predictor
of outcome using the multivariate linear regression model and analyzed this factor in
detail in a recent report [20].
A 3-monthly injections’ loading dose protocol was used, yet anatomical
responders and early functional responders were evaluated at 3M, where all eyes were
treated alike. Moreover, most of the improvement in BCVA occurs until 3M and this
improvement predicts BCVA in the long term [21]. We used two different anti-VEGFs,
ranibizumab and aflibercept. Available data suggest that these two drugs are mostly
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
95
similar [22, 23]. According to the multivariate linear regression model, there was no
difference between the two anti-VEGFs (Table 3.3).
The cut-off definition of DME by OCT is elusive or variable in most of trials and
about 1 of 5 cases of DME may be missed if the diagnosis is supported by OCT thickness
measurements only [24]. This is why we used the ETDRS funduscopic criteria of CI-
CSME (hard exudates or hemorrhages within 500 μm of the fovea) to include cases of
DME whose CRT was less than 300 μm. Only Type 2 diabetics were included because
we wanted to check the value of SFCT as a prognostic marker and Type 1 diabetics
have thicker choroids [2]. HR scan mode was used as it gives a higher quality image and
allows a better visualization of the choroidoscleral border and of the EZ.
ELM was not evaluated, since it largely parallels the prognostic profile of the EZ
[8]. Other possible prognostic markers such as cysts and DRIL were not evaluated,
mainly because of the limitation in the input imposed by the multivariate linear regression
models. However, a recent study by one of the authors of this study compared those
factors and the EZ and concluded that an intact EZ was the most reliable OCT marker
of them all [25].
The biggest limitation of this study is that it is not a randomized controlled trial,
does not involve multiple centers, and that factors such as DRIL, HRS or cysts were not
evaluated.
The strengths of this study are related to the fact that it is a real-world study with
a prospective profile, including one eye per patient only, to avoid a Type 1 error (when
comparing two means, concluding the means were different when in reality they were
not different – the rejection of a true null hypothesis) [26], the inclusion of Type 2 diabetics
only, the use of the HR scan mode and the use of the ETDRS charts to evaluate BCVA.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
96
3.6. Conclusion
What was known before
An intact EZ and lower baseline BCVA are predictors of functional outcome and
higher baseline CRT is a predictor of anatomic outcome.
What this study adds
SND is a predictor of anatomic outcome but does not predict the functional
outcome.
Neither CRT nor SFCT are predictors of functional outcome.
Good metabolic control is a predictor of outcome in non-fixed regimens.
Laser naivety is associated with being a functional responder but needs further
research since it did not prove to be an independent predictor in the logistic regression
model.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was developed after approval from
the Ethical Committees of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Coimbra and of
the Leiria Hospital.
Availability of data and materials: Most of data generated or analyzed during this study
are included in this published article and in its supplementary information files. The
remaining datasets are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable
request.
Conflict of interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding/support: Grant by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology,
Strategic Project (UID/NEU/04539/2013) and COMPETE-FEDER (POCI-01-0145-
FEDER-007440). EJC was financially supported by the FCT Postdoctoral Fellowship
SFRH/BPD/93672/2013, through European Union and National funds and co-funded by
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
97
Human Capital Operating Program (Programa Operacional do Capital Humano, POCH).
JM was financially supported by an unrestricted grant from Novartis. The funding
organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
3.7. References
1. Das, A., P.G. McGuire, and S. Rangasamy, Diabetic Macular Edema: Pathophysiology and Novel Therapeutic Targets. Ophthalmology, 2015. 122(7): p. 1375-94.
2. Campos, A., et al., Viewing the choroid: where we stand, challenges and contradictions in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017. 95(5): p. 446-459.
3. Vujosevic, S., et al., Imaging retinal inflammatory biomarkers after intravitreal steroid and anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017. 95(5): p. 464-471.
4. Vujosevic, S., et al., Diabetic Macular Edema With and Without Subfoveal Neuroretinal Detachment: Two Different Morphologic and Functional Entities. Am J Ophthalmol, 2017. 181: p. 149-155.
5. Ashraf, M., A. Souka, and R. Adelman, Predicting outcomes to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in diabetic macular oedema: a review of the literature. Br J Ophthalmol, 2016. 100(12): p. 1596-1604.
6. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research, N., et al., Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med, 2015. 372(13): p. 1193-203.
7. Tao, L.W., et al., Ellipsoid zone on optical coherence tomography: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2016. 44(5): p. 422-30.
8. Muftuoglu, I.K., et al., Integrity of Outer Retinal Layers after Resolution of Central Involved Diabetic Macular Edema. Retina, 2017. 37(11): p. 2015-2024.
9. Sun, J.K., et al., Disorganization of the retinal inner layers as a predictor of visual acuity in eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2014. 132(11): p. 1309-16.
10. Rayess, N., et al., Baseline choroidal thickness as a predictor for response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015. 159(1): p. 85-91 e1-3.
11. Esen, F., et al., Double-Organ Bias in Published Randomized Controlled Trials of Glaucoma. J Glaucoma, 2016. 25(6): p. 520-2.
12. Meng, W., et al., Axial length of myopia: a review of current research. Ophthalmologica, 2011. 225(3): p. 127-34.
13. Maheshwary, A.S., et al., The association between percent disruption of the photoreceptor inner segment-outer segment junction and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol, 2010. 150(1): p. 63-67 e1.
14. Grover, S., et al., Normative data for macular thickness by high-definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (spectralis). Am J Ophthalmol, 2009. 148(2): p. 266-71.
15. Schmidt-Erfurth, U., et al., Three-year outcomes of individualized ranibizumab treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema: the RESTORE extension study. Ophthalmology, 2014. 121(5): p. 1045-53.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
98
16. Regnier, S., et al., Efficacy of anti-VEGF and laser photocoagulation in the treatment of visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2014. 9(7): p. e102309.
17. Brown, D.M., et al., Long-term outcomes of ranibizumab therapy for diabetic macular edema: the 36-month results from two phase III trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology, 2013. 120(10): p. 2013-22.
18. Joshi, L., et al., Intravitreal bevacizumab injections for diabetic macular edema - predictors of response: a retrospective study. Clin Ophthalmol, 2016. 10: p. 2093-2098.
19. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research, N., et al., Relationship between optical coherence tomography-measured central retinal thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology, 2007. 114(3): p. 525-36.
20. Campos, A., et al., Choroidal thickness changes stratified by outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2018.
21. Gonzalez, V.H., et al., Early and Long-Term Responses to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of Protocol I Data. Am J Ophthalmol, 2016. 172: p. 72-79.
22. Wells, J.A., et al., Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology, 2016. 123(6): p. 1351-9.
23. Sivaprasad, S., et al., Using Patient-Level Data to Develop Meaningful Cross-Trial Comparisons of Visual Impairment in Individuals with Diabetic Macular Edema. Adv Ther, 2016. 33(4): p. 597-609.
24. Virgili, G., et al., Optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detection of macular oedema in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015. 1: p. CD008081.
25. Santos, A.R., et al., Optical coherence tomography baseline predictors for initial best-corrected visual acuity response to intra-vitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in eyes with diabetic macular edema: The Chartres Study. Retina, 2018. 38(6): p. 1110-1119.
26. Armstrong, R.A., Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2013. 33(1): p. 7-14.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
99
3.8. Supplementary files
Figure 3.1. ETDRS grid in place centered at the fovea. Note that ETDRS grid plotted (7.2 mm in
diameter) is larger than the OCT-modified ETDRS grid (6 mm in diameter) plotted to access
central retinal thickness CRT. A. and B. HR horizontal scans used to measure the SFCT. ETDRS
grid inner circle is 1200 μm (a) and middle circle is 3600 μm wide (b). C. HR vertical scan with
SFCT measured underneath the fovea.
A
B
C
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
100
Table 3.1. Baseline values for BCVA, CRT and SFCT. Differences in BCVA, CRT and SFCT
between endpoints and baseline, and number of injections given
Baseline
(n = 122)
3M - Baseline
(n = 122)
6M - Baseline
(n = 122)
63.2 ± 12.7 5.9 ± 7.1 9.5 ± 7.9
BCVA (L) <0.001 <0.001
60.6%a 77.9%a
432.4 ± 107.0 -92.8 ± 103.9 -95.7 ± 108.6
CRT (µm) <0.001 <0.001
346.6 ± 75.6 -22.5 ± 35.8 -25.6 ± 44.8
SFCT (µm) <0.001 <0.001
n Injections 3.0 ± 0.0
(3.0–3.0)
4.6 ± 1.3
(3.0–7.0)
Abbreviations: BCVA (L) = best corrected visual acuity scored using the ETDRS letters (L) chart: 63L are equivalent
to LogMAR 0.44 or Snellen 20/55; CRT = 1 mm central retinal thickness; SFCT = subfoveal choroidal thickness; n
injections = number of intra-vitreal injections given; 3M = after the 3-monthly injection loading dose; 6M = 6 months;
N injections = number of injections given at each endpoint. Results are presented as mean ± SD and range for
injections. aProportion of eyes that displayed an increase of 5L or more when compared to the baseline.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
101
Table 3.2. Comparison of outcome measures between anatomic responders and non-responders
at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Anatomic non-
responders
(n = 21)
Anatomic responders
(n = 98) p-value
BCVA (L)
Baseline 67.4 ± 11.1 61.9 ± 12.9 0.037
3M 72.7 ± 11.5 68.2 ± 12.6 0.088
6M 75.7 ± 10.7 71.9 ± 11.6 0.109
Percentage increasing ≥5L 61.9% 62.2% 1.000
p-value 3M <0.001 <0.001
p-value 6M <0.001 <0.001
CRT (µm)
Baseline 367.8 ± 58.2 450.6 ± 108.3 <0.001
3M 366.2 ± 71.8 336.4 ± 72.3 0.026
6M 367.2 ± 71.2 332.1 ± 74.3
p-value 3M 0.832 <0.001
p-value 6M 0.941 <0.001
SFCT (µm)
Baseline 350.6 ± 73.7 347.3 ± 76.1 0.859
3M 322.9 ± 72.0 326.0 ± 82.3 0.858
6M 326.7 ± 70.6 321.0 ± 78.9 0.762
p-value 3M 0.003 <0.001
p-value 6M 0.036 <0.001
Baseline SND
Yes 0 (0.0%) 27 (27.6 %) 0.003
No 21 (100%) 71 (72.4 %)
Baseline EZ
Intact 18 (85.7%) 59 (60.8%) 0.042
Disrupted 3 (14.3%) 38 (39.2%)
Laser
Yes 14 (66.7%) 51 (52.0%) 0.239
No 7 (33.3%) 47 (48.0%)
Number of injections 4.0 ± 1.2 4.8 ± 1.3 0.016
Abbreviations: BCVA = best corrected visual acuity scored using the ETDRS letters (L) chart: 62L are Snellen 20/58,
67L (20/46), 68L (20/44), 72L (20/36), 73L (20/35) and 76L (20/30); 3M = 3 month endpoint after the loading dose;
6M = 6 month endpoint; CRT = 1 mm central retinal thickness; SFCT = subfoveal choroidal thickness; SND = subfoveal
neuroretinal detachment; EZ = ellipsoid zone. For anatomic responders’ calculation, only eyes with baseline CRT
≥300 μm were considered, n = 119 eyes. Eyes were considered responders if they had a 10% decrease from baseline
CRT. The difference in vision gain between anatomic responders and non-responders was not statistically significant.
A higher mean baseline CRT and baseline SND correlated with anatomic response. The mean baseline SFCT
decreased significantly with treatment in both groups with no statistically significant difference between them.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
102
Table 3.3. Comparison of outcome measures between anatomic responders and non-responders
using a cut-off for CRT of 350 μm
Anatomic
responders
(n = 10)
Anatomic
nonresponders
(n = 84)
p-value
BCVA (L)
Baseline 63.0 ± 13.5 60.2 ± 13.0 0.450
3M 69.3 ± 14.8 67.1 ± 12.2 0.407
6M 71.7 ± 14.0 70.9 ± 11.6 0.572
p-value 3M 0.021 <0.001
p-value 6M <0.001 <0.001
CRT (µm)
Baseline 407.0 ± 64.3 471.8 ± 102.3 0.029
3M 401.6 ± 80.0 343.8 ± 74.5 0.006
6M 404.1 ± 85.8 340.3 ± 76.9 0.007
p-value 3M 0.432 <0.001
p-value 6M 0.415 <0.001
Number of injections 4.3 ± 1.3 4.9 ± 1.2 0.174
Abbreviations: BCVA = best corrected visual acuity scored using the ETDRS letters (L) chart: 60L are Snellen 20/63,
63L (20/55), 67L (20/46), 69L (20/42), 71L (20/38), and 72L (20/36); 3M = 3-month endpoint after the loading dose;
6M = 6-month endpoint; CRT = 1 mm central retinal thickness. For anatomic responders’ calculation, only eyes with
baseline CRT ≥350 μm were considered, n = 94 eyes. Unlike the former criterion using a CRT cut-off of 300 μm for
calculating anatomic outcome displayed in Supplementary Table 2.2, the differences in the number of injections given
and in the baseline BCVA did not withstand with a CRT cut-off of 350 μm. Only baseline CRT was significantly higher
in the anatomic responders.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
103
Table 3.4. Demographic characteristics of functional responders and non-responders
Functional
non-responders (n = 26)
Functional responders
(n = 96)
p-value
Age (years)
Mean ± SD 64.3 ± 8.6 65.4 ± 9.0 0.562
Median (range) 66 (47-78) 66 (46–85)
Sex
Male 11 (42.3%) 55 (7.3%) 0.190
Female 15 (57.7%) 41 (42.7%)
Duration of diabetes (years)
1-15 9 (34.6%) 46 (47.9%) 0.432
16-25 14 (53.9%) 38 (39.6%)
>25 3 (11.5%) 12 (12.5%)
HbA1c (%)
<7 1 (3.8%) 30 (31.3%) 0.003
>7 and <8 15 (57.7%) 29 (30.2%)
>8 10 (38.5%) 37 (38.5%)
Hypertensiona
Yes 19 (73.1%) 56 (58.3%) 0.256
No 7 (26.9%) 40 (41.7%)
Insulin
Yes 15 (57.7%) 49 (51.0%) 0.659
No 11 (42.3%) 47 (49.0%)
Laser
Yes 22 (84.6%) 46 (47.9%) <0.001
No 4 (15.4%) 50 (52.1%)
Abbreviations: HbA1c = level of glycated hemoglobin (percentage); SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic
blood pressure; MAP = mean arterial blood pressure. MAP was determined using the formula: MAP = DBP + 1/3 ×
(SBP - DBP). aThe patient was rated as hypertensive whenever two MAP values above 110 mmHg were recorded in
two separate visits to the hospital. Baseline demographic characteristics show a statistically significant difference
between functional responders and non-responders for metabolic control and laser treatment. Interestingly, the
duration of diabetes is not a factor influencing the prognosis when defining functional response as a gain of 5 letters.
Choroid and diabetes Evaluation of markers of outcome
104
Table 3.5. Logistic regression model using all predictors of BCVA increase as independent
variables entering the interaction between duration of diabetes and laser treatment
Predictor (reference) B SE p-value 95% CI for B
Baseline BCVA (L) -0.397 0.055 <0.001 (-0.505, -0.289)
Baseline EZ 4.917 1.453 0.001 (2.040, 7.795)
Dummy 1 1.136 1.808 0.531 (-2.444, 4.717)
Dummy 2 -0.936 1.794 0.603 (-4.490, 2.617)
Dummy 3 -3.591 1.567 0.024 (-6.694, -0.488)
Constant 32.590 3.247 <0.001 (26.158, 39.022)
Abbreviations: BCVA (L) = best corrected visual acuity scored using the ETDRS letters (L) chart; EZ = ellipsoid zone;
B = regression coefficient; SE = standard error for B; 95% CI for B is the 95% confidence interval for the regression
coefficient; DM = duration of diabetes. The interaction variable between diabetes duration and laser treatment has
four different categories: DM ≤15 years and no laser treatment; DM >15 years and no laser treatment; DM ≤15 years
and laser treatment; DM >15 years and laser treatment. This interaction variable entered in the regression model as
a set of three dummy variables representing the last three categories described before (Dummy 1 = DM >15 years
and no laser treatment; Dummy 2 = DM ≤15 years and laser treatment; Dummy 3 = DM >15 years and laser treatment).
In this model, the variables Dummy 1 and Dummy 2 were not statistically significant. The meaning of the regression
coefficient is similar to the first model (Table 3.3) except for the variable Dummy 3. In this case, the B value means
that eyes of patients being diabetic for more than 15 years and undergone laser treatment present on average a
decrease of 3.591 letters in the dependent variable (increase of BCVA after 6 months) when compared to the eyes of
patients that did not have laser treatment and have diabetes for less than 16 years. The model attained was statistically
significant (F(5,115) = 12.624, p <0.001) and the variables explained about 33% of the variance (R_adj = 0.326). The
assumptions of the model regarding residuals were observed as well as collinearity.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
105
4. Inflammatory cells proliferate in the choroid and
retina without choroidal thickness change in
Type 1 diabetes4
4 Section 4 is based on an article submitted to Experimental Eye Research.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
106
4.1. Abstract
Purpose: Increasing evidence points to inflammation as a key factor in the pathogenesis
of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Choroidal inflammatory changes in diabetes have been
reported and in vivo choroidal thickness (CT) has been searched as a marker of
retinopathy with contradictory results. We aimed to investigate the early stages in the
choroid and retina in an animal model of Type 1 diabetes.
Methods: Type 1 diabetes was induced in male Wistar rats via a single i.p.
streptozotocin injection. At 8 weeks after disease onset, CT, choroidal vascular density,
VEGF and VEGFR2 expression, microglial cell and pericyte distribution were evaluated.
