PERFIL DE PACIENTES FUMANTES E O PAPEL DO...

49
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS DA SAÚDE CURSO DE ODONTOLOGIA PERFIL DE PACIENTES FUMANTES E O PAPEL DO CIRURGIÃO-DENTISTA NA CESSAÇÃO DO TABAGISMO: UM ESTUDO TRANSVERSAL NO SUL DO BRASIL TRABALHO DE CONCLUSÃO DE CURSO Carolina Dummel Santa Maria, RS, Brasil 2015

Transcript of PERFIL DE PACIENTES FUMANTES E O PAPEL DO...

1

UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS DA SAÚDE

CURSO DE ODONTOLOGIA

PERFIL DE PACIENTES FUMANTES E O PAPEL DO CIRURGIÃO-DENTISTA NA CESSAÇÃO DO

TABAGISMO: UM ESTUDO TRANSVERSAL NO SUL DO BRASIL

TRABALHO DE CONCLUSÃO DE CURSO

Carolina Dummel

Santa Maria, RS, Brasil

2015

2

PERFIL DE PACIENTES FUMANTES E O PAPEL DO CIRURGIÃO-DENTISTA NA CESSAÇÃO DO TABAGISMO:

UM ESTUDO TRANSVERSAL NO SUL DO BRASIL.

Carolina Dummel

Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso apresentado ao Curso de Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria como requisito parcial para

obtenção do grau de Cirurgião-Dentista

Orientador: Prof. Dr. Sílvia Ataide Pithan

Santa Maria, RS, Brasil

2015

3

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências da Saúde

Curso de Odontologia

A Comissão Examinadora, abaixo assinada, aprova o Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso

PERFIL DE PACIENTES FUMANTES E O PAPEL DO CIRURGIÃO-

DENTISTA NA CESSAÇÃO DO TABAGISMO: UM ESTUDO TRANSVERSAL NO SUL DO BRASIL.

elaborado por Carolina Dummel

como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Cirurgião-Dentista

COMISSÃO EXAMINADORA:

______________________________________ Prof. Dr. Sílvia Ataide Pithan

(Presidente/Orientador)

______________________________________ Prof. Dr. Rachel de Oliveira Rocha (UFSM)

____________________________________ Prof. Dr. Thiago Machado Ardenghi (UFSM)

Santa Maria, 16 de junho de 2015.

4

O presente trabalho, intitulado

PERFIL DE PACIENTES FUMANTES E O PAPEL DO CIRURGIÃO-

DENTISTA NA CESSAÇÃO DO TABAGISMO: UM ESTUDO

TRANSVERSAL NO SUL DO BRASIL.

será submetido para publicação no periódico

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY

sob o título

PROFILE OF SMOKERS AND THE ROLE OF DENTISTS IN

TOBACCO USE CESSATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN

SOUTHERN BRAZIL.

5

AGRADECIMENTOS

Aos meus pais, Valdir e Izolete, pelo amor, cuidado e apoio incondicional.

Obrigada pela oportunidade de estudar e pela confiança e incentivo constantes.

Obrigada, pai, por me mostrar a admiração pela nossa profissão. Obrigada, mãe, por

me ensinar o amor pela saúde pública e por buscar incansavelmente uma sociedade

mais justa e igual para todos.

As minhas irmãs Juliana e Claudia, pelo amor e companheirismo. À Juliana, por

ser meu grande exemplo e inspiração. À Claudia, pelo exemplo de esforço,

humildade e motivação.

Aos meus sobrinhos Angelina, Mateus e Miguel, por serem a luz e a alegria dos

meus dias e por me mostrarem o amor mais puro e verdadeiro.

A minha orientadora Sílvia Pithan, pelo suporte, auxílio e motivação nessa

caminhada. Obrigada pela inspiração em promover a saúde de forma universal,

integral e igualitária.

À professora Ângela Dullius, pelo auxílio na estatística do nosso trabalho.

Aos colegas e amigos Caroline, Patrícia e Renan pela ajuda na pesquisa desde

o seu início, sem nunca desanimar frente às dificuldades encontradas.

Ao Renan, pelo amor e parceria diários, e por dividir comigo o sonho de tornar

nossa sociedade um lugar melhor para todos, sem preconceitos e opressões.

À Paula, Laura e Carine, obrigada pela amizade, parceria, pelo aprendizado

diário e pela oportunidade de conviver com pessoas de corações tão grandes e

solidários.

As minhas amigas Priscila Campeol, Priscila Kist, Bárbara, Silvana e Vanessa,

obrigada pela amizade nesses seis anos (e nos próximos que virão), pelo apoio em

incontáveis momentos e por serem minha família em Santa Maria.

A todos os professores, colegas e amigos que ao longo desses seis anos

contribuíram para a minha formação acadêmica e pessoal. Sou eternamente grata a

todos vocês!

À Universidade Federal de Santa Maria pela formação de alto nível e por todas

as oportunidades de atividades de ensino, pesquisa e extensão.

Ao programa Ciência sem Fronteiras e a De Montfort University pela

oportunidade de estudar um ano em uma universidade de excelência na Inglaterra,

6

vendo a saúde pública de outra perspectiva e aprendendo com um sistema de saúde

reconhecido internacionalmente. A todas as pessoas que eu conheci nessa

aventura, que me ajudaram a abrir meus olhos para outras culturas e realidades e a

vencer muitas barreiras e preconceitos.

À cidade de Santa Maria e suas pessoas de todas as cores e credos, obrigada

por me formar para a vida.

“Um sonho que se sonha só é só um sonho que se sonha só, mas sonho que se

sonha junto é realidade.”

Raul Seixas

7

“Se você trata a doença, você ganha ou perde. Se você trata a pessoa, você sempre

ganha – independentemente do resultado.”

Patch Adams

8

RESUMO

Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso Curso de Odontologia

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria

PERFIL DE PACIENTES FUMANTES E O PAPEL DO CIRURGIÃO-DENTISTA NA CESSAÇÃO DO TABAGISMO: UM ESTUDO TRANSVERSAL NO SUL DO

BRASIL.

Autor: Carolina Dummel

Orientador: Sílvia Ataide Pithan Local e Data da Defesa: Santa Maria, 16 de junho de 2015.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o perfil dos pacientes fumantes que

frequentam as clínicas de um Curso de Odontologia no sul do Brasil e a opinião dos

mesmos sobre o papel do cirurgião-dentista na cessação do tabagismo. Trata-se de

um estudo transversal analítico, onde os dados foram coletados por meio de um

questionário contendo questões fechadas e abertas. A amostra compreendeu 442

pacientes e os dados foram analisados por meio de estatística descritiva e do teste

Qui-quadrado com nível de significância de 5%. A idade média foi de 48,5 anos e 93

pacientes (21,04%) eram fumantes, a maioria do sexo feminino (52,7%). Verificou-se

associação significativa entre fumo, escolaridade e renda, sendo que quanto menor

a escolaridade, maior a frequência de fumantes (p=0,026), e a frequência de não

fumantes esteve associada a uma maior renda (p=0,021). Dos fumantes

entrevistados, 95,7% gostariam de abandonar o hábito, 81,7% já tentaram parar e

apenas 23,7% têm conhecimento de grupos de apoio à cessação. Em relação ao

papel do cirurgião-dentista na cessação do hábito de fumar, 97,8% dos fumantes

acredita que este deve dar orientações sobre os danos provocados pelo cigarro,

mas 36,6% não receberam informações ou conselhos do dentista. A identificação do

perfil dos pacientes tabagistas permite um melhor planejamento de estratégias em

saúde pública e é imprescindível que todos os profissionais de saúde trabalhem

juntos para ajudar seus pacientes a pararem de fumar. Neste contexto, o papel do

cirurgião-dentista é fundamental, pois seus pacientes esperam receber informações

e conselhos para a cessação.

Palavras-Chave: Tabaco, Abandono do Uso de Tabaco, Odontólogos.

9

ABSTRACT

Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso

Curso de Odontologia Universidade Federal de Santa Maria

PROFILE OF SMOKERS AND THE ROLE OF DENTISTS IN TOBACCO USE CESSATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL.

Autor: Carolina Dummel Orientador: Sílvia Ataide Pithan

Local e Data da Defesa: Santa Maria, 16 de junho de 2015.

The aim of this study was to investigate the profile of smokers in a dental clinic

of a university in southern Brazil and their views about the role of dentists in smoking

cessation. A cross-sectional study was carried out with the patients of the Dental

School, who answered a face-to-face interview containing closed and open

questions. The sample was formed by 442 patients and data was analysed using

descriptive statistics and Chi Square test with a significance level of 5%. The mean

age was 48.5 years old and 93 patients (21.04%) were smokers, most of them

women (52.7%). A significant association was found between smoking and

schooling, as well as between smoking and income. The lower the level of schooling,

the higher the frequency of smokers was (p=0.026), and the frequency of non-

smokers was associated with a higher income (p=0.021). Among tobacco users,

95.7% would like to quit smoking, 81.7% had tried at least once to stop and only

23.7% have knowledge of counselling groups for cessation. Regarding the role of

dentists in tobacco use cessation, 97.8% of smokers believe that the dentist should

give information and advice about the damage caused by smoking, but 36.6% did not

receive any advice from dentists. Evaluating the profile of smokers allows a better

planning of strategies of cessation and it is imperative that all health professionals

work together to help their patients quit smoking. In this context, the role of dentists is

essential, as patients expect them to offer information and advice for cessation.

