TRIBUNAL EUROPEU DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS: casos contra … · 12/19/2017 · moreira ferreira v....

TEDH 2017

1

TRIBUNAL EUROPEU DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS: casos contra Portugal

2017-12-19: LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL (Application no. 56080/13)

2017-11-28: GASPAR c. PORTUGAL (Requête no 3155/15)

2017-10-03: SILVA AND MONDIM CORREIA v. PORTUGAL (Applications nos. 72105/14 and 20415/15)

2017-07-25: MATEUS PEREIRA DA SILVA v. PORTUGAL (N.º 13) (Application no. 67081/13)

2017-07-25: CARVALHO PINTO DE SOUSA MORAIS v. PORTUGAL (N.º 3) (Application no. 17484/15)

2017-07-11: MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (N° 2) (Application no. 19867/12)

2017-07-04: ALBERTINA CARVALHO E FILHOS LDA v. PORTUGAL (Application no. 23603/14)

2017-05-14: MARTINS O'NEILL PEDROSA v. PORTUGAL (Application no. 55214/15)

2017-03-28: FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA v. PORTUGAL (Application no. 78103/14)

2017-03-14: CARNEIRO DA SILVA v. PORTUGAL (Application no. 75415/13)

2017-02-28: CUNHA MARTINS DA SILVA COUTO c. PORTUGAL (Requête no 69062/13)

TEDH 2017

2

2017-12-19

LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL, 19 December 2017

THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

GRAND CHAMBER

CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL

(Application no. 56080/13)

JUDGMENT

Strasbourg, 19 December 2017

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT

1. Joins to the merits, unanimously, the Government’s preliminary objection that the application is manifestly ill-founded and

dismisses it;

2. Holds, by fifteen votes to two, that there has been no violation of the substantive limb of Article 2 of the Convention;

3. Holds, unanimously, that there has been a violation of the procedural limb of Article 2 of the Convention;

4. Holds, by fifteen votes to two,

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months, the sum of EUR 23,000 (twenty-three thousand euros), plus any

tax that may be chargeable on that amount, in respect of non‑pecuniary damage:

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a

rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;

5. Dismisses, by fifteen votes to two, the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction.

Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 19 December

2017.

Roderick Liddell, Registrar / Guido Raimondi, President

In accordance with Article 45 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 74 § 2 of the Rules of Court, the following separate opinions are

annexed to this judgment:

(a) Partly concurring, partly dissenting opinion of Judge Pinto de Albuquerque;

(b) Partly dissenting opinion of Judge Serghides.

Keywords:

(Art. 2) Right to life

(Art. 2) Positive obligations

(Art. 2-1) Effective investigation

(Art. 2-1) Life

(Art. 35) Admissibility criteria

(Art. 35-3) Manifestly ill-founded

(Art. 41) Just satisfaction-{general}

(Art. 41) Just satisfaction

(Art. 41) Non-pecuniary damage

(Art. 41) Pecuniary damage

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013

Document URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556

http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556

TEDH 2017

3

2017-11-28

AFFAIRE GASPAR c. PORTUGAL

CEDH, QUATRIÈME SECTION

AFFAIRE GASPAR c. PORTUGAL

(Requête no 3155/15)

ARRÊT

STRASBOURG

28 novembre 2017

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA COUR, À L’UNANIMITÉ,

1. Déclare la requête recevable;

2. Dit qu’il n’y a pas eu violation de l’article 5 § 3 de la Convention en ce qui concerne le droit de la requérante d’être traduite

aussitôt après son arrestation devant un juge ou un autre magistrat habilité par la loi à exercer des fonctions judiciaires;

3. Dit qu’il n’y a pas eu violation de l’article 5 § 3 de la Convention en raison de la durée de la détention provisoire.

Fait en français, puis communiqué par écrit le 28 novembre 2017, en application de l’article 77 §§ 2 et 3 du règlement de la

Cour.