Results: Diabetic rats showed no significant change in CT and choroidal vascular
density. A widened pericyte-free gap between the retinal pigment epithelium and the
choroid was observed in diabetic rats. The immunoreactivity of VEGFR2 was decreased
in the retina of diabetic rats, despite no statistically significant difference in the
immunoreactivity of VEGF. The density of microglial cells significantly increased in the
choroid and retina of diabetic rats. Reactive microglial cells were found to be more
abundant in the choroid of diabetic rats. Evidences of the interconnection between the
superficial, intermediate, and deep plexuses of the retina were also observed.
Conclusions: At early stages, Type 1 diabetes does not affect choroidal thickness and
choroidal vascular density. Proliferation and reactivity of microglial cells occurs in the
choroidal stroma and the retina. The expression of VEGFR2 decreases in the retina.
Keywords: Choroid; retina; Type 1 diabetes; choroidal thickness; microglia.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
107
4.2. Introduction
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common complication of diabetes and is
characterized by alterations in the blood-retinal barrier (BRB), inflammation and
choroidopathy [1]. Although Type 1 diabetes (T1D) accounts for less than 10% of all
cases of diabetes, DR progression is faster and more severe than in Type 2 diabetes [2].
DR was for long considered to be a pure microvascular disease, but increasing
evidences point to inflammation as a key factor in the pathogenesis of DR [3].
Inflammatory events develop either in the retina and the choroid during the course of DR
[4, 5]. The choroid is essential for the nutrition and water clearance of the outer retina
[6]. A diabetic choroidopathy has long been described, although clear evidence of the
role of the choroid in the pathophysiology of DR is lacking.
Several attempts have been made to establish a link between alterations in the
choroidal thickness (CT), assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and the
progression of DR in humans. However, CT as a surrogate of choroidal flux, DR or
choroidal inflammation in studies with human diabetic subjects failed to be reliable [7].
OCT has been used to search for retinal changes in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced
diabetic rats [8, 9]. However, in vivo CT has not been assessed in animal models of
diabetes.
While involved in the regular homeostasis of the retina, under the low level
chronical inflammation in the diabetic retina, due to hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and
oxidative stress, the retinal resident innate immune cells, microglial cells, become
activated, change their morphologic appearance from “dendritic” to “ameboid”, and start
to produce pro-inflammatory mediators [4]. These mediators are known to lead to
neuronal cell dysfunction, and damage capillary pericytes and endothelial cells, exposing
the endothelia to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), resulting in inner BRB
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
108
breakdown [10, 11]. Furthermore, migration of activated microglial cells from the retina
to the choroid by transcytosis has been demonstrated in diabetes [1, 12].
VEGF-A is the VEGF isoform related to vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in
homeostasis and disease. VEGF-A triggers its effects in the retina and choroid through
complex receptor-mediated signaling cascades, involving tyrosine kinase VEGF receptor
2 (VEGFR2), which is the major mediator of mitogenesis, angiogenesis and
microvascular permeability [11]. VEGF secreted at the basolateral side of retinal RPE
cells contribute to keep the fenestrations of the choriocapillaris endothelium, primordial
for the nourishment of the outer retina, pan-retinal dehydration and outer BRB
homeostasis. Nevertheless, increased VEGF levels may lead to junction-protein loss,
altered polarization and loss of function of the RPE cells, with disruption of the outer BRB
and macular edema [1]. Comparison of VEGF and VEGFR2 profiles throughout the
retina and choroid in T1D has not been assessed yet.
Herein, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the early stages of T1D on the choroid
and retina, searching for molecular and cellular signatures of the normal physiological
functioning, as well as of pathological change in disease.
4.3. Materials and Methods
Animals
All procedures got previous approval by the Animal Welfare Committee of the
Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine,
University of Coimbra. The animals received humane care according to the criteria
outlined in the Guide for the Care and the Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by EU
Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments and with the Association for Research in
Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) statement for animal use.
Male Wistar Han rats (8-weeks old) were randomly assigned to T1D (n = 16) and
control (n = 12) experimental groups. T1D was induced with a single intra-peritoneal
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
109
injection of STZ (65 mg/kg), freshly dissolved in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 4.5,
(Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) [13]. Hyperglycemic status (glycemia > 250 mg/dL) was
confirmed two days later using a glucometer (Ascensia ELITE™, Bayer Corporation,
Mishawaka, IN, USA). The rats were weighted, glycemia was measured, blood samples
were collected (i) at the beginning of the study, i.e., just before STZ injection (these
values were omitted for convenience), (ii) 2 days after STZ injection (diabetes onset),
and (iii) 8 weeks after diabetes onset. Hemoglobin A1c (Hb A1c) was measured at 8
weeks after diabetes onset only.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT)
The CT was evaluated by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-
OCT, Phoenix Micron IV, Phoenix Research Labs, Pleasanton, CA, USA) [14]. SD-OCT
scans were performed in both eyes of all rats, (i) at the beginning of the study, i.e., just
before STZ injection in the animals randomised for the diabetic cohort, and (ii) 8 weeks
after diabetes onset. The animals were anesthetised via i.p. injection with ketamine 80
mg/kg+xylazine 5 mg/kg (80:5, for short; Imalgene 1000, Merial, Lyon, France, and
Rompum, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany, respectively), and cornea anesthesia (4
mg/mL oxybuprocaine hydrochloride; Anestocil®, Laboratório Edol, Carnaxide,
Portugal), pupils dilation (1%, Tropicil®, Laboratório Edol, Carnaxide, Portugal) and
corneal hydration (2% Methocel™, Dávi II Farmacêutica S.A., Barcarena, Portugal) was
kept during procedure. The lens was placed closer to the rat’s eye, such that an inverted
image was obtained, and the deeper structures were placed closer to zero-delay [15].
SD-OCT scans were obtained above the optic nerve head (ONH), in both eyes
of all rats, in the area within 1 to 3 ONH diameter from the optic disc. The CT was
automatically measured using the InSight image segmentation software (v.1; Voxeleron
LLC - Image analysis solutions, Chabot Drive, CA, USA). Lines of automatic
segmentation of the choroid delivered by the software were manually replaced at the
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
110
boundary lines, i.e., at the RPE and the choroid-scleral border (Supplementary Figure
4.1). The mean CT per scan was determined and the final CT value was obtained by
averaging the results of three scans from distinct locations.
Tissue preparation for cryosections
The animals were anesthetised, as described above, and intracardially perfused
with 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline (PBS, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.8 mM KH2PO4,
10 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.4), followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M PBS. The
enucleated eyes of diabetic rats (n = 9) and controls (n = 7) were post-fixed in 4% PFA,
for 1 h. The eyes were washed in successive solutions of PBS, and immersed in solutions
containing 15% and 30% of sucrose in PBS, for 1 h in each solution. Afterwards, they
were embedded in a 1:1 30% sucrose and embedding resin (Shandon™ Cryomatrix™,
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) solution, before freezing in dry ice. Eyeball
sections, 14 µm-thick, from both right and left eyes, were obtained using a cryostat (Leica
CM3050S, Nussloch, Germany), at -22ºC, and mounted on adhesive slides (Superfrost
Plus™, Thermo Fisher Scientific). A total of four sections (140 µm apart) were collected
per slide.
Immunofluorescence
Eye cryosections were labelled to assess the retinal and choroidal structure,
following a procedure described previously [16]. The cryosections were rehydrated twice
in PBS for 5 min, followed by blocking and permeabilization for 1 h in 10% goat serum
and 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS. The cryosections were then incubated overnight with
primary antibodies (Supplementary Table 4.1) diluted in 0.5% Triton X-100, at 4ºC. After
washing with PBS, the crysections were incubated with corresponding secondary
antibodies (Supplementary Table 4.2) diluted in 0.5% Triton X-100, for 1 h. After
washing, the cryosections were incubated with 1:5,000 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
111
(DAPI, Invitrogen™), and coverslipped using mounting medium (Glycergel, Dako,
Carpinteria, CA, USA).
Digital images were captured using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Axio
Observer.Z1, Zeiss, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), using a Plan-Apochromat
20×/0.8 objective), and a laser scanning confocal inverted microscope (LSM 710 Axio
Observer, Zeiss), using a Plan-Apochromat 20×/0.8 objective.
Eight bit images were analyzed using the ImageJ software (version 1.48, National
Institutes of Health, USA) [17]. Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cells were manually counted in
the choroid and retina. Data were expressed as number of cells/mm of choroidal or
retinal length, respectively. Rat endothelial cell antigen 1 (RECA-1) and NG2
immunoreactivity was scored in the choroid as mean fluorescence intensity per area
selected (reference area selected of 10,737.08 ± 6,306.11 µm2), while fluorescent NG2+
cells and RECA-1 focal immunostaining were manually counted in the retina. VEGF and
VEGFR2 immunoreactivity were quantified as mean fluorescence intensity/area for each
layer analysed. All results were expressed as the mean count of 12 slices per eye (right
eyes only).
Direct labelling and visualization of choroidal vessels in
sclerochoroidal whole mounts
Intracardiac perfusion with PBS was performed in rats under anesthesia (i.p.;
ketamine:xylazine 160:30). Intra-cardiac perfusion of 1,1’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-
tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI, Cat. #D-282, Invitrogen/Molecular
Probes, Carlsbad, CA, USA) 0.120 mg/mL in 1% glucose in PBS was applied, following
perfusion with 4% PFA. The eyes were enucleated, and sclerochoroidal whole mounts
were prepared. The whole mounts were fixed in 4% PFA for 15 min, washed with PBS,
and blocked with 10% goat serum in 0.3% Tween in PBS for 1 h. Samples were
incubated with the primary antibodies diluted in 3% goat serum in PBS for 3 days at 4ºC
(Supplementary Table 4.1). After washing overnight with PBS, whole mounts were
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
112
incubated with secondary antibodies (Supplementary Table 4.2) overnight at 4ºC. After
washing, explants were flat mounted onto glass slides using mounting medium.
The images were obtained by confocal microscopy using Plan-Apochromat 20×
objective lens NA0.8 or EC Plan-Neofluor 40x oil objective lens NA1.3, and were
analysed using the ImageJ software. Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cells were classified as
elongated or round-shaped cells, and were manually counted in the choroid in all in-
depth planes of the slice (Supplementary Figure 4.2). Z-stacks were 34 µm-thick and
were imaged in 11 in-depth slices. The choroidal vascular density (defined as the
percentage of total area covered by choroidal vessels) [18] was determined at ≤10 µm
(choriocapillaris) and >10 µm outwards from the RPE plane (medium and large vessels)
in a selected area (213 × 213 µm, Supplementary Figure 4.3). Results were expressed
as the mean of 14 counts per eye (n = 5 controls; n = 7 diabetics).
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Version 25.0, IBM Corp.,
Armonk, NY, USA). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normality of data (p >
0.05). The normally distributed data were evaluated concerning the homogeneity of
variance, using the Levene’s test (p > 0.05). The independent Student’s t-test was used
to compare the means between two experimental groups for the same variable.
Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Values were presented as mean ±
standard error of the mean (SEM).
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
113
4.4. Results
Choroidal thickness and vascular density do not change in Type 1
diabetes
T1D was induced in 16 rats while 12 animals were in the control group. Diabetic
rats exhibited significantly decreased body weight (p < 0.001), hyperglycemia (p <
0.001), and increased HbA1c (control: 6.2 ± 0.1% versus T1D: 8.3 ± 0.3%, t(13) = 4.486,
p = 0.001), at 8 weeks after diabetes onset (Supplementary Figure 4.4).
CT was assessed in both eyes of all rats by OCT (Figure 4.1A). At the beginning
of the study, CT was similar in both experimental groups (38.00 ± 1.18 µm, in the control
group, and 39.13 ± 0.88 µm, in the diabetic group; t(52) = - 0.773, p = 0.443). Likewise,
8 weeks after diabetes onset, no significant differences were detected between both
groups (39.83 ± 0.91 µm, in the control group, and 39.44 ± 0.62 µm, in the diabetic group;
t(52) = 0.369, p = 0.714) (Figure 4.1B).
Twelve rats were assigned for choroidal whole mounts analyses (n = 5 controls
and n = 7 diabetics). A trend towards increased vascular density was observed in the
middle+outer choroid of diabetic rats. However, no statistically significant differences in
vascular density were found when comparing the choroidal vasculature between both
experimental groups (Figure 4.1C and Supplementary Table 4.3).
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
114
Figure 4.1. Effect of Type 1 diabetes on the choroidal thickness. (A) Representative OCT images
of the retina and choroid of control and diabetic rats, at the beginning of the study (baseline) and
at 8 weeks after diabetes onset. Scale bar: 50 µm. (B) Choroidal thickness of control and diabetic
rats, at the baseline and 8 weeks after diabetes onset, based on in vivo OCT line scans. Bars
represent mean ± SEM (control rats, n = 12; diabetic rats, n = 16). (C) Vascular density analysis
at the inner (≤ 10 µm from the outer RPE plane) and middle + outer choroid (> 10 µm from the
outer RPE plane) in control and diabetic rats assessed in sclerochoroidal wholemounts, at 8
weeks after diabetes onset, based on Dil labelling of choroidal vessels. Bars represent mean ±
SEM (control animals, n = 5; diabetic animals, n = 7).
GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer nuclear
layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
B
A
Control
Ba
seli
ne
8
we
ek
s
Diabetic
INL
GCL
ONL
RPEChoroid
Control Diabetic
0
20
40
60
80
100
inner choroid outer choroid
Ch
oro
idal va
scu
lar
den
sity
(%)
C
Control Diabetic
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 8
Ch
oro
idal th
ickn
ess (
µm
)
Time (week)
baseline
inner middle + outer
INL
GCL
ONL
RPEChoroid
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
115
Type 1 diabetes changes pericyte cells distribution in the inner
choroid
Sixteen rats (7 controls and 9 diabetics) were assigned for immunoreactivity
experiments in eye cryosections. Immunoreactivity of NG2 evidenced polarity in
distribution of perivascular mural cells (pericytes) at the innermost choroidal area. NG2+
cells were found to leave unmarked ‘blank’ gaps behind, at the area between the RPE
posterior cell line and the inner choroid, drawing a jagged pattern, corresponding to
multifocal decreases in mural cells. This pattern was more evident in diabetic rats (Figure
4.2A). RECA-1 immunoreactivity at the choriocapillaris showed continuity with the RPE
line (Figure 4.2B). Evidences of interconnecting vessels between retinal plexuses were
visualised by immunolabelling RECA-1 (Supplementary Figure 4.5), between (i) the
superficial and intermediate plexuses, (ii) the intermediate and deep plexuses, and (iii)
the superficial and deep plexuses. There were no statistically significant differences in
the immunoreactivity of NG2 and RECA-1 in the whole choroidal or retinal areas,
between both experimental groups (Supplementary Table 4.4).
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
116
Figure 4.2. Effect of T1D on the localization of mural and endothelial cells in the choroid and
retina. Representative images showing the immunolabelling pattern of (A) NG2 and (B) RECA-1
in the choroid and retina of control and diabetic rats, 8 weeks after diabetes onset (control
animals, n = 7; diabetic animals, n = 9). Polarization in the disposition mural cells is highlighted
(white arrows). Scale bar: 100 µm.
GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer nuclear
layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
NG
2
Control Diabetic
RE
CA
-1
A
B
Control Diabetic
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
117
Type 1 diabetes decreases the expression of VEGR2 in the retina
VEGF immunoreactivity was higher at the outer limiting membrane (OLM) and
RPE, being still important at the retinal nerve fibre layer and choroid (Figure 4.3A and
C). There was a trend for an increase in the VEGF immunoreactivity in diabetic rats, but
this difference was not statistically significant at any of the locations considered (Figure
4.3C and Supplementary Table 4.5).
VEGFR2 immunoreactivity was of overall much lower magnitude of fluorescence,
being observed mainly in the retinal nerve fibre and ganglion cell layers (GCL), outer
plexiform layer (OPL) and OLM, in control and diabetic rats (Figure 4.3B and D).
Conversely to VEGF’s, the VEGFR2 immunoreactivity significantly decreased in diabetic
rats in the inner nuclear layer (INL) (t(13) = 2.337, p = 0.036) and outer nuclear layer
(ONL) (t(13) = 2.465, p = 0.028) (Figure 4.3D and Supplementary Table 4.5).
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
118
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
119
Figure 4.3. Effect of early T1D on the immunoreactivity of VEGF and VEGFR2 in the choroid and
retina. Representative images showing the immunoreactivity of (A) VEGF and (B) VEGFR2 in the
choroid and retina of control and diabetic rats, at 8 weeks after diabetes onset. Scale bar: 100
µm. (C) VEGF and (D) VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in eye cryosections based on 12 independent
specimen counts per eye. VEGF and VEGFR2 immunoreactivity was quantified as fluorescence
intensity/area per layer. Counting was done for the right eye only, in all animals. Bars represent
mean ± SEM (control animals, n = 7; diabetic animals, n = 9). Significance: *p < 0.05.
GCL + RNFL: ganglion cell layer and retinal nerve fibre layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer; INL: inner
nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer; OLM: outer limiting
membrane; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
C
D
Control Diabetic
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Flu
ore
sce
nce
in
ten
sity/a
rea
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Flu
ore
sce
nce
in
ten
sity/a
rea
Control Diabetic
**
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
120
Interestingly, VEGF immunoreactivity across the retina co-localises with MG
marker, vimentin (Figure 4.4). Maximum immunoreactivity of both, VEGF and vimentin,
was found at the GCL in its innermost area and retinal nerve fibre layer, limited by the
inner limiting membrane or MG basement membrane, peaking again at the plexiform
layers until the OLM, where MG end feet intertwine with PRs outer segments.
Figure 4.4. Co-localization of the immunoreactivity of vimentin and VEGF in the retina.
Representative eye cross-sections of (A) control and (B) diabetic rats, at 8 weeks after diabetes
onset, immunolabelled against vimentin and VEGF. Scale bar: 100 µm.
GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer nuclear
layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
A Control
Vimentin VEGF Vimentin VEGF DAPI
DA
PI
DA
PI
B Diabetic
Vimentin VEGF Vimentin VEGF DAPI
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
121
Type 1 diabetes increases microglial cells’ density and reactivity in
the choroid and retina
In eye cryosections, we observed a trend to higher Iba1+ cells’ density in the
choroid of diabetic rats. In the retina of diabetic rats, Iba1+ cells’ density significantly
increased (t(9.293) = - 2.785, p = 0.021; Figure 4.5A and C and Supplementary Table
4.6). Iba1+ cells in the retina of control rats were found mostly in the inner retinal layers.
Conversely, in diabetic rats, Iba1+ cells were observed throughout the retina, including
in the outer retinal layers, ONL and OPL.
MHC class II+ cells were significantly increased in the choroid of diabetic rats (t(14)
= - 2.669, p = 0.018). No MHC class II+ cells were observed in the retina of both
experimental groups (Figure 4.5B and D and Supplementary Table 4.6).
Iba1 and MHC class II immunolabelling was further performed in sclerochoroidal
whole mounts, after cleaning and labelling choroidal blood vessels by cardiac perfusions
with PBS and DiI (n = 5, controls; n = 7 diabetics). Iba1+ cells density in the choroidal
stroma were statistically significantly increased in diabetic rats (Figure 4.5E and
Supplementary Table 4.7), which is in line with the aforementioned trend obtained in eye
cryosections. Statistically significant differences were observed for elongated cell counts
(t(10) = -3.201, p = 0.009). Likewise, a trend towards increased choroidal round MHC
class II+ cell counts in T1D rats was observed (Figure 4.5E and Supplementary Table
4.7).
Interestingly, Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cells are located increasingly outwards in the
choroidal stroma, respecting a polarity in distribution of cells as observed with pericytes,
leaving a cell-free space behind at the innermost choroidal area (Supplementary videos
4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5).
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
122
Iba1
MH
C c
lass II
A
B
Control Diabetic
Control Diabetic
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
123
Figure 4.5. Effect of Type 1 diabetes on microglial cell counts and reactivity in the choroid and
retina. Representative images showing the immunoreactivity of (A) Iba1+ and (B) MHC class II+
cells in the choroid and retina of control and diabetic rats, at 8 weeks after diabetes onset. Scale
bar: 100 µm. (C) Iba1+ cell counts in the retina, and (D) Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cell counts in the
choroid, collected from immunolabelling of eye cross-sections. Bars represent mean ± SEM
(control animals, n = 7; diabetic animals, n = 9). (E) Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cells density in the
choroid collected from sclerochoroidal wholemounts. Bars represent mean ± SEM (control
animals, n = 5; diabetic animals, n = 7). Significance: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
MHC class II: major histocompatibility complex class II; IPL: inner plexiform layer; INL: inner
nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer.
0
10
20
30
40
elongated round elongated round
Iba1+ cells MHC class II+ cells
Num
ber
of
cells
all
in-d
epth
pla
nes
C
Control Diabetic
D
Control Diabetic
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
IPL OPL total retina
Iba1
+cells
/mm
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Iba1 MHC class II
Positiv
e c
ells
/mm
*
*
Control Diabetic
E
**
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
124
4.5. Discussion
CT has been used as a surrogate for choroidal blood flow, DR, diabetic
choroidopathy and diabetic macular edema (DME) in diabetic patients. Most studies
found CT to decrease after panphotocoagulation for proliferative DR and after anti-VEGF
treatment for DME. However, different studies led to different conclusions about CT
changes with diabetes, DR staging and DME [6, 19, 20]. Most reasons are related to
bias in collecting and treating data, but other reasons are linked to CT inter- and intra-
individual variability and difficulty in evaluating the suprachoroid [7]. CT decreases with
age and T1D patients are usually younger with thicker choroids. The evidences of
diabetes as an inflammatory disease and the findings that one third of patients with DME
are resistant to anti-VEGF therapy and responsive to steroids [10, 21-24] brought the
focus back on diabetic choroidopathy.
OCT has been used in animals to check for retinal changes in diabetes, but not
for changes in the choroid [9]. Rats are the most used model for studying human
diseases and their choroidal structure is closest to human’s than other models’ [25, 26].
In this work, to the best of our knowledge, in vivo CT was evaluated by OCT for the first
time in STZ-induced T1D rats. No significant differences in CT were observed between
control and diabetic rats. Perhaps the duration of diabetes (8 weeks) might not be long
enough to cause significant differences in the CT. Nonetheless, this was an aggressive
model of T1D, with hyperglycemia, body weight loss and mean Hb A1c of 8.3 ± 0.3%.
DiI-perfused sclerochoroidal whole mounts observed by confocal microscopy
revealed no significant differences in vessel density in the inner or outer choroid between
control and diabetic rats. Indeed, the choriocapillaris analysis failed to reveal significant
differences in density between control and diabetic rats, paralleling similar findings in
humans in histopathological studies [27] and OCT angiography (OCTA) [28]. Subtle,
transient, reversible changes in the choriocapillaris detected by OCTA, like vascular
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
125
remodeling, dependent on, or causing, RPE cell stress and disease, may be more
accountable in humans. Nevertheless, our data agree with previous data from electron
microscopy, hemodynamic and histopathological studies of the choriocapillaris in T1D
rats, where no differences in the capillary diameter, despite reduced blood flow, and no
changes in the luminal surface area or in the area of intervessel stroma, were reported
[29]. Vascular remodeling or focal alterations were suggested, since there was evidence
of cellular debris in the stroma and of migrating endothelial cells in the choriocapillaris.
Mural cells, essentially pericytes, were reported to have a sparse,
noncircumferential, polarized distribution, leaving a gap free of cells at the
choriocapillaris side facing the RPE, a polarized disposition [30]. We observed this
polarized disposition in the form of multifocal gaps between the RPE and the inner
choroid by NG2 immunolabelling, drawing a jagged pattern. Enhancement of this jagged
pattern to some degree was observed in diabetic rats, where pericyte cell disposition
leaves slightly wider cell-free gaps between the choroid and the RPE. The total
expression of NG2 in the choroid was not different between control and diabetic rats,
suggesting that there is not a significant loss of perivascular mural cells that wrap around
medium and large vessels. However, if depletion of pericytes at the choriocapillaris is
related with vascular remodeling, the increased jagged pattern observed in diabetic rats
might just be an indirect clue of increased vascular remodeling at the choriocapillaris
level in T1D. Interestingly, polarized disposition of cells was also observed for
inflammatory cells in the choroidal stroma via Iba1 and MHC class II immunolabelling in
sclerochoroidal whole mounts (Supplmentary videos 1-5).
VEGF immunoreactivity was higher at the retinal nerve fibre layer, GCL and RPE,
being still relevant at the choroid. VEGFR2 immunoreactivity peaked at the innermost
retina but was negligible at the RPE and choroid. Moreover, there was a trend of the
immunoreactivity of VEGF to be increased in diabetic rats while the immunoreactivity of
VEGFR2 was higher in control rats. These results agree with data previously described,
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
126
where VEGF and VEGFR2 were found to be present at the same locations in normal rat
eyes as constitutive survival factors and VEGF was increased in diabetic eyes [31].
Conversely, they do not agree with results reporting VEGFR2 to be increased in the
retina and choroid of early diabetic rats, where VEGFR2 expression was mainly located
in the capillaries [32]. Our data seem to be more in line with previous results relating
VEGFR2 expression to neurons than to blood vessels [33]. These differences may
depend on a shorter duration of diabetes, on a distinct animal model, on a different
antibody, or on a different locus of probe or antibody linkage to the tyrosine kinase
receptor 2. The profile of VEGF immunoreactivity is consistent with VEGF secretion by
Müller cells and the RPE, as reported by others [34, 35].
A statistically significant increase of elongated Iba1+ cells and a trend towards
increased MHC class II+ cell number was observed in diabetic choroidal stroma. Cell
migration from the retina into the choroid has been described before [12]. We
demonstrated that the Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cells were actually present in the
choroidal stroma and not just passing by within the vessel lumina, since the choroidal
vasculature had been previously cleaned by perfusions. These data were confirmed by
the analysis of eye cryosections, where Iba1+ cells in the retina and MHC class II+ cells
in the choroid were statistically significantly increased in diabetic rats. The presence of
Iba1+ cells in the outer retina layers was a distinct feature of diabetic retinas, as
previously described [36], including in the outer retinal layers [10, 37].
The accumulation of inflammatory cells in the outer retina may be due to
increased cell traffic from the retina into the choroid [12] or to increased metabolic-driven
hypoxemia at the outer retina [38] with VEGF-mediated recruitment of inflammatory cells
[11, 39]. Increased number and activity of inflammatory cells in the retina displace
pericytes from the endothelium and increase endothelial leakage via increased VEGF
secretion and rupture junction proteins [10, 40], resulting in inner BRB breakdown. These
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
127
are features that confirm the association of T1D with increased inflammation in the retina
and in the choroid, including of choriocapillaris remodeling [4, 5].
We sought for molecular, inflammatory, and mural cells signatures in T1D,
because diabetes is not just a VEGF-mediated but it is also an inflammatory condition
[3, 41].
VEGF-driven inner BRB breakdown at the venule side of the superficial retinal
vasculature has been pointed as the earliest event in diabetes [42] and it was related to
pericyte loss and retinal hypoxemia [43, 44]. However, retinal hypoxemia may not be
present in the early stages of T1D in rats [45]. Microglial cell migration throughout the
retina has been described in T1D [10, 12], and, particularly, microglia cell activation has
been observed since the early stages of the disease [36]. Pericytes protect the
endothelial cells from exposition to VEGF [11]. Mitochondrial superoxide production in
response to hyperglycaemia, rather than hypoxemia, may be the first event to dislodge
pericytes from the capillary wall [46].
In this work we found important simultaneous events occurring at the choroid and
retina in T1D. Accumulation of microglial cells in the outer retina and of
monocyte/macrophage cells in the choroid, along with loss of the polarized distribution
of choroidal pericytes, widening the gap between the RPE and the inner choroid, may
significantly disturb the function of the RPE. Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cells showed the
same kind of polarized distribution in the inner choroid. We hypothesise that the
increased burden of inflammatory cells in the T1D choroid may change this polarized
distribution. All these findings point to a role of choriocapillaris remodeling and outer BRB
in the initial stages of T1D retinopathy.
In vivo CT characterization by OCT and the cell signatures in whole thickness
tissues, such as the choroid and retina, was also performed in T1D rats. This approach
was important to understand the role of the choroid in DR while looking at events that
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
128
are simultaneously taking place in the retina. Immunofluorescence colocalization studies
allowed the identification of several types of cells involved in the choroid and retina of
T1D rats, as well as changes in their number and disposition. These studies also allowed
to map and compare the expression of VEGF and VEGFR2 in the choroid, RPE and
retina. T1D rats used in our experiments had a significant metabolic imbalance (Hb A1c
8.3 ± 0.3%) and 8 weeks of ongoing DM left untreated in rat, is roughly equivalent to six
years of unbalanced diabetes in a human being without any treatment at all [25].
Although we refer often to this model as “early T1D”, it does not match early diabetes in
man, since T1D in human beings is seldom left untreated for so long. Therefore, it is not
surprising that some features found in this work correspond to a longer disease duration
in T1D patients.
In summary, the choroidal thickness measured by OCT is probably a doubtful
surrogate of choroid flux and of an ongoing T1D choroidopathy and retinopathy in rats
as in humans, leading to confusing and contradictory results. We showed evidence that
an inflammatory condition develops in the choroid of rats in early T1D, as previously
reported in humans, even before gross histopathological alterations are observed. We
have shown that inflammatory cells are more abundant in the choroid and retinal outer
layers in T1D. We further evidenced polarized disposition of pericytes, Iba1+ and MHC
class II+ cells in the choroid.
Funding
This work was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
(UID/NEU/04539/2013, UID/NEU/04539/2019, UIDB/04539/2020 and
UIDP/04539/2020), COMPETE-FEDER (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007440), Centro 2020
Regional Operational Programme (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000008: BrainHealth
2020) and Novartis. JM was financially supported by an unrestricted grant from Novartis.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
129
4.6. References
1. Daruich, A., et al., Mechanisms of macular edema: Beyond the surface. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2018. 63: p. 20-68.
2. Romero-Aroca, P., et al., Differences in incidence of diabetic retinopathy between type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: a nine-year follow-up study. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2017. 101(10): p. 1346.
3. Rübsam, A., S. Parikh, and P.E. Fort, Role of inflammation in diabetic retinopathy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018. 19(4): p. 942.
4. Sorrentino, F.S., et al., The importance of glial cells in the homeostasis of the retinal microenvironment and their pivotal role in the course of diabetic retinopathy. Life Sciences, 2016. 162: p. 54-59.
5. Lutty, G.A., Diabetic choroidopathy. Vision Research, 2017. 139: p. 161-167.
6. Campos, A., et al., Viewing the choroid: where we stand, challenges and contradictions in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017. 95(5): p. 446-459.
7. Campos, A., et al., Choroidal thickness changes stratified by outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2018.
8. He, M., et al., ALDH2 attenuates early-stage STZ-induced aged diabetic rats retinas damage via Sirt1/Nrf2 pathway. Life Sci, 2018. 215: p. 227-235.
9. Masser, D.R., et al., Functional changes in the neural retina occur in the absence of mitochondrial dysfunction in a rodent model of diabetic retinopathy. J Neurochem, 2017. 143(5): p. 595-608.
10. Sorrentino, F.S., et al., The importance of glial cells in the homeostasis of the retinal microenvironment and their pivotal role in the course of diabetic retinopathy. Life Sci, 2016. 162: p. 54-9.
11. Ferrara, N., H.P. Gerber, and J. LeCouter, The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med, 2003. 9(6): p. 669-76.
12. Omri, S., et al., Microglia/macrophages migrate through retinal epithelium barrier by a transcellular route in diabetic retinopathy: role of PKCzeta in the Goto Kakizaki rat model. Am J Pathol, 2011. 179(2): p. 942-53.
13. Baptista, F.I., et al., Diabetes induces changes in KIF1A, KIF5B and dynein distribution in the rat retina: implications for axonal transport. Exp Eye Res, 2014. 127: p. 91-103.
14. Alves, M.R.P., et al., Subtle thinning of retinal layers without overt vascular and inflammatory alterations in a rat model of prediabetes. Mol Vis, 2018. 24: p. 353-366.
15. Spaide, R.F., H. Koizumi, and M.C. Pozzoni, Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol, 2008. 146(4): p. 496-500.
16. Fernandez-Sanchez, L., et al., Loss of outer retinal neurons and circuitry alterations in the DBA/2J mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014. 55(9): p. 6059-72.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
130
17. Schneider, C.A., W.S. Rasband, and K.W. Eliceiri, NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods, 2012. 9(7): p. 671-675.
18. Kumar, A., et al., Vascular associations and dynamic process motility in perivascular myeloid cells of the mouse choroid: implications for function and senescent change. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014. 55(3): p. 1787-96.
19. Endo, H., et al., Relationship between diabetic macular edema and choroidal layer thickness. PLoS One, 2020. 15(1): p. e0226630.
20. Gupta, C., et al., Choroidal structural analysis in eyes with diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema-A novel OCT based imaging biomarker. PLoS One, 2018. 13(12): p. e0207435.
21. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research, N., et al., Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology, 2010. 117(6): p. 1064-1077 e35.
22. Gonzalez, V.H., et al., Early and Long-Term Responses to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of Protocol I Data. Am J Ophthalmol, 2016. 172: p. 72-79.
23. Bellocq, D., et al., The Pattern of Recurrence in Diabetic Macular Edema Treated by Dexamethasone Implant: The PREDIAMEX Study. Ophthalmol Retina, 2018. 2(6): p. 567-573.
24. Campos, A., et al., Deferred intravitreal triamcinolone in diabetic eyes after phacoemulsification. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2014. 30(9): p. 717-28.
25. Sengupta, P., The Laboratory Rat: Relating Its Age With Human's. Int J Prev Med, 2013. 4(6): p. 624-30.
26. Castro-Correia, J., Understanding the choroid. Int Ophthalmol, 1995. 19(3): p. 135-47.
27. Lutty, G.A., Diabetic choroidopathy. Vision Res, 2017. 139: p. 161-167.
28. Carnevali, A., et al., Optical coherence tomography angiography analysis of retinal vascular plexuses and choriocapillaris in patients with type 1 diabetes without diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol, 2017. 54(7): p. 695-702.
29. Braun, R.D., C.A. Wienczewski, and A. Abbas, Erythrocyte flow in choriocapillaris of normal and diabetic rats. Microvascular Research, 2009. 77(3): p. 247-255.
30. Condren, A.B., et al., Perivascular mural cells of the mouse choroid demonstrate morphological diversity that is correlated to vasoregulatory function. PLoS One, 2013. 8(1): p. e53386.
31. Kim, I., et al., Constitutive Expression of VEGF, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 in Normal Eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1999. 40(9): p. 2115-2121.
32. Sun, D., et al., Molecular imaging reveals elevated VEGFR-2 expression in retinal capillaries in diabetes: a novel biomarker for early diagnosis. FASEB J, 2014. 28(9): p. 3942-51.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
131
33. Okabe, K., et al., Neurons limit angiogenesis by titrating VEGF in retina. Cell, 2014. 159(3): p. 584-96.
34. Le, Y.Z., VEGF production and signaling in Muller glia are critical to modulating vascular function and neuronal integrity in diabetic retinopathy and hypoxic retinal vascular diseases. Vision Res, 2017. 139: p. 108-114.
35. Strauss, O., The retinal pigment epithelium in visual function. Physiol Rev, 2005. 85(3): p. 845-81.
36. Rungger-Brandle, E., A.A. Dosso, and P.M. Leuenberger, Glial reactivity, an early feature of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2000. 41(7): p. 1971-80.
37. Lechner, J., O.E. O'Leary, and A.W. Stitt, The pathology associated with diabetic retinopathy. Vision Res, 2017. 139: p. 7-14.