Key Words: Tobacco, Tobacco Use Cessation, Dentists.

10

LISTA DE TABELAS

Tabela 1 – Demographic data....................................................................................19

Tabela 2 – Socioeconomic characteristics……………………………………..............19

Tabela 3 – Patterns of smoking………………………………………………….............20

Tabela 4 – Nicotine dependence - Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.................21

11

SUMÁRIO

INTRODUÇÃO…………………………………………………………........................11

ARTIGO – PROFILE OF SMOKERS AND THE ROLE OF DENTISTS IN

TOBACCO USE CESSATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN

SOUTHERN BRAZIL…………………………………………………………............15

Abstract………..……………………………………………………………………………16

Introduction……………………………………………………………………...…………17

Methods……………………………………………………………………………………..18

Results………………………………………………………………………………………19

Discussion………………………………………………………………………………….21

References………………………………………………………………………………….25

CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS…………………………………………………………28

REFERÊNCIAS………………………………………………………………………....29

ANEXOS…………………………………………………………………………………..31

Anexo 1 – PARECER FINAL DO COMITÊ DE ÉTICA EM PESQUISA DA UFSM:

Levantamento epidemiológico e perfil dos pacientes tabagistas das Clínicas de

Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria..............................................31

Anexo 2 – PARECER FINAL DO COMITÊ DE ÉTICA EM PESQUISA DA UFSM:

Avaliação do Grau de Dependência Nicotínica por meio do Questionário de

Tolerância de Fagerström nas clínicas do Curso de Odontologia da Universidade

Federal de Santa Maria..............................................................................................34

Anexo 3 – QUESTIONÁRIO: LEVANTAMENTO EPIDEMIOLÓGICO E PERFIL DOS

PACIENTES TABAGISTAS DAS CLÍNICAS DE ODONTOLOGIA DA

UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA........................................................36

Anexo 4 – QUESTIONÁRIO DE TOLERÂNCIA DE FAGERSTRÖM........................37

Anexo 5 – NORMAS DA REVISTA: JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH

DENTISTRY...............................................................................................................38

Anexo 6 – PLANILHA DE CÓDIGOS – PROFISSÕES.............................................47

11

INTRODUÇÃO

O tabagismo ainda constitui um dos principais problemas de saúde pública em

todo o mundo. A mortalidade e a morbidade atribuídas ao tabagismo constituem um

problema crescente, principalmente nos países em desenvolvimento, principal alvo

das indústrias de tabaco na atualidade. Além disso, o fumo gera um impacto

significativo para a economia dos países, representado pelos custos da assistência

médica para o sistema de saúde e pela perda de produtividade devido à morte

precoce e morbidade. O custo total atribuível ao tabagismo para o sistema de saúde

no Brasil em um ano foi de R$ 20,69 bilhões, sem estimar os custos do tabagismo

passivo (ALDERETE, 2014; ALIANÇA DE CONTROLE AO TABAGISMO, 2011).

Atualmente, 29% da população mundial é fumante (FDI/WHO, 2005), e o

cigarro é responsável por quase seis milhões de mortes todos os anos (WHO, 2011).

No Brasil, a prevalência do uso de cigarro é de 17,2% (IBGE, 2009) e o hábito é a

causa de 13% de todas as mortes no país (ALIANÇA DE CONTROLE AO

TABAGISMO, 2011), excedendo a soma das mortes por alcoolismo, AIDS, acidentes

de trânsito, homicídios e suicídios (INCA, 2007). O cigarro contém mais de 4000

substâncias tóxicas, das quais pelo menos 50 são comprovadamente carcinogênicas

(WHO, 2011). Ele é fator causal de quase 50 doenças incapacitantes e fatais (INCA,

2007) e tem impacto na saúde oral e geral, sendo fator de risco para o câncer

(principalmente quando associado ao consumo de álcool), lesões potencialmente

malignas como a leucoplasia, doenças periodontais, halitose, perda de implantes,

candidíase oral e língua pilosa (REIBEL, 2003; FERREIRA ANTUNES, 2013;

BUSENLECHNER, 2014; JOHNSON & SLACH, 2001).

A idade média de iniciação ao fumo é 15 anos, transformando o tabagismo em

um problema pediátrico (INCA, 2007). O consumo de tabaco é aprendido e

tipicamente iniciado durante a adolescência, quando a necessidade de adquirir

aceitação adaptando-se aos grupos sociais é particularmente forte (CHRISTEN et

al., 2001). Entre os fatores que influenciam a iniciação ao tabagismo na

adolescência pode-se destacar a influência dos amigos, morar com alguém que

fuma e a crença de que o cigarro tem um efeito calmante e é eficaz em controlar o

peso (BERNAT, KLEIN & FORSTER, 2012). A presença de pais e irmãos fumantes

também é um fator de influência, além das mensagens disseminadas pela mídia,

12

atualmente por meio de filmes e séries (CHRISTEN et al., 2001).

Entender o mecanismo da dependência nicotínica e como ela influencia as

tentativas de cessação é essencial para a elaboração de estratégias de suporte aos

tabagistas. A nicotina é encontrada na folha do tabaco e após ser inalada e entrar na

corrente sanguínea, atinge o cérebro em 7 a 10 segundos. Ela promove o

relaxamento muscular, aumento da frequência cardíaca e respiratória e aumento da

pressão arterial, sendo utilizada com o objetivo de melhorar a concentração e a

energia e pelo seu suposto efeito calmante. Assim como ocorre com outras

substâncias viciantes, os fumantes desenvolvem uma tolerância após um tempo de

uso, passando a exigir maiores quantidades de tabaco para alcançar os mesmos

efeitos (CHRISTEN et al., 2012). Além disso, a dependência à nicotina está

conectada a dois outros fatores: a dependência psicológica e fatores socioculturais

(CHRISTEN et al., 2001).

Com o objetivo de combater a epidemia do tabagismo, políticas de saúde

pública têm sido criadas nos últimos anos. O Brasil foi um dos 180 países que

ratificaram a Convenção-Quadro para o Controle do Tabaco da Organização

Mundial de Saúde (CQCT), que articula ações multissetoriais para proteger as

gerações presentes e futuras das consequências sociais, sanitárias, ambientais e

econômicas ocasionadas pelo uso e pela exposição à fumaça do tabaco. Ela

também tem o intuito de proteger as políticas públicas dos interesses da indústria do

tabaco (INCA, 2007; ALDERETE, 2014). Entre as principais leis e medidas de

controle ao tabagismo implementadas no Brasil, destaca-se a proibição de

publicidade de produtos de tabaco nos pontos de venda, aumento dos impostos

sobre os cigarros, proibição do fumo em todos os ambientes coletivos totais ou

parcialmente fechados, privados ou públicos e a obrigatoriedade de inclusão de

advertências sanitárias em 100% de um dos lados do maço de cigarros. A partir de

2016 serão adicionadas advertências também em 30% da face frontal da

embalagem (BRASIL. Lei nº 12.546, de 14 de dezembro de 2011; BRASIL. Decreto

nº 8.262, de 31 de maio de 2014.).

Apesar dos constantes esforços dos Estados em garantir a saúde acima de

qualquer interesse particular, a indústria do tabaco cria obstáculos à implementação

da legislação e articula estratégias contra as políticas de controle do tabagismo. No

Brasil, por exemplo, a Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária realizou uma

13

consulta pública em 2010 que resultou em uma resolução proibindo o uso de

aditivos como mentol, cravo e outros aromatizantes nos cigarros, usados para torná-

los mais palatáveis e atrativos, principalmente para os jovens. No entanto, a

indústria do tabaco conseguiu impedir a aplicação da resolução através de uma

liminar concedida pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal em 2013, disseminando a ideia de

que tais medidas causariam um impacto negativo sobre a economia brasileira,

gerando o desemprego dos produtores de fumo e estimulando o contrabando

(ALDERETE, 2014). A indústria tem focado sua expansão no público jovem dos

países em desenvolvimento, e por isso busca atrativos para promover a iniciação ao

fumo. O Brasil é o segundo maior produtor e o maior exportador de tabaco e

milhares de famílias de pequenos agricultores inseridas nessa cadeia produtiva

encontram-se em situação de vulnerabilidade social, econômica e sanitária. Estes

produtores estão expostos ao risco de intoxicações por agrotóxicos usados no

cultivo do fumo e ao desenvolvimento da doença da folha verde do tabaco, causada

pela absorção de nicotina na colheita da folha do tabaco (INCA, 2007; RIQUINHO;

HENNINGTON, 2014).

