1PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012
PR
INC
IPA
IS D
AD
OS
OBJETIVOS
;$YDOLDU� DV� URGRYLDV� EUDVLOHLUDV� SDYLPHQWDGDV�� LGHQWLoFDQGR� DV� FRQGL·ÅHV� HP�UHOD·µR�DR�SDYLPHQWR��²�VLQDOL]D·µR�H�²�JHRPHWULD�YL±ULD�
;,GHQWLoFDU�DV�GHoFLºQFLDV��UHJLVWUDU�RV�SRQWRV�FU¼WLFRV�H�HODERUDU�D�FODVVLoFD·µR�GD�VLWXD·µR�SRU�WLSR�GH�JHVWµR��SÆEOLFD�H�FRQFHGLGD���SRU�URGRYLD�IHGHUDO��SRU�URGRYLD�HVWDGXDO�H�SRU�FRUUHGRU�URGRYL±ULR�
;$YDOLDU� WDPE¸P� DV� FRQGL·ÅHV� GDV� URGRYLDV� SRU� 8QLGDGH� GD� )HGHUD·µR� H� SRU�UHJLµR�
DADOS GERAIS
;(VWD�¸�D�����HGL·µR��1D�SULPHLUD��HP�������IRUDP�DQDOLVDGRV��������NP�
;([WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�HP��������������NP�
;1HVWD�ÆOWLPD�HGL·µR���������KRXYH�XP�DFU¸VFLPR�GH�������NP��������HP�UHOD·µR�DR�DQR�SDVVDGR�
;���HTXLSHV�����URWDV�GH�FROHWD�H���GH�FKHFDJHP��
;���GLDV�GH�FROHWD�HP�FDPSR�
;$V�URGRYLDV�SHVTXLVDGDV�DEUDQJHP�WRGD�D�PDOKD�URGRYL±ULD�IHGHUDO�SDYLPHQWDGD��RV�SULQFLSDLV�WUHFKRV�GH�URGRYLDV�HVWDGXDLV�SDYLPHQWDGDV�H�URGRYLDV�FRQFHGLGDV�
;,QIUDHVWUXWXUDV� GH� DSRLR� FROHWDGDV�� SRVWRV� GH� DEDVWHFLPHQWR�� ERUUDFKDULDV��FRQFHVVLRQ±ULDV�H�RoFLQDV�PHF³QLFDV�GH�FDPLQKÅHV�RX�ÃQLEXV��UHVWDXUDQWHV�H�ODQFKRQHWHV��SRVWRV�SROLFLDLV�H�oVFDLV��HQWUH�RXWURV�
2 PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012P
RIN
CIP
AIS
DA
DO
S
CARACTERÍSTICAS PESQUISADAS
Característica Variáveis pesquisadas
Geometria da Via
Tipo de rodovia
3HUoO�GD�URGRYLD
)DL[D�DGLFLRQDO�GH�VXELGD�H�FRQGL·µR
2EUDV�GH�DUWH�H�FRQGL·µR
&XUYDV�SHULJRVDV�H�FRQGL·µR
Acostamento
Pavimento
&RQGL·µR�GH�VXSHUI¼FLH
9HORFLGDGH�GHYLGR�DR�SDYLPHQWR
Pavimento do acostamento
6LQDOL]D·µR
Faixas centrais
)DL[DV�ODWHUDLV
3ODFDV�GH�OLPLWH�GH�YHORFLGDGH
3ODFDV�GH�LQGLFD·µR
3ODFDV�GH�LQWHUVH·µR
'LVSRVLWLYRV�GH�SURWH·µR�FRQW¼QXD
9LVLELOLGDGHV�GDV�SODFDV
/HJLELOLGDGH�GDV�SODFDV
Grupo de variáveis de coleta por característica
,QGLFD·ÅHV�GD�3HVTXLVD([WHQVµR�7RWDO
km %
3DYLPHQWR�HP�HVWDGR�VDWLVIDWÁULR��ÁWLPR�H�ERP� 51.726 54,0
3DYLPHQWR�HP�HVWDGR�GHoFLHQWH��UHJXODU��UXLP�H�S¸VVLPR� 43.981 46,0
6LQDOL]D·µR�VDWLVIDWÁULD��ÁWLPR�H�ERP� 32.297 33,7
6LQDOL]D·µR�FRP�SUREOHPDV��UHJXODU��UXLP�H�S¸VVLPR� 63.410 66,3
3ODFDV�WRWDOPHQWH�FREHUWDV�SHOR�PDWR 20.279 21,2
([WHQVµR�FRP�DFRVWDPHQWR 58.013 60,6
3UHGRPLQ³QFLD�GH�SLVWD�VLPSOHV�GH�PµR�GXSOD 84.351 88,1
INDICAÇÕES GERAIS DA PESQUISA
3PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012
PR
INC
IPA
IS D
AD
OS
ABRANGÊNCIA
([WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�SRU�WLSR�GH�JHVWµR�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������NP