38. Yu, D.Y., et al., Retinal capillary perfusion: Spatial and temporal heterogeneity. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2019. 70: p. 23-54.
39. Holmes, D.I. and I. Zachary, The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family: angiogenic factors in health and disease. Genome Biol, 2005. 6(2): p. 209.
40. Cebe-Suarez, S., A. Zehnder-Fjallman, and K. Ballmer-Hofer, The role of VEGF receptors in angiogenesis; complex partnerships. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2006. 63(5): p. 601-15.
41. Adamis, A.P., Is diabetic retinopathy an inflammatory disease? British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2002. 86(4): p. 363.
42. Qaum, T., et al., VEGF-initiated blood-retinal barrier breakdown in early diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001. 42(10): p. 2408-13.
43. Arden, G.B. and S. Sivaprasad, Hypoxia and oxidative stress in the causation of diabetic retinopathy. Curr Diabetes Rev, 2011. 7(5): p. 291-304.
44. Hammes, H.P., et al., Pericytes and the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes, 2002. 51(10): p. 3107-12.
45. Lau, J.C. and R.A. Linsenmeier, Increased intraretinal PO2 in short-term diabetic rats. Diabetes, 2014. 63(12): p. 4338-42.
46. Nishikawa, T., et al., Normalizing mitochondrial superoxide production blocks three pathways of hyperglycaemic damage. Nature, 2000. 404(6779): p. 787-790.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
132
4.7. Supplementary files
Figure 4.1. SD-OCT scan acquisition for choroidal thickness evaluation. (A) Linear
scans (blue line) were acquired above the optic nerve head (ONH), in the area within 1
to 3 ONH diameter from the optic disc. (B) Segmentation lines were manually drawn at
the inner (retinal pigment epithelium, RPE; green line) and outer (choroidal-scleral
border; yellow line) boundaries of the choroid. Scale bar: 50 µm.
GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer
nuclear layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
A B
INL
GCL
ONL
RPE
Choroid
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
133
Figure 4.2. Quantification of Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cells in sclerochoroidal whole
mounts (n = 5 controls; n = 7 diabetics). (A) Iba1+ cells were counted in all depth planes
of the choroid. (B) MHC class II+ cells marked using yellow dots to avoid duplicate
counting. Scale bar: 100 µm.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
134
Figure 4.3. Quantification of the vascular density in sclerochoroidal wholemounts
(defined as the percentage of total area covered by choriocapillaris vessels) using the
‘image>adjust>threshold’ window tool of ImageJ to obtain the percentage of vascular
coverage (n = 5 controls; n = 7 diabetics). (A) At the inner choroid/choriocapillaris (z-
stacks collected at ≤10 µm from the posterior RPE cell plane), and (B) at middle and
outer choroid/medium and large vessels (z-stacks collected at >10 µm from the posterior
RPE cell plane). Scale bar: 50 µm.
A B
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
135
Figure 4.4. Body weight and glycaemia values of animals, since diabetes onset. (A) At
diabetes onset (0 weeks), both control (254.9 ± 7.5 g) and diabetic (267.8 ± 7.0 g) groups
did not differ significantly for body weight; at 8 weeks after diabetes onset, control rats
were significantly heavier (control: 398.7 ± 8.5 g vs diabetic: 266.7± 0.8 g). (B) Glycaemia
was significantly higher in the diabetic rats, at diabetes onset (control: 109.6 ± 3.4 g/dL
vs diabetic: 502.3 ± 27.7 g/dL), and 8 weeks later (control: 100.0 ± 2.1 g/dL vs diabetic:
537.8 ± 17.1 g/dL). HbA1c was significantly higher in diabetic rats, at 8 weeks after
diabetes onset (control: 6.2 ± 0.1% vs diabetic: 8.3 ± 0.3%, t(13)=4.486, p = 0.001). Bars
represent mean ± SEM (control animals, n = 12; diabetic animals, n = 16). Significance:
***p < 0.001.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
136
Figure 4.5. Interconnecting vessels between retinal plexuses were observed in eye
cross-sections immunolabelled against RECA-1: superficial and middle plexuses (white
arrow); middle and deep plexuses (yellow arrow); deep and superficial plexuses (red
arrow). Scale bar: 100 µm.
GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer
nuclear layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
137
Table 4.1. Primary antibodies
Antigen Target Host Supplier Cat. N.er Dilution
Iba1 Microglia Rabbit Wako Chemicals Inc.,North Chesterfield, VA, USA 019-19741 1:250
MHC II Activated microglia Mouse Bio-RAD Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA MCA46R 1:200
NG2 Cell membrane chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan Rabbit Merck, Darmstadt, Germany AB530 1:200
RECA-1 Endothelial cells Mouse Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA ab9774 1:200
VEGF-A Signal growth factor protein Mouse Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA ab1316 1:200
VEGFR2 VEGF receptor 2 Rabbit Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA ab131241 1:200
Iba1: calcium binding adapter molecule 1; MHC II: major histocompatibility complex II; RECA-1: rat endothelial cell antigen; NG2: proteoglycan NG2/Cspg4, neuroglial antigen
2; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR2: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2.
Table 4.2. Secondary antibodies
Fluorophore Target Host Supplier Cat. N.er Dilution
Alexa Fluor® 488 Mouse Ig G Goat IntrovitrogenTM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA A-11001 1:500
Alexa Fluor® 568 Rabbit Ig G Goat IntrovitrogenTM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA A-110036 1:500
Abbreviations: Ig G, immunoglobulin G.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
138
Table 4.3. Choroidal vascular density
Choroidal vessels area/total area
Control Diabetic p
Inner choroid 93.96 ± 0.75 94.49 ± 0.72 0.631
Middle + outer
choroid
71.98 ± 2.29 79.72 ± 2.82 0.080
Quantification of the choroidal vascular density in the inner and outer choroid, after labelling choroidal
blood vessels by cardiac perfusion with DiI (defined as the percentage of total area covered by
choriocapillaris vessels), using the ‘image>adjust>threshold’ window tool of ImageJ to obtain the
percentage of vascular coverage. Inner choroid: z-stacks collected at ≤ 10 µm (choriocapillaris). Middle +
outer choroid: z-stacks collected at > 10 µm from the outer RPE plane (medium and large vessels).
Quantitative analyses were performed based on 14 independent counts per eye in each and all in-depth z-
stacks per specimen. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5, control group; n = 7, diabetic group).
Significance: p < 0.05.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
139
Table 4.4. NG2 and RECA-1 immunoreactivity in the retina and choroid
NG2 RECA-1
Control Diabetic p Control Diabetic p
Positive cells/mm
GCL 9.439 ± 0.38 10.287 ± 0.49 0.204
OPL 13.755 ± 1.04 13.199 ± 1.82 0.796
Retina 10.04± 0.53 9.85 ± 1.79 0.826
Fluorescence intensity/area
Choroid 617.30 ± 42.69 591.13 ± 39.83 0.661 857.18 ± 55.0 812.89 ± 31.91 0.485
Quantification of the immunoreactivity of NG2 and RECA-1 in the retina and choroid scored as (i) manually
counted positive cells, in the retina; (ii) fluorescence intensity per selected area (reference area selected
of 10,737.08 ± 6,306.11 µm2), in the choroid. Counting was done for the right eye only, in 12 independent
specimen counts per eye. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (control animals, n = 7; diabetic animals,
n = 9). Significance: p < 0.05. GCL: ganglion cell layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
140
Table 4.5. VEGF and VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in the retina and choroid
VEGF VEGFR2
Fluorescence intensity/area
Control Diabetic p Control Diabetic p
GCL+ RNFL
725.47 ± 31.24 752.05 ± 84.25 0.549 574.42 ± 27.76 537.61 ± 33.97 0.425
IPL 682.85 ± 46.30 757.25 ± 57.02 0.339 279.71 ± 20.33 228.75 ± 23.96 0.135
INL 561.14 ± 29.21 581.25 ± 42.03 0.701 240.29 ± 16.87 184.88 ± 16.55 0.036*
OPL 883.26 ± 56.61 834.00 ± 46.94 0.511 349.02 ± 11.41 321.77 ± 18.17 0.242
ONL 678.00 ± 58.12 734.75 ± 66.21 0.536 220.71 ± 11.59 170.38 ± 16.14 0.028*
OLMPr 1426.29 ± 189.01 1791.50 ± 237.79 0.260 303.12 ± 12.27 267.25 ± 25.36 0.246
RPE 1070.32 ± 52.03 1208.12 ± 56.22 0.098 155.20 ± 10.46 165.07 ± 6.22 0.418
Choroid 705.37 ± 39.19 769.02 ± 21.52 0.164 133.88 ± 9.02 135.52 ± 6.23 0.881
Quantification of the VEGF and VGFR2 immunoreactivities in the retina and choroid based on 12
independent specimen counts per eye. VEGF and VEGFR2 immunoreactivities were quantified as
fluorescence intensity/area per layer. Counting was done for the right eye only, in all animals. The
expression of VEGF tends to be higher in diabetic animals, but the difference is not statistically significant.
There is a tendency to higher expression of VEGFR2 in control animals; statistically significant differences
in the retina were observed only at the level of the INL and ONL though. Values are expressed as mean
± SEM (control animals, n = 7; diabetic animals, n = 9). Significance: *p < 0.05.
VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR2: VEGF receptor 2; GCL + RNFL: ganglion cell layer
and retinal nerve fibre layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform
layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer; OLMPr: outer limiting membrane and photoreceptor inner segments;
RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
141
Table 4.6. Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cell counts in the retina and choroid
based on immunolabelling of eye cryosections
Iba1+ cells/mm MHC class II+ cells/mm
Control Diabetic p Control Diabetic p
IPL 7.73 ± 0.32 8.13 ± 0.71 0.652 - - -
OPL 0.37 ± 0.17 2.74 ± 1.06 0.056 - - -
Retina 18.57 ± 0.8 26.64 ± 2.78 0.021* - - -
Choroid 23.11 ± 1.99 26.42 ± 1.13 0.148 15.28 ± 0.1 18.39 ± 0.68 0.018*
Quantification of Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells in eye cryosections based on 12 independent specimen counts
per eye. Counting was made as the number of cell/mm of choroidal or retinal length, respectively.
Counting was done for the right eye only, in all animals. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance:
*p < 0.05. Iba1+ cells are significantly increased in the retina of Type 1 diabetic animals. MHC class II+
cells are significantly increased in the choroid of Type 1 diabetic animals. Values are expressed as mean
± SEM (control animals, n = 7; diabetic animals, n = 9).
MHC class II: major histocompatibility complex class II; IPL: inner plexiform layer; OPL: outer plexiform
layer.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
142
Table 4.7. Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cells’ density in the choroid
Positive cells/mm
Marker Cell shape Control Diabetic p
Iba1 elongated 23.40 ± 0.76 29.74 ± 1.57 0.009**
round 2.53 ± 0.36 2.91 ± 0.37 0.502
MHC class II elongated 1.83 ± 0.67 1.89 ± 0.61 0.954
round 18.98 ± 1.64 25.17 ± 2.36 0.116
Iba1+ and MHC II+ in the choroid of control and diabetic rats in all in-depth z-stacks of the choroid, based
on immunolabelling of sclerochoroidal whole mounts, after labelling choroidal blood vessels by
cardiac perfusion with DiI. Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells were manually counted in the choroid. Quantitative
analyses were performed based on 14 independent counts per eye in each and all in-depth z-stacks per
specimen. Images were collected by confocal microscopy with Zeiss EC Plan-Neofluor 40x oil objective
lens, NA 1.3. Significance: **p < 0.01. Elongated Iba1+ cells are significantly increased in the choroid of
diabetic animals. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (control animals, n = 5; diabetic animals, n = 7).
MHC class II: major histocompatibility complex class II.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T1D
143
Video 4.1. Sequenced images showing the localization of Iba1+ cells (green) sparing
the innermost choroid outwards the RPE cell plane of a control rat, aged 16 weeks, at 8
weeks after diabetes onset in diabetic rats. Slice thickness: 14.8 μm. AC and JM
authored the video: 18’’; 9,982 KB.
Video 4.2. Sequenced images showing the localization of Iba1+ cells (green) outwards
the inner choroidal vascular network (red) in a control rat aged 16 weeks, at 8 weeks
after diabetes onset in diabetic rats. Slice thickness: 23.1 μm. AC and JM authored the
video: 20’’; 10,925 KB.
Video 4.3. Sequenced images showing the localization of Iba1+ cells (green) outwards
the inner choroidal vascular network perfused using DiI (red) in a diabetic rat, at 8 weeks
after diabetes onset. Slice thickness: 23.1 μm. AC and JM authored the video: 13’’; 7,188
KB.
Video 4.4. Sequenced images in the same location as in video 4.3, showing the
localization of MHC class II+ cells (purple) outwards the choriocapillaris perfused by DiI
(red) in a diabetic rat, at 8 weeks after diabetes onset. Slice thickness: 23.1 μm. AC and
JM authored the video: 14’’; 7,433 KB.
Video 4.5. Sequenced images in the same location as in videos 4.3 and 4.4, showing
the co-localization of Iba1+ cells (green) and MHC class II+ cells (purple) outwards the
inner choroidal vascular network perfused using DiI (red) in a diabetic rat, at 8 weeks
after diabetes onset. Slice thickness: 23.1 μm. AC and JM authored the video: 13’’; 7,107
KB.
Suplementary videos available at:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YWm9HQ8ijOKu0XWj6bytF7TpG7Lp_FDo?usp
=sharing
144
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
145
5. Choroidal and retinal structural, cellular and
vascular changes in Type 2 diabetes5
5 Section 5 is based on an article submitted to Plos One.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
146
5.1. Abstract
Purpose: Increasing evidences point to inflammation as a key factor in the pathogenesis
of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Choroidal changes in diabetes have been reported and
several attempts were made to validate in vivo choroidal thickness (CT) as a marker of
retinopathy. We aimed to study choroidal and retinal changes associated to retinopathy
in an animal model for spontaneous Type 2 diabetes, Goto-Kakikazi (GK) rats.
Methods: Sclerochoroidal whole mounts and cryosections were prepared from 52-week
GK rats and age-matched Wistar Han controls. CT was measured by optical coherence
tomography. Microglia reactivity, pericyte and endothelial cells distribution, and
immunoreactivity of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptor 2
(VEGFR2) were evaluated by immunofluorescence. Choroidal vessels were visualized
by direct perfusion with 1,1’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindocarbocyanine
perchlorate (DiI). Choroidal vascular density was evaluated by fluorescence microscopy.
Results: GK rats had increased CT (58.40 ± 1.15 µm versus 50.90 ± 1.58 µm, p < 0.001),
reduced vascular density of the choriocapillaris (p = 0.045), increased Iba1+ cells density
in the outer retina (p = 0.003) and increased VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in most retinal
layers (p = 0.021 to 0.037). Choroidal microglial cells and pericytes showed polarity in
their distribution, sparing the innermost choroid. This cell-free gap at the inner choroid
was more pronounced in GK rats.
Conclusions: GK rats have increased CT with decreased vascular density at the
innermost choroid, increased VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in the retina and Iba1+ cells
density at the outer retina.
Keywords: Type 2 diabetes; choroid; retina; choroidal thickness; microglia; VEGFR2.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
147
5.2. Introduction
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) accounts for more than 90% of all cases of diabetes and is
related, mostly, with age, sedentary life and diet overload [1, 2]. Diabetic retinopathy
(DR) and its complications are commonly treated with anti-VEGF agents [3, 4] and the
greater focus has been put on the role of VEGF on the pathogenesis of DR [5-7]. In fact,
retinal hypoxemia has been also related to the pathogenesis of DR [8, 9]. VEGF-driven
inner blood-retinal barrier (BRB) breakdown in the venule side of the superficial retinal
vasculature has been pointed as the earliest event in DR [5] and it was related to pericyte
loss and hypoxemia [9]. Nevertheless, retinal hypoxemia was reported to be absent on
the early stages of diabetes in rats [10].
Actually, VEGF is not increased in the vitreous of all patients with diabetic macular
edema (DME) while pro-inflammatory markers were found to be increased [11].
Accordingly, about one third of patients with DME fail to respond to anti-VEGF therapy
[12, 13]. Furthermore, steroids proved to be effective in treating post-surgical cystoid
macular edema and DME [14, 15]. Those facts pointed DR to be an inflammatory
condition and that was confirmed experimentally [16-18].
Mitochondrial superoxide production in response to hyperglycemia may be the first
event to dislodge pericytes from the capillary wall. The retinal resident innate immune
system, macrophage-like microglial cells, become activated and start to produce
proinflammatory mediators [18]. Overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leads
to the increased formation of advanced glycated end-products (AGEs), activation of
protein kinase C, aldose reductase, and nuclear factor kB, leading to pericyte loss,
exposure of endothelial junction proteins to VEGF, BRB breakdown and diabetic
microangiopathies [19].
The perspective of DR as inflammatory disease brought new attention on previous
works describing choroidal inflammatory alterations in diabetes, named as ‘diabetic
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
148
choroidopathy’, including Brüch’s membrane deposits and increased thickness, and
choriocapillaris dropout [20-22].
Since the advent of optical coherence tomography (OCT) [23], the choroidal
thickness (CT) [24] has been sought as a surrogate of choroidal flux, diabetic
choroidopathy or DR, but the results are conflicting and disappointing [25-29]. The
thinning of the choroid with the anti-VEGF treatment increased the assumption that the
choroid thickens in DR and DME in an exclusive VEGF-dependent manner [29].
Nevertheless, the thinning of the choroid under anti-VEGF treatment seems to be only a
side effect with poor prognostic value [30], focusing back the attention on cellular and
molecular signatures that might take place in diabetic choroidopathy.
Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats present some features found in patients with DR and they
are a model to study the kinetics and events of T2D [31]. Increased NO production, early
inner BRB breakdown and migration of activated microglial cells from the retina to the
choroid by transcytosis has been demonstrated in GK rats [32-34], but the breakdown of
the outer BRB and Brüch’s membrane permeability in diabetes is not completely
understood yet [35, 36].