Vários desafios ainda precisam ser enfrentados para a redução do consumo

de tabaco e de seu impacto na sociedade. Os cigarros brasileiros estão entre um

dos mais baratos do mundo, facilitando a iniciação entre os jovens. Há também um

aumento na prevalência de fumantes entre as mulheres, e uma maior concentração

de tabagistas na população de menor escolaridade e renda. Logo, esforços devem

ser concentrados para combater essas desigualdades. Além disso, o acesso ao

tratamento para cessação do tabagismo no SUS ainda é incipiente, com apenas

6,8% dos municípios brasileiros oferecendo o serviço à população. Os cursos de

graduação da área da saúde ainda não inserem o controle do tabagismo na grade

curricular, formando profissionais com pouca ou nenhuma capacitação para atuar na

prevenção e cessação do tabagismo (INCA, 2007).

Cirurgiões-dentistas, assim como outros profissionais da área da saúde, têm a

obrigação ética de fornecer informações aos seus pacientes sobre os danos

provocados pelo cigarro e de motivar os tabagistas a pararem de fumar (CHRISTEN

et al., 2012). Quando doenças orais causadas pelo fumo são diagnosticadas, o

aconselhamento e suporte à cessação torna-se uma parte essencial do tratamento

14

odontológico e não podem ser ignorados. Atualmente 266.530 cirurgiões-dentistas

estão em atividade no Brasil (CONSELHO FEDERAL DE ODONTOLOGIA, 2015), e

aproximadamente 9.000 novos dentistas se formam anualmente no país (MORITA,

HADDAD & ARAÚJO, 2010). A grande frequência de visitas de pacientes nos

consultórios dentários possibilita repetidas intervenções para a cessação do

tabagismo, resultando em um ganho significativo para a saúde e na redução da

prevalência de uso de tabaco (FDI/WHO, 2005). O suporte à cessação do tabagismo

continua sendo uma das mais importantes estratégias no combate ao fumo, e todos

os profissionais de saúde devem estar conscientes da sua responsabilidade no

apoio aos fumantes.

15

ARTIGO

Profile of smokers and the role of dentists in tobacco use cessation: a cross-

sectional study in southern Brazil.

Carolina Dummel¹, Caroline Francieli Weber², Angela Isabel dos Santos Dullius3,

Sílvia Ataide Pithan4.

¹ Dental student of Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil;

² Dental student of Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil;

3 Professor in the Department of Statistics in Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS,

Brazil;

4 Professor in the Department of Stomatology in Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS,

Brazil.

Correspondence

Prof. Dr. Sílvia Ataide Pithan

Federal University of Santa Maria, Department of Stomatology.

Rua Floriano Peixoto, 1184, Prédio da Antiga Reitoria – Sala 116.

Bairro Centro - Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Telephone: +55 55 32209269

Email: [email protected]

16

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the profile of smokers in a dental clinic

of a university in southern Brazil and their views about the role of dentists in smoking

cessation. A cross-sectional study was carried out with the patients of the Dental

School, who answered a face-to-face interview containing closed and open

questions. The sample was formed by 442 patients and data was analysed using

descriptive statistics and Chi Square test with a significance level of 5%. The mean

age was 48.5 years old and 93 patients (21.04%) were smokers, most of them

women (52.7%). A significant association was found between smoking and schooling

and between smoking and income. The lower the level of schooling, the higher the

frequency of smokers was (p=0.026), and the frequency of non-smokers was

associated with a higher income (p=0.021). Among tobacco users, 95.7% would like

to quit smoking, 81.7% had tried at least once to stop and only 23.7% have

knowledge of counselling groups. Regarding the role of dentists in tobacco use

cessation, 97.8% of smokers believe that the dentist should give information and

advice about the damage caused by smoking, but 36.6% did not receive any advice

from dentists. Evaluating the profile of smokers allows a better planning of strategies

of cessation and it is imperative that all health professionals work together to help

their patients quit smoking. In this context, the role of dentists is essential, as patients

expect them to offer information and advice for cessation.

Key Words: Tobacco, Tobacco Use Cessation, Dentists.

17

Introduction

Smoking remains one of the greatest public health concerns worldwide.

Currently, there are an estimated 1.3 billion smokers in the world, which represents

29% of the global population (1). Almost six million people die from tobacco use

every year, both from direct tobacco use and second-hand smoke (2). Smoking

prevalence among Brazilian adults is 17.2% (3) and the habit is responsible for 13%

of all deaths in this country (4). Tobacco consumption also produces a significant

burden for the economy. A 2010 report showed that R$ 20,69 billion (approximately

U$7 billion) was spent in that year in Brazil to treat tobacco-related diseases, such as

cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and some types of cancer (4).

Smoking tobacco contains over 4000 chemicals, of which at least 50 are

carcinogenic (2). It has many harmful effects both on the oral and overall health. It is

a risk factor for cancer (especially when combined with alcohol consumption),

premalignant lesions such as leukoplakia, periodontal diseases, halitosis, oral

candidosis and hairy tongue. Continued smoking is extremely detrimental to the

success of periodontal therapy and can be the cause of implant failure (5-8).

To tackle tobacco epidemic, public policies have been created in the past

years, such as restrictions on tobacco advertisements and public campaigns

promoting smoking prevention and cessation. Laws establishing smoke-free

environments, including pubs and restaurants, were adopted aiming to protect all the

population from passive smoking, and to motivate smokers to quit (9). Increasing

cigarette prices is also an effective measure to reduce tobacco use, mainly among

adolescents (10).

Offering assistance in quitting is one of the most effective strategies to control

tobacco use. Quit rates are significantly higher when the individual has support

(11,12). Tobacco cessation treatment is a cost-effective intervention whose positive

outcomes also include the early detection of oral cancer - which is decisive to the

success of the treatment – and the opportunity to teach patients how to do an oral

self-examination (13). Identifying the patterns of smoking and the level of nicotine

addiction is important to guide strategies for cessation.

18

Despite the damage caused by smoking, many health professionals do not

provide any treatment or information to tobacco users, or even referral into smoking

cessation services, in part because of a lack of knowledge and skills (14). Dentists

could significantly contribute to tobacco cessation, informing and advising their

patients and intervening at individual and community levels (15). Patients visit their

dentist more than once in a year, giving an excellent opportunity for dentists to

contribute to tobacco prevention and cessation.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the profile of tobacco users, their interest

in quitting and dental patients’ views about the role of dentists in smoking cessation.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Dental School of Federal

University of Santa Maria, in Santa Maria, southern Brazil. The project was approved

by the Local Ethical Committee.

A convenience sample was used with patients of the dental clinics who were

18 years of age or older. Data collection occurred between 2013 and 2014, when

patients of different clinics, smokers and non-smokers, were approached before or

after their dental appointment in the waiting room. The researcher assessed eligibility

to participate, read a plain language statement describing the project to each

potential participant and written informed consent was obtained before proceeding

with data collection. Patients were asked to answer a face-to-face interview with

twelve closed and open questions assessing the profile of tobacco users, their

interest in quitting smoking and patients’ opinions on the role of dentists in tobacco

use cessation. Smokers who answered the first interview were invited to participate in

a second interview containing six questions evaluating the level of nicotine

dependence through Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

The statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for Social

Science (SPSS), version 17. Data was analysed by descriptive statistics and Chi

Square test was applied. T-test was used to test the difference between the age’s

averages. The level of statistical significance was set at p≤0.05.

19

Results

A total of 442 patients answered the first interview assessing the profile of

smokers and patients’ views about the role of dentists in smoking cessation. Among

the participants, 146 were men (33%) and 296 were women (67%). Ninety-three (93)

smokers answered the second interview evaluating their level of nicotine addiction.

Demographic results are outlined in Table 1. The mean age was 48.5 years old and

93 patients (21.04%) were smokers, most of them women (52.7%). There is a higher

frequency of smokers among men (0.001).

*Standard Deviation.

A significant association was found between smoking and schooling, as well

as between smoking and income. The lower the level of schooling, the higher the

frequency of smokers was (p=0.026), and the frequency of non-smokers was

associated with a higher income (p=0.021). Socioeconomics characteristics are

shown in Table 2. Among tobacco users, 95.7% would like to quit smoking and

81.7% had tried at least once to stop, with an average of 185 days without smoking

before relapsing. Only 23.7% smokers have knowledge of counselling groups for

cessation.