Marialena Tsirli, Greffière

Ganna Yudkivska, Présidente

Keywords

(Art. 5) Right to liberty and security

(Art. 5-3) Brought promptly before judge or other officer

(Art. 5-3) Length of pre-trial detention

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD000315515



TEDH 2017

4

2017-10-03

SILVA AND MONDIM CORREIA v. PORTUGAL, 3 October 2017


FOURTH SECTION

CASE OF SILVA AND MONDIM CORREIA v. PORTUGAL

(Applications nos. 72105/14 and 20415/15)

JUDGMENT

Strasbourg, 3 October 2017

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

1. Joins the applications;

2. Declares the applications admissible;

3. Holds that there has been no violation of Article 8 of the Convention.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 3 October 2017, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Andrea Tamietti, Deputy Registrar

Ganna Yudkivska, President

Keywords:

(Art. 8) Right to respect for private and family life

(Art. 8-1) Respect for family life

(Art. 8-1) Respect for private life

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD007210514



TEDH 2017

5

2017-07-25

MATEUS PEREIRA DA SILVA v. PORTUGAL (N.º 13), 25 July 2017


FOURTH SECTION

CASE OF MATEUS PEREIRA DA SILVA v. PORTUGAL


JUDGMENT

Strasbourg, 25 July 2017


1. Declares the application admissible concerning the eviction proceedings and the remainder of the application inadmissible;

2. Joins to the merits the Government’s objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies and dismisses it;

3. Holds that there has been a violation of Articles 13 and 6 § 1 of the Convention as far as the eviction proceedings are

concerned;

4. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months, the following amounts:

(i) EUR 6,400 (six thousand four hundred euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage;

(ii) EUR 1,000 (one thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant, in respect of costs and expenses;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above

amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three

percentage points;

5. Dismisses the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 25 July 2017, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Andrea Tamietti, Deputy Registrar

Egidijus Kūris, President

Keywords:

(Art. 6) Right to a fair trial

(Art. 6) Civil proceedings

(Art. 6-1) Reasonable time

(Art. 13) Right to an effective remedy

(Art. 13) Effective remedy

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0725JUD006708113



TEDH 2017

6

2017-07-25

CARVALHO PINTO DE SOUSA MORAIS v. PORTUGAL (N.º 3), 25 July 2017


FOURTH SECTION

CASE OF CARVALHO PINTO DE SOUSA MORAIS v. PORTUGAL


JUDGMENT

Strasbourg, 25 July 2017

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT,

1. Declares, by a majority, the application admissible;

2. Holds, by five votes to two, that there has been a violation of Article 14 of the Convention read together with Article 8;

3. Holds, by five votes to two,

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes

final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, the following amounts:

(i) EUR 3,250 (three thousand two hundred and fifty euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary

damage;

(ii) EUR 2,460 (two thousand four hundred and sixty euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant, in respect

of costs and expenses;


amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three

percentage points;

4. Dismisses, unanimously, the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction.


Andrea Tamietti, Registrar Deputy - Ganna Yudkivska, President



(a) concurring opinion of Judge Yudkivska; (b) concurring opinion of Judge Motoc; (c) joint dissenting opinion of Judges Ravarani and

Bošnjak.

Keywords

(Art. 8) Right to respect for private and family life

(Art. 14) Prohibition of discrimination

(Art. 14) Discrimination

(Art. 14) Other status

(Art. 14) Sex

(Art. 41) Just satisfaction-{general}

(Art. 41) Just satisfaction

(Art. 41) Non-pecuniary damage

ECLI ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0725JUD001748415



TEDH 2017

7

2017-07-11

MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (N° 2), 11 July 2017


GRAND CHAMBER

CASE OF MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (no. 2)


JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG, 11 July 2017

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT

1. Declares, by a majority, the complaint under Article 6 of the Convention admissible and the remainder of the application

inadmissible;

2. Holds, by nine votes to eight, that there has been no violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

Done in French and in English, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 11 July 2017.

Françoise Elens-Passos, Registrar

Guido Raimondi, President



(a) joint dissenting opinion of Judges Raimondi, Nußberger, De Gaetano, Keller, Mahoney, Kjølbro and O’Leary (partial translation);

(b) dissenting opinion of Judge Pinto de Albuquerque joined by Judges Karakaş, Sajó, Lazarova Trajkovska, Tsotsoria, Vehabović and

Kūris;

(c) dissenting opinion of Judge Kūris, joined by Judges Sajó, Tsotsoria and Vehabović;

(d) dissenting opinion of Judge Bošnjak.



TEDH 2017

8

2017-07-04

ALBERTINA CARVALHO E FILHOS LDA v. PORTUGAL, 4 July 2017


Fourth Section

CASE OF ALBERTINA CARVALHO E FILHOS LDA v. PORTUGAL


JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG, 4 July 2017


1. Declares the application admissible;

2. Holds that there has been a violation of Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention;

3. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant company, within three months, the following amounts:

(i) EUR 3,600 (three thousand six hundred euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage; (ii) EUR 1,000 (one thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant company, in respect of costs and expenses;


amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage

points;

4. Dismisses the remainder of the applicant company’s claim for just satisfaction.




TEDH 2017

9

2017-05-14

MARTINS O'NEILL PEDROSA v. PORTUGAL, 14-05-2017


Fourth Section

CASE OF MARTINS O’NEILL PEDROSA v. PORTUGAL


JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG, 14 February 2017

FINAL, 14/05/2017

This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.



2. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention;

3. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in

accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, EUR 3,250 (three thousand two hundred and fifty euros), plus any tax that may be

chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage;


amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period, plus three percentage

points;


Done in English, and notified in writing on 14 February 2017, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.



TEDH 2017

10

2017-03-28

FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA v. PORTUGAL, 28 March 2017


Fourth Section

CASE OF FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA v. PORTUGAL


JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG, 28 March 2017



2. Holds that there has been a violation of the substantive aspect of Article 2 of the Convention;

3. Holds that there has been a violation of the procedural aspect of Article 2 of the Convention;

4. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in

accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, the following amounts:

(i) EUR 703.80 (seven hundred and three euros and eighty cents), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of pecuniary damage;

(ii) EUR 25,000 (twenty five thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage;

(iii) EUR 409 (four hundred and nine euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant, in respect of costs and expenses;



points;


Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 March 2017, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.



TEDH 2017

11

2017-03-14

CARNEIRO DA SILVA v. PORTUGAL, 14 March 2017


Fourth Section

CASE OF CARNEIRO DA SILVA v. PORTUGAL


JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG, 14 March 2017

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Carneiro da Silva v. Portugal



2. Holds that there has been a violation of Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention;

3. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months, the following amounts:

(i) EUR 13,000 (thirteen thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage;

(ii) EUR 1,000 (one thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant, in respect of costs and expenses;



points;


Done in English, and notified in writing on 14 March 2017, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.



TEDH 2017

12

2017-02-28

CUNHA MARTINS DA SILVA COUTO c. PORTUGAL, 28 Feb 2017

CEDH. Quatrième Section

AFFAIRE CUNHA MARTINS DA SILVA COUTO c. PORTUGAL

(Requête no 69062/13)

ARRÊT

STRASBOURG, 28 février 2017

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA COUR, À L’UNANIMITÉ,

1. Déclare la requête recevable;

2. Dit qu’il y a eu violation de l’article 6 § 1 de la Convention;

3. Dit

a) que l’État défendeur doit verser au requérant, dans les trois mois, les sommes suivantes:

i) 1 800 EUR (mille huit cent euros), plus tout montant pouvant être dû à titre d’impôt, pour dommage moral;

ii) 500 EUR (cinq cents euros), plus tout montant pouvant être dû par le requérant à titre d’impôt, pour frais et dépens;

b) qu’à compter de l’expiration dudit délai et jusqu’au versement, ces montants seront à majorer d’un intérêt simple à un taux égal à celui de

la facilité de prêt marginal de la Banque centrale européenne applicable pendant cette période, augmenté de trois points de pourcentage;

4. Rejette la demande de satisfaction équitable pour le surplus.

Fait en français, puis communiqué par écrit le 28 février 2017, en application de l’article 77 §§ 2 et 3 du règlement de la Cour.


COUNCIL OF EUROPE | EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS | RECENT JUDGMENTS http://www.echr.coe.int/

BIBLIOTECA DA ORDEM DOS ADVOGADOS

2017-12-21 / 19:15 - DOC – 217 KB – 2717 PALAVRAS - 12 PÁGINA

Portal da Ordem dos Advogados | Comunicação | Publicações | Gazetas e Resenhas | Resenhas | 2017 | Resenhas de informação

https://portal.oa.pt/comunicacao/publicacoes/gazetas-e-resenhas/2017/resenhas-de-informacao/resenhas-internacionais/

Área da Biblioteca no portal http://www.oa.pt/CD/default.aspx?sidc=58102

Catálogo bibliográfico http://boa.oa.pt/

Correio eletrónico [email protected]


http://www.echr.coe.int/

https://portal.oa.pt/comunicacao/publicacoes/gazetas-e-resenhas/2017/resenhas-de-informacao/resenhas-internacionais/

http://www.oa.pt/CD/default.aspx?sidc=58102

http://boa.oa.pt/

mailto:[email protected]

TRIBUNAL EUROPEU DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS: casos contra … · 12/19/2017 · moreira ferreira v....

Documents

Transcript of TRIBUNAL EUROPEU DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS: casos contra … · 12/19/2017 · moreira ferreira v....