We investigated the impact of T2D on the CT and choroidal vascular density, as
well as on endothelial cells and pericytes, microglial cell reactivity, VEGF and VEGFR2
immunoreactivity, in the retina and choroid of GK (52 weeks old, 52 W) and age-matched
control Wistar Han rats.
5.3. Materials and Methods
Animals
GK rats are characterized by an early increase in serum insulin and also by mild
hyperglycemia, insulin resistance and mild T2D [34]. All procedures were approved by
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
149
the Animal Welfare Committee of the Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical
Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra. The animals received
humane care according to the criteria outlined in the Guide for the Care and the Use of
Laboratory Animals prepared by EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments and
with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) statement for
animal use. At 52 W, the animals were weighted, blood samples were collected for
measurement of glycemia and Hb A1c (Vantage® Analyzer, Siemens Healthinners,
Erlanger, Germany).
Optical coherence tomography
The animals were anesthetized via i.p. injection with ketamine 80 mg/kg + xylazine
5 mg/kg (80:5, for short; Imalgene 1000, Merial, Lyon, France, and Rompum, Bayer,
Leverkusen, Germany, respectively), and cornea anesthesia (4 mg/mL oxybuprocaine
hydrochloride; Anestocil®, Laboratório Edol, Carnaxide, Portugal), pupils dilation (1%,
Tropicil®, Laboratório Edol, Carnaxide, Portugal) and corneal hydration (2% Methocel™,
Dávi II Farmacêutica S.A., Barcarena, Portugal) was kept during procedure.
The choroid was evaluated in the animals using SD-OCT at 52 W. The SD-OCT
system is able to capture 10,000 – 20,000 A scans per second with an axial resolution
of 2 µm and a transverse resolution of 4 µm. OCT was performed in both eyes of all
animals at 52 W, just before being euthanized.
The 830 nm SD-OCT Imagine System (Phoenix Micron IV, Phoenix Research
Labs, Pleasanton, CA, USA) [37] was placed closer to the eye such that an inverted
image was obtained and the deeper structures were placed closer to zero-delay [38].
Scans were obtained superior to the optic nerve head/optic disc (ONH), in both eyes of
all animals, in the area within 1 to 3 ONH diameter from the optic disc. For each location,
the device collected a set of 1024 raster scans along the scan length. Upon collection, a
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
150
set of five images was converted into a single image to reduce the noise observed on
individual images. The CT was measured using InSight image segmentation software
(v.1, Voxeleron LLC - Image analysis solutions, Chabot Drive, CA, USA). An average of
three independent scores obtained from 3 sets “five frames averaged” was used as the
CT value per eye per time-point.
Tissue preparation for cryosections
The animals were anesthetized, as described above, and intracardially perfused
with 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline (PBS, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.8 mM KH2PO4,
10 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.4), followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M PBS, pre-
warmed at 37ºC.
The enucleated eyes of GK (n = 8) and age-matched control Wistar Han (n = 5)
rats were post-fixed in 4% PFA for 1 h. The eyes were washed in successive solutions
of PBS and immersed in solutions containing 15% and 30% of sucrose in PBS, for 1 h
in each solution. They were embedded in a 1:1 30% sucrose and embedding resin
(Shandon™ Cryomatrix™, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) solution,
before freezing in dry ice. The samples were stored at -80ºC, until further use. Eye ball
sections 14 µm-thick from both right and left eyes were obtained using a cryostat (Leica
CM3050S, Nussloch, Germany), at -22ºC, and mounted on adhesive slides (Superfrost
Plus™, Thermo Fisher Scientific). A total of four sections (14 µm apart) were collected
per slide.
Immunofluorescence
Eye sections were labeled to assess the retinal and choroidal structure, following
a procedure described previously [39]. The cryosections were rehydrated twice in PBS
for 5 min, followed by blocking and permeabilization for 1 h in 10% goat serum and 0.5%
Triton X-100 in PBS. The sections were then incubated overnight with primary antibodies
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
151
(Supplementary Table 5.1) diluted in 0.5% Triton X-100, at 4ºC. After washing with PBS,
sections were incubated with corresponding secondary antibodies (Supplementary
Table 5.2) diluted in 0.5% Triton X-100, for 1 h. After washing, the sections were
incubated with 1:5,000 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Invitrogen™), and
coverslipped using mounting medium (Glycergel, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA).
Digital images were captured using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Axio
Observer.Z1, Zeiss, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), using a Plan-Apochromat
20×/0.8 objective), and a laser scanning confocal inverted microscope (LSM 710 Axio
Observer, Zeiss), using a Plan-Apochromat 20×/0.8 objective.
Eight bit images were analyzed using the ImageJ software (version 1.48,
National Institutes of Health, USA) [40]. Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells were manually
counted in the choroid and retina. Data were expressed as number of cell/mm of
choroidal or retinal length, respectively. Rat endothelial cell antigen 1 (RECA-1)
and the proteoglycan NG2/Cspg4 (NG2) immunoreactivities were scored in the
choroid as mean fluorescence intensity per area selected (reference area
selected of 10,737.08 ± 6,306.11 µm2), while fluorescent NG2+ cells and RECA-
1 focal immunostaining were manually counted in the retina. VEGF and VEGFR2
immunoreactivities were quantified as mean fluorescence intensity/area for each
layer analyzed. All results were expressed as the mean count of 12 slices per eye
(right eyes only).
Direct labeling and visualization of choroidal vessels in
sclerochoroidal whole mounts
Intracardiac perfusion with PBS was performed in rats under anesthesia (i.p.;
ketamine:xylazine 160:30). DiI (Cat. #D-282, Invitrogen/Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA,
USA) 0.120 mg/mL in 1% glucose in PBS was applied via cardiac perfusion, following
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
152
perfusion with 4% PFA. The eyes were enucleated, and choroidoscleral whole mounts
were prepared. The whole mounts were fixed in 4% PFA for 15 min, washed with PBS,
and blocked with 10% goat serum in 0.3 % Tween in PBS for 1 h. Samples were
incubated with the primary antibodies diluted in 3% goat serum in PBS for 3 days at 4ºC
(Supplementary Table 5.1). After washing overnight with PBS, whole mounts were
incubated with secondary antibodies (Supplementary Table 5.2) overnight at 4ºC. After
washing, samples were flat mounted onto glass slides using mounting medium.
The images were obtained by laser scanning confocal microscope LSM 710
(Zeiss), using Zeiss EC Plan-Neofluor 40x oil objective lens, NA 1.3. A series of z-stacks
were captured from the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) outer surface, to the outer
choroid. Each z-stack consisted of a depth of optical sections, 3 µm apart, along the z-
axis. Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells were classified as ramified or round cells and were manually
counted in the choroid in all in-depth planes of the slide (Supplementary Figure 5.1).
The choroidal vascular density (defined as the percentage of total area covered
by choriocapillaris vessels) [41] was determined from independent z-stacks collected at
≤ 10 µm (choriocapillaris) and > 10 µm outwards from the RPE plane (medium and large
vessels) in a selected area (213 × 213 µm, Supplementary Figure 5.2). Results were
expressed as the mean of 14 counts per eye.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Version 25.0, IBM Corp.,
Armonk, NY, USA). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normality of data (p >
0.05). The normally distributed data were evaluated concerning the homogeneity of
variance, using the Levene’s test (p > 0.05). The independent Student’s t-test was used
to compare the means between two experimental groups for the same variable.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
153
Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Values were presented as mean +
standard error of the mean (SEM).
5.4. Results
Diabetic animals exhibit decreased body weight and
hyperglycemia
A total of 31 animals (52 W) were enrolled in the study (18 GK and 13 age-matched
control Wistar Han rats). The weight of GK rats was significantly lower than that of age-
matched control rats (416.31 ± 7.0 g and 462.5 ± 9.24 g, respectively, p < 0.001) and
glycemia was significantly higher (227.75 ± 12.1 mg/dL versus 107.0 ± 0.94 mg/dL, p <
0.001, Supplementary Figure 5.3).
Increased choroidal thickness in GK rats
CT was assessed in both eyes of all GK and age-matched control Wistar Han
rats at 52 W (n = 62 eyes), using OCT. CT was higher in GK rats (58.40 ± 1.15 µm versus
50.90 ± 1.58 µm, p < 0.001, Figures 5.1A and B).
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
154
Figure 5.1. Choroidal thickness (CT) of GK and age-matched control Wistar Han rats (52 W). (A)
Images resulting from five frames averaged, collected as inverted images using OCT raster scans
obtained in 1024 continuous points, by approaching the device to the zero delay line. Horizontal
raster scan line encompasses an area within 1 to 3 disk diameters from the optic nerve head.
Choroidal layer obtained by automatic segmentation was manually corrected. A mean of three
independent scores obtained from 3 different located sets “five frames averaged” were used as
the CT value per eye per time-point. (B) CT values from all eyes of GK (n = 36) and age-matched
control (n = 26) rats. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Scale bar: 100 µm. Significance: ***p
< 0.001.
GCL = ganglion cell layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, ONL = outer nuclear layer, RPE = retinal
pigment epithelium.
B
Control GK
0
20
40
60
80
0
Choro
idal th
ickness (
µm
) ***
INLGCL
ONL
RPEChoroid
A
Control GK
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
155
Choroidal blood vascular density is reduced in the inner choroid of
GK rats
Eighteen animals (10 GK and 8 age-matched control Wistar Han rats) were assigned
to perfusion with DiI and sclerochoroidal whole mounts were prepared and assessed by
confocal microscopy.
The choroidal vascular density in the innermost choroid/choriocapillaris (≤ 10 µm)
was significantly decreased in GK rats (p = 0.045, Figures 5.2A and C and
Supplementary Table 5.3). Choroidal Iba1+ and MHC II+ cell number was not significantly
different between GK and age-matched control rats (Figures 5.2B and D and
Supplementary Table 5.4).
Interestingly, Iba1+ cells and MHC II+ cells topographic disposition in the choroid
spare the innermost choroid, where they are notably rare or absent, being preferentially
present in the middle and outer choroidal stroma, either in GK or age-matched control
rats (Supplementary videos 5.1 - 5.6).
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
156
A
Control GK
DiI
B
Control GK
Iba1
MH
C II
*
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
157
Figure 5.2. Vascular and cell profiles of the choroid of GK and age-matched control Wistar Han
rats (52 W). (A) Representative images of vascular density in the inner choroid (≤ 10 µm). (B)
Choroidal Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells. Ramified cells (green arrows) and round cells (red arrows)
were highlighted. (C) Quantification of the choroidal vascular density in the inner and outer choroid
using the ‘image>adjust>threshold’ window tool of ImageJ to obtain the percentage of vascular
coverage, obtained from z-stacks collected at ≤ 10 µm or > 10 µm from the outer RPE plane,
respectively. (D) Iba1+ and MHC II+ cell number in the choroid in all in-depth z-stacks. Images
were collected with Zeiss EC Plan-Neofluor 40x oil objective lens, NA 1.3. Quantitative analyses
were performed based on 14 independent counts per eye in each and all in-depth z-stacks per
specimen. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8, control group; n = 10, GK group). Scale
bar: 50 µm. Significance: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
C
Control GK
0
20
40
60
80
100
inner choroid outer choroid
Blo
od v
ascula
r density in t
he
choro
id
*
D
Control GK
0
10
20
30
40
ramified round ramified round
Iba1-positive cells MHC II-positive cells
Num
ber
of
cells
in t
he c
horo
id
Iba1+ cells MHC II+ cells
**
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
158
Increased immunoreactivity of microglial cell markers in the outer
retina of GK rats
Iba1+ cells increased in the retina of GK rats, being statistically significantly
increased in the outer plexiform layer (OPL, t(11.000) = -3.872, p = 0.003). Iba1+ (p =
0.195) and MHC II+ cells density was not statistically significantly different in the choroid
of GK rats (t(11.000) = 2.190, p = 0.051, Figure 5.3 and Supplementary Table 5.5).
Interestingly, Iba1+ cells were distributed throughout the retina of GK rats paralleling
the topographic distribution of the 3 vascular plexuses of the retina. Iba1+ cell extensions
from the inner plexiform layer (IPL) to the OPL resemble the communications between
the deep and middle vascular plexuses of the retina, suggesting that migrating glial cells
towards the outer retina may use the communicating inter-plexuses retinal capillaries as
a scaffold (Figure 5.3A, bottom left panel). Communications between plexus were
evidenced.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
159
Figure 5.3. Microglial cells in the retina and choroid of GK and age-matched control Wistar Han
rats (52 W). (A) Representative eye cross-sections immunolabelled against Iba1 (left panels),
MHC-II (middle panels) and merge (right panels). Iba1+ cells are located in the superficial and
plexiform layers of the retina, mainly. Iba1+ cells located in the OPL of the GK cohort only (green
arrows). In GK rats, Iba1+ cells migrate from the IPL to the OPL, crossing the INL (red arrow). (B)
Quantification of Iba1+ and MHC II+ cell density of GK (n = 8) and age-matched control (n = 5) rats
based on 12 independent specimen counts per eye. Counting was done for the right eye only, in
all animals. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Scale bar: 100 µm. Significance: **p < 0.01.
GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, OPL = outer
plexiform layer, ONL = outer nuclear layer, RPE = retinal pigment epithelium.
B
Control GK
0
10
20
30
40
50
INL IPL OPL retina choroid choroid
Iba1 MCH II
Po
sitiv
e
ce
lls/m
m
**
A
Co
ntr
ol
GK
Iba1 MHC II
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
IPL
OPL
Iba1 MHC II DAPI
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
IPL
OPL
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
160
Pericytes are rare in the innermost choroid of GK rats
There were no statistically significant differences in the immunoreactivity of NG2
and RECA-1 between GK and age-matched control Wistar Han rats, whatever the
location considered (Figure 5.4 and Supplementary Table 5.6). Nevertheless, there was
a trend to increased NG2 immunostaining in the choroid of GK rats. Combined
immunoreactivity of RECA-1 and NG2 evidenced a rarefaction of pericytes in the
innermost choroid of GK rats. RECA-1 co-localized with the choriocapillaris layer, just
underneath and in close continuity with the RPE cell plane (Figure 5.4A, left panels).
NG2 immunoreactivity was absent in some areas of the choriocapillaris plane, leaving
fluorescent-free gaps between the RPE and the inner choroid, drawing a typical jagged
pattern, corresponding to the absence of pericytes/mural cells in the innermost choroid
(Figure 5.4A, middle panels, blue arrows). This ‘polarity’ in choroidal vascular regulatory
cells disposition evidenced by NG2, corresponding to a rarefaction of pericytes in the
innermost choroid, was more enhanced in GK rats.
The three retinal plexuses (superficial, in the retinal nerve fiber and ganglion cell
(GCL) layers; middle, in the IPL and deep, in the OPL) were visualized by RECA-1
immunolabelling (Figure 5.4A, top panels, left and right).
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
161
Figure 5.4. Localization of mural and endothelial cells in the retina and choroid of GK and age-
matched control Wistar Han rats (52 W). (A) Representative eye cross-sections immunolabelled
against RECA-1(left panels), NG2 (middle panels) and merge (right panels). The 3 plexuses of
the retina are evidenced by RECA-1 immunostaining (white arrows). Communications between
(i) the superficial and middle plexuses of the retina (red arrow), (ii) the middle and deep plexuses
and (iii) the deep and superficial plexuses (green arrow), are visible. RECA-1 immunoreactivity
relates to the presence of endothelial cells and fluorescence of the choriocapillaris endothelial
cells is continuous with the RPE cell plane (left panels). Conversely, NG2 immunostaining of
pericyte/mural cells leaves focal gaps between the RPE and the inner choroid, drawing a jagged
pattern, more pronounced in GK rats (blue arrows). (B) Quantification of RECA-1 and NG2
immunoreactivity in the retina and choroid of GK (n = 8) and age-matched control (n = 5) rats.
RECA-1 and the proteoglycan NG2/Cspg4 (NG2) immunoreactivities were scored as
fluorescence intensity per area selected in the choroid (reference area selected of 10,737.08 ±
6,306.11 µm2), while NG2+ cells and RECA-1 focal immunostaining were manually counted in the
retina. Counting was done for the right eye only, in 12 independent specimen counts per eye.
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Scale bar: 100 µm.
GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, OPL = outer
plexiform layer, ONL = outer nuclear layer, RPE = retinal pigment epithelium.
B
Control GK
0
5
10
15
20
GCL OPL retina
RECA-1 NG2P
ositiv
e
ce
lls in
th
e r
etin
a/m
m
0
200
400
600
800
RECA-1 NG2
Flu
ore
sce
nce
in
ten
sity in
th
e
ch
oro
id/a
rea
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
162
VEGR2 immunoreactivity was significantly increased in GK rats
VEGF immunoreactivity was more intense in the level of the OLM, RPE and
choroid, while VEGFR2 immunoreactivity was negligible at those locations. VEGFR2
immunoreactivity was more intense in the inner retina. Higher VEGFR2 immunoreactivity
was observed in GK rats, significantly in the IPL, INL, OPL, ONL and OLM, when
comparing with age-matched control rats (Figure 5.5 and Supplementary Table 5.7).
A
Co
ntr
ol
GK
VEGF VEGFR2
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
IPL
OPL
VEGF VEGFR2 DAPI
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
IPL
OPL
GCL
INL
Choroid
ONL
RPE
IPL
OPL
OLM
OLM
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
163
Figure 5.5. Immunoreactivity of VEGF and VEGFR2 of GK and age-matched control Wistar Han
rats (52 W). (A) Representative eye cross-sections immunolabelled against VEGF (left panels),
VEGFR2 (middle panels) and merge (right panels). VEGF immunoreactivity spreads throughout
the retina, increasing in the OPL, OLM, RPE and choroid. VEGFR2 immunoreactivity is higher in
the innermost retina (retinal nerve fiber layer) and very low or absent in the RPE and choroid.