Variable Total (n=442) Smokers (n=93) Non-smokers

(n=349)

p

Schooling

Incomplete Elementary School Complete Elementary School Complete High School Undergraduate degree/Postgraduate

175 (39.6%) 96 (21.7%) 127 (28.7%) 44 (9.9%)

48 (51.6%) 19 (20.4%) 22 (23.7%) 4 (4.3%)

127 (36.4%) 77 (22.1%) 105 (30.1%) 40 (11.4%)

0.026

Variable Category Total (n=442) Smokers (n=93) Non-smokers (n=349) p

Age (Years)

Mean ±SD*

Minimum Maximum

48.5 ±14.14* 18 87

48.09 ±12.68 19 71

48.63 ± 14.43 18 87

0.718

Gender

Male Female

146 (33%) 296 (67%)

44 (47%) 49 (52%)

102 (29.2%) 247 (70.8%)

0.001

Table 1 – Demographic data.

Table 2 – Socioeconomic characteristics.

20

course

Occupation

1 – Retired 2 – Student 3 – Technicians 4 – Administrative professionals 5 – Public administration professionals and businessman 6 – Scientific and intellectual professions 7 – Farmer 8 – Production workers 9 – Sellers and other services/Not informed

68 (15.4%) 25 (5.7%) 9 (2.0%) 15 (3.4%) 12 (2.7%) 10 (2.3%) 28 (6.3%) 13 (2.9%) 262 (59.2%)

12 (12.9%) 3 (3.2%) 3 (2.2%) 2 (2.2%) 2 (2.2%) - 8 (8.6%) 4 (4.3%) 59 (63.4%)

50 (16.6%) 22 (6.3%) 6 (1.7%) 13 (3.7%) 10 (2.9%) 10 (2.9%) 20 (5.7%) 9 (2.6%) 203 (58.1%)

0.479

Family income (Reais) Less than 500 Between 500 and 1000 Between 1001 and 2000 Between 2001 and 3000/More than 3000

28 (6.3%) 191 (43.2%) 152 (34.4%) 71 (16.1%)

6 (6.5%) 53 (57%) 24 (25.8%) 10(10.8%)

22 (6.3%) 138 (39.5%) 128 (36.7%) 61 (17.5%)

0.021

Regarding the role of dentists in tobacco use cessation, 97.8% of smokers

believe that dentists should give information and advice about the damage caused by

smoking, but 36.6% did not receive any advice from them. The majority of

participants of this study (99.3% of all participants and 98.9% of smokers) agree with

the law establishing smoke-free environments, including pubs and restaurants.

Variable Total (n=442) Smokers (n=93) Non-smokers (n=349)

Do you smoke? Yes No

93 (21.04%) 349 (78.96%)

-- --

How long have you been smoking (in years)?

Média ±SD

--

27.49 13.82*

--

How many cigarettes do you smoke per day?

Mean ±SD

--

15.33 8.66*

--

Have you ever tried to quit smoking? Yes No

--

76 (81.7%) 17 (18.3%)

--

If yes, how many days did you stay free of smoking?

Mean ±SE

--

185 63**

--

Would you like to quit smoking? Yes No

--

89 (95.7%) 4 (4.3%)

--

Do you believe that oral health problems are related to smoking? Yes No

411 (93.0%) 13 (7.0%)

84 (90.3%) 9 ( 9.7%)

327 (93.7%) 22 (6.3%)

Do you believe that oral health can improve if the person stops smoking?

Table 3 – Patterns of smoking.

21

Yes No

429 (97.1%) 13 (2.9%)

91 (97.8%) 2 (2.2%)

338 (96.8%) 11 (3.2%)

Do you think dentists should inform and advise their patients about the damage caused by smoking? Yes No

433 (98.0%) 9 (2%)

91 (97.8%) 2 (2.2%)

342 (98.0%) 7 (2.0%)

Have you ever received any information or advice about the harms of smoking from a dentist? Yes No

199 (45.1%) 242 (54.9%)

59 (63.4%) 34 (36.6%)

140 (40.2%) 208 (59.8%)

Do you know couselling groups for cessation in the city of Santa Maria? Yes No

115 (26%) 327 (74%)

22 (23.7%) 71 (76.3%)

93 (26.6%) 256 (73.4%)

Do you agree with the law establishing smoke-free environments, including pubs and restaurants? Yes No

439 (99.3%) 3 (0.7%)

92 (98.9%) 1 (1.1%)

347 (99.4%) 2 (0.6%)

*Standard Deviation. **Standard Error.

Using Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire, 51.6% were classified as very low

and low dependent, 11.8% as medium and 36.6 % were classified as high and very

high dependent of nicotine. No association was found among level of dependence

and income (p=0.883), schooling and gender (p=0.356).

Table 4 – Level of nicotine dependence: Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire

Discussion

Identifying the profile of tobacco users and their level of nicotine dependence

is essential for planning cessation strategies. The pattern of smoking varies

according to the countries and their culture, but previous studies have shown that

generally the frequency of smoking is highest amongst people of low income and

educational background (1), which is consistent with the findings of the current study.

Reducing inequalities in smoking is a key public health priority and tobacco

prevention and cessation policies should be focused on this target audience (16).

Variable Smokers (n=93)

Level of dependence (points)

Mean ±SD

10.26 ±1.88

Level of dependence Very low Low Medium High Very high

23 (24.7%) 25 (26.9%) 11 (11.8%) 22 (23.7%) 12 (12.9%)

22

The majority of women found in our sample, even among smokers, can be explained

by the fact that women are generally more concerned than men with their oral health

and search more for dental services. Participants of this study, including smokers,

have positive attitudes towards the law establishing smoke-free environments,

showing that the population is getting more conscious of the damage of smoking in

society.

Findings from our study have shown that the greatest majority of smokers

were willing to quit and had attempted at least once to stop smoking, but most of

them did not succeed. Besides, a few people were aware of community resources to

help them, indicating gaps in advertising counselling groups in the city. Difficulties

experienced during quit attempts include irritability, aggression, urge to smoke,

restlessness, increased appetite, nighttime awakenings and depression (11). A

significant number of participants of this study have a high or very high level of

nicotine dependence, which indicates they will need counselling and

pharmacotherapy to help them quit smoking. Tobacco use cessation therapies, such

as individual or group-based counselling (12), nicotine replacement therapy (17) and

other pharmacotherapies (18) can enhance treatment outcomes, improving the odds

of quitting. The combination of counselling and medication can significantly improve

cessation rates (19) and providing follow-up can produce additional benefit (12).

Several medications are currently available for helping tobacco users to quit.

Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) temporarily replaces the nicotine from cigarettes

to reduce nicotine withdrawal symptoms and acute cravings, facilitating the transition

from smoking to complete abstinence. This therapy increases the rate of long-term

quitting by approximately 50 to 70% and is commercially available in a variety of

forms, such as gum, transdermal patch, nasal spray and inhaler (17). Other

medications have been proved to help people to quit, such as bupropion and

varenicline. Bupropion is an antidepressant which works by blocking nicotine effects,

relieving withdrawal or reducing depressed mood. The comparison between

bupropion and NRT suggests no advantage for either therapy (18). Varenicline is a

nicotine receptor partial agonist and it is suggested that it is more effective than NRT

and bupropion to help quit smoking. It more than doubled the odds of quitting

compared with placebo (18). Adapting interventions to match smokers’ needs and

23

expectations may improve treatment outcomes. Health professionals should consider

the experiences of smokers in past quit attempts – such as difficulties, side effects of

smoking cessation medications - and consider their preferences before

recommending a cessation therapy (11).

Dentists can easily identify smokers and the impact of tobacco use in the

mouth, but their role in smoking cessation is not clear yet. Currently, there are

266,530 dentists (20) in Brazil and approximately 9,000 new dentists graduate

annually in the country (21). Dentists are in a unique position to contribute to tobacco

control. They have regular contact with patients and can easily identify the impact of

tobacco use in the mouth in a routine exam (1). First of all, dentists have an ethical

responsibility to advise all smokers to quit (13). Moreover, studies have shown that a

brief intervention for smoking cessation performed by the dentist will often result in

significant health gain, reducing the prevalence of smoking (1). When oral diseases

caused by tobacco use are diagnosed, cessation counselling is an essential part of

the treatment and cannot be neglected.

Oral professionals can intervene at individual and community levels to

contribute to the decrease of tobacco consumption. Individual approach occurs at

chair side, where the dentist spends a few minutes at every visit encouraging their

patients to quit smoking by highlighting the damage caused by tobacco use to oral

tissues and to general health and emphasizing the health benefits of quitting, always

offering support (15). For a basic intervention, dentists can use a protocol known as

the “Five As”, where they should ASK patients about their tobacco use at every

appropriate opportunity, ADVISE all smokers to quit, ASSESS their willingness to

make a quit attempt, ASSIST them in stopping and ARRANGE for supportive follow-

up procedures (22). Community intervention includes spreading information and

educational material through mass media and community events, participating in

counselling groups for cessation and acting as a role model by not using tobacco

(15).