*HVWµR�3ÆEOLFD 80.315
*HVWµR�&RQFHVVLRQDGD 15.392
TOTAL 95.707
([WHQVµR�WRWDO�SHVTXLVDGD�SRU�UHJLµR
5HJLµR km
Norte 10.393
Nordeste 26.739
Sudeste 27.187
6XO 16.842
Centro-Oeste 14.546
TOTAL 95.707
([WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������NP
)HGHUDO 65.273
(VWDGXDO 30.434
TOTAL 95.707
4 PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012P
RIN
CIP
AIS
DA
DO
S
AVALIAÇÃO
ExTENSãO TOTAL DAS RODOVIAS PESQUISADAS
(VWDGR�*HUDO2011 2012
km % km %
Ótimo 11.743 12,7 9.454 9,9
Bom 27.778 30,0 26.200 27,4
5HJXODU 28.327 30,5 31.990 33,4
Ruim 16.751 18,1 19.412 20,3
3¸VVLPR 8.148 8,8 8.651 9,0
7RWDO 92.747 100,0 95.707 100,0
6LQDOL]D·µR2011 2012
km % km %
Ótimo 15.382 16,6 11.566 12,1
Bom 24.627 26,6 20.731 21,7
5HJXODU 26.576 28,7 29.180 30,5
Ruim 13.257 14,3 19.071 19,9
3¸VVLPR 12.905 13,9 15.159 15,8
7RWDO 92.747 100,0 95.707 100,0
Pavimento2011 2012
km % km %
Ótimo 43.233 46,6 46.890 49,0
Bom 5.035 5,4 4.836 5,1
5HJXODU 31.429 33,9 31.944 33,4
Ruim 10.432 11,2 8.272 8,6
3¸VVLPR 2.618 2,8 3.765 3,9
7RWDO 92.747 100,0 95.707 100,0
5PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012
PR
INC
IPA
IS D
AD
OS
(VWDGR�*HUDO2011 2012
km % km %
Ótimo 4.370 5,6 2.576 3,2
Bom 21.795 28,2 19.731 24,6
5HJXODU 26.480 34,2 30.218 31,6
Ruim 16.580 21,4 19.149 20,0
3¸VVLPR 8.148 10,5 8.641 9,0
7RWDO 77.373 100,0 80.315 100,0
(VWDGR�*HUDO2011 2012
km % km %
Ótimo 7.373 48,0 6.878 44,7
Bom 5.983 38,9 6.469 42,0
5HJXODU 1.847 12,0 1.772 11,5
Ruim 171 1,1 263 1,7
3¸VVLPR - - 10 0,1
7RWDO 15.374 100,0 15.392 100,0
Extensão Pública
Extensão Concedida
AVALIAÇÃO POR TIPO DE GESTÃO
Geometria da Via2011 2012
km % km %
Ótimo 3.895 4,2 3.878 4,1
Bom 17.660 19,0 17.716 18,5
5HJXODU 25.310 27,3 28.722 30,0
Ruim 16.158 17,4 15.509 16,2
3¸VVLPR 29.724 32,0 29.882 31,2
7RWDO 92.747 100,0 95.707 100,0
6 PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012P
RIN
CIP
AIS
DA
DO
S
PAVImENTO
;��������������NP��GD�H[WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�DSUHVHQWD�DOJXP�WLSR�GH�SUREOHPD�
;��������������NP��GDV�URGRYLDV�VRE�FRQFHVVµR�IRUDP�FODVVLoFDGRV�FRPR�ÁWLPR�RX�ERP�
SINALIzAÇÃO
;��������������NP��GD�H[WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�DSUHVHQWD�DOJXP�WLSR�GH�SUREOHPD�
;������ �������� NP�� GDV� URGRYLDV� VRE� JHVWµR� SÆEOLFD� SRVVXL� DOJXP� WLSR� GH�SUREOHPD�
;������ �������� NP�� GD� H[WHQVµR� SHVTXLVDGD� SRVVXL� SODFDV� WRWDOPHQWH� RX�SDUFLDOPHQWH�FREHUWDV�SHOR�PDWR�
;������ �������� NP�� GD� H[WHQVµR� SHVTXLVDGD� SRVVXL� SODFDV� GHVJDVWDGDV� RX�WRWDOPHQWH�LOHJ¼YHLV�
;������ �������� NP�� GD� H[WHQVµR� SHVTXLVDGD� QµR� SRVVXL� SODFDV� GH� OLPLWH� GH�YHORFLGDGH�
;��������������NP��GD�H[WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�QµR�SRVVXL�SODFDV�GH�LQGLFD·µR�
GEOmETRIA DA VIA
;��������������NP��GD�H[WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�¸�GH�SLVWD�VLPSOHV�GH�PµR�GXSOD�
;��������������NP��GD�H[WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�QµR�SRVVXL�DFRVWDPHQWR��
PONTOS CRÍTICOS
;5HSUHVHQWDP�VLWXD·ÅHV�TXH�FRQoJXUDP�ULVFR�FRQVLGHU±YHO�RX�SRWHQFLDO�SDUD�RV�XVX±ULRV�GDV�URGRYLDV��FRPSURPHWHQGR�DV�FRQGL·ÅHV�GH�VHJXUDQ·D�QR�WU±IHJR�GH�YH¼FXORV�
;6µR� FRQVLGHUDGRV� SRQWRV� FU¼WLFRV�� EXUDFRV� JUDQGHV�� HURVµR� QD� SLVWD�� SRQWHV�FD¼GDV�H�TXHGDV�GH�EDUUHLUD�
;(P�������KRXYH�XP�DXPHQWR�QR�QÆPHUR�WRWDO�GH�SRQWRV�FU¼WLFRV�LGHQWLoFDGRV�QD�3HVTXLVD�&17�GH�5RGRYLDV��SDVVDQGR�GH�����RFRUUºQFLDV��HP�������SDUD�����
7PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012
PR
INC
IPA
IS D
AD
OS
CLASSIFICAÇÃO DO ESTADO GERAL (%) - POR REGIÃO E UF
8 PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012P
RIN
CIP
AIS
DA
DO
S
LIGAÇÕES RODOVIÁRIAS
;$�3HVTXLVD�&17�GH�5RGRYLDV�ID]�R�UDQNLQJ�GH�����OLJD·ÅHV�URGRYL±ULDV��6µR�WUHFKRV�UHJLRQDLV�TXH�LQWHUOLJDP�WHUULWÁULRV�GH�XPD�RX�PDLV�8QLGDGHV�GD�)HGHUD·µR�
;(VVDV� H[WHQVÅHV� WºP� LPSRUW³QFLD� VRFLRHFRQÃPLFD� H� YROXPH� VLJQLoFDWLYR� GH�WU±IHJR�GH�YH¼FXORV�GH�FDUJDV�H�RX�GH�SDVVDJHLURV�
10 melhores
3RVL·µR Nome Rodovias &ODVVLoFD·µR*HVWµR�
Concedida
1° 6µR�3DXOR�63���/LPHLUD�63 SP-310/BR-364, SP-348 ÁWLPR sim
2°6µR�3DXOR�63���,WD¼�63��� Espírito Santo do Turvo SP
SP-255, SP-280/BR-374 ÁWLPR sim
3° Bauru SP - Itirapina SP SP-225/BR-369 ÁWLPR sim
4° Barretos SP - Bueno de Andrade SP SP-326/BR-364 ÁWLPR sim
5° 5LEHLUµR�3UHWR�63���%RUERUHPD�63 SP-330/BR-050, SP-333 ÁWLPR sim
6°Limeira SP -
6µR�-RV¸�GR�5LR�3UHWR�63SP-310/BR-364, SP-310/
BR-456, SP-330/BR-050ÁWLPR sim
7° 6µR�3DXOR�63���8EHUDED�0* BR-050, SP-330/BR-050 ÁWLPR sim
8° 5LR�&ODUR�63���,WDSHWLQLQJD�63 SP-127, SP-127/BR-373 ÁWLPR sim
9°Catanduva SP - Taquaritinga SP -
5LEHLUµR�3UHWR�63
SP-322, SP-322/BR-265,
SP-323, SP-330/BR-050,
SP-351
ÁWLPR sim
10° 6µR�3DXOR�63���7DXEDW¸�63 SP-070 ÁWLPR sim
9PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012
PR
INC
IPA
IS D
AD
OS
INVESTImENTO Em INFRAESTRUTURA E ImPACTOS DAS CONDIÇÕES DAS RODOVIAS
���1(&(66,'$'(�'(�,19(67,0(172�3$5$�$�02'(51,=$¬à2�'$�,1)5$(6758785$�RODOVIáRIA NO BRASIL
;,QYHVWLPHQWR�WRWDO��5��������ELOKÅHV
;&RQVWUX·µR�GH�URGRYLD��5�������ELOKÅHV��������NP�
;'XSOLFD·µR�GH�URGRYLD��5�������ELOKÅHV���������NP�
;3DYLPHQWD·µR��5�������ELOKÅHV��������NP�
;5HFXSHUD·µR�GH�SDYLPHQWR��5�������ELOKÅHV���������NP�
;2XWUDV�LQWHUYHQ·ÅHV��5�������ELOKÅHV
10 Piores
3RVL·µR Nome Rodovias &ODVVLoFD·µR*HVWµR�
Concedida
100° 3RUWR�9HOKR�52���5LR�%UDQFR�$& BR-364 ruim QµR
101° -DWD¼�*2���3LUDQKDV�*2 BR-158 ruim QµR
102° 0DUDE±�3$���'RP�(OLVHX�3$ BR-222 ruim QµR
103°0DQDXV�$0���%RD�9LVWD�55���Pacaraíma RR
BR-174 ruim QµR
104° %DUUDFµR�35���&DVFDYHO�35BR-163, PR-163/BR-163, PR-182/
BR-163, PR-582/BR-163ruim QµR
105° $OWD�)ORUHVWD�07���&XLDE±�07 %5������%5������07���� ruim QµR
106° %UDV¼OLD�')���3DOPDV�72BR-010, DF-345/BR-010, GO-118,
GO-118/BR-010, TO-010, TO-050,
TO-050/BR-010, TO-342
ruim QµR
107° %HO¸P�3$���*XDUD¼�72BR-222, PA-150, PA-151, PA-252,
PA-287, PA-447, PA-475, PA-483,
TO-336
ruim QµR
108° Natividade TO - Barreiras BABA-460, BA-460/BR-242,
TO-040, TO-280ruim QµR
109° Rio Verde GO - Iporá GO GO-174 S¸VVLPR QµR
10 PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012P
RIN
CIP
AIS
DA
DO
S
2. CUSTO
;2�FXVWR�RSHUDFLRQDO�GRV�YH¼FXORV�¸� LPSDFWDGR�SHODV�FRQGL·ÅHV�GR�SDYLPHQWR��2�DFU¸VFLPR�P¸GLR�QR�FXVWR�RSHUDFLRQDO�GHYLGR�²V�DWXDLV�FRQGL·ÅHV�GD�PDOKD�URGRYL±ULD�EUDVLOHLUD�¸�GH�����
;5RGRYLDV�GHoFLHQWHV�DXPHQWDP�R�FXVWR�GH�PDQXWHQ·µR�GRV�YH¼FXORV�H�RV�JDVWRV�FRP�FRPEXVW¼YHO��OXEULoFDQWHV��IUHLRV�H�SQHXV�
;2� DXPHQWR� QR� FXVWR� GH� WUDQVSRUWH� HP� GHFRUUºQFLD� GD� P±� FRQVHUYD·µR� GDV�URGRYLDV�GLPLQXL�D�FRPSHWLWLYLGDGH�GRV�SURGXWRV�QDFLRQDLV��
3. COmBUSTÍVEL E mEIO AmBIENTE
;5RGRYLDV� TXH� DSUHVHQWDP� DOJXP� WLSR� GH� FRPSURPHWLPHQWR� GR� SDYLPHQWR�DXPHQWDP�R�FRQVXPR�GH�FRPEXVW¼YHO�H�FRQWULEXHP�SDUD�XPD�PDLRU�HPLVVµR�GH�SROXHQWHV�
;8PD� URGRYLD� HP� ERP� HVWDGR� GH� FRQVHUYD·µR� SRGH� UHVXOWDU� HP� DW¸� ��� GH�HFRQRPLD�QR�FRQVXPR�GH�FRPEXVW¼YHO�HP�UHOD·µR�D�XPD�URGRYLD�FRP�HVWDGR�GH�FRQVHUYD·µR�LQDGHTXDGR�
;6H�R�SDYLPHQWR�GH�WRGDV�DV�URGRYLDV�WLYHVVH�FODVVLoFD·µR�ERD�RX�ÁWLPD�HP�������VHULD�SRVV¼YHO�XPD�HFRQRPLD�GH�����PLOKÅHV�GH� OLWURV�GH�ÁOHR�GLHVHO��RX�VHMD�������5�������ELOKµR�H�XPD�UHGX·µR�GD�HPLVVµR�GH�����PHJDWRQHODGD�GH�&2
���SULQFLSDO�
J±V�GH�HIHLWR�HVWXID�
4. ACIDENTES
;(P������IRUDP�UHJLVWUDGRV�������PLO�DFLGHQWHV�QDV�URGRYLDV�IHGHUDLV�SROLFLDGDV��FHUFD�GH���PLO�DFLGHQWHV�D�PDLV�GR�TXH�HP������
;0DLV�GH����PLO�SHVVRDV� VRIUHUDP� OHVÅHV�JUDYHV�HP�DFLGHQWHV� URGRYL±ULRV�HP�������RXWUDV�����PLO�IRUDP�Y¼WLPDV�IDWDLV�
;2� FXVWR� FRP� DFLGHQWHV� HP� URGRYLDV� IHGHUDLV� IRL� GH� 5�� ����� ELOKÅHV� HP� ������'HVVHV��5������VµR�UHIHUHQWHV�D�DFLGHQWHV�FRP�Y¼WLPDV�IDWDLV�
Top Related