VEGFR2 immunoreactivity is still visible as a faint coloration in the retinal layers other than the
retinal nerve fiber layer of GK rats only (white arrows). (B) Quantification of the VEGF (top) and
VGFR2 (bottom) immunoreactivities in the retina and choroid of GK rats (n = 8) and age-matched
controls (n = 5) based on 12 independent specimen counts per eye. VEGF and VEGFR2
immunoreactivities were quantified as fluorescence intensity/area per layer. Counting was done
for the right eyes only, in all animals. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Scale bar: 100 µm.
Significance: *p < 0.05.
GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, OPL = outer
plexiform layer, ONL = outer nuclear layer, OLM = outer limiting membrane, RPE = retinal pigment
epithelium.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
164
5.5. Discussion
CT has been searched as a surrogate of DR, DME, choroidal flux and diabetic
choroidopathy in T2D patients, but contradictory results have been reported [25-29].
Although GK rats are not blueprints for the diseased T2D humans, they provide
excellent insights into the pathogenesis of T2D [42]. Furthermore, rats are recognized
as the preeminent model for studying the choroid [43, 44]. We found that CT was
significantly increased in GK rats when comparing with age-matched control Wistar Han
rats. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the CT is assessed in a rat model of T2D
[45].
The vascular density was reduced in the inner choroid of GK rats, corresponding
to the choriocapillaris. This observation is in accordance with choriocapillaris
degeneration observed in T2 humans, either by post-mortem specimens or by OCT-
angiography (OCTA) [46-48]. The findings of no significant difference in the outer choroid
vascular density combined with a significantly higher CT in GK rats, enhances the role
of the outer choroid layer, the suprachoroid, as an important contributor to total CT and
may explain why available data on human CT are so contradictory [27-29, 49, 50]. The
suprachoroid is the choroidal layer most prone to change, but it is the most difficult to
evaluate correctly, mainly when not using high definition devices as Swept Source OCT
and the high resolution mode EDI of the SD-Spectralis OCT [25, 30]. Unfortunately,
devices based on red blood cells’ movement as the OCTA are not expected to help much
in this issue either [51].
The normal distribution of inflammatory cells in the choroidal stroma, sparing the
innermost choroid, suggests that under inflammatory stress a dramatic increase in the
number of inflammatory cells may result in packing of cells at this area, leading to
disturbances of the PRs/RPE/Bruch´s membrane/choriocapillaris tapetoretinal unit
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
165
(Supplementary videos 5.1-5.3) [52]. Nevertheless, we did not find inflammatory cells to
be significantly increased in the choroid of GK rats. It is possible that this finding
correlates with the low level of diabetes in this animal model. If that was to be so, one
might expect to find increased inflammatory cells in the choroid of the more aggressive
diabetic animal models such as the STZ-induced Type 1. The number of inflammatory
cells were increased in the retina, as previously described, mainly in the OPL [18, 33].
Interestingly, Iba1+ cells disposition parallels the three retinal plexuses’, and the
migration of cells from the inner to the outer retina resembles the capillary
communications between plexuses, suggesting that vessels are a scaffold for glial cell
migration.
The VEGF levels were not significantly increased in the retina, RPE or choroid, in
GK rats. VEGFR2 expression was negligible in the RPE or choroid in GK and age-
matched control Wistar Han rats. Conversely, VEGFR2 immunoreactivity peaked in the
retinal nerve fiber layer of both GK and control rats, and it was increased throughout the
retina of GK rats. The precise cellular background for this increased expression is not
clear, but the combination of maximum expression in the innermost retina and
expression throughout the retina resembles the distribution of Müller cells and neurons
within the retina. Nevertheless, a previous report in an animal model of T1D showed
VEGFR2 to be expressed mainly in the capillaries of the retina and, in opposition to our
findings, in the choriocapillaris [53]. Conversely, other data correlated VEGFR2 more
strikingly with neurons and Müller cells rather than with endothelial cells [54].
Interestingly, the later correlated VEGFR2 expression by neurons and Müller cells
combined with the action of MHC II cells, to be related with capillary vertical sprouting
and the formation of the deep retinal plexus, an example of neurovascular crosstalk or
coupling. The relationship between increased VEGFR2 and normal VEGF
immunoreactivity is not clear, if any at all. If that results from a milder diabetes status in
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
166
our model, VEGFR2 would be among the first molecular biomarkers to change in DR,
rather than VEGF.
Disposition of pericytes in the choriocapillaris was previously described in mice to
be at its scleral surface only (polarized distribution) and focal pericyte depletion has been
related to vascular remodeling [55]. We found distribution of NG2+ cells in the innermost
choroid of rats to draw a jagged pattern, when comparing with RECA-1 endothelial
immunostaining. These focal ‘gaps’, suggesting the existing of cell-free spaces in the
innermost choroid, may be related to vascular remodeling of the choriocapillaris and not
necessarily to permanent alterations, and were more pronounced in T2D. Interestingly,
this disposition is shared by stromal Iba1+ cells in the same location (Supplementary
videos 5.1-5.6).
The finding of indirect signs of vascular remodeling in the choriocapillaris suggests
that some alterations reported by OCTA-based studies may be only transient. OCTA is
able to examine nonperfusion but not detailed morphological vascular patterns, since the
choriocapillaris being as thin as 10-20 µm is not resolved by a system that has a
maximum lateral resolution within that range [56].
Perivascular mural cells in the middle and outer choroid were previously reported
to show contractile properties that were related to vasoregulatory functions [55]. We did
not find a significant difference in immunostaining intensity for NG2 between GK and
age-matched control Wistar Han rats. Perhaps, a more severe model of T2D and
individual cell counting using combined immunomarkers of perivascular mural cells in a
3D imaging system may eventually reveal such differences in future studies [55].
In conclusion, we found an increase in CT, a decrease in the inner choroidal
vascular density, increased Iba1+ cells density in the outer retina, and increased
VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in the retina, in GK rats. Disposition of pericytes and Iba1+
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
167
cells in the choroidal stroma spare the innermost choroid, either in GK or age-matched
control Wistar Han rats.
5.6. References
1. Bullard, K.M., et al., Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes in Adults by Diabetes Type - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2018. 67(12): p. 359-361.
2. Klein, R., et al., The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of diabetic retinopathy. XIV. Ten-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol, 1994. 112(9): p. 1217-28.
3. Wells, J.A., et al., Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology, 2016. 123(6): p. 1351-9.
4. Gross, J.G., et al., Five-Year Outcomes of Panretinal Photocoagulation vs Intravitreous Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2018. 136(10): p. 1138-1148.
5. Qaum, T., et al., VEGF-initiated blood-retinal barrier breakdown in early diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001. 42(10): p. 2408-13.
6. Baharivand, N., et al., Relationship between vitreous and serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels, control of diabetes and microalbuminuria in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Clin Ophthalmol, 2012. 6: p. 185-91.
7. Shimada, H., et al., Concentration gradient of vascular endothelial growth factor in the vitreous of eyes with diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009. 50(6): p. 2953-5.
8. Arden, G.B. and S. Sivaprasad, Hypoxia and oxidative stress in the causation of diabetic retinopathy. Curr Diabetes Rev, 2011. 7(5): p. 291-304.
9. Hammes, H.P., et al., Pericytes and the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes, 2002. 51(10): p. 3107-12.
10. Lau, J.C. and R.A. Linsenmeier, Increased intraretinal PO2 in short-term diabetic rats. Diabetes, 2014. 63(12): p. 4338-42.
11. Funatsu, H., et al., Vitreous levels of interleukin-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor are related to diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology, 2003. 110(9): p. 1690-6.
12. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research, N., et al., Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology, 2010. 117(6): p. 1064-1077 e35.
13. Gonzalez, V.H., et al., Early and Long-Term Responses to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of Protocol I Data. Am J Ophthalmol, 2016. 172: p. 72-79.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
168
14. Campos, A., et al., Deferred intravitreal triamcinolone in diabetic eyes after phacoemulsification. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2014. 30(9): p. 717-28.
15. Bellocq, D., et al., The Pattern of Recurrence in Diabetic Macular Edema Treated by Dexamethasone Implant: The PREDIAMEX Study. Ophthalmol Retina, 2018. 2(6): p. 567-573.
16. Adamis, A.P., Is diabetic retinopathy an inflammatory disease? Br J Ophthalmol, 2002. 86(4): p. 363-5.
17. Rubsam, A., S. Parikh, and P.E. Fort, Role of Inflammation in Diabetic Retinopathy. Int J Mol Sci, 2018. 19(4).
18. Sorrentino, F.S., et al., The importance of glial cells in the homeostasis of the retinal microenvironment and their pivotal role in the course of diabetic retinopathy. Life Sci, 2016. 162: p. 54-9.
19. Nishikawa, T., et al., Normalizing mitochondrial superoxide production blocks three pathways of hyperglycaemic damage. Nature, 2000. 404(6779): p. 787-790.
20. Hidayat, A.A. and B.S. Fine, Diabetic choroidopathy. Light and electron microscopic observations of seven cases. Ophthalmology, 1985. 92(4): p. 512-22.
21. Fryczkowski, A.W., S.E. Sato, and B.L. Hodes, Changes in the diabetic choroidal vasculature: scanning electron microscopy findings. Ann Ophthalmol, 1988. 20(8): p. 299-305.
22. Lutty, G.A., Effects of diabetes on the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2013. 54(14): p. ORSF81-7.
23. Huang, D., et al., Optical coherence tomography. Science, 1991. 254(5035): p. 1178-81.
24. Margolis, R. and R.F. Spaide, A pilot study of enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol, 2009. 147(5): p. 811-5.
25. Campos, A., et al., Viewing the choroid: where we stand, challenges and contradictions in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017. 95(5): p. 446-459.
26. Lains, I., et al., Choroidal Thickness in Diabetic Retinopathy Assessed with Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography. Retina, 2018. 38(1): p. 173-182.
27. Mohamed, D.M.F., et al., Subfoveal choroidal thickness in diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol, 2019. 13: p. 921-925.
28. Gupta, C., et al., Choroidal structural analysis in eyes with diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema-A novel OCT based imaging biomarker. PLoS One, 2018. 13(12): p. e0207435.
29. Endo, H., et al., Relationship between diabetic macular edema and choroidal layer thickness. PLoS One, 2020. 15(1): p. e0226630.
30. Campos, A., et al., Choroidal thickness changes stratified by outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2018.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
169
31. Omri, S., et al., PKCzeta mediates breakdown of outer blood-retinal barriers in diabetic retinopathy. PLoS One, 2013. 8(11): p. e81600.
32. Omri, S., et al., Microglia/macrophages migrate through retinal epithelium barrier by a transcellular route in diabetic retinopathy: role of PKCzeta in the Goto Kakizaki rat model. Am J Pathol, 2011. 179(2): p. 942-53.
33. Daruich, A., et al., Mechanisms of macular edema: Beyond the surface. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2018. 63: p. 20-68.
34. Carmo, A., et al., Nitric oxide synthase activity in retinas from non-insulin-dependent diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats: correlation with blood-retinal barrier permeability. Nitric Oxide, 2000. 4(6): p. 590-6.
35. Moore, D.J. and G.M. Clover, The effect of age on the macromolecular permeability of human Bruch's membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001. 42(12): p. 2970-5.
36. Sorensen, N.B., et al., Bruch's membrane allows unhindered passage of up to 2mum latex beads in an in vivo porcine model. Exp Eye Res, 2019. 180: p. 1-7.
37. Alves, M.R.P., et al., Subtle thinning of retinal layers without overt vascular and inflammatory alterations in a rat model of prediabetes. Mol Vis, 2018. 24: p. 353-366.
38. Spaide, R.F., H. Koizumi, and M.C. Pozzoni, Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol, 2008. 146(4): p. 496-500.
39. Fernandez-Sanchez, L., et al., Loss of outer retinal neurons and circuitry alterations in the DBA/2J mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014. 55(9): p. 6059-72.
40. Schneider, C.A., W.S. Rasband, and K.W. Eliceiri, NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods, 2012. 9(7): p. 671-675.
41. Kumar, A., et al., Vascular associations and dynamic process motility in perivascular myeloid cells of the mouse choroid: implications for function and senescent change. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014. 55(3): p. 1787-96.
42. Portha, B., et al., The GK rat: a prototype for the study of non-overweight type 2 diabetes. Methods Mol Biol, 2012. 933: p. 125-59.
43. Sengupta, P., The Laboratory Rat: Relating Its Age With Human's. Int J Prev Med, 2013. 4(6): p. 624-30.
44. Castro-Correia, J., Understanding the choroid. Int Ophthalmol, 1995. 19(3): p. 135-47.
45. Wild, S., et al., Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care, 2004. 27(5): p. 1047-53.
46. Cao, J., et al., Choriocapillaris degeneration and related pathologic changes in human diabetic eyes. Arch Ophthalmol, 1998. 116(5): p. 589-97.
47. Fryczkowski, A.W., B.L. Hodes, and J. Walker, Diabetic choroidal and iris vasculature scanning electron microscopy findings. Int Ophthalmol, 1989. 13(4): p. 269-79.
48. Conti, F.F., et al., Choriocapillaris and retinal vascular plexus density of diabetic eyes using split-spectrum amplitude decorrelation spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol, 2019. 103(4): p. 452-456.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
170
49. Abalem, M.F., et al., The effect of glycaemia on choroidal thickness in different stages of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Res, 2020.
50. Wang, H. and Y. Tao, Choroidal structural changes correlate with severity of diabetic retinopathy in diabetes mellitus. BMC Ophthalmol, 2019. 19(1): p. 186.
51. Borrelli, E., et al., OCT angiography and evaluation of the choroid and choroidal vascular disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2018. 67: p. 30-55.
52. Ma, W., et al., Microglia in the mouse retina alter the structure and function of retinal pigmented epithelial cells: a potential cellular interaction relevant to AMD. PLoS One, 2009. 4(11): p. e7945.
53. Sun, D., et al., Molecular imaging reveals elevated VEGFR-2 expression in retinal capillaries in diabetes: a novel biomarker for early diagnosis. FASEB J, 2014. 28(9): p. 3942-51.
54. Okabe, K., et al., Neurons limit angiogenesis by titrating VEGF in retina. Cell, 2014. 159(3): p. 584-96.
55. Condren, A.B., et al., Perivascular mural cells of the mouse choroid demonstrate morphological diversity that is correlated to vasoregulatory function. PLoS One, 2013. 8(1): p. e53386.
56. Chu, Z., et al., Quantification of Choriocapillaris with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Comparison Study. Am J Ophthalmol, 2019. 208: p. 111-123.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
171
5.7. Supplementary files
Figure 5.1. Iba1+ and MHC II+ cell count by ImageJ. (A) Iba1+ cells were quantified in
all-dept planes. (B) For each plane, MHC II+ cells were marked with yellow dots to avoid
duplication.
Figure 5.2. Quantification of the choroidal vascular density in the inner and outer choroid
(defined as the percentage of total area covered by choriocapillaris vessels) using the
‘image>adjust>threshold’ window tool of ImageJ to obtain the percentage of vascular
1 32A
B
BA
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
172
coverage. (A) z-stacks collected at ≤ 10 µm (choriocapillaris). (B) z-stacks collected at >
10 µm from the outer RPE plane (medium and large vessels).
Figure 5.3. Body weight and glycemia in GK and in age-matched control Wistar Han rats
(52 W).
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1 2
Body w
eig
ht
(g)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1 2
Gly
cem
ia (
mg/d
l)***
Control GK
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1 2
Gly
cem
ia (
mg/d
l)
*** Gly
cem
ia (m
g/d
l)
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
173
Table 5.1. Primary antibodies
Antigen Target Host Supplier Cat. N.er Dilution
Iba1 Microglia Rabbit Wako Chemicals Inc.,North Chesterfield, VA, USA 019-19741 1:250
MHC II Activated microglia Mouse Bio-RAD Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA MCA46R 1:200
NG2 Cell membrane chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan Rabbit Merck, Darmstadt, Germany AB530 1:200
RECA-1 Endothelial cells Mouse Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA ab9774 1:200
VEGF Signal growth factor protein Mouse Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA ab1316 1:200
VEGFR2 VEGF receptor 2 Rabbit Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA ab131241 1:200
Abbreviations: Iba1, calcium binding adapter molecule 1; MHC II, major histocompatibility complex II; RECA-1, rat endothelial cell antigen; NG2, neuroglial antigen 2; VEGF,
vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR-2, vascular endothelial growth factor 2.
Table 5.2. Secondary antibodies
Fluorophore Target Host Supplier Cat. N.er Dilution
Alexa Fluor® 488 Mouse Ig G Goat IntrovitrogenTM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA A-11001 1:500
Alexa Fluor® 568 Rabbit Ig G Goat IntrovitrogenTM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA A-110036 1:500
Abbreviations: Ig G, immunoglobulin G.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
174
Table 5.3. Choroidal vascular density
Vessel area/total area
Control GK p
Inner Choroid 90.95 ± 0.65% 87.04 ± 1.65% 0.045*
Middle-outer choroid 67.75 ± 1.83% 63.57 ± 1.53% 0.121
Quantification of the mean choroidal vascular density in the inner and outer choroid (defined
as the percentage of total area covered by choriocapillaris vessels) using the
‘image>adjust>threshold’ window tool of ImageJ to obtain the percentage of vascular coverage.
Inner choroid: z-stacks collected at ≤ 10 µm (choriocapillaris). Outer choroid: z-stacks collected
at > 10 µm from the outer RPE plane (medium and large vessels). Quantitative analyses were
performed based on 14 independent counts per eye in each and all in-depth z-stacks per
specimen. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8, control group; n = 10, GK group).
Significance: *p < 0.05.