Although dentists have the opportunity to inform and motivate their patients to

stop smoking, this is not a routine in the dental care. The findings of the current study

are consistent with the findings of previous work (23,24), showing that patients

expect dentists to give information and advice about smoking, but many people did

24

not receive any information about the damage caused by tobacco use. Major barriers

identified by dentists to smoking cessation in the dental setting are lack of

reimbursement, time constraints, not knowing where to refer, lack of training and

knowledge, and not feeling well prepared and confident of doing so (25,26,27).

Dentists have generally positive attitudes toward the effectiveness of providing

tobacco cessation services in the dental settings, thus engaging dental professionals

in effective training and providing resources could address a number of the outlined

barriers, such as lack of knowledge, training and confidence (27). The health

department of Brazilian government offers a free training of tobacco cessation for

health professionals who work in the public service. Online training programs are

also available for health professionals, but attention is needed for the quality of these

courses (14).

The implementation of tobacco cessation programs into dental universities is

another way of involving future dentists in the duty of smoking cessation and there is

evidence of the effectiveness of this action (13,22). The Indiana University tobacco

cessation program has been successfully employed in the School of Dentistry for

more than twenty years, with the one-month quit rate of 58 percent and the one-year

quit rate of 33 percent (22). Generally, dental school curriculum concentrates on

tobacco effects in the oral cavity, but does not focus on cessation techniques.

Including tobacco cessation treatment programs into dental school curriculum would

capacitate dental students to help their patients on quit attempts and prescribe

medications when necessary. Moreover, it would make them aware of their

professional responsibility and important contribution to tackle tobacco consumption.

The use of a convenient sample is a limitation of the current study, which

allows only an internal validity of the results. As with any such research, bias may be

present, considering that all participants were patients of a dental service and most of

them were positive about the role of dentists in tobacco control. This study raises

important questions associated with the challenge of cessation faced by smokers and

health professionals. Further research is required to gain a clearer understanding of

the role of dentists in smoking cessation and prevention, including the opinion of

dental professionals, practical experiences and barriers related to tobacco cessation

programs in the dental setting.

25

References

1. FDI/WHO. Tobacco or oral health: an advocacy guide for oral health

professionals. FDI World Dental Federation, Ferney Voltaire, France / World

Dental Press, Lowestoft, UK; 2005.

2. WHO. Global Status Report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva:

World Health Organization; 2011.

3. IBGE. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios: Tabagismo – 2008. Rio

de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; 2009.

4. Aliança de Controle do Tabagismo. Carga das doenças tabaco-relacionadas

para o Brasil – Relatório Final. Rio de Janeiro: Aliança de Controle do

Tabagismo; 2011.

5. Reibel, J. Tobacco and oral diseases. Update on the evidence, with

recommendations. Med Print Pract. 2003;12(1):22-32.

6. Ferreira Antunes, JL, Toporcov, TN, Biazevic, MGH, Boing, AF, Scully, C,

Petti, S. Joint and independent effects of alcohol drinking and tobacco smoking

on oral cancer: a large case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):e68132.

7. Busenlechner, D, Fürhauser, R, Haas, R, Watzek, G, Mailath, G, Pommer, B.

Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year

follow-up and risk factor analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014;44(3):102-

108.

8. Johnson, GK, Slach, NA. Impact of tobacco use on periodontal status. J Dent

Educ. 2001;65(4):313–321.

9. Godoy, I. Prevalence of smoking in Brazil: additional measures for smoking

control should be a priority in the Year of the Lung. J Bras Pneumol.

2010;36(1):4-5.

10. Difranza, JR, Savageau, JA, Fletcher, KE. Enforcement of underage sales laws

as a predictor of daily smoking among adolescents – a national study. BMC

Public Health. 2009;9:107.

11. Thomas, D, Abramson, MJ, Bonevski, B, Taylor, S, Poole, SG, Weeks, GR, et

al. Quitting experiences and preferences for a future quit attempt: a study

among inpatient smokers. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006959.

26

12. Stead, LF, Buitrago, D, Preciado, N, Sanchez, G, Hartmann-Boyce, J,

Lancaster, T, et al. Physician advice for smoking cessation. Cochrane

Database Syst Rev. 2013;(5):CD000165.

13. Maillet, JP, Tax, CL, Neish, NR, Denny, AL. Evaluation of Outcomes for

Tobacco Cessation Counseling in the Dalhousie University Dental Hygiene

Curriculum. Journal of Dental Education. 2010;74(3):311-317.

14. Selby, P, Goncharenko, K, Barker, M, Fahim, M, Timothy, V, Dragonetti, R, et

al. Reviews and Evaluation of Online Dependence Treatment Training

Programs for Health Care Practitioners. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e97.

15. Kalyanpur, R, Pushpanjali, K, Prasad, KV, Chhabra, KG. Tobacco cessation in

India: A contemporary issue in public health dentistry. Indian J Dent Res.

2012;23(1):123.

16. Klumbiene, J, Sakyte, E, Petkeviciene, J, Prattala, R, Kunst, AE. The effect of

tobacco control policies on smoking cessation in relation to gender, age and

education in Lithuania, 1994-2010. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:181.

17. Stead, LF, Perera, R, Bullen, C, Mant, D, Hartmann-Boyce, J, Cahill, K, et al.

Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst

Rev. 2012;(11):CD000146.

18. Cahill, K, Stevens, S, Perera, R, Lancaster, T. Pharmacological interventions

for smoking cessation: and overview and network meta-analysis. Cochrane

Database Syst Rev. 2013;(5):CD009329.

19. Fiore, MC, Jaén, CR, Baker, TB, Bailey, WC, Curry, SJ, Dorfman, SF, et al.

Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical practice

Guideline. Rockvile, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Public

Health Services; 2008.

20. Conselho Federal de Odontologia. Dados estatísticos [Internet]. 2015 [updated

2015; cited 2015 Jun 3]. Available from: http://cfo.org.br/servicos-e-

consultas/Dados-

estatisticos/?elemento=profissionais&categoria=CD&cro=Todos&municipio=

21. Morita, MC, Haddad, AE, Araújo, ME. Perfil Atual e Tendências do Cirurgião-

dentista Brasileiro. Maringá: Dental Press; 2010.

22. Christen, AG. Tobacco Cessation, the Dental Profession, and the Role of

Dental Education. Journal of Dental Education. 2001;65(4):368-374.

27

23. Walsh, MM, Belek, M, Prakash, P, Grimes, B, Heckman, B, Kaufman, N, et al.

The effect of training on the use of tobacco-use cessation guidelines in dental

settings. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143(6):602–613.

24. Kadtane, SS, Bhaskar, DJ, Agali, C, Shah, S, Malu, A, Jadhav, S. Perception

about the role of dentists in smoking cessation: a cross-sectional study. Int J

Dent Med Res. 2014;1(1):2-7.

25. Prakash, P, Belek, MG, Grimes, B, Silverstein, S, Meckstroth, R, Heckman, B,

et al. Dentists’ attitudes, behaviors and barriers related to tobacco-use

cessation in the dental setting. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 2013;73:94-

102.

26. Cannick, GF, Horowitz, AM, Reed, SG, Drury, TF, Day, TA. Opinions of South

Carolina Dental Students toward Tobacco Use Interventions. Journal of Public

Health Dentistry. 2009;6(1):44-48.

27. Ahmady, AE, Khoshnevisan, MH, Heidari, N, Lando, HA. Dentist’ familiarity

with tobacco cessation programs in dental settings in Iran. Journal of Public

Health Dentistry. 2011;71:271-277.

28

CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS

Este trabalho possibilitou a identificação do perfil dos pacientes fumantes do

Curso de Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, incluindo seu nível

de dependência nicotínica. Além disso, avaliou o papel do cirurgião-dentista no

auxílio à cessação do tabagismo, colaborando para o desenvolvimento da pesquisa

científica. Pôde-se observar que ainda há dificuldades no encaminhamento de

pacientes para grupos de apoio à cessação em Santa Maria, pois só há um grupo

em atividade que não suporta toda a demanda da região. Qualquer profissional das

Unidades Básicas de Saúde ou Estratégias de Saúde da Família pode criar um

grupo de apoio ao abandono do tabagismo e prescrever a terapia de reposição de

nicotina. A prescrição de antidepressivos também é oferecida pelo Sistema Único de

Saúde para fumantes com dependência elevada à nicotina. Para a capacitação dos

profissionais das equipes, o Ministério da Saúde oferece um treinamento gratuito

que ensina as técnicas e abordagens mais adequadas no tratamento dos fumantes,

assim como a prescrição dos medicamentos que auxiliam a cessação.

O tratamento para cessação do tabagismo pode ser realizado por qualquer

profissional da saúde e o cirurgião-dentista deve colaborar mais ativamente no

combate ao fumo, orientando seus pacientes e oferecendo suporte em todo o

tratamento.

