Fernando Schnaid - Antonino Di...

Post on 15-Oct-2018

216 views 0 download

Transcript of Fernando Schnaid - Antonino Di...

1

Dilatometer test

Fernando SchnaidUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

2

STANDARDS

Eurocode 7 (1997). Geotechnical design - Part 3: Design assisted by field testing, Section 9: Flat dilatometer test (DMT).

ASTM D 6635-01 (2001). "Standard Test Method for Performing the Flat Plate Dilatometer ".

MANUALS

Marchetti, S. & Crapps, D.K. (1981). "Flat Dilatometer Manual". Internal Report of G.P.E.

Schmertmann, J.H. (1988). Rept. No. FHWA-PA-87-022+84-24 to PennDOT, Office of Research and Special Studies, Harrisburg, PA, in 4 volumes.

US DOT - Briaud, J.L. & Miran, J. (1992). "The Flat Dilatometer Test". Dept. Transp., Fed. Highway Adm., Washington, D.C., FHWA-SA-91-044, 102 pp.

ISSMGE TC16 (2001): DMT in Soil Investigations

DMT on the INTERNET

Bibliographic site <www.marchetti-dmt.it> download papers

Basic reference

3

DMT: LAYOUT

Slides:courtesy from Silvano Marchetti

4

PenetrationDMT USING APENETROMETER

DMT USING ADRILL RIG

5

6

7

8Dilatômetro sísmico

9

Measurements and parameters

A- pressure: “lift-off”pressure – membrane starts to expand

B- pressure: 1,1 mm movement of centre of membrane

C-pressure: closing pressure (≈ uo)

Calibration in arΔA = external pressure to be applied to membrane

ΔB = internal pressure required to move 1,1 mm

( ) ( )BZBAZAp mm Δ−−−Δ+−= 05.005.10

( )BZBp m Δ−−=1

10

Measurements and parameters

a) Material Index: ID

b) Horizontal stress index: KD

c) Dilatometer modulus ED

'vo

ooD

upKσ−

=

( )oD ppE −= 17.34

oo

oD up

ppI−−

= 1

11

Typical results

• Id : soil type • Courtesy from Marchetti

Obs :Kd = 2 →OCR ≈ 1

12

Typical results: seismic

Courtesy from Marchetti

13

Repeatability Cestari (SGI), Lacasse (NGI), Lunne (NGI), Marchetti (Aq)

NC clay Onsoy, Norway

14

InterpretationMarchetti, 1981From A, B (p0, p1) :

Kd : an amplified Ko

Theory of elasticity

Rm=f(Kd,Id)Distortion, Horiz to VertDrained-undrained

Undrained shear strength

after Powell & Uglow, 1988after Powell & Uglow, 1988

16

DMT: NC Clay

Cu in Tokyo Bay Clay

Geotechnical Research Center Kiso-Jiban Consultants Co., Tokyo

Iwasaki K., Tsuchiya H., Sakai Y., Yamamoto Y. (1991). "Applicability of the Marchetti Dilatometer Test to Soft Ground in Japan", GEOCOAST '91, Sept. 1991, Yokohama 1/6

17

Cu: Skeena Ontario Canada

Vs Field Vane

Mekechuk J. (1983). "DMT Use on C.N. Rail Line British Columbia",First Int.Conf. on the Flat Dilatometer, Edmonton, Canada, Feb 83, 50

18

Cu: National Site BOTHKENNAR UK

Nash et al., Géotechnique, June 1995, p. 173

0

5

10

15

20

Z (m

)

kPa

19

Cu: National Site FUCINO

Note the various Nc for CPT(U)A.G.I., 10th ECSMFE Firenze 1991, Vol. 1, p. 37

Z (m

)

kPa

20

Cu: 2 Malaysian Clays

Vs Field Vane

Wong, J.T.F. & Dobie, M.J.D. 1990. Marchetti Dilatometer: Interpretation in Malaysian Alluvial Clays. Seminar on Geotechn. Aspects of the North-South Expressway, 5-6th Nov, pp. 87-96.

21

Cu: Recife

Coutinho et al., Atlanta ISC'98

22

OCR

Kamei T. and Iwasaki K. (1995). "Evaluation of Undrained shear strenght of cohesive soils using a flat dilatometer"

NoteMarchetti (1980) original: OK

23

OCR

FEM, Yu (2004)FEM, Yu (2004)

24

M: ONSOY Clay (NORWAY)

Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (1986). "In Situ Site Investigation Techniques and interpretation for offshore practice". Report 40019-28 by S. Lacasse, Fig. 16a, 8 Sept 86

25

M: Tokyo Bay Clay

Geotechnical Research CenterKiso-Jiban Consultants Co., Tokyo

Iwasaki K, Tsuchiya H., Sakai Y., Yamamoto Y. (1991) "Applicability of the Marchetti Dilatometer Test to Soft Ground in Japan", GEOCOAST '91, Sept. 1991, Yokohama 1/6

26

M: Bangkok Clay

Seah and Rasheed – unpublished results

SIMILAR CONCLUSIONS for MGenerally satisfactory for everyday practice, w/o local correlations (clay)

27

DILATOMETRO SÍSMICO (SDMT)

ALTERNATIVAS

2 sensores

Amplificador

Independe do operatodor

SDMT S - DMT

28

Seismic Dilatometer (SDMT)Seismic Dilatometer (SDMT)

29

30

SDMT at Fucino (June 2004)

AS RECORDED RE-PHASED

9 m

10 m

11 m

12 m

13 m

31

Comparison with other techniques (after Merchetti, 2006)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 100 200 300 400Vs (m/s)

Z (m

)

SDMT P.I.

SDMT T.I.

SCPT P.I.

Fucino Research Site Venezia - Treporti

32

G - γ curve

HARA (1973)

YOKOTA et al. (1981)

TATSUOKA (1977)

SEED & IDRISS (1970)

ATHANASOPOULOS (1995)

CARRUBBA, MAUGERI (1988)

MAUGERIS. Louis 1995

0.05 to 0.1%

Telespazio

Fucino Centro Telespazio, Marchetti (2006)

Zelazny Most, Poland, Marchetti (2006)

35

Final comments

Validation is restricted to sedimentary depositsCimentation effects not known (structuration and destructuration)Empirical approaches will preveil

Easy to used deviceUsed worldwide

Grazie tanto

Muito obrigado

www.cesup.ufrgs.br/fernandofernando@ufrgs.br