Table 5.4. Quantification of Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells in whole mounts of the
choroid
Marker Cell shape Positive cells
Control GK p
Iba1 ramified 31.61 ± 1.42 31.87 ± 1.52 0.903
round 2.73 ± 0.30 1.00 0.085
MHC II ramified 2.96 ± 0.55 0 0.003**
round 26.60 ± 2.30 26.69 ± 1.39 0.973
Mean Iba1+ and MHC II+ in the choroid of control and GK rats in all in-depth z-stacks of the
choroid. Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells were manually counted in the choroid. Quantitative analyses
were performed based on 14 independent counts per eye in each and all in-depth z-stacks per
specimen. Images were collected by confocal microscopy with Zeiss EC Plan-Neofluor 40x oil
objective lens, NA 1.3. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8, control group; n = 10, GK
group). Significance: **p < 0.01.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
175
Table 5.5. Quantification of Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells in cryosections of the
retina and choroid.
Iba1+ cells/mm MHC II+ cells/mm
Control GK p Control GK p
Choroid 38.44 ± 2.57 32.70 ± 2.85 0.195 25.33 ± 2.06 19.77 ± 1.54 0.051
Retina 34.62 ± 1.97 37.91 ± 4.54 0.523 0 0
INL 0.53 ± 0.17 1.37 ± 0.30 0.065 0 0
IPL 14.33 ± 1.23 10.30 ± 2.07 0.124 0 0
OPL 3.48 ± 0.70 11.41 ± 1.54 0.003** 0 0
Quantification of mean Iba1+ and MHC II+ cells in GK rats (n = 8) and age-matched controls (n
= 5) based on 12 independent specimen counts per eye. Counting was made as the number
of cell/mm of choroidal or retinal length, respectively. Counting was done for the right eye only,
in all animals. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance: **p < 0.01.
INL = inner nuclear layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, OPL = outer plexiform layer.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
176
Table 5.6. NG2 and RECA-1 immunoreactivity in cryosections of the retina
and choroid
NG2 RECA-1
Control GK p Control GK p
Choroid 473.66 ± 52.17 558.01 ± 42.78 0.241 675.81 ± 54.97 658.71 ± 30.94 0.774
Retina 8.86 ± 0.34 8.98 ± 0.43 0.845 0 0
GCL 0 0 9.94 ± 0.36 8.88 ± 0.45 0.130
OPL 0 0 16.76 ± 0.92 14.68 ± 0.89 0.151
Quantification of mean RECA-1 and NG2 immunoreactivities in the retina and choroid in GK
rats (n = 8) and age-matched controls (n = 5). RECA-1 and the NG2 immunoreactivity was
scored as mean fluorescence intensity per area selected in the choroid (reference area
selected of 10,737.08 ± 6,306.11 µm2), while NG2+ cells and RECA-1 focal immunostaining
were manually counted in the retina. Counting was done for the right eye only, in 12
independent specimen counts per eye. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance: p <
0.05. GCL = ganglion cell layer, OPL = outer plexiform layer.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
177
Table 5.7. VEGF and VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in cryosections of the
retina and choroid
VEGF VEGFR2
Control GK p Control GK p
GCL+RNFL 766.67 ± 33.82
827.54 ± 61.08
0.403 323.15 ± 17.16
418.33 ± 52.84
0.123
IPL 769.40 ± 74.70
809.86 ± 96.18
0.746 157.00 ± 16.53
267.75 ± 36.37
0.021*
INL 691.20 ± 77.01
714.88 ± 78.89
0.844 145.80 ± 16.37
264.38 ± 41.34
0.026*
OPL 828.12 ± 83.86
875.01 ± 61.45
0.655 207.43 ± 10.23
290.69 ± 35.04
0.050*
ONL 730.40 ± 102.38
641.00 ± 57.42
0.425 136.60 ± 12.64
242.88 ± 37.55
0.026*
OLM 1546.80 ± 231.61
1142.38 ± 121.76
0.116 184.80 ± 19.63
320.25 ± 51.54
0.037*
RPE 1168.45 ± 60.60
1284.52 ± 88.12
0.364 118.67 ± 5.05
132.59 ± 9.70
0.232
Choroid 771.66 ± 32.21
867.25 ± 61.69
0.200 95.42 ± 3.57
110.81 ± 8.34
0.123
Quantification of the mean VEGF and VGFR2 immunoreactivities in the retina and choroid in GK
rats (n = 8) and age-matched controls (n = 5) based on 12 independent specimen counts per eye.
VEGF and VEGFR2 immunoreactivities were quantified as mean fluorescence intensity/area per
layer. Counting was done for the right eye only, in all animals. Data are expressed as mean ±
SEM. Significant values: *p < 0.05.
RPE = retinal pigment epithelium, GCL+RNFL = ganglion cell and nerve fiber layers, IPL = inner
plexiform layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, OPL = outer plexiform layer, ONL = outer nuclear layer,
OLM = outer limiting membrane (and photoreceptor inner segments); VEGF = vascular
endothelial growth factor, VEGFR2 = VEGF receptor 2.
Choroid and diabetes Choroid and retina in T2D
178
Video 5.1. Sequenced images showing the localization of Iba1+ cells (green) sparing the
innermost choroid (red) outwards the RPE cell plane of a 52-week-old GK rat. Slice
thickness: 27.2 μm. AC and JM authored the video: 11’’; 40,221 KB.
Video 5.2. Sequenced images in the same location as in video 5.1, showing the
localization of MHC class II+ cells (cyan) outwards the choriocapillaris perfused by DiI
(red) in a 52-week-old GK rat. Slice thickness: 23.8 μm. AC and JM authored the video:
10’’; 25,306 KB.
Video 5.3. Sequenced images in the same location as in videos 5.1 and 5.2, showing
the co-localization of Iba1+ cells (green) and MHC II+ cells (cyan) outwards the
choriocapillaris perfused by DiI (red) in a 52-week-old GK rat. Slice thickness: 30.6 μm.
AC and JM authored the video: 17’’; 30,465 KB.
Video 5.4. Sequenced images showing the localization of Iba1+ cells (green) outwards
the choriocapillaris (red) in a 52-week-old control Wistar Han rat. Slice thickness: 48 μm.
AC and JM authored the video: 16’’; 51,062 KB.
Video 5.5. Sequenced images showing the localization of MHC II+ cells (cyan) outwards
the inner choroidal vascular network perfused by DiI (red) in a 52-week-old control Wistar
Han rat. Slice thickness: 45 μm. AC and JM authored the video: 16’’; 49,140 KB.
Video 5.6. Sequenced images in the same location as in videos 5.4 and 5.5, showing
the co-localization of Iba1+ cells (green) and MHC II+ cells (cyan) outwards the
choriocapillaris perfused by DiI (red) in a 52-week-old control Wistar Han rat. Slice
thickness: 45 μm. AC and JM authored the video: 16’’; 63,560 KB.
Suplementary videos available at:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YWm9HQ8ijOKu0XWj6bytF7TpG7Lp_FDo?usp
=sharing
Choroid and diabetes Discussion and future perspectives
179
6. Discussion and future perspectives
Choroid and diabetes Discussion and future perspectives
180
Progression of microvascular complications in diabetes depends on diabetes
type and metabolic balance [1-3]. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) accounts for less than 10% of
all cases of diabetes, but affects younger people and when retinopathy develops,
progression is faster and more severe than in Type 2 (T2D) [4-6]. Diabetic retinopathy
(DR) was for long considered to be a pure microvascular disease, but increasing
evidence points to inflammation as a key factor in the pathogenesis of DR [7-9].
Inflammatory events develop both in the retina and choroid during the course of
disease [10, 11]. The choroid is essential for the nutrition and water clearance of the
outer retina [12]. These facts lead investigators to focus back on earlier evidence of
diabetic choroidopathy [13, 14] and on the role of the outer blood retinal barrier in DR
[15].
Several attempts have been made to establish a link between alterations in the
choroidal thickness (CT), assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and the
progression of DR in humans. However, CT as a surrogate for choroidal blood flow,
metabolic status, DR, diabetic macular edema (DME), choroidal inflammation or diabetic
choroidopathy, in studies with human diabetic subjects, failed to be reliable [16-21]. We
found that most contradictions are related to bias in collecting and treating data, but other
reasons are linked to CT inter- and intra-individual variability and to the difficulty in
evaluating the suprachoroid [12, 16]. The suprachoroid is the choroidal layer most prone
to change but its posterior location next to the sclera and its non-vascular nature makes
the evaluation difficult when not using high resolution modes in SD-OCT or swept-source
OCT [16, 18]. Even though after eliminating most of the reasons that might lead to bias,
the CT did not prove to have prognostic value in DME, even though it decreased with
anti-VEGF agents’ administration [3, 22, 23].
Conversely, we found that good metabolic control (Hb A1c ≤ 7%) and intact
ellipsoid zone were markers of good functional outcome in DME, while subfoveal
Choroid and diabetes Discussion and future perspectives
181
neuroretinal detachment, also known as subretinal fluid, was a marker of anatomic
outcome only.
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) does not detect structures
with no significant erythrocyte movement as the suprachoroid, therefore it does not add
much to OCT high resolution modes or swept source OCT in the evaluation of CT. OCTA
has been invaluable in the evaluation of the choriocapillaris in human subjects [24].
Alterations in the diabetic choriocapillaris were reported in OCTA studies, although it is
not clear if they are permanent or if they are transient and reversible, mirroring increased
choriocapillaris remodeling in diabetes reported in post-mortem studies [25-28]. Being
able to resolve the microvascular network of the retina and nonperfusion areas at the
choriocapillaris, OCTA does not evaluate hitherto detailed morphological vascular
patterns of the later, since the choriocapillaris being as thin as 10-20 µm is not resolved
by a system that has a maximum lateral resolution within that range (~15-20 μm) [29].
Rats are widely used models for studying human diseases and their choroidal
structure is closest to human’s than rabbits’, cats’ or guinea pigs’ [30, 31]. Recently, a
novel imaging platform combining photoacoustic microscopy and SD-OCT was
suggested to be valuable in evaluating the CT in rabbits [32]. We evaluated for the first
time in vivo CT by OCT in T1D (streptozotocin-induced diabetes) and T2D (Goto-
Kakizaki, GK) rats. No significant differences in CT were observed between control and
16 weeks old T1D rats, but one year old T2D rats had larger CT.
One may hypothesize that the shorter duration of diabetes (8 weeks) in T1D
accounts for the absence of differences or, conversely, that differences in T2D rats
depend on the model and not on T2D disease. Future perspectives to shed light on these
issues may follow two complementary pathways: in vivo CT evaluation in T1D rats with
longer disease duration, under metabolic control with insulin, and in vivo CT evaluation
in younger T2D GK rats (16 weeks old), to compare with T1D rats data.
Choroid and diabetes Discussion and future perspectives
182
Vascular remodeling of the choriocapillaris has been related to the depletion of
pericytes [33]. We found a reduced vascular density at the inner choroid of T2D rats,
corresponding to the choriocapillaris. Similar findings were reported in human T2D
individuals, in vivo and post-mortem [24, 28, 34]. The findings of a significantly higher
CT in T2D rats, enhances the role of the suprachoroid and may explain why available
data on human in vivo CT are so contradictory [17, 19, 21, 26, 35].
Glial cells are associated with pericyte removal from the perivascular wall and to
increased exposure of the vascular endothelia to vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF) [10, 36]. Increased number and activity of inflammatory cells in the retina
displace pericytes from the endothelium and increase endothelial leakage via increased
VEGF secretion and tight junction proteins downregulation and disorganization [10, 37].
It is possible that the vascular remodeling at the choriocapillaris follows the same
direction: increased glial cell activity, increased focal pericyte depletion, increased
endothelial exposure to VEGF, leading not to leakage as in the retinal endothelium, but
to remodeling [36]. We found pericytes’ disposition in the choroid sparing the innermost
choroid, which has been previously named as ‘polarized disposition’ [38]. When
comparing the coriocapillaris immunostaining (RECA-1) with the pericyte
immunostaining (NG2), focal gaps were observed at the inner choroid of control, T1D
and T2D rats. These gaps were wider in diabetic rats, suggesting increased vascular
remodeling. These data should be assessed in future confocal microscopy studies
combining several mural cells’ markers, such as NG2, α-smooth muscle actin and
desmin immunostaining at the inner choroid. Electron microscopy may be useful as well
[39].
We found differences in VEGF/VEGFR2 immunoreactivity between T1D and T2D
rats. VEGFR2 immunoreactivity was increased in T2D. One possible explanation to be
cross-checked in the future is whether VEGFR2 upregulation is a marker of a low level
of diabetes imbalance in T2D, while decreased VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in T1D is a
Choroid and diabetes Discussion and future perspectives
183
marker of a significant metabolic imbalance. Data from perfusion recovery experiments
in the hind limb muscles of T1D mice, show that VEGFR2 expression is decreased in
the endothelial cells in a hyperglycemia-depend gradient mode via increased
ubiquitination of VEGFR2. Such decrease of VEGFR2 expression was related to poor
adaptation to ischemia and was reversed by improving the metabolic control with insulin
[40]. T1D rats used in our experiments had a significant metabolic imbalance (Hb A1c
8.3 ± 0.3%) and the diabetes duration of 8 weeks is roughly equivalent to six years of
unbalanced diabetes left untreated in a human being [30]. Therefore, one may speculate
that a decreased VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in the T1D rat retina follows the same
pathway, enhancing the role of metabolic control in the development and progression of
diabetic retinopathy, as shown by the results herein displayed in human subjects.
The distribution of the VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in the retina and the co-
localization of the VEGF immunoreactivity with Müller cell marker, vimentin, suggest that
the regulation of VEGFR2 expression is in the endothelium of the three retinal plexuses,
while the regulation of VEGF expression is, at least in part, in Müller cells.
Inflammatory cells were increased in the outer retina of T1D and T2D rats and in
choroid of T1D rats only. Iba1+ and MHC class II+ cells were increased in the choroidal
stroma of T1D rats, and not just passing by within the vessel lumina, since the choroidal
vasculature had been previously cleaned by perfusions. Conversely, they were not
increased in T2D, suggesting that intensity and not duration of diabetes, is paramount in
inflammatory cell expression in the choroid.
Glia migration throughout the retina has been described in normal homeostasis
and diabetes [10, 41-43], but its role in the outer BRB breakdown and in Bruch’s
membrane permeability status in diabetes remains to be established [44, 45]. We found
that the increased presence of Iba1+ cells in the retina, and in particular in the outer
retinal layers, is a distinct feature of diabetic retinas, as previously described by others
Choroid and diabetes Discussion and future perspectives
184
[10, 46, 47]. The distribution of glial cells around the retinal microvascular network
suggest that they may use vessels as a scaffold for migration. The accumulation of
inflammatory cells in the outer retina may be due to increased cell traffic from the retina
into the choroid [43], to increased metabolic-driven hypoxemia at the outer retina [48]
with VEGF-mediated recruitment of inflammatory cells [36, 49], to increased Brüch’s
membrane impermeabilization [44, 45, 50] or to transcytosis arrest through the RPE cells
[43]. Since we found inflammatory cells to be increased in the choroid and outer retina
of T1D, it will be interesting in the future to find a link between these two events, although
some available evidence seems to indicate that some of the inflammatory cells present
in the choroid, including in the choriocapillaris, actually come from the retina [43].
Interdependence of glial cell proliferation, inner choroid pericyte disposition,
Bruch’s membrane inflammatory-driven changes and choriocapilaris remodeling may be
pathways for future studies.
The localization of arteries at the choriocapillaris lobules, e. g., center [31, 51, 52]
versus periphery [53-58] has been subject to debate, as well as the end-arterial nature
of the choroidal circulation. Angiographic studies support the end-arterial theory [59],
while post-mortem studies revealed that the choroidal circulation has multiple
anastomosis at various levels [54]. An end-arterial functional model was proposed
reconciling the post-mortem and the angiographic findings. The choroidal vascular
system has been proposed as composed of multiple sectors, with the presence of
anastomoses within sector, before the emergence of the last pre-terminal arteriole.
Therefore, the coriocapillaris bed would be end-arterial [60]. By DiI perfusion, we found
a lobar structure of the choroid very similar to the bronchiolar tree in lungs and by RECA-
1 immunostaining a lobular structure of the choriocapillaris as described by others using
different techniques [52, 56, 58]. In the choroid, the blood flows in arteries and veins in
the same direction, contrariwise to most organs [55, 57, 61]. After labeling all sectors,
we mounted the whole choroid of the rat perfused by DiI and found no staining of the
Choroid and diabetes Discussion and future perspectives
185
vortex veins, which we interpreted as an indirect signal that Dil behaves as an arterial
and choriocapillaris preferential stain. We found evidence of pre-terminal arterial-arterial
anastomoses and of central position of the artery in choroidal lobules.
Capillary communications between the superficial and middle, middle and deep,
and deep and superficial retinal capillary plexuses, were found, as described before by
OCTA in humans and rats [62-65]. Two different conceptions about the organization of
the retinal plexuses were described, always with arterioles more superficial than veins
[66]. A serial organization of the retinal vasculature with the venous drainage draining
primarily into the deep retinal capillary plexus [63] versus an alternative parallel or
‘‘hammock’’ model, wherein each neurovascular/capillary layer operates as an
independent unit with its own arteriolar supply and venous drainage [62]. This model
would support the generally accepted neurovascular unit, with independent control of the
capillary layers that match their neuronal needs. Mixed or combined models were
purposed as well [65, 66]. Whatever model is closest to the real architecture of the retinal
vascular plexuses, undoubtedly the deep vascular plexus drives in a low oxygen
environment and seems to be critical in permanent damage from retinal diseases,
including DR [48, 67-71].
Future studies of arterial versus venous phenotyping or immunolabelling with
three dimensional analyses by confocal microscopy may help to better characterize the
choroidal and retinal microvasculature [72-76].
References
1. Varma, R., et al., Prevalence of and risk factors for diabetic macular edema in the United States. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2014. 132(11): p. 1334-40.
2. Stratton, I.M., et al., Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ, 2000. 321(7258): p. 405-12.
Choroid and diabetes Discussion and future perspectives
186
3. Campos, A., et al., Evaluation of markers of outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema. Eye Vis (Lond), 2018. 5: p. 27.