29

REFERÊNCIAS

ALDERETE, M. A saúde não é negociável: a sociedade civil ante as estratégias da indústria do tabaco na América Latina. Casos de estudo 2014. 2. ed. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires : Fundación Interamericana del Corazón Argentina, 2014. ALIANÇA DE CONTROLE DO TABAGISMO. Carga das doenças tabaco-relacionadas para o Brasil – Relatório Final. Rio de Janeiro, 2011. BERNAT, D. H.; KLEIN, E. G.; FORSTER, J. L. Smoking Initiation During Young Adulthood: A Longitudinal Study of a Population-Based Cohort. J Adolesc Health, v. 51, n. 5, p. 497-502, Nov. 2012. BRASIL. Lei nº 12.546, de 14 de dezembro de 2011. Institui o Regime Especial de Reintegração de Valores Tributários para as Empresas Exportadoras (Reintegra) e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 14 dez. 2011. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/lei/l12546.htm>. Acesso em: 25 mai. 2015. BRASIL. Decreto nº 8.262, de 31 de maio de 2014. Altera o Decreto nº 2.018, de 1º de outubro de 1996, que regulamenta a Lei nº 9.294, de 15 de julho de 1996. Diário Oficial [da República Federativa do Brasil], Brasília, DF, 31 mai. 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2014/Decreto/D8262.htm> Acesso em: 25 mai. 2015. BUSENLECHNER, D. et al. Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci, v. 44, n. 3, p. 102-108, May 2014. CHRISTEN, A. G. Tobacco Cessation, the Dental Profession, and the Role of Dental Education. Journal of Dental Education, v. 65, n. 4, p. 368-374, Apr 2001. CHRISTEN, A. G. et al. Understanding Nicotine Addiction and Tobacco Intervention Techniques for the Dental Professional. Crest® Oral-B® at dentalcare.com Continuing Education Course, Revised January 6, 2012. CONSELHO FEDERAL DE ODONTOLOGIA. Dados estatísticos. CFO, 2015. Disponível em: <http://cfo.org.br/servicos-e-consultas/Dados-estatisticos/?elemento=profissionais&categoria=CD&cro=Todos&municipio=>. Acesso em: 3 jun. 2015. FDI/WHO. Tobacco or oral health: an advocacy guide for oral health professionals. FDI World Dental Federation, Ferney Voltaire, France / World Dental Press, Lowestoft, UK: 2005.

30

FERREIRA ANTUNES, J. L. et al. Joint and independent effects of alcohol drinking and tobacco smoking on oral cancer: a large case-control study. PLoS ONE, v. 8, n. 7, e68132, Jul 2013. IBGE. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios: Tabagismo – 2008. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 2009. INCA. Tabagismo: um grave problema de saúde pública. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional do Câncer, 2007. JOHNSON, G. K.; SLACH, N. A. Impact of tobacco use on periodontal status. J Dent Educ, v. 65, n. 4, p. 313-321, Apr 2001. MORITA, M. C.; HADDAD, A. E.; ARAÚJO, M. E. Perfil Atual e Tendências do Cirurgião-dentista Brasileiro. Maringá: Dental Press, 2010. REIBEL, J. Tobacco and oral diseases. Update on the evidence, with recommendations. Med Print Pract, v. 12, n. 1, p. 22-32, 2003. RIQUINHO, D. L.; HENNINGTON, E. A. Tobacco cultivation in the south of Brazil: green tobacco sickness and other health problems. Cien Saude Colet, v. 19, n. 12, p. 4797-4808, 2014. WHO. Global Status Report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. World Health Organization. Geneva, 2011.

31

Anexo 1

32

33

34

Anexo 2

35

36

Anexo 3

QUESTIONÁRIO

TÍTULO DA PESQUISA: LEVANTAMENTO EPIDEMIOLÓGICO E PERFIL DOS PACIENTES

TABAGISTAS DAS CLÍNICAS DE ODONTOLOGIA DA UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA

MARIA

NOME: ___________________________________________ IDADE: __________________ SEXO:

( ) M ( ) F PROFISSÃO: ____________________________________________ ENDEREÇO:

__________________________________ TELEFONE: __________________ BAIRRO:

___________________________ CEP: __________ CIDADE: ________________

NÍVEL DE ESCOLARIDADE:

( ) Ensino fundamental incompleto ( ) Ensino fundamental completo ( ) Ensino médio completo ( ) Curso superior

( ) Pós-Graduação

RENDA MENSAL DA FAMÍLIA: ( ) Menos de R$ 500,0 ( ) Entre R$ 500,0 e R$ 1.000,0 ( ) Entre R$ 1001 e R$ 2.000,0 ( ) Entre R$ 2001 e R$ 3.000,0 ( ) Mais de R$ 3.000,0 DATA: ___/___/___

1. Você é fumante? ( ) Sim ( ) Não

2. Há quanto tempo fuma? _________________________________________

3. Quantos cigarros fuma diariamente?________________________________

4. Já tentou parar de fumar? ( ) Sim ( ) Não

5. Se sim, por quanto tempo ficou sem fumar?__________________________

6. Gostaria de parar de fumar? ( ) Sim ( ) Não

7. Você acredita que algum problema de saúde bucal possa ter relação com o hábito de fumar ou ter

fumado? ( ) Sim ( ) Não

8. Você acredita que a saúde bucal pode ser beneficiada se o indivíduo parar de fumar? ( )

Sim ( ) Não

9. Você acredita que o dentista deve dar orientações aos pacientes fumantes sobre os danos

provocados pelo cigarro?( )Sim ( )Não

10. Você já foi orientado por cirurgiões-dentistas sobre os malefícios provocados pelo tabaco?(

)Sim ( )Não

11. Você tem conhecimento de grupos de apoio para cessação do tabagismo na cidade de Santa

Maria?( )Sim ( )Não

12. Você concorda com a Lei que proíbe o fumo em todos os ambientes fechados inclusive bares e

37

restaurantes?( )Sim ( )Não

Anexo 4

QUESTIONÁRIO DE TOLERÂNCIA DE FAGERSTRÖM

NOME: ______________________________________________________________

IDADE: ____________________________TELEFONE: ________________________

ENDEREÇO: __________________________________________________________

BAIRRO: ___________________________ CEP: _____________________________

CIDADE: _____________________________________________________________

DATA: ___/___/___ CLÍNICA: __________________________________

Pergunta nº 1: Quanto tempo após acordar você fuma seu primeiro cigarro?

( ) Dentro de 5 minutos - 3 pontos

( ) Entre 6 e 30 minutos - 2 pontos

( ) Entre 31 e 60 minutos - 1 ponto

( ) Após 60 minutos - 0 pontos

Pergunta nº 2: Você acha difícil não fumar em locais onde o fumo é proibido (como igrejas,

bibliotecas, etc.)?

( ) Sim - 1 ponto

( ) Não - 0 pontos

Pergunta nº 3: Qual o cigarro do dia que traz mais satisfação (ou que mais detestaria deixar de

fumar)?

( ) O primeiro da manhã - 1 ponto

( ) Outros - 0 pontos

Pergunta nº 4: Quantos cigarros você fuma por dia?

( ) 10 ou menos - 0 pontos

( ) 11 a 20 - 1 ponto

( ) 21 a 30 - 2 pontos

( ) 31 ou mais - 3 pontos

Pergunta nº 5: Você fuma mais frequentemente pela manhã (ou nas 1as horas do dia) que no resto

do dia?

( ) Sim - 1 ponto

( ) Não - 0 pontos

Pergunta nº 6: Você fuma mesmo quando está tão doente que precisa ficar de cama a maior parte

do tempo?

( ) Sim - 1 ponto

( ) Não - 0 pontos

Análise dos resultados:

De acordo com a soma de pontos obtidos com as respostas referentes às perguntas, classifica-se a dependência nicotínica em cinco graus:

- muito baixa (0-2 pontos) - elevada (6-7)

38

- baixa (3-4) - muito elevada (8-10)

- média (5)

Anexo 5

NORMAS DA REVISTA: JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY

Journal of Public Health Dentistry

Instructions for Contributors

The Journal of Public Health Dentistry (JPHD) is devoted to the advancement of

public health dentistry through the publication of related research, practice, and

policy developments. We publish, after peer review and/or editorial consideration,

original research articles, brief reports, systematic reviews, articles addressing new

research methods, community action reports, special issues, guest editorials and

commentaries, letters to the editor, and book reviews.

Regular-length scientific articles should be between 2,500 and 3,500 words in length,

with no more than six tables or figures and fewer than 30 references (estimated to be

a total of 21 or fewer double-space pages).

Systematic reviews are similar in length but with different expectations regarding

references and tables, based on the results of the review. Authors are strongly

encouraged to discuss systematic reviews with the editor prior to initiating the review

to ensure that they are carried out in accordance with best practices (e.g., QUORUM

guidelines) and their length can be accommodated by the Journal.

Brief Communications are 1,000–1,500 words, no more than two tables or figures, an

abstract of 150 words or less, and 10 or fewer references. Brief Communications,

commentaries, and systematic reviews undergo peer review similar to regular

scientific manuscripts.

Community Action Reports, highlighting practice-based programs or policy initiatives,

commentaries, and guest editorials of widespread interest to the dental public health

community are 1,000–1,500 words.

Special Issues and Supplements to regular issues may be published, the full cost

being paid by the authors or sponsoring agency. Contact the editor for further in

formation.

Preparation of Manuscripts

Submissions must be in English and conform to the Uniform Requirements for

Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. The complete document appears in

Ann Intern Med 1997;126(1):36-47; or online

at http://www.acponline.org/journals/resource/unifreqr.htm.

39

If you feel that your paper could benefit from English language polishing, we

recommend that you have your paper professionally edited for English language by a

service such as Wiley's athttp://wileyeditingservices.com. Please note that while this

service (which is paid for by the author) will greatly improve the readability of your

paper, it does not guarantee acceptance or preference of your paper by the journal.

Submission of Manuscripts

Manuscripts should be submitted through the ScholarOne Manuscripts site

at:http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jphd. Authors will be directed through the

submission process at the Website.

Use double-spacing throughout, including title pages, abstract, text,

acknowledgments, references. Begin each of the following sections on separate

pages: title page, abstract and key words, text, acknowledgments, references, and

individual tables and figures. Number pages consecutively in the upper right-hand

corner of each page, beginning with the title page. Our reference book is Merriam-

Webster Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edition (Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster,

2003).

Format and Style of Scientific Articles

Title Page. To facilitate the masked review process, include a title page giving only

the title of the manuscript and not identifying authorship. Authors’ names should not

appear on any manuscript page.

Abstract. The second page should carry an abstract of no more than 250 words (150

for Brief Communications) consisting of four paragraphs, labeled Objectives,

Methods, Results, and Conclusions. These sections should describe the problem

being addressed in the study, how the study was performed, the salient results

(without statistical tests), and what the authors conclude from the results.

Key Words. Below the abstract, provide, and identify as such, three to 10 key words

or short phrases that will assist indexers in cross-indexing your article. At least three

terms from the medical subject headings (MeSH) list of Index Medicus should be

used. The use of MeSH headings greatly facilitates the identification of your article by

online search engines and improves the likelihood that interested readers can

retrieve your article. Assistance in locating MeSH headings is provided

at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MBrowser.html

Text. Divide text of scientific articles into sections labeled Introduction, Methods,

Results, and Discussion. For other types of articles, consult recent issues of the

JPHD for further guidance. All acronyms must be spelled out when they first appear

in the text.

40

Introduction. Clearly state the purpose of the article and summarize the rationale for

the study. Give only strictly pertinent references, and do not review the subject

extensively.

Methods. Describe your methods clearly and in sufficient detail to allow other

workers to reproduce the results. Give references to established methods, including

statistical methods; provide references and brief descriptions for methods that have

been published but are not well known; describe new or substantially modified

methods, give reasons for using them, and evaluate their limitations. When reporting

investigations involving human subjects, indicate whether the procedures followed

were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on

human experimentation.

Results. Present results in logical sequence in the text, tables, and illustrations. Do

not repeat in the text all the data in the tables or figures; rather emphasize or

summarize only important observations.

Discussion. Emphasize the new and important aspects of the study and conclusions

that follow from them, particularly as these relate to public health. Do not repeat in

detail data given in the Results section. Include in the Discussion the implications of

the findings and their limitations, and relate the observations to other relevant

studies. Avoid unqualified statements and conclusions not well supported by your

data. State new hypotheses when warranted, but clearly label them as such. Include

recommendations when appropriate.

Acknowledgments. Acknowledge only persons who have made substantive

contributions to the study. Obtain written permission from persons acknowledged by

name, because readers may infer their endorsement of the data and conclusions. A

description of sources of funding, financial disclosure, and the role of sponsors must

be included in this section.

Conflicts of Interest. Include this section as part of Acknowledgements, but only if

the authors have personal financial interests related to the subject matters discussed

in the manuscript.

Footnotes and Appendices. Except in tables and figures, footnotes should not be

used. Appendices may be placed on the JPHD website by Blackwell after

consultation with the editor.

References. References for research manuscripts are in general limited to no more

than 30; for brief communications please limit to ten or fewer. The author(s) must

verify cited references against the original documents. JPHD uses the “Vancouver”

41

style and information can be found at the Uniform Requirements page and well as

some examples at (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/uniform_requirements.html).

Identify references in text, tables, and legends by Arabic numerals in parentheses;

number consecutively in the order in which they are first mentioned in the text. Avoid

using abstracts as references. Abstracts not published in the periodical literature

(e.g., printed only in an annual meeting program) may be cited only as written

communications in parentheses in the text. “Unpublished observations” and

“personal communications” may not be used as references, although references to

written, not oral, communications may be inserted (in parentheses) in the text. For

papers accepted but not yet published; designate the journal and add “in press.”

Information from manuscripts submitted but not yet accepted should be cited in the

text as “unpublished observations” (in parentheses). Acceptable forms of references

are based on an ANSI standard style adapted by the National Library of Medicine

and authors are encouraged to refer to the examples of reference styles provided in

the Uniform Requirements. Systematic reviews do not have a specific limitation on

number of references.

Tables. Type each table on a separate page. Number tables with an Arabic numeral

consecutively and supply a brief title for each. Explain in footnotes all nonstandard

abbreviations used in each table. (Please refer to the JPHD, Volume 60, No. 4, page

347-8 to confirm these characters if you plan to use these symbols).

Illustrations and Legends. Submit the required number of complete sets of figures.

Figures should be of a high standard and if necessary, professionally drawn. Label

each figure indicating the number of the figure. Cite each figure in the text in

consecutive order. Type or print out legends for illustrations using double spacing,

starting on a separate page, with Arabic numerals corresponding to the illustrations.

When symbols, arrows, numbers, or letters are used to identify parts of the

illustrations, identify and explain each one clearly in the legend. Explain the internal

scale and identify the method of staining in photomicrographs. The Journal cannot

reproduce color images or figures.

Photographs of People. The Journal of Public Health Dentistry follows current

HIPAA guidelines for the protection of patient/subject privacy. If an individual

pictured in a digital image or photograph can be identified, his or her permission is

required to publish the image. The corresponding author may submit a letter signed

the patient authorizing the Journal of Public Health Dentistry to publish the

image/photo. Or, a form provided by the Journal of Public Health Dentistry

(available here or by clicking the “instructions and Forms” link in Manuscript Central)

may be downloaded for your use. The approval must be received by the Editorial

Office prior to final acceptance of the manuscript for publication. Otherwise, the

image/photo must be altered such that the individual cannot be identified (black bars

over eyes, tattoos, scars, etc.). The Journal of Public Health Dentistry will not publish

42

patient photographs that will in any way allow the patient to be identified, unless the

patient has given their express consent.

Publication

Prior and Duplicate Publication. Manuscripts are not accepted for consideration if

they are based on work that has been or will be published or submitted elsewhere

before appearing in the JPHD. Exceptions are consistent with the policy on duplicate

or redundant publication developed by the International Committee of Medical

Journal Editors Ann Intern Med 1997;126(1):36-47; or online

at http://www.acponline.org/journals/resource/unifreqr.htm. Copies of any closely

related manuscripts should be submitted to the editor along with the manuscript that

is to be considered by the JPHD.

Authorship

All persons designated as authors should qualify for authorship. Each author should

have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content.

Authorship credit should be based only on substantial contributions to: (1) conception

and design, or analysis and interpretation of the data; and to (2) drafting the article or

revising it critically for important intellectual content; and on (3) final approval of the

version to be published. Conditions 1, 2, and 3 must all be met. The editor may ask

for verification of these conditions for each author.

Copyright Issues

JPHD encourages the posting of manuscripts resulting from NIH-funded research to

PubMed Central (www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov) in order to promote public access to

critical research findings. Authors whose manuscripts are accepted for publication in

JPHD may post the final, edited version of the manuscript as soon as the printed

journal version is distributed.

Submission of Manuscripts and Correspondence

Manuscripts should be submitted through the ScholarOne Manuscripts site

at:http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jphd. Follow the guidelines for submitting at the

site.

Questions on manuscript submission, cover letters, and copyright assignments

should be directed to the journal administrator at: [email protected].

Questions regarding the appropriateness of articles for the journal or questions about

the review and acceptance process should be directed to the editor

at: [email protected].

A covering letter, signed by all authors, should be mailed or FAXED (217-529-9120)

to be received at the same time as the manuscript. A scanned copy of a signed letter,

sent electronically as a PDF, is also acceptable. It should include (1) information on

prior or duplicate publication or submission elsewhere of any part of the work as

defined in the Uniform Requirements; (2) a statement of financial or other

43

relationships that might lead to a conflict of interest; (3) a statement that the

manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors, that the requirements for

authorship have been met, and that each author believes that the manuscript

represents honest work; and (4) the name, address, and telephone number of the

corresponding author who is responsible for communicating with the other authors

about revisions and final approval of the proofs. A scanned copy of the signed letter

may be sent electronically or mailed to the journal administrator at above address.