4. Bullard, K.M., et al., Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes in Adults by Diabetes Type - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2018. 67(12): p. 359-361.
5. Klein, R., et al., The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of diabetic retinopathy. XIV. Ten-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol, 1994. 112(9): p. 1217-28.
6. Romero-Aroca, P., et al., Differences in incidence of diabetic retinopathy between type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: a nine-year follow-up study. Br J Ophthalmol, 2017. 101(10): p. 1346-1351.
7. Adamis, A.P., Is diabetic retinopathy an inflammatory disease? Br J Ophthalmol, 2002. 86(4): p. 363-5.
8. Lampeter, E.R., et al., Elevated levels of circulating adhesion molecules in IDDM patients and in subjects at risk for IDDM. Diabetes, 1992. 41(12): p. 1668-71.
9. Rubsam, A., S. Parikh, and P.E. Fort, Role of Inflammation in Diabetic Retinopathy. Int J Mol Sci, 2018. 19(4).
10. Sorrentino, F.S., et al., The importance of glial cells in the homeostasis of the retinal microenvironment and their pivotal role in the course of diabetic retinopathy. Life Sci, 2016. 162: p. 54-9.
11. Lutty, G.A., Diabetic choroidopathy. Vision Res, 2017. 139: p. 161-167. 12. Campos, A., et al., Viewing the choroid: where we stand, challenges and contradictions
in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017. 95(5): p. 446-459.
13. Fryczkowski, A.W., S.E. Sato, and B.L. Hodes, Changes in the diabetic choroidal vasculature: scanning electron microscopy findings. Ann Ophthalmol, 1988. 20(8): p. 299-305.
14. Hidayat, A.A. and B.S. Fine, Diabetic choroidopathy. Light and electron microscopic observations of seven cases. Ophthalmology, 1985. 92(4): p. 512-22.
15. Bento, C.F., et al., Methylglyoxal-induced imbalance in the ratio of vascular endothelial growth factor to angiopoietin 2 secreted by retinal pigment epithelial cells leads to endothelial dysfunction. Exp Physiol, 2010. 95(9): p. 955-70.
16. Campos, A., et al., Choroidal thickness changes stratified by outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2018.
17. Endo, H., et al., Relationship between diabetic macular edema and choroidal layer thickness. PLoS One, 2020. 15(1): p. e0226630.
18. Lains, I., et al., Choroidal Thickness in Diabetic Retinopathy Assessed with Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography. Retina, 2018. 38(1): p. 173-182.
19. Mohamed, D.M.F., et al., Subfoveal choroidal thickness in diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol, 2019. 13: p. 921-925.
20. Torabi, H., et al., Choroidal Thickness and Hemoglobin A1c Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Ophthalmic Vis Res, 2019. 14(3): p. 285-290.
21. Abalem, M.F., et al., The effect of glycaemia on choroidal thickness in different stages of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Res, 2020.
22. Campos, A., et al., Choroidal thickness changes stratified by outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2018. 256(10): p. 1857-1865.
23. Campos, A., et al., Response to: Choroidal thickness changes stratified by outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2019. 257(1): p. 243-244.
Choroid and diabetes Discussion and future perspectives
187
24. Conti, F.F., et al., Choriocapillaris and retinal vascular plexus density of diabetic eyes using split-spectrum amplitude decorrelation spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol, 2019. 103(4): p. 452-456.
25. Borrelli, E., et al., OCT angiography and evaluation of the choroid and choroidal vascular disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2018. 67: p. 30-55.
26. Wang, H. and Y. Tao, Choroidal structural changes correlate with severity of diabetic retinopathy in diabetes mellitus. BMC Ophthalmol, 2019. 19(1): p. 186.
27. Caldwell, R.B. and M.E. Fitzgerald, The choriocapillaris in spontaneously diabetic rats. Microvasc Res, 1991. 42(3): p. 229-44.
28. Cao, J., et al., Choriocapillaris degeneration and related pathologic changes in human diabetic eyes. Arch Ophthalmol, 1998. 116(5): p. 589-97.
29. Chu, Z., et al., Quantification of Choriocapillaris with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Comparison Study. Am J Ophthalmol, 2019. 208: p. 111-123.
30. Sengupta, P., The Laboratory Rat: Relating Its Age With Human's. Int J Prev Med, 2013. 4(6): p. 624-30.
31. Castro-Correia, J., Understanding the choroid. Int Ophthalmol, 1995. 19(3): p. 135-47. 32. Tian, C., et al., Retinal and choroidal imaging in vivo using integrated photoacoustic
microscopy and optical coherence tomography. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng, 2018. 10474. 33. Manche, E.E. and G.E. Korte, Ultrastructural evidence of remodelling in the
microvasculature of the normal rabbit and human eye. Acta Anat (Basel), 1990. 138(2): p. 89-96.
34. Fryczkowski, A.W., B.L. Hodes, and J. Walker, Diabetic choroidal and iris vasculature scanning electron microscopy findings. Int Ophthalmol, 1989. 13(4): p. 269-79.
35. Gupta, C., et al., Choroidal structural analysis in eyes with diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema-A novel OCT based imaging biomarker. PLoS One, 2018. 13(12): p. e0207435.
36. Ferrara, N., H.P. Gerber, and J. LeCouter, The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med, 2003. 9(6): p. 669-76.
37. Cebe-Suarez, S., A. Zehnder-Fjallman, and K. Ballmer-Hofer, The role of VEGF receptors in angiogenesis; complex partnerships. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2006. 63(5): p. 601-15.
38. Condren, A.B., et al., Perivascular mural cells of the mouse choroid demonstrate morphological diversity that is correlated to vasoregulatory function. PLoS One, 2013. 8(1): p. e53386.
39. Tilton, R.G., et al., Absence of degenerative changes in retinal and uveal capillary pericytes in diabetic rats. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1986. 27(5): p. 716-721.
40. Dokun, A.O., et al., Glycaemic control improves perfusion recovery and VEGFR2 protein expression in diabetic mice following experimental PAD. Cardiovasc Res, 2014. 101(3): p. 364-72.
41. Daruich, A., et al., Mechanisms of macular edema: Beyond the surface. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2018. 63: p. 20-68.
42. Omri, S., et al., PKCzeta mediates breakdown of outer blood-retinal barriers in diabetic retinopathy. PLoS One, 2013. 8(11): p. e81600.
43. Omri, S., et al., Microglia/macrophages migrate through retinal epithelium barrier by a transcellular route in diabetic retinopathy: role of PKCzeta in the Goto Kakizaki rat model. Am J Pathol, 2011. 179(2): p. 942-53.
44. Moore, D.J. and G.M. Clover, The effect of age on the macromolecular permeability of human Bruch's membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001. 42(12): p. 2970-5.
45. Sorensen, N.B., et al., Bruch's membrane allows unhindered passage of up to 2mum latex beads in an in vivo porcine model. Exp Eye Res, 2019. 180: p. 1-7.
Choroid and diabetes Discussion and future perspectives
188
46. Rungger-Brandle, E., A.A. Dosso, and P.M. Leuenberger, Glial reactivity, an early feature of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2000. 41(7): p. 1971-80.
47. Lechner, J., O.E. O'Leary, and A.W. Stitt, The pathology associated with diabetic retinopathy. Vision Res, 2017. 139: p. 7-14.
48. Yu, D.Y., et al., Retinal capillary perfusion: Spatial and temporal heterogeneity. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2019. 70: p. 23-54.
49. Holmes, D.I. and I. Zachary, The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family: angiogenic factors in health and disease. Genome Biol, 2005. 6(2): p. 209.
50. Curcio, C.A. and M. Johnson, Structure, Function, and Pathology of Bruch's Membrane in Retina, S.J. Ryan, Editor. 2013, Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA. p. 465–81.
51. Krey, H.F., Segmental vascular patterns of the choriocapillaris. Am J Ophthalmol, 1975. 80(2): p. 198-202.
52. Castro Correia, J., Anátomo-fisiologia da coroide. Thesis Doctorat, 1958: p. 52-126. 53. Hayreh, S.S., The choriocapillaris. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol,
1974. 192(3): p. 165-79. 54. Yoneya, S., M.O. Tso, and K. Shimizu, Patterns of the choriocapillaris. A method to
study the choroidal vasculature of the enucleated human eye. Int Ophthalmol, 1983. 6(2): p. 95-9.
55. Torczynski, E. and M.O. Tso, The architecture of the choriocapillaris at the posterior pole. Am J Ophthalmol, 1976. 81(4): p. 428-40.
56. Olver, J.M., Functional anatomy of the choroidal circulation: methyl methacrylate casting of human choroid. Eye (Lond), 1990. 4 ( Pt 2): p. 262-72.
57. Hogan, M.J., J.A. Alvarado, and J.E. Weddell, Histology of the Human Eye — An Atlas and Textbook 1971, Philadelphia, London, Toronto: Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders. 403-497.
58. Risco, J.M. and W. Nopanitaya, Ocular microcirculation. Scanning electron microscopic study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1980. 19(1): p. 5-12.
59. Hayreh, S.S., In vivo choroidal circulation and its watershed zones. Eye (Lond), 1990. 4 ( Pt 2): p. 273-89.
60. Lee, J.E., et al., Functional end-arterial circulation of the choroid assessed by using fat embolism and electric circuit simulation. Sci Rep, 2017. 7(1): p. 2490.
61. Federman, J.L., The fenestrations of the choriocapillaris in the presence of choroidal melanoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, 1982. 80: p. 498-516.
62. Campbell, J.P., et al., Detailed Vascular Anatomy of the Human Retina by Projection-Resolved Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Sci Rep, 2017. 7: p. 42201.
63. Garrity, S.T., et al., Considerations in the Understanding of Venous Outflow in the Retinal Capillary Plexus. Retina, 2017. 37(10): p. 1809-1812.
64. Pi, S., et al., Rodent retinal circulation organization and oxygen metabolism revealed by visible-light optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express, 2018. 9(11): p. 5851-5862.
65. Leahy, C., et al., Mapping the 3D Connectivity of the Rat Inner Retinal Vascular Network Using OCT Angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2015. 56(10): p. 5785-93.
66. Nesper, P.L. and A.A. Fawzi, Human Parafoveal Capillary Vascular Anatomy and Connectivity Revealed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2018. 59(10): p. 3858-3867.
67. Hasegawa, N., et al., New Insights Into Microaneurysms in the Deep Capillary Plexus Detected by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Macular Edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2016. 57(9): p. OCT348-55.
68. Garrity, S.T., V.L. Tseng, and D. Sarraf, Paracentral Acute Middle Maculopathy in a Perivenular Fern-Like Distribution with En Face Optical Coherence Tomography. Retin Cases Brief Rep, 2018. 12 Suppl 1: p. S25-S28.
Choroid and diabetes Discussion and future perspectives
189
69. Yu, S., et al., The spectrum of superficial and deep capillary ischemia in retinal artery occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015. 159(1): p. 53-63 e1-2.
70. Spaide, R.F., J.M. Klancnik, Jr., and M.J. Cooney, Retinal vascular layers in macular telangiectasia type 2 imaged by optical coherence tomographic angiography. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2015. 133(1): p. 66-73.
71. Moon, B.G., et al., Correlation between Deep Capillary Plexus Perfusion and Long-Term Photoreceptor Recovery after Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment. Ophthalmol Retina, 2018. 2(3): p. 235-243.
72. Crist, A.M., C. Young, and S.M. Meadows, Characterization of arteriovenous identity in the developing neonate mouse retina. Gene Expr Patterns, 2017. 23-24: p. 22-31.
73. Poissonnier, L., et al., Egfl7 is differentially expressed in arteries and veins during retinal vascular development. PLoS One, 2014. 9(3): p. e90455.
74. Corada, M., M.F. Morini, and E. Dejana, Signaling pathways in the specification of arteries and veins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2014. 34(11): p. 2372-7.
75. dela Paz, N.G. and P.A. D'Amore, Arterial versus venous endothelial cells. Cell Tissue Res, 2009. 335(1): p. 5-16.
76. Rosa, S., et al., Functional characterization of iPSC-derived arterial- and venous-like endothelial cells. Sci Rep, 2019. 9(1): p. 3826.
190
Choroid and diabetes Conclusions
191
7. Conclusions
Choroid and diabetes Conclusions
192
Studies on human subjects
1. In a prospective study lasting 2 years, avoiding the most common biases that
are actually present in many studies, the choroidal thickness was found to
decrease with anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular edema, but without
prognostic value for anatomic or functional outcomes, at the 3 and 6 months
end-points. Besides, the subfoveal choroidal thickness was found to be a
reliable surrogate of the choroidal thickness as such.
2. In a prospective study lasting 6 months for each subject enrolled, comparing
prognostic factors for anatomic and functional recovery of diabetic macular
edema under anti-VEGF treatment, metabolic control and the ellipsoid zone
status were found to be factors of functional outcome, while subretinal fluid
was found to be a factor of anatomic outcome only.
Studies on animal models of diabetes
3. In streptozotocin-induced Type 1 diabetic (T1D) Wistar rats (16 weeks old; 8
weeks of ongoing T1D):
3.1. To the best of our knowledge, we evaluated for the first time in vivo
choroidal thickness assessed by OCT in T1D rats. The combined findings
of no change in the choroidal thickness and in the choroidal vascular
density suggest that these alterations may be unnoticeable until the late
stages of disease, even when the metabolic control is poor;
Choroid and diabetes Conclusions
193
3.2. The combined findings of no change in the density of mural cells that
wrap around choroidal vessels and the existence of multifocal pericyte
cell-free areas at the choriocapillaris, suggest that most of the vascular
regulatory cells in the choroidal vasculature are present, but vascular
remodeling at the choriocapillaris is increased. Taken together, such
findings and data aforementioned in 3.1 may explain some contradictions
or limitations reported by OCTA in the choriocapillaris;
3.3. Decreased VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in the retina of T1D rats suggests
that VEGFR2 immunoreactivity decreases in a condition of severe
hyperglycemia, probably due to increased VEGFR2 ubiquitination in
endothelial cells, as reported before for hind limb muscles in T1D mice;
VEGF immunostaining co-localized with Müller cell marker vimentin,
suggesting that the regulation of VEGF is significantly dependent on
Müller cells;
3.4. The combined findings of Iba1+ and MHC+ cells sparing the inner choroid
with the increased number of inflammatory cells in the choroidal stroma
and in the retina, including the outer retina, suggest a potential
mechanism of injury at the choriocapillaris in diabetes, mainly when the
metabolic control is poor.
4. In Goto Kakizaki Type 2 diabetes (T2D) rats (52 weeks old):
4.1. To the best of our knowledge we evaluated for the first time in vivo
Choroid and diabetes Conclusions
194
choroidal thickness assessed by OCT in T2D rats. Increased choroidal
thickness and decreased vascular density at the choriocapillaris, suggest
that in the long lasting disease substantial alterations occur in the
choroid, including vascular remodeling and permanent damage, and that
such alterations may be assessed by OCT and OCTA with a high
potential agreement;
4.2. As for point 3.2, the combined findings of no difference in perivascular
mural cells immunoreactivity in the choroid and pericytes’ rarefaction at
the inner choroid, suggest that the disease has more impact on vascular
remodeling at the choriocapillaris than on regulatory peri-vascular mural
cells;
4.3. Increased VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in the retina with no difference for
VEGF immunoreactivity, suggests that in the long lasting disease, with
slight metabolic imbalance, VEGFR2, rather than VEGF, may be the best
molecular signature of disease status or the best surrogate of the
homeostasis mechanisms.
The retinal layers where VEGFR2 immunoreactivity increased (Figures
4.3 and 5.5) suggest a co-localization with the three retinal plexuses and
with Müller cells;
4.4. Increased number of inflammatory cells in the outer retina, but not in the
choroid, where Iba1+ and MHC+ spare the inner choroid, suggests that
even in the long lasting disease, as long as there is a reasonable
metabolic control, the signs of inflammation are mainly confined to the
retina.
Choroid and diabetes Conclusions
195
5. The combined findings in T1D and T2D rats suggest that:
5.1. Choriocapillaris remodeling was increased and vascular density at the
choriocapillaris was decreased in T2D rats. The choroidal thickness was
increased in T2D rats only.
These results suggest that OCT and OCTA findings on the human
choroid, respecting choroidal thickness or vascular indexes of the
choriocapillaris, may be more close to consensus between studies
whenever checking the long lasting disease;
5.2. VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in the retina decreased when the metabolic
control was poor in T1D. Conversely, VEGFR2 immunoreactivity in the
retina increased in the presence of mild hyperglycemia in T2D.
These resuts may be related to a decreased VEGFR2 expression in the
presence of sustained high glucose levels in the retinal vascular
endothelium;
5.3. Higher immunoreactivity of VEGF and of VEGFR2 at the innermost
retina, namely at the retinal nerve fiber layer, may explain why the
intravitreal administration of anti-VEGF agents is so effective. Anti-
VEGFs readily sequester VEGF in the vitreous and, by rapidly diffusing
to the inner retina, they prevent VEGF-A to bind to VEGFR2, the VEGF
receptor with the highest tyrosine kinase activity, either in the superficial
vascular plexus’ endothelium or in Müller cells;
5.4. The increased presence of inflammatory cells in the choroid of T1D rats,
suggests that when the metabolic control is poor, inflammatory cells
Choroid and diabetes Conclusions
196
may pack at the innermost choroid, potentially impairing the
choriocapillaris or causing permanent damage.
The perivascular distribution of Iba1+ cells in the retina suggests that
inflammatory cells may use the retinal capillaris network as a scaffold
for migration;
5.5. These inflammatory-like alterations demonstrated in the choroid may
explain, at least in part, the success of intravitreal steroids in DME, even
when nonresponsive to anti-VEGFs, either by acting at the Müller cells
mechanisms of water clearance, or by reducing microglial cell migration
to the outer retina or, in addition, by reducing the inflammatory
microenvironment in the choroidal stroma.