Manuscript Submitted Previously to Another Journal

If a manuscript recently underwent peer review by another journal, authors should

disclose this information. They should include either the previous critique or a cover

letter with the new submission that explains how the authors have modified the

manuscript to address the previous (outside) critique.

Review and Action

Manuscripts are acknowledged upon receipt, reviewed by the editorial staff, and if

they meet minimal publication criteria, are sent to at least two outside referees for a

blind review.

Accepted manuscripts are examined and editorial revisions likely will be made to add

clarity and to conform to the JPHD style. Authors will be sent proofs prior to printing.

Upon acceptance, papers become the permanent property of the JPHD and may not

be reproduced by any means, in whole or in part, without the written consent of the

editor.

Peer Reviewer Nominations

The editor selects the reviewers for each submission and encourages

recommendations for reviewers from submitting authors. Thus, during the submission

process, authors may nominate 2 to 4 external referees to review their manuscript

(please provide at least their name and email address). The best reviewers are

authors of publications on which your research builds and which you cite. Peer

reviewers must have a publishing track in the area the manuscript deals with.

When suggesting peer reviewers, conflicts of interests should be avoided, that is,

suggested referees should not:

be from the same department or (ideally) the same university;

have been a research supervisor or graduate student of one of the authors within the

past five years;

have collaborated with one of the authors within the past five years or have plans to

collaborate in the immediate future;

be employees of non-academic organizations with which one of the authors has

collaborated within the past five years;

or be in any other kind of potential conflict of interest situation (eg, personal,

financial).

44

We ask applicants not to contact suggested referees in advance. The editor reserves

the right to send the manuscript to other referees.

Reporting Guidelines for Specific Study Designs

Authors are encouraged to consult best practice guidelines relevant for their research

design. Research reports frequently omit important information.

Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials (RCTs) are highly encouraged and should be

reported in accordance with the CONSORT statement (http://www.consort-

statement.org/).

A diagram illustrating the flow of participants through the trial is required

(http://www.consort-statement.org/index.aspx?o=1077). Please complete and include

the CONSORT checklist with the submission.

In accordance with recommendations from the ICMJE (Uniform Requirements) it is

strongly recommended that RCTs be registered in a WHO accredited trial registry

(this is mandatory for industry sponsored trials). Please mention the International

Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) (or a comparable trial

identifier) at the end of the abstract (in brackets), as well as when you first mention

the acronym of a RCT in the manuscript.

Reporting guidelines have also been developed for a number of other study designs

and as JPHD encourages reviewers to use these guidelines during the peer review

process, authors are well advised to use these checklists as well during research

planning and manuscript preparation. Examples include:

for observational epidemiology studies the STROBE guidelines (http://www.strobe-

statement.org/) and for meta-analysis and systematic reviews the QUORUM

statement, (Lancet. 1999 Nov 27;354(9193):1896-900).

Early View

The Journal is part of the Wiley Interscience Early View service. Articles are

published on a regular basis online in advance of their appearance in a print issue.

These articles are fully peer reviewed, edited, and complete—they only lack page

numbers and volume/issue details—and are considered fully published from the date

they first appear online. This date is shown with the article in the online table of

contents. Because Early View articles are considered fully complete, please bear in

mind that changes cannot be made to an article after the online publication date even

if it is still yet to appear in print.

The articles are available as full text HTML or PDF and can be cited as references by

using their Digital Object Identifier (DOI) numbers. For more information on DOIs,

please seehttp://www.doi.org/faq.html.

To view all the articles currently available, please visit the journal homepage

athttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.2008.9999.issue-9999/issuetoc.

Upon print publication, the article will be removed from the Early View area and will

appear instead in the relevant online issue, complete with page numbers and

volume/issue details. No other changes will be made.

45

The implementation of Early View for JPHD represents our commitment to publishing

articles as soon as possible for readers, reducing time to publication considerably

without sacrificing quality or completeness.

NIH Policy

Wiley-Blackwell supports authors by posting the accepted version of articles by NIH

grant-holders to PubMed Central. The accepted version is the version that

incorporates all amendments made during peer review, but prior to the publisher's

copy-editing and typesetting. This accepted version will be made publicly available

12 months after publication in the journal. The NIH mandate applies to all articles

based on research that has been wholly or partially funded by the NIH and that are

accepted for publication on or after April 7, 2008. For more information about the

NIH's Public Access Policy, visit http://publicaccess.nih.gov.

Wiley-Blackwell also offers its OnlineOpen and Funded Access services. Upon

payment of the OnlineOpen or Funded Access fee, we will deposit the published

version of the article into PubMed Central, with public availability in PubMed Central

and on the journal's website immediately upon publication.

Copyright

If your paper is accepted, the author identified as the formal corresponding author for

the paper will receive an email prompting them to login into Author Services; where

via the Wiley Author Licensing Service (WALS) they will be able to complete the

license agreement on behalf of all authors on the paper.

For authors signing the Copyright Assignment Form

If the OnlineOpen option is not selected the corresponding author will be presented

with the copyright form to sign. The terms and conditions of the copyright form can be

previewed here.

Terms and Conditions [PE to add existing non-standard license PDF to OTIS and

provide link from Online Library once live]. Please do not complete this PDF until you

are prompted to login into Author Services as described above.

Note to Contributors on Deposit of Accepted Version

Funder arrangements

Certain funders, including the NIH, members of the Research Councils UK (RCUK)

and Wellcome Trust require deposit of the Accepted Version in a repository after an

embargo period. Details of funding arrangements are set out at the following website:

http://www.wiley.com/go/funderstatement. Please contact the Journal production

editor if you have additional funding requirements.

Institutions

Wiley has arrangements with certain academic institutions to permit the deposit of

the Accepted Version in the institutional repository after an embargo period. Details

of such arrangements are set out at the following website:

http://www.wiley.com/go/funderstatement

46

For authors choosing OnlineOpen

If the OnlineOpen option is selected the corresponding author will have a choice of

the following Creative Commons License Open Access Agreements (OAA):

Creative Commons Attribution License OAA

Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License OAA

Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial -NoDerivs License OAA

To preview the terms and conditions of these open access agreements please visit

the Copyright FAQs hosted on Wiley Author Services

http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/faqs_copyright.asp and visit

http://www.wileyopenaccess.com/details/content/12f25db4c87/Copyright--

License.html.

If you select the OnlineOpen option and your research is funded by The Wellcome

Trust and members of the Research Councils UK (RCUK) you will be given the

opportunity to publish your article under a CC-BY license supporting you in

complying with Wellcome Trust and Research Councils UK requirements. For more

information on this policy and the Journal’s compliant self-archiving policy, please

visit: http://www.wiley.com/go/funderstatement.

47

Anexo 6

PLANILHA DE CÓDIGOS - PROFISSÕES

Código Resposta

1 Aposentado (a)

2 Estudante

3 Técnicos e profissionais de nível intermédio: Técnica em enfermagem Técnico em Refrigeração Consultora

4 Pessoal Administrativo e similares: Caixa de operadora Auxiliar de Secretária Agente Educacional Secretária Contadora Operadora de caixa Auxiliar contábil Administradora escolar Auxiliar administrativo Auxiliar de Escritório

5 Quadros superiores da administração pública, dirigentes, etc: Funcionário Público (Municipal, Estadual e Federal) Microempresário

6 Especialistas das profissões intelectuais e científicas: Professor, Pedagogo (a), Fisioterapeuta, Enfermeira, Veterinário, Enfermeira, Agrônomo,

7 Agricultores e trabalhadores qualificados da agropecuária: Agricultor Domadora de Animais Técnico Agrícola

8 Operários, artífices e trabalhadores similares: Ajudante de pedreiro Carpinteiro Eletricista Operador de escavadeira Pedreiro Pintor Servente

9 Pessoal dos serviços e vendedores: Açougueiro Agente de serviços complementares Ajudante de cozinha

48

Atendente de lanchonete Atendente de farmácia Autônoma Auxiliar de confeiteira Auxiliar de limpeza Auxiliar de Saúde Bucal Auxiliar de serviços gerais Balconista Bicicleteiro Cabelereiro Camareira Caseira Chapista Comerciante Confeiteira Costureira Cuidadora de idosos Do lar Doméstica/Diarista Empacotadora Escriturário Esteticista canina Fiscal de loja Funcionário do HUSM Garçom Guincheiro Instrutora Lojista Manicure Mecânico Motoboy Motorista Músico Operador CNC Padeiro Porteiro Preparador automotivo Recepcionista Revendedor Sapateiro Serviços gerais Vendedor (a) Vigilante Zelador